
What it takes to make courage contagious
In the next few days, what looked like a solitary stand became a galvanizing one, a boulder shift that started a landslide.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
One by one, other schools announced their intent to follow Harvard's lead. 'Princeton stands with Harvard,' university president Christopher Eisgruber declared on social media. Several Big Ten schools were working together to form a '
Advertisement
Harvard's audacity, it appears, triggered an epidemic of courage that continues to spread. 'You can think of that as high-level social contagion,' says Ronald Riggio, an organizational psychologist and leadership scholar at Claremont McKenna College. What happened in Cambridge, Riggio explains, led other school leaders to think:
Harvard's done it, so it's OK for us to follow suit
.
Advertisement
Social contagion has plenty of negative associations, some of which are deserved. It's hard to forget how the
But the dynamics of social contagion are actually more complex than that, and they run in positive directions as well as negative ones.
Emotional contagion — say, laughing along with hundreds of other audience members or tearing up alongside a devastated friend — is a largely unconscious response, arising in part from primitive regions of the brain.
Behavioral contagion tends to involve more conscious thought, Riggio says, because it requires a deliberate choice to emulate what someone else is doing. The degree of conscious thought varies; teens who popped detergent pods down their throats weren't spending much time weighing the merits. Decisions widely understood as costly, like taking a moral stand, generate more conscious wrestling as people weigh the potential fallout of their actions.
Social influence plays a crucial role at these fraught decision points. After Cambridge-based whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers — which showed that US officials hid Vietnam War operations from the public — he said that encounters with war resisters, including fellow Harvard alum Randy Kehler, helped convince him to release the papers. Ellsberg
Advertisement
In moments like this, emotional contagion helps drive behavioral uptake. Moved by what Kehler was putting on the line, Ellsberg realized he, too, was willing to risk prison — and resolved to tell Americans what he knew.
This kind of thoughtful contagion is now taking hold not just at universities but in the halls of Congress. When Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland traveled to El Salvador last week to check on the welfare of his wrongfully imprisoned constituent Kilmar Abrego Garcia, he supplied a permission structure and a practical road map for other lawmakers. 'In ambiguous situations,' Riggio says, 'we look to the behavior of others to guide us.'
After Van Hollen's trip, Senator Cory Booker and
'When one person helps in a situation, others follow,' says Ervin Staub, an emeritus psychology professor and altruism scholar at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. 'Not always, but often.'
Prominent figures who step up first, like Van Hollen and Kehler, have outsized power to ignite courageous social contagion. In the infamous Milgram experiments, when leaders told 'teacher' participants to electrically shock 'learners' who got questions wrong, teachers were
Advertisement
A kind of
For those looking to deploy social contagion to virtuous effect — whether college presidents, lawmakers, or activists — recent research offers some tactical counsel. In social simulations, some behaviors that seem uncomfortable must be
In addition, when you take a courageous stand, it pays to be clear about what actions you'd like others to take. It's important, in other words, to 'not only look at the problematic things,' Staub says, 'but look at how we can address these problematic things.' If you've just paid a visit to an innocent person in detention, describe a specific step others can take to support their own threatened neighbors. The more clear-cut your suggested action, the more it may invite mimicry, as in the
Advertisement
Though courage is prone to spread overnight under the right conditions, personal and collective bravery require stubborn long-term commitment. The Trump administration has already
But even an initial stand has lasting behavioral resonance. As a courageous stance spreads to others, it also tends to stick to the initiator. 'If you publicly declare your intention,' Riggio says, 'it's more likely that you're going to follow through,' since backing out would feel like a public betrayal. Social obligation, then, not only drives the contagion of courage — it steadies and sustains those who got the transmission going.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Tells German Chancellor D-Day Was 'Not A Pleasant Day For You'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump told German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that D-Day—the day Allied forces invaded Normandy, France, during World War II—was "not a great day" for Germany. What To Know Trump made his comments while he and Merz spoke to reporters during Merz's White House visit on Thursday. Merz pointed out that the anniversary of D-Day is on Friday, saying it was when "the Americans ... ended the war in Europe." "That was not a pleasant day for you," Trump responded. "No, that was not a pleasant—well—" Merz began before Trump interjected. "This was not a great day," Trump said. Merz cut in: "In the long run, Mr. President, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship." "That's true," Trump said. Merz went on to say that "we know what we owe you," adding that the U.S. can play a similarly crucial role in bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. "America is, again, in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war, so let's talk about what we can do jointly," the German chancellor said. "We are ready to do what we can and you know that we gave support to Ukraine and that we are looking for more pressure on Russia ... we should talk about that." MERZ: Tomorrow is the D Day anniversary, when the Americans ended a war in Europe TRUMP: That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day MERZ: This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 5, 2025 President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. Evan Vucci/AP This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What will Trump's megabill do to programs like Medicare and SNAP?
A large part of funding for President Donald Trump's second-term agenda would come from cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid, the health care program for lower-income Americans and those with disabilities, and SNAP, which helps millions of lower-income Americans buy groceries every month. The bill passed by the House makes around $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid. About 10.9 million people could lose their coverage over the next 10 years, according to Wednesday's estimate by the Congressional Budget Office. The SNAP cuts total an estimated $230 billion over 10 years. MORE: Trump tries to shore up support for megabill among Senate GOP at White House meeting Republicans say their goal is reducing 'waste, fraud, and abuse' in these programs to save hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade and to pay for Trump's tax cuts and increased funding for the border and defense. Here's a breakdown of those cuts in the current form of the bill: Work requirements: The bill imposes new 80-hours per month work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients aged 19 to 64 who don't have dependents. These requirements include working or other approved activities such as volunteering. Under the bill's current text, these work requirements won't kick in until 2026. Increased eligibility checks: The bill also requires states to conduct eligibility redeterminations at least every six months for all recipients instead of the current 12 months. Undocumented migrants: The legislation seeks to prohibit states from using their funds to cover undocumented immigrants. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid, but 14 states and the District of Columbia have opted to use their own funds to cover those individuals. This bill would penalize them by reducing Medicaid funding. The White House estimates approximately 1.4 million undocumented migrants would lose coverage. MORE: Trump administration live updates Increased copays: The bill increases copays for Medicaid recipients who make more than the federal poverty level of just over $15,500 for single beneficiaries. They would be required to pay an extra $35 dollar copay in some visits. Income and residency verification: Required Medicaid paperwork for income and residency verification will increase as lawmakers look to crack down on people who are 'double-dipping' in multiple jurisdictions. The additional steps are expected to especially impact seniors and others who can't promptly respond. Prohibits funds for abortion providers and gender transition care: The legislation would ban Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood as long as the organization provides abortions and abortion services. The legislation also prohibits Medicaid funds from going to gender transition care, including puberty blockers, hormone treatments and surgery. In the initial text of the bill, this language applied only to children, but it was expanded to include adults shortly before the House vote. MORE: CBO estimates Trump's bill could add $2.4T to deficit, leave 11 million without health insurance Obamacare enrollment: The bill ends open enrollment for the Affordable Care Act a month earlier. Most states hold open enrollment from Nov. 1 to Jan. 15. The House bill requires open enrollment to end on Dec. 15. An analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation found in 2025 that roughly 40% of enrollees, or about 10 million people, selected plans after Dec. 15. The legislation also eliminates a Biden-era policy that allows year-round ACA enrollment for the poorest Americans -- those who make up to 150% of the poverty level, or around $22,600 a year. Americans will still be able to enroll year-round if they've had a 'change in circumstances or the occurrence of a specific event.' These changes would codify a rule proposed in March by the Trump administration's Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The bill tightens eligibility requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which used to be called the 'food stamp' program, which helped roughly 42 million low-income people buy groceries per month in 2024. Work requirements: The bill raises the age for work requirements from 54 to 64. A similar bill introduced in the House in 2023 would have reduced rolls by between 3 million and 3.5 million people, according to the CBO. It would also require parents with children older than 6 to meet the work requirement. There is currently no work requirement for SNAP beneficiaries with dependent children at home. Shifting costs to states: SNAP is currently 100% federally funded. The bill requires states to share in at least 5% of SNAP benefit costs starting in 2028. Indirect effects: The changes could have an impact on school lunch programs, requiring some previously eligible families to apply for access and on federal reimbursement payments for some school districts.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alberta government walks back beer tax hike citing tariffs, need to support business
EDMONTON — Alberta's government has ditched a new fee schedule for breweries that would have seen the province's oldest beer maker pay significantly more in taxes. The schedule was introduced in February and it substantially lowered the production threshold breweries needed to hit before they had to pay higher fees to the government. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said at the time that the fee hike was supposed to protect small breweries and that "99 per cent" of companies wouldn't pay more. Calgary-based Big Rock Brewery didn't fall under the 99 per cent, and the company calculated it was going to pay $1.4 million more every year. Nally's office says the government decided to lower the fees in light of U.S. tariffs and to ensure small breweries are supported as they grow. The province replaced the fee system as of June 1 in favour of a schedule of more gradual increases. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025. Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press