
White House Deflects Questions Raised About Musk's Alleged Drug Use
Elon Musk's final hours working for President Donald Trump were spent in part by deflecting questions about his drug use, which a New York Times investigation on Friday revealed was far more extensive than previously known.
Standing beside Trump in the Oval Office to mark his last day in government, Musk cut off a reporter for even mentioning the New York Times' reported allegations that he regularly consumed ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms while traveling with Trump on the campaign trail last year. 'The New York Times. Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on Russiagate?' Musk said when asked about the report. 'Let's move on.'
Musk has had a ubiquitous presence at the White House over the past year, attending Cabinet meetings, appearing regularly with Trump in the Oval Office, and serving as the public face of the Department of Government Efficiency, a network of engineers tasked with rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse from the federal government. His role, while technically unpaid and temporary, grew in both scope and influence—often bypassing traditional bureaucratic channels.
But as Musk's visibility rose, so did concerns about his behavior behind the scenes. The Times report described an increasingly erratic figure whose drug use went far beyond the occasional ketamine prescription he had previously disclosed. According to people familiar with his activities, he told associates that he was taking so much ketamine that it was damaging his bladder, a known consequence of chronic abuse. He also traveled with a daily medication box filled with roughly 20 pills, including Adderall, The Times reported.
It remains unclear whether Musk was under the influence while in his government role. But some critics have noted his erratic behavior, such as his Nazi-like gesture at a rally, garbled answers during interviews, and frequent insults of top Trump officials.
The White House declined to comment directly on the matter. Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters Friday that he has no concerns over Musk's alleged drug use. 'The drugs I'm concerned about are the drugs that are coming across the border from the criminal cartels that are killing hundreds of thousands of Americans,' Miller said.
Musk has previously admitted his history of recreational drug use. In a 2024 interview with Don Lemon, he acknowledged he took 'a small amount' of prescribed ketamine to treat negative moods about once every two weeks, but that his heavy workload prevented him from using it too much. 'If you've used too much ketamine, you can't really get work done, and I have a lot of work,' he said.
Musk announced on Friday that he plans to continue advising Trump and the U.S. DOGE Service even after he formally departs the government to focus more on his companies, which include Tesla and SpaceX, among others. During his time in the government, Musk oversaw DOGE's sweeping cuts to the federal workforce as part of the Trump Administration's efforts to vastly reduce federal spending. He had initially sought to cut $2 trillion from the nation's roughly $6.8 trillion federal budget, before walking back that figure. DOGE's website claims it has secured $175 billion in estimated savings, but media outlets have found its assertions to be exaggerated and misleading. TIME has not been able to independently verify those savings.
'I expect to continue to provide advice, whenever the President would like advice,' Musk said on Friday.
'I hope so,' Trump chimed in.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Abrego Garcia lawyers blast ‘shocking proposition' behind Trump admin resistance
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is still imprisoned in El Salvador after the U.S. government illegally sent him there in March. According to the latest filing from his lawyers, the Trump administration is still resisting facilitating his return, despite having been ordered to do so by judges at every level of the court system. 'The Government asks this Court to accept a shocking proposition: that federal officers may snatch residents of this country and deposit them in foreign prisons in admitted violation of federal law, while no court in the United States has jurisdiction to do anything about it,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote Monday in their opposition to the government's motion to dismiss. The motion, filed last week, is pending before U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who ordered the government to facilitate his return nearly two months ago. The Supreme Court largely backed her order in April, but instead of approving it completely in a way that could've ended the matter, the high court's order left open questions while sending the case back to the Maryland judge for further litigation. The Supreme Court said on April 10 that Xinis' order 'properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.' And yet, the government has not done that. Since then, the lower court litigation has been unfolding too slowly to the liking of Abrego Garcia's lawyers, who said in their opposition filing that the administration is just trying to rehash 'recycled arguments' in its dismissal motion. The government can now file a final reply brief before Xinis rules, and that reply would ordinarily be due in two weeks; but Abrego Garcia's lawyers have asked the judge to cut that due date to one week. 'Further briefing on recycled arguments should not prolong a case that has already dragged on far too long for Abrego Garcia and his family,' they wrote. So while news has emerged of yet more immigrants the government has wrongly sent to other countries since Abrego Garcia's illegal removal, his return is still not in sight. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Reign of Corruption Chronicled in Elizabeth Warren Report
As Elon Musk departs the Trump White House — at least officially — a new Senate report examines how the world's richest man leveraged his access to the levers of federal power to boost his myriad personal businesses including his electric vehicle company Tesla, aerospace contractor SpaceX, social media platform X, and brain chip firm Neuralink. Musk is leaving his post as a 'special government employee' — a status that limited his stint in the executive branch to 130 days. As Donald Trump made clear in a press conference, where he gave Musk a 'key' to the White House, the billionaire's influence will live on, as will his crusade against his own regulators. Issued by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the report is titled 'Special Interests Over the Public Interest: Elon Musk's 130 Days in the Trump Administration' and features a list of 130 actions by Musk, his companies, and family members that 'raise questions about corruption, ethics, and conflicts of interest.'Musk, of course, was Trump's biggest benefactor in the 2024 campaign, spending nearly $300 million to put Trump and Republican candidates into office. He then camped out at Mar-a-Lago during the presidential transition and moved to Washington with the 47th president. At times appearing to be the nation's true chief executive, Musk commanded the forces of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and sent critical agencies like USAID (the U.S. Agency for International Development) through the 'woodchipper,' likely condemning millions of vulnerable people across the globe to death by preventable diseases. The Warren report is focused on Elon's use of political power to boost his businesses, or secure special benefits — from regulatory relief to rich new contracts — that favor his fortunes and his family. The report clarifies that 'Not every action listed… represents a violation of federal law,' but argues instead that 'Musk has violated norms at an astonishing pace' while engaging in and supporting actions that are 'hurting the American public.' It labels this 'scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution.' The Warren report divides its list into 15 categories, which Rolling Stone can exclusively preview below: The report highlights the time, when Tesla showrooms were increasingly beset by public protests, that Trump turned the White House lawn into a Tesla lot. The report highlights more than 20 instances of Musk or DOGE helping Musk's enterprises secure new contracts on an inside track on rich lines of business. For example, it highlights Rolling Stone's report about how staff at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) were instructed to find 'tens of millions' of dollars for a rich new Starlink contract. As well as a new $100 million NASA contract for SpaceX to launch an asteroid monitoring space telescope. When Trump took office, Musk companies faced federal penalties and enforcement actions totalling up to $2.4 billion, according to the report. Warren highlights CNBC reporting that the federal government has allowed nearly 40 cases against Musk companies to effectively go dormant, while others, including a Department of Justice case against SpaceX for alleged anti-immigrant discrimination in hiring, have been dropped. The report describes how Musk and the administration have targeted agencies with powers to regulate Musk businesses — including 'gutting their staff, throwing sand in the gears of their operations, and embedding DOGE staff loyal to Musk.' A key example of this is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has authority to police Musk as he turns X into a payment platform. 'Delete CFPB,' Musk has posted, and the administration has tried to bring the agency to its knees. (Read Rolling Stone's interview with Warren on this topic.) Musk operates in many highly regulated areas, from launching rockets to biomedical brain implants. The FAA has, under Trump, become a service agency for SpaceX, clearing the way for rocket launches despite frequent catastrophic failures. In Trump's auto tariff battles, the administration announced that cars with 85 percent domestic content were spared the levy — a category that reportedly only includes Teslas. Never before has a presidential megadonor had so much unfettered access to government data, insight, and decisionmakers. The report highlights Musk's role as a dominant participant at Trump cabinet meetings, despite having no cabinet-level post, who was 'privy to upcoming policy changes at the highest level of government,' many of which could boost his bottom line. Musk has been deeply enmeshed, through DOGE, in the HR decisions of the federal government — firing tens of thousands of employees while installing loyalists throughout the bureaucracy. Many of these lackeys now have permanent government gigs, and will be able to carry out Musk-aligned policy without his active direction, including the head of the Federal Communications Commission, which has oversight of radio spectrum needed by Starlink, SpaceX's satellite internet business. The report links Musk to the Trump administration's sudden, curious interest in the cause of white Afrikaaners from South Africa, who have been granted refugee status amid Musk's trumped-up allegations that they face a 'genocide' — even as other truly vulnerable people from around the world are being denied admission to the United States. The report highlights a Wall Street Journal investigation into perceived threats from X execs who intimated that a planned merger between ad conglomerates might face trouble if ad clients didn't ramp up their spending on the social media platform. The report links Musk to the Trump Federal Trade Commission's 'seemingly baseless' investigation into whether Media Matters colluded with advertisers. X sued the watchdog in late 2023, after Media Matters reported that ads on the platform were being served up against 'pro-Nazi' content, leading large brands to suspend campaigns on the platform. The report links Musk's White House influence to favorable provisions of the House budget bill, including funding for the 'Golden Dome,' a space-based missile defense program that seems ready-made for Starlink. Warren's report highlights dozens of deals that Musk companies have inked with countries that are under tariff threat from the administration, as well as Musk accompanying Trump's tour of Persian Gulf countries, where the DOGE chief announced deals of his own — including that Neuralink had inked a deal to begin clinical trials in the United Arab Emirates. The report highlights how Musk's power is translating to deals for family members, including his brother recently inking a deal with Gulf states to mount drone light shows while his dad is reportedly in talks to build a Musk Tower in Dubai. Musk's fruitless effort to finance a conservative takeover of the Wisconsin state Supreme Court is highlighted in the report, as is his call for judges who oppose Trump to be impeached. Despite his pledge of 'maximum transparency' by DOGE, Musk himself has hidden his norms-busting activities behind a veil of secrecy, the report concludes, failing to make public his vast financial holdings, or what if any waivers of federal ethics requirements he may have received. More from Rolling Stone Trump Has 'Broken' Musk, Jon Stewart Roasts Tech Billionaire After White House Departure Crypto Bros Celebrate Themselves at Bitcoin's Most MAGA Convention Yet Trump Tries to Blame Biden for Colorado Attack Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cuomo flip-flops on flip-flop, supports NYC congestion pricing a year after opposing it
Mayoral hopeful Andrew Cuomo brazenly flip-flopped on congestion pricing yet again, saying he now supports the Manhattan toll program he initially fought for – after last year calling for it to be paused. Cuomo insisted in a New York Times interview Tuesday that he not only can't think of any issues he changed his mind on, but his opinion on congestion pricing has never wavered. The former governor had approved the controversial plan to toll vehicles entering Manhattan south of 60th Street, but last year wrote an op-ed for The New York Post urging leaders to pump the brakes on the first-in-the-nation program. Advertisement Andrew Cuomo claimed that his opinion on congestion pricing has never wavered — despite brazenly flip-flopping on the issue. Robert Miller But when asked by The New York Times whether he supports congestion pricing now that it shows signs of success, Cuomo gave a blunt response: 'Yes.' Earlier in the interview, Cuomo echoed the arguments he made in The Post op-ed. He contended his past opposition was rooted in concern that congestion pricing would drive people into unsafe subways. Advertisement 'All I said was, let's study this before we do it in this moment, to make sure people aren't going to say, 'you know what, another reason for me to stay home,'' he said. The apparent flip-flop quickly rankled at least one Democratic operative. 'Andrew Cuomo has no core principles, he'll say whatever it takes to claw his way back into power,' the operative told The Post. 'He's exactly why so many people have lost faith in politics: a flip-flopping wannabe king who ran to the Hamptons when things got tough.'