Qatar gifts Trump Boeing 747-8i Jet ahead of Mideast tour
Published May 12th, 2025 - 04:33 GMT Trump defended the gesture, framing it as a token of appreciation from Gulf allies for America's role in ensuring regional security.
ALBAWABA- As U.S. President Donald Trump embarked today on a high-profile Middle East tour, including stops in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, controversy erupted over a luxury Boeing 747-8i reportedly gifted to the U.S. by the Qatari royal family. Also Read Trump to visit KSA, UAE, and Qatar from May 13-16
During a press briefing in the White House's Roosevelt Room, an ABC News reporter questioned whether the aircraft, formerly used by Qatar's royals, was a personal gift to Trump. 'What do you say to people who view that luxury jet as a personal gift to you? Why not leave it behind?' the reporter asked.
Trump responded sharply, calling the outlet 'ABC Fake News' and dismissing the concern:
'They're giving us a free jet. I could say no, no, no, don't give us… I want to pay you $1 billion or $400 million, or I could say thank you very much,' he said. 'The Qatari plane will go to the Trump Library, and I won't use it after the presidency.'
According to ABC News sources, the aircraft will be made available for presidential use, possibly serving as an alternative to Air Force One during Trump's term. Later, it may be transferred to the Trump Presidential Library Foundation, raising concerns over potential personal benefit. Also Read Trump says Netanyahu 'Manipulated' him, cuts all contact
Trump defended the gesture, framing it as a token of appreciation from Gulf allies for America's role in ensuring regional security. 'What Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are offering the United States is a gesture of appreciation,' he stated.
The controversy comes as Trump begins his regional visit, with plans to meet leaders in Riyadh, Doha, and Abu Dhabi.
He also hinted at a possible surprise trip to Turkey on Thursday to attend a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, their first face-to-face meeting since war broke out in April 2022. The move signals growing hopes for a potential ceasefire.
© 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
4 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Outrage in Palestine over snack ad mocking 'last supper'
ALBAWABA - A controversial advertisement by a Palestinian snack company has sparked widespread anger among Christian communities and broader segments of Palestinian society after it featured a parody of The Last Supper, one of Christianity's most sacred religious images. The ad replaced the figures of Jesus and his disciples with sheep heads and used bags of chips to represent the holy meal, turning a deeply spiritual symbol into a promotional gimmick. The response was swift and condemning. Many Christians viewed the campaign as a blatant act of disrespect and an attack on their faith. Protests erupted online and offline, with some store owners discarding the company's products in public protest. Religious leaders and civil society figures issued statements denouncing the ad for crossing ethical lines and mocking foundational religious values. In an opinion piece, Dr. Imad Salem emphasized that the ad cannot be defended as humorous or creative. He argued that such content undermines the delicate social fabric of Palestine and damages the values of respect, unity, and national dignity. Salem noted that Palestine's strength lies in its religious and cultural diversity, and acts like this threaten to unravel the coexistence Palestinians have long upheld under occupation and adversity. He warned that turning sacred symbols into tools for marketing trivializes deeply held beliefs and can open the door to sectarian division. He also criticized the growing trend of commercial content crossing moral and spiritual boundaries without accountability. Salem called for a renewed national dialogue that reinforces values of tolerance and respect for all faiths. He urged media creators, educators, and businesses to align their work with the broader ethical and cultural responsibility of building a nation that embraces all its people equally. He concluded that true national unity requires more than slogans—it must be rooted in everyday practices of dignity, empathy, and moral accountability. Only through this commitment can Palestinians maintain their shared identity and uphold justice for all citizens, regardless of faith.
Roya News
12 hours ago
- Roya News
Man wrongly deported under Trump returns to US to face trafficking charges
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador earlier this year, has been returned to the US to face federal criminal charges, Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed on Friday. Abrego Garcia's case had stirred months of legal wrangling and political controversy, culminating in a standoff between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary over a court order requiring the government to assist in his return. One federal judge even warned the situation risked becoming an 'incipient crisis' between the branches of government. Upon his return, Abrego Garcia was indicted in the Middle District of Tennessee on two federal counts: conspiracy to unlawfully transport undocumented immigrants for profit and actual unlawful transport for profit. The indictment alleges that he and several unnamed co-conspirators helped move thousands of undocumented individuals, some of whom were believed to be affiliated with the MS-13 gang, across multiple states, including Texas and Maryland. Abrego Garcia and his family deny any gang affiliations. They say he fled El Salvador years ago to escape gang violence. His defense attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, sharply criticized the government's actions. 'The government disappeared Kilmar to a foreign prison in violation of a court order. Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they're bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him. This shows that they were playing games with the court all along,' Sandoval-Moshenberg said. 'Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice.' President Donald Trump, however, applauded the Justice Department's handling of the case. Speaking aboard Air Force One, he said, 'He should have never had to be returned, take a look at what's happened with it. Take a look at what they found in the grand jury. I thought Pam Bondi did a great job.' Officials familiar with the situation said the White House and State Department both signed off on the decision to bring Abrego Garcia back, a move that unfolded quietly over the past few days. The charges stem from incidents dating as far back as 2016. In one example detailed in the indictment, Abrego Garcia was pulled over in Tennessee in late 2022 while driving a vehicle containing nine Hispanic men who had no identification or belongings. Prosecutors allege he was involved in organizing repeated transportation routes for undocumented migrants across state lines, often under the guise of bringing them to construction jobs. Though narcotics trafficking is mentioned in the indictment, Abrego Garcia has not been charged with drug-related offenses. At a press conference Friday, Bondi announced his return and thanked Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele for cooperating. 'Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice,' she said. However, the case has not been without internal fallout. Sources revealed that Ben Schrader, the chief of the criminal division in the US Attorney's Office in Nashville, resigned shortly after the indictment was issued, amid internal disagreements over how the case was handled. In court Friday, Abrego Garcia appeared before a magistrate judge in Nashville wearing a short-sleeved white shirt. When asked whether he understood the charges, he replied in Spanish, 'Sí. Lo entiendo,' which was translated to English as 'Yes. I understand.' While Republican officials defended the return and charges, Democratic lawmakers continued to question the original deportation and what they argue was a breach of Abrego Garcia's constitutional rights. Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who met with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador earlier this year, said, 'This is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights – and the rights of all. The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along.' Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington added, 'Mr. Abrego Garcia was kidnapped in front of his young child, and disappeared to El Salvador with no due process.' ICE officials had previously admitted that Abrego Garcia's March deportation was due to an administrative mistake. He was initially detained in El Salvador's notorious mega-prison before being relocated to another facility. Despite earlier claims from the Trump administration that the US could not return him, the Supreme Court ruled in April that officials must 'facilitate' his return, though not 'effectuate' it, leaving legal interpretation open. The case, now unfolding in a Tennessee courtroom, remains a flashpoint in broader debates over immigration enforcement, due process, and executive power. Though Abrego Garcia is back on US soil, his long-term future here remains uncertain. Federal prosecutors may still seek to deport him to a third country, sidestepping a 2019 court order that barred his removal to El Salvador due to the risk of gang violence.
Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
Breakup timeline: Trump, Musk's political bromance implodes
A once-warm relationship between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk dramatically unraveled Thursday in a fiery online clash that played out minute-by-minute across social media and the White House. It all began with Trump's reaction to Musk's criticism of a controversial tax and spending bill championed by the former president. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump said, "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised." Musk had previously blasted the bill on X, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Trump, seemingly caught off guard, expressed disappointment, "I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem." That comment triggered an immediate rebuttal from Musk, who took to X around noon to respond, "ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill... Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way." Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Just minutes later, Musk escalated the dispute, denying Trump's claim that he was closely involved in crafting the legislation, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Then, in a post dripping with frustration and bravado, Musk claimed credit for Trump's 2024 victory, "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." He added, "Such ingratitude." Such ingratitude — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 The tone shifted again when Musk floated a more radical idea, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" The post was pinned to the top of his timeline. Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Trump, clearly infuriated, fired back on his Truth Social account, threatening to cut off federal support for Musk's businesses, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Estimates from US media suggest Musk's companies have received around USD 18 billion in government contracts. The president's remarks struck a nerve, and Musk responded just over 30 minutes later with a bombshell accusation tied to one of America's darkest scandals,"Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Trump, still at the White House, responded by defending the bill that sparked the entire fallout, "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress." "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," Musk then posted. In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 The Dragon spacecraft is central to NASA's human spaceflight program, currently the only certified US vehicle capable of carrying astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) under a multibillion-dollar agreement. Hours later, in a puzzling follow-up, Musk responded to a user on X saying, "OK, we won't decommission Dragon," though his tone left observers unclear on whether he was serious or backpedaling. Good advice. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 The extraordinary exchange left political analysts stunned and observers questioning whether the split between Trump and Musk marks a deeper fracture within America's political and tech elite. Whether this feud cools off or ignites further remains to be seen.
