Edwin Poots in new dressing down of assembly members
The Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly has followed up last week's dressing down over MLAs' clothes with another salvo about their behaviour.Edwin Poots told them it was "extremely discourteous" not to be in the chamber to ask a listed question.And in a letter to all 90 assembly members he said some were "undermining the concept of debate" by turning up just before they are due to speak and then leaving again immediately afterwards.Last week he reminded them that the dress code was "smart" adding "some of you have a very loose interpretation of smart".
'Effective scrutiny'
In his latest missive Mr Poots said next week would mark the first anniversary of the return of devolution."The development of, and maintenance of, the parliamentary culture around how we do our business has undoubtedly been affected by the fact that the assembly has not been operating consistently over the past 27 years," he said."However, upholding a parliamentary culture around the serious business we have to do, has a major part to play in restoring and increasing confidence in the assembly."He said as speaker, he could not control the business that ministers and members bring forward, or the level of scrutiny which members want to apply. "However, it is my role, and that of officials, to seek to create the conditions for our business to be done properly and for effective scrutiny to be conducted."Mr Poots said he realised that how MLAs dress may appear trivial to some, but it underlined some significant principles.
'Not casual matters'
He told MLAs that "sittings of the assembly are not just another engagement in Members' diaries" and the chamber was "not just another meeting room". "At any one time there are only 90 people who have the immense privilege of participating in this chamber and they are given that privilege by the people."As an institution, this assembly is the prime source of authority for devolved matters. "With the privilege given to us to be here, comes the responsibility to exercise that authority by representing our constituents, holding ministers to account and taking decisions to change policy, and the law, to address the issues impacting our whole community."Mr Poots said these were "not casual matters". "They require a level of formality to ensure that these responsibilities are discharged properly and with fairness to all members," he said. "Therefore, issues like how we present ourselves and avoiding clutter in the chamber are purely small symbols of protecting the dignity of the chamber."Respecting our courtesies and procedures is about respecting the serious business we have to do and respecting the people who put us here to do it.The speaker added he would have more to say in future about "our standards of debate".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
‘I do not believe I have done anything worthy of an apology'
The Stormont Communities Minister has insisted he does not believe he has done anything worthy of apologising for following criticism over a social media post. Gordon Lyons was accused of 'poor judgment' following the post, sent hours before a crowd gathered outside Larne Leisure Centre and it was set alight, causing significant damage. Advertisement His post detailed that some individuals had been temporarily moved to Larne Leisure Centre in the early hours of the morning following disturbances in Ballymena, adding that as an MLA for the area, neither he nor his DUP council colleagues were made aware of that until that afternoon. A police officer outside Larne Leisure Centre following an attack on the facility. Photo: Liam McBurney/PA. He went on to say that the individuals had since been moved out of Larne, adding that while protesting is a legitimate right, violence is not, and urged everyone to remain peaceful. Mr Lyons faced a grilling by MLAs over the post at the Assembly on Monday. He insisted that police had encouraged him and other elected representatives to share the message that those who had fled disorder in Ballymena, and had been accommodated at Larne Leisure Centre, were no longer there. Advertisement Mr Lyons pointed out that the location had already been publicised by others, and that his post pointed out that no one was sheltering at the leisure centre. He also accused those criticising him as 'attempting to score political points'. Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole put to Mr Lyons that his instinct appears to be to 'double down' and to be 'pugilistic rather than empathise with people who have been put out of their homes'. He asked Mr Lyons to express 'some measure of regret and responsibility taking, for what was said on that post and the fact that it put vulnerable people in real fear.' Advertisement Mr Lyons said he rejected that characterisation. 'I took the decision to put a post up later on that afternoon because of the rumours that were circulating, because at lunchtime, a post had gone up on another page saying that there was going to be a protest at the leisure centre that evening,' he told MLAs. 'I was making it clear that there was nobody at the leisure centre anymore, which was the reason for the protest in the first place. 'That's the clarification that I was providing, that the council had already provided, as well, that the news outlets were reporting as well. So I was trying to temper the situation, to try and stop it getting out of hand.' Advertisement Mr Lyons also said it was 'absolutely outrageous' that people have tried to get 'political capital out of the horrendous events that have taken place'. 'I think that it is absolutely outrageous, I think violence is wrong, I thought that we saw absolutely despicable scenes and we should be united together as a House in condemning the violence,' he said. 'We should be united in support of victims, we should be united in support of police, we should be united in listening to the communities that have been affected and yes, those who are affected by some of the immigration policies that we have in place as well. 'He's asking me to say sorry for my role in this, and I simply do not believe that I have done anything that is worthy of an apology.' Advertisement Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn had said Gordon Lyons should reconsider his words after the social media post Photo: Ben Whitley/PA. Ireland Facebook being used to coordinate racist attacks i... Read More First Minister Michelle O'Neill called for Mr Lyons to resign last week, while Secretary of State Hilary Benn said he should reconsider his words. Mr Lyons said he had had a private conversation with Mr Benn since then. He also cautioned that some comments made about him by 'a number of individuals that were not just wrong but offensive'.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘I do not believe I have done anything worthy of an apology'
The Stormont Communities Minister has insisted he does not believe he has done anything worthy of apologising for following criticism over a social media post. Gordon Lyons was accused of 'poor judgment' following the post, sent hours before a crowd gathered outside Larne Leisure Centre and it was set alight, causing significant damage. His post detailed that some individuals had been temporarily moved to Larne Leisure Centre in the early hours of the morning following disturbances in Ballymena, adding that as an MLA for the area, neither he nor his DUP council colleagues were made aware of that until that afternoon. He went on to say that the individuals had since been moved out of Larne, adding that while protesting is a legitimate right, violence is not, and urged everyone to remain peaceful. Mr Lyons faced a grilling by MLAs over the post at the Assembly on Monday. He insisted that police had encouraged him and other elected representatives to share the message that those who had fled disorder in Ballymena, and had been accommodated at Larne Leisure Centre, were no longer there. Mr Lyons pointed out that the location had already been publicised by others, and that his post pointed out that no one was sheltering at the leisure centre. He also accused those criticising him as 'attempting to score political points'. Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole put to Mr Lyons that his instinct appears to be to 'double down' and to be 'pugilistic rather than empathise with people who have been put out of their homes'. He asked Mr Lyons to express 'some measure of regret and responsibility taking, for what was said on that post and the fact that it put vulnerable people in real fear.' Mr Lyons said he rejected that characterisation. 'I took the decision to put a post up later on that afternoon because of the rumours that were circulating, because at lunchtime, a post had gone up on another page saying that there was going to be a protest at the leisure centre that evening,' he told MLAs. 'I was making it clear that there was nobody at the leisure centre anymore, which was the reason for the protest in the first place. 'That's the clarification that I was providing, that the council had already provided, as well, that the news outlets were reporting as well. So I was trying to temper the situation, to try and stop it getting out of hand.' Mr Lyons also said it was 'absolutely outrageous' that people have tried to get 'political capital out of the horrendous events that have taken place'. 'I think that it is absolutely outrageous, I think violence is wrong, I thought that we saw absolutely despicable scenes and we should be united together as a House in condemning the violence,' he said. 'We should be united in support of victims, we should be united in support of police, we should be united in listening to the communities that have been affected and yes, those who are affected by some of the immigration policies that we have in place as well. 'He's asking me to say sorry for my role in this, and I simply do not believe that I have done anything that is worthy of an apology.' First Minister Michelle O'Neill called for Mr Lyons to resign last week, while Secretary of State Hilary Benn said he should reconsider his words. Mr Lyons said he had had a private conversation with Mr Benn since then. He also cautioned that some comments made about him by 'a number of individuals that were not just wrong but offensive'.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition
The Stormont Assembly have voted to pass a new independent board to determine their salaries despite opposition from the smallest parties. The Assembly Members (Independent Remuneration Board) Bill will establish a new independent board to determine salaries and pensions for MLAs. It will replace the previous Independent Financial Review Panel which has been defunct for a number of years. Currently, the basic salary for an MLA is £51,500, but this can rise with position including chairing some committees or serving as a minister, with the First and deputy First Ministers receiving a salary of £123,500. A report alongside the Bill showed MLA salaries are lower than those received by Members of the Scottish Parliament (£72,196), Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly (£72,057) and Members of the Irish Parliament (113,679 euros/£94,537). The Bill, put forward by the Assembly Commission, was passed by an oral vote by MLAs on Monday, with the sole MLAs representing the TUV and People Before Profit both opposing the Bill. TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed it is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves a substantial pay rise', and objected to former MLAs being entitled to sit on the new board. People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll also criticised that former MLAs could sit on the board, and said that a pay rise for MLAs amid 'rising rates of poverty' would be 'completely tone deaf'. However UUP MLA Andy Allen, who sits on the Assembly Commission, described a 'technical Bill' to deal with the process of how salaries and pensions are set. Closing the debate Sinn Fein MLA Sinead Ennis slammed what she termed 'inaccuracies and misunderstandings' over the Bill. She also warned that if the Bill did not pass the Assembly 'will have failed' to ensure legal clarity and leave no structure in place to determine the salaries and pensions of MLAs. 'In passing this Bill today, future discussions and decisions around the salaries and pensions of members will shift to the independent remuneration board,' she told MLAs. 'That board has independence in deciding what factors it wants to consider before determining its view on the appropriate level of salaries and pensions for members. 'That is the appropriate way of dealing with these matters.'
