logo
More Colorado workplaces are becoming safe places for employees in recovery

More Colorado workplaces are becoming safe places for employees in recovery

Yahoo29-05-2025

At Odie B's, a sandwich shop in Denver, recovery from drug and alcohol use is part of daily operations.
'Seventy percent of our staff is active in recovery,' Cliff Blauvelt, co-owner of Odie B's, said in a video testimonial. 'We try to provide a safe space where people can feel comfortable.'
Blauvelt has struggled with alcohol use for more than 20 years. He co-owns Odie B's with his wife, Cara Blauvelt.
One employee, Molly, said working at Odie B's helped her focus on sobriety and reconnect with her sense of purpose.
'I was burned out, I was working a lot of hours. … I started dry January, and after a few months I realized I needed to quit drinking,' she said in the same video testimonial. 'Cara definitely helped with my sobriety journey, just reminding me one day at a time, and now, I have been sober for going on two years.'
Colorado is one of more than 30 states that have launched recovery-friendly workplace programs in recent years. They're part of a growing effort to reframe how employers address addiction, mental health and recovery for the well-being of their employees and businesses.
Our team from the Centers for Health, Work & Environment at the Colorado School of Public Health works with employers to develop training guidelines and policies to help make their workplaces supportive of recovery.
Over the past three years, we've worked to understand the tools employers need to better support employees with substance use disorders.
Many are deeply motivated but lack formal policies or training. That gap is what the Colorado Recovery Friendly Workplace Initiative is designed to fill.
Since 2021, our team has developed and delivered recovery and mental health training to more than 8,000 Colorado employees. They represent more than 100 businesses in industries ranging from local government to construction companies and health care providers. Our training sessions focus on equipping individuals with an understanding of mental health and substance use disorders, explaining how to combat stigma, and outlining how to navigate accommodations in the workplace.
Substance use is not just a personal issue; it's a public health and workforce challenge.
In 2023, 1,865 Coloradans died from a drug overdose, according to data from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. That's up about 65 deaths from the previous year. Nationally, overdose deaths have more than doubled since 2015.
In high-risk industries, such as construction and mining, where physically demanding work, long hours and job insecurity are common, workers have some of the highest rates of nonmedical opioid use. These workers are thus at a high risk of developing substance use disorders.
They also face other mental health challenges. These same sectors face the highest suicide rates across all occupations and nearly double that of the general public.
Recovery, as defined by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a federal agency, includes 'a process of change through which people improve their health and wellness, live self-directed lives, and strive to reach their full potential.' In Colorado, an estimated 400,000 people identify as being in recovery. Many of them are working, raising families and rebuilding their lives.
The economic impact of substance use is significant. Colorado has lost more than 360 million work hours to opioid use over the past decade, according to the American Action Forum, a nonprofit that conducts economic analyses. That's the equivalent of 173,000 full-time jobs for one year.
In 2017 alone, the cost of lost productivity due to opioid use disorder and fatal opioid overdose in Colorado was estimated to be US$834 million.
Employers save an average of $8,500 per year for each employee in recovery, according to the National Safety Council. These savings come from lower health care costs, reduced absenteeism and decreased turnover. In other words, when employers retain and support workers through recovery rather than lose them to untreated substance use, they see measurable benefits.
In 2024, Colorado lawmakers passed a bill for supporting recovery and addressing the opioid epidemic. The legislation provided funding to establish the Recovery Friendly Workplaces Initiative and the voluntary employer participation and certification program.
In early 2025, funding for the initiative was removed from the state budget due to a broader fiscal shortfall. The funding cut disrupted many of our planned activities, and we are currently relying on interim support from counties and state offices.
Small businesses remain a priority for our team, despite recent funding cuts. Many lack human resources departments or formal wellness programs but are nonetheless deeply committed to helping their employees succeed.
A Colorado Recovery Friendly Workplace Initative participant, Absolute Caulking & Waterproofing of Colorado, employs 39 people. Absolute has championed recovery-friendly policies as something the business values.
'This partnership saves us time and resources, which is invaluable for our small, family-owned business,' said Sarah Deering, vice president of the company.
The road ahead presents challenges, including limited funding, the societal stigma around recovery and all of the complexities of recovery itself. But we continue to follow the scientific evidence. Our research team is evaluating the outcomes of our programs to better understand their impact and hopefully inform future policy recommendations. We are committed to the belief that work can and should be a place of healing.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Liliana Tenney, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Olivia Zarella, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Read more:
Explainer: how recovery high schools help kids with addiction
The opioid epidemic in 6 charts
Work requirements are better at blocking benefits for low-income people than they are at helping those folks find jobs
Liliana Tenney receives funding from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Olivia Zarella receives funding from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Committee approves EPA, Army Corps, highway nominees
Committee approves EPA, Army Corps, highway nominees

E&E News

time2 hours ago

  • E&E News

Committee approves EPA, Army Corps, highway nominees

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee advanced three of President Donald Trump's nominees for EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Transportation. Senators voted along party lines, 10-9, for John Busterud to be EPA assistant administrator to head the Office of Land and Emergency Management. The longtime PG&E attorney led EPA's Southwest Region during the final year of Trump's first term. Former colleagues have regarded Busterud as a level-headed choice to lead the agency's waste office, which oversees hallmark cleanup programs such as Superfund and Brownfields. Advertisement During his confirmation hearing, he backed the 'polluter pays' principle when it comes to 'forever chemicals' remediation, a thorny issue splitting lawmakers.

EPA proposes rollback on rules limiting carbon and air pollution from fossil fuel power plants
EPA proposes rollback on rules limiting carbon and air pollution from fossil fuel power plants

CBS News

time4 hours ago

  • CBS News

EPA proposes rollback on rules limiting carbon and air pollution from fossil fuel power plants

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that it will seek to revoke a key rule put in place by the Biden administration that set limits on the amount of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, emitted from fossil fuel-fired power plants. The rule was finalized in April 2024 and is projected to reduce 1.38 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere by 2047, as well as eliminate tens of thousands of tons of other harmful air pollutants that are dangerous to public health. Eliminating 1.38 billion metric tons of carbon emissions is equivalent to driving more than 320 million gas-powered cars for a year, according to an EPA estimate. In a press conference, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the Trump administration is demonstrating that it "can both protect the environment and grow the economy." "Today is a historic day at the EPA," he said. "For the last few months, since President Trump was sworn in for this term, we here at the EPA have been taking actions to end the agency's war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply." Zeldin argued that the Biden-era rules were attempting to "suffocate our economy in order to protect the environment." EPA data shows that in 2023, the power sector produced 31% of carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels, the second-highest of all industries. Former Obama EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, disagreed with Zeldin, saying in a statement, "The key rationale Zeldin is using to justify the dismantling of our nation's protections from power plant pollution is absolutely illogical and indefensible. It's purely a political play that goes against decades of science and policy review." Zeldin also announced that the agency will move to repeal updated limits to the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, which restricts the amount of pollutants that can be emitted by coal and natural gas-fired power plants. The rule was first introduced in 2011, but the Biden administration tightened the regulations in 2024 to ensure that fossil fuel plants reduce emissions from toxic metals by 67% and from mercury by 70%. Now, the EPA plans to loosen those more stringent standards, which Zeldin said are "gratuitous." Zeldin said that if the rule is finalized, power plants will not be allowed to emit more than they do today or as much as they did during the Biden administration. Although mercury is naturally occurring in nature, exposure to high levels of it in the air, water and food supply is toxic to human health and especially dangerous to the development of young children and fetuses, according to the World Health Organization. When mercury is released into the air, it can travel great distances and land in lakes and rivers, where it is exposed to fish that can be eaten by humans. The rule has been highly effective, reducing mercury air emissions from power plants by 85% from 2013-2022. It's worth noting that a big part of that shift was driven by a decline in coal plants and by installing pollution controls on fossil fuel-based power generation. Zeldin was joined by several Republican members of the House and Senate, including Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, who applauded the announcement as a "common-sense" change. "What's been done up to this point is literally a unilateral disarmament of the American economy," he said. The rollbacks support President Trump's executive order, "Unleashing American Energy," and its mission to review policies that might "impose an undue burden on … domestic energy resources." But critics of the announcement, including many environmentalists, say the economic and health benefits of the Biden-era rules outweigh the cost of compliance and the rollbacks could be dangerous. "The EPA is hoisting the white flag of surrender on the power plant pollution that's poisoning the air we breathe and harming our climate," said Manish Bapna in a statement, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "What's more, EPA is trying to repeal toxic air pollution standards for the nation's dirtiest coal plants, allowing the worst actors to keep poisoning the air." The Environmental Protection Network, a group of hundreds of former EPA employees, did an analysis of EPA data to estimate the health and economic impact of both rules. It found that the Biden-era power plant pollution and mercury rules, combined, could avoid the premature mortality of more than 15,000 people and prevent more than 5.1 million symptomatic asthma incidents, cumulatively through 2050. The two rules are estimated to provide more than $2.24 billion in annual net benefits for public health and the economy by reducing hospital and health care costs. Zeldin claimed that the new proposed Trump-era rules are expected to save more than $1 billion per year. Some environmental groups say they are prepared to sue the EPA over the rollbacks. "If EPA proceeds with repealing these life-saving standards based on a legal theory that doesn't pass the laugh test, our lawyers are ready to defend the public's right to breathe in court," Meredith Hankins, a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store