
European fertiliser plants use US ammonia made with shale gas, investigation reveals
The coastal city of Freeport, Texas is a dense tangle of metal pipes, tanks and towers. Located 60 miles south of Houston, it's home to a sprawling petrochemical complex – one of the largest and most polluting in the US.
Among its facilities is a plant dedicated to the production of ammonia, a colourless compound of nitrogen and hydrogen and a key ingredient in fertilisers widely used on industrial arable farms – including on fields of barley, wheat and maize across Europe.
Chemicals giants Yara and BASF opened the factory to great fanfare in 2018, promising 'cost-efficient' and 'sustainable' ammonia production. Unlike conventional plants, which use hydrogen made from natural gas, this factory would employ a hydrogen 'byproduct' from a nearby Dow plant producing components for plastic, they said, helping to tackle the fertiliser industry's sizeable carbon footprint.
But an investigation by DeSmog, Data Desk and the Guardian reveals that despite these green promises, the Yara Freeport plant is relying on hydrogen made from US shale gas – one of the most environmentally and socially damaging fossil fuels – to manufacture its ammonia in Texas.
Analysis of pipeline and permit documents traces the source of this gas hundreds of miles west of Freeport to the Permian Basin – the second largest gas-producing region in the US.
Experts said Yara and BASF's claim the production process was gas-free was 'not true at all'. While the recycling of hydrogen results in energy savings overall, the fuel has to be replaced with fossil gas, meaning that Yara Freeport indirectly drives demand for gas.
Despite these links to fracked gas and uncertain carbon savings, the investigation shows this ammonia is being shipped to fertiliser factories in Europe.
Yara – which remains Europe's largest industrial buyer of natural gas and is globally responsible for emissions equivalent to 16 coal-fired power plants each year – claims it is 'committed to reducing emissions' and 'mitigating climate change'.
Yet shale gas extraction through fracking releases large volumes of the potent greenhouse gas methane and multiple toxic chemicals and pollutants into the air and water.
Ammonia production's gas demand is expected to triple in the next decades, driven by a booming fertiliser trade currently estimated at about $200bn. The use and production of fertiliser is already a major contributor to climate breakdown, creating more emissions than aviation and shipping combined.
Efforts to tackle fertiliser emissions in Europe appear to have stalled since an ambitious reductions pledge was announced in 2021.
'European countries and companies claim to be feeding the world with 'clean' fertilisers and fuelling the future with 'clean' energy,' says Taylor Hodge, an agrochemicals campaigner from the Washington-based group the Center for International Environmental Law. 'In reality, they're offshoring the pollution, costs, and risks to communities in the US Gulf south.'
Yara's plant in Freeport is the company's first investment on US soil. The Norwegian chemicals giant – Europe's largest fertiliser producer – said in its joint launch press release with the German multinational BASF that its use of hydrogen byproduct would reduce the environmental impact of 750,000 tonnes of ammonia production a year.
Pipeline maps and permit documents show the hydrogen supplying Yara's plant can be traced back to fracked gas stored at Mont Belvieu, a vast salt dome containing dozens of caverns filled with natural gas liquids from several shale gas basins including the Permian.
From Mont Belvieu, the fracked gas is piped 90 miles south to Dow's ethylene plant in Freeport, just metres from the ammonia plant, where an intensive steam cracking process produces both ethylene and hydrogen.
Yara claims the Freeport plant's use of byproduct hydrogen reduces emissions from chemical production by 25%, but experts say that while such savings are possible, they do not go far enough.
'Just because it's a byproduct doesn't mean it's clean,' says Paul Martin, a chemical engineer with Spitfire Research, a Toronto-based consultancy specialising in industry decarbonisation.
While Yara can claim it is using a more 'sustainable' byproduct, Dow's plant has to use more fracked gas to fuel its furnace to replace the lost heat energy it would otherwise have generated from burning its hydrogen in-house.
According to Martin, this would amount to about 1.1m kg of natural gas a year being fed to the cracker furnaces to replace the lost heat energy from hydrogen. He therefore says that while the use of byproduct hydrogen is more efficient overall, reducing the amount of fossil fuels required to produce Yara's ammonia, it is 'not true at all' to say the ammonia production is gas-free, since it is also driving up Dow's use of natural gas.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Yara's use of fracked gas makes a mockery of Yara's 'green' expansion in Europe and undermines its attempts at 'sustainable' US production, according to Hodge.
'The Freeport facility is making ammonia out of hydrogen derived from fossil gas – plain and simple,' she says. 'The flow of feedstocks from plastic production and other petrochemical operations makes it clear how deeply these dirty industries are intertwined. Yara's claims mislead the public about their climate- and community-harming emissions.'
Yara recently closed two of its largest European ammonia plants, in France and Belgium. Despite this, the company maintains that 'a strong European fertiliser industry is crucial not only for ensuring food security in Europe and globally but also for enabling Europe to lead the green transition' and has highlighted recent investments in 'green ammonia' created using renewable energy at plants in Norway and the Netherlands.
Yara has communicated little about how its European facilities are using ammonia imported from its US plant, but DeSmog and Data Desk were able to trace ammonia shipped across the Atlantic Ocean from Yara's Freeport facility to a number of key European fertiliser plants.
Analysis of customs and shipping data reveals that about a quarter of Yara Freeport ammonia is exported outside of the US, with more than 90% of this shipped to Europe to be made into fertiliser.
These fertilisers – used for everything from wheat to potatoes – are shipped onwards to Asian and European markets.
In 2023, Ireland received about 14% of all its fertiliser imports from the facilities, while the UK received about 8% and Spain almost 6%.
The investigation 'exposes the bitter truth' of the industry, according to Raj Patel, a research professor at the University of Texas in Austin and panel expert at the IPES-Food coalition, who said a focus on green hydrogen fertiliser technology did not address underlying issues around fertiliser use, and called for policies that instead targeted reduction.
'They don't touch the root problem – the overuse, pollution and potent greenhouse gas emissions happening on farms,' he said. 'We're applying 21st-century technology to preserve 20th-century farming problems.'
'While fertiliser giant Yara markets 'green solutions', it's actually pioneering new frontiers for fracking and fossil fuels. Our food system is becoming Big Oil's emergency escape hatch.'
A Yara spokesperson said: 'Yara is a leader in the transition to lower-carbon fertilisers and low-emission ammonia. Profitable decarbonisation is a top strategic priority, and since 2005, we have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions by about 45%. Ammonia produced at Yara's Freeport plant has always relied on hydrogen derived from natural gas, supplied by third parties. Still, the configuration of the plant makes it both one of the lowest emitters of pollutants and one of the lowest carbon intensity plants in the US.'
BASF and Dow did not respond to requests for comment.
This article was supported by a grant from Journalismfund.eu

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Perfect' mini brownie box slashed to under £5 for Father's Day
This might just be the perfect affordable gift for the foodie dad with a sweet tooth There are 10 days left until Father's Day, and those still on the hunt for the perfect gift have enough time to find something Dad will love. If he has a sweet tooth, something delicious to tuck into on the special occasion might be a winner, and Cutter & Squidge is well worth checking out to put a smile on his face. The Mixed Mini Brownie Box is a popular pick; it comes with a Father's Day packaging sleeve and contains an assortment of rich, gooey mini brownies in a selection of flavours for £21.99. The London-based bakery is known for its letterbox-friendly boxes of handmade brownies, cakes, and biscuits, each wrapped in occasion-specific packaging. Thanks to a limited deal with TopCashback, shoppers will be able to save big for this special occasion. New customers to TopCashback and Cutter & Squidge will receive a £15 new member bonus plus additional cashback, meaning the Mixed Mini Brownie Box will cost £4.79 after cashback. For an existing Cutter & Squidge customer but new to TopCashback, the brownie box will be £5.52 after cashback. Delivery of the sweet treat is letterbox-friendly, but next-day service comes at an extra charge. For the foodie dad who enjoys the finer things, the Luxury Wine, Cheese, and Rillette Hamper (£70) from is a standout choice. It's packed with artisan cheeses, crackers, a bottle of wine and more to enjoy. Alternatively, Bloom & Wild also offer a number of sweet treats available to send to a special someone by post. The Mixed Mini Brownie Box has become a go-to gift for all sorts of occasions, from 'get well soon' pick-me-ups to congratulatory treats for exam results or even a quirky way to ask someone to be a bridesmaid; the contents stay the same, with only the sleeve swapping out to suit the occasion. The Birthday Box (£19.99) is the most widely reviewed on Cutter & Squidge's site, earning an impressive 4.8 out of 5 stars from 164 reviews. In reviews for the Mixed Mini Brownie Box, one shopper shared: "The Mixed Brownie Box is a perfect selection of deliciousness and comes in lovely packaging that matches each occasion." Another happy customer wrote: "I received these brownies as a birthday gift and they were so delicious that I ordered a box of 12 to be sent to a relative for her birthday. They are highly recommended - a great gift to send and receive." However, while most reviews are glowing, a handful of customers have noted that the portions are on the smaller side, though that's not unusual for a mixed selection designed to fit through the letterbox. Another customer noted: "Fantastic selection of the most delicious brownies!" How to get Father's Day Brownie Box for less than £6 To claim the new member bonus, new members of TopCashback need to sign up via this link Search for Cutter & Squidge and click 'Get Cashback Now' Shop and check out as usual Cashback will track and appear in your TopCashback account


The Courier
33 minutes ago
- The Courier
Administration extended for ex-Dundee United chief Stephen Thompson's failed business
The administration of Stephen Thompson's failed convenience shop business will extend into next year. The former Dundee United chief set up Eddy's Food Station in 2022 with ambitions to grow to 50 shops and 800 staff within five years. But two years later the business entered administration, with millions of pounds of debt. Mr Thompson was subsequently made bankrupt a week before Christmas last year. Since being appointed in April last year, administrators from FRP Advisory have been working to sell the company's assets and establish the scale of the debt. The administration process was due to conclude in April but has been extended until April 24 next year. This will give administrators more time to adjudicate on creditor claims and distribute funds. Eddy's Food Station grew to have six shops – including locations in Ceres, Leuchars and Buckhaven in Fife – though just three outlets remained at the time of collapse. A new progress report from FRP shows the scale of the company's debts. A secured creditor, Nash Business Services Limited is owed £3.8m while HMRC is due £141,000 and unsecured creditors are owed around £550,000. The three remaining stores owned by the company were sold to Dundee-based CJ Lang for £1.5m a year ago. This included sums of £35,000 for stock and £110,000 for furniture and equipment. FRP expects HMRC will be repaid in full and there will be 'sufficient funds available to make a partial distribution to unsecured creditors'. In terms of the secured creditor, the new report adds that 'an issue with the security remains unresolved, and the secured creditor is assessing their options'. Mr Thompson previously told The Courier that 'no banks would speak to him' as the company failed. He highlighted spiralling energy costs as one of the reasons the business didn't work. However, FRP said the company had 'paid premiums' to secure leases as it built up its portfolio of six stores and had also incurred 'substantial' refurbishment costs. It said three sites were sold at a substantial discount. The administrator said: 'The company has struggled with high debt servicing costs and had experienced cash flow pressures caused by high investment costs and lack of profitability.' The administrators said the extent of debts in the company meant a sale as a going concern was impossible because 'the company did not have sufficient working capital to trade in the short term and insufficient assets to liquidate to satisfy creditor demands'. Mr Thompson, who sold his Dundee United shareholding in 2018, previously stated he had invested his 'total pension pot' into Eddy's Food Station. The businessman was granted sequestration – the Scottish term for the legal process of declaring someone bankrupt – on December 18. A document available at Accountant in Bankruptcy, Scotland's insolvency service, details his level of debt at £881,833. Mr Thompson announced he had filed for bankruptcy when he was a guest on BBC's Off The Ball radio show at the start of November. When asked by host Tam Cowan what he has been up to, he said: 'Well, I've kind of hit rock bottom to be honest. I actually signed a petition for bankruptcy yesterday. 'It's not a great place to be in life but it's a fresh start for me.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump will come out on top in his battle with Musk
In the end it was always bound to get messy – how could it not? Two bombastic billionaires aligned by ambition and imperiousness – an unlikely bromance fuelled by an unquenchable attraction to both legitimacy and impunity. But here we are – barely four months after joining him in the Oval Office, Tesla-chief Elon Musk has not merely fallen out with his presidential benefactor: he's taking their battle public. On Thursday, Musk – now finished leading Trump's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency – 'went nuclear,' as the New York Post phrased it, accusing the president of covering up his cameo in the infamous Jeffrey Epstein sex-crimes saga. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' posted Musk on Twitter Thursday afternoon. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' he added as he teased an Epstein-related bombshell. The daggers come as Musk takes aim at Trump's massive One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which bundles together much of the president's key legislative objectives. The bill has already passed in the House, but Musk wants Congress to 'kill it.' His beef: among other provisions, the ending of tax credits for electric vehicles (like Musk-made Teslas) which was approved by former president Joe Biden. As both Trump and Musk know well, the truth around the Epstein affair matters far less than the fact that the two men are fighting about it. Even if Musk uncovers some sort of sexual salaciousness, it's unlikely to matter – both to Trump, nor his base, who are fully aware of (and unbothered by) the President's messy amorous history. What really matters is Trump – both his tendency for prolonged distractions (such as Musk!) and his zeal for heart-daggering retribution. Still Musk, despite lacking presidential powers, cannot be easily taken down – after all his perch exists because the president placed him there. But neither can Musk simply dismiss Trump outright. Ever skilful with a threat, Trump has already warned that he could withhold 'billion and billions of dollars' in federal funding for Musk-related companies, such as Tesla and Space X. Little doubt Trump could easily identify billions more. But cutting Musk's cash flow won't come without consequence: SpaceX, for instance, forms much of the transport network needed to maintain the International Space Station. Yet Trump's barbs matter just as much – Tesla's stock sank nearly 10 per cent on Thursday in response to the Trump-Musk kerfuffle. Considering the stock is already trading 40 per cent below its 52-week high, Musk could face internal pressure to tone things down if his feud with the president deepens. It likely will – at least in the short term. After all, neither Trump nor Musk shy away from conflict and both view adversarialism as a necessary tool of conquest. Both certainly have the required ammunition – billions of dollars, wholly-owned social media platforms and eager, sycophantic fan bases. But Trump – clear-eyed against Musk's alleged drug-taking – will likely wind up the winner. Having poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's campaign, Musk clearly craves a return on his investment. He had one when he was hanging in the Oval, but now cast adrift he's clearly resentful and seeking vengeance. Trump, however, wants nothing nor really needs nothing from Musk – except, when the time comes, to simply be left alone. For men like Musk and Trump – consumed with attention and approval – indifference may prove the most potent poison of all.