London dominates England's social mobility league with top 20 places
The top 20 constituencies with the best social mobility in England are all in London, according to research from a leading education charity that underscores the stark regional divide in children's life chances.
In a report published on Thursday, the Sutton Trust has put together an 'opportunity index' by analysing six measures of mobility. These include the share of children on free school meals who achieve passes in GCSE maths and English; who complete a degree by age 22; and who make it into the top 20% of earners by age 28.
The trust finds that all of the top-scoring 20 constituencies on this index, and 42 of the top 50, are in London. The highest-ranked constituency outside the capital is Birmingham Perry Bar, in the West Midlands, in 23rd.
The research shows the dramatic differences in children's prospects, depending on where in England they happen to be born.
Children receiving free school meals in the best-performing constituency, the social security minister Stephen Timms's seat of East Ham, are a startling 30 percentage points more likely to achieve grade 5 in English and maths than their counterparts in the area at the bottom of the list, Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West, represented by Labour's Chi Onwura.
As they go on through life, these same children are three times as likely to complete a degree if they came from Timms's east London seat than they are if they were born in Onwura's Newcastle seat. The latter is one of three of the 10 lowest-scoring constituencies in north-east England.
Nick Harrison, the Sutton Trust's chief executive, said: 'This research paints a startling picture of inequality of opportunity across England. The life chances of disadvantaged young people remain strongly tied to where they grow up.'
The report, which is based on data covering 10 million people over 25 years, also reveals big differences in the likelihood that children from low-income families leave the area they grew up in when they become adults.
Despite the familiar narrative of young people moving to London to seek their fortune, the Sutton Trust finds that the capital is one of two regions, with the east of England, where the highest proportion of children on free school meals go on to move elsewhere, at 13%. That is more than twice the 6% in north-east England who do so.
Anthony Breach, a research director at the Centre for Cities thinktank, said the Sutton Trust's research suggested that aside from London, many English cities are not offering the economic opportunities they could.
'It's striking that only London among our major cities consistently performs the role we'd expect of a big city – driving progression, opportunity and advancement for its residents. This aligns with the evidence that Britain's other big cities are underperforming,' he said.
The Sutton Trust makes a series of policy recommendations for narrowing these regional gaps in social mobility, including incentivising the best teachers to work in disadvantaged schools, and improving financial help for children from low-income families who attend university.
As negotiations between the Treasury and Whitehall departments intensify, the trust also calls on the government to make improving social mobility a guiding principle in the forthcoming spending review.
'Opportunities for social mobility will only be available nationwide if there is a more even spread of economic opportunities across the country,' the report says.
'This should be a sustained effort across government, potentially including greater devolution of powers and reforms to funding for local government, as well as greater investment in infrastructure regionally – including transport, and opportunities for education and training.'
Priya Edwards, a senior policy and advocacy adviser at Save the Children UK, agreed that ministers should be prepared to commit significant resources to improving children's prospects.
'This report shows how children's life chances are sadly limited by both poverty and geography and it should serve as a wake-up call to the UK government,' she said.
'Ministers must act to level the playing field for all children, regardless of where they live. They should start by scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap at the comprehensive spending review on 11 June, or in the forthcoming child poverty strategy.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'High and rising standards are at the heart of the government's mission to break down barriers to opportunity and ensure where you come from does not determine your future success.
'This government has inherited a system with baked-in inequalities, which we're tackling head-on through our plan for change by rolling out free breakfast clubs, improving mental health support, investing over £3bn to support those children who need it most and delivering a rich and broad curriculum so pupils are set up for life, work and the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Teachers balloted for strike action over ‘excessive' workloads
Teachers are being urged to vote for strike action in a bid to send a message to ministers on 'excessive' workloads. Scotland's largest teaching union, the EIS, is launching a consultative ballot for industrial action during its annual general meeting on Friday. The ballot comes in the wake of a survey by the union which revealed more than two-fifths of teachers (44%) work an additional seven unpaid hours in a typical week. The research also found 11.5% of teachers work an extra 15 hours or more per week – the equivalent of two days. EIS general secretary Andrea Bradley said the ballot will highlight the 'pressing need' to deliver on a commitment to cut the time teachers spend in the classroom. The SNP 2021 manifesto pledged to reduce this by 1.5 hours a week – with Ms Bradley insisting action is needed to 'reduce excessive teacher workload'. Speaking ahead of the AGM, which is taking place in Aviemore, the she said: 'This ballot is an opportunity for our members to send a clear message to their employers and the Scottish Government of the need to honour the commitments to tackle excessive teacher workload by reducing weekly class contact time.' Accusing the Scottish Government and local authority leaders in Cosla of failing to deliver the promised reduction in classroom time, she called on union members to vote in favour of industrial action – including strikes. Ms Bradley said: 'Only sending a strong and clear message will compel the Scottish Government and Cosla to finally take action to tackle teacher workload.' She told how 'teachers have waited more than four years' for the time they spend in classes to be reduced, saying in the meantime workload pressures 'continue to soar'. Ms Bradley added: 'This is having a detrimental impact on the health and wellbeing of teachers, with significant consequences for the learning experience of pupils in our schools.' The recent EIS survey revealed the 'scale of the workload demands that are being placed on teachers', she said, adding this showed 'almost half' of those in the profession are working the equivalent of an extra day per week to keep on top of their workload. On the commitment to reduce class contact time by 1.5 hours per week, she said the Scottish Government and Cosla have 'failed even to produce any firm proposals on how to take this forward'. The EIS ballot comes as a second union, the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association (SSTA), is also preparing to hold a consultative survey on strike action on the issue. SSTA general secretary Seamus Searson said: 'The reduction of 90 minutes class contact time was promised by the Scottish Government four years ago and Cosla has baulked at every turn to progress the promise. 'The reduction of class contact time is a small step in addressing teacher workload and the employers have failed to acknowledge the importance of the 90 minutes to teachers. 'SSTA members have reached the end of their patience and now have no option but to resort to taking strike action to force the employers to implement a real benefit for hard pressed secondary school teachers. 'To get to this point shows a lack of respect and understanding by the employers of the challenges teachers are facing to deliver education.' The SSTA said its survey will start in the week of June 16 and run until the end of August. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government will continue to work with unions and Cosla to agree our approach to delivering a reduction in class contact time, which ultimately requires agreement from the whole Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers. 'This is also why we are providing local authorities with an additional £186.5 million to restore teacher numbers, alongside an additional £29 million to support the recruitment and retention of the ASN workforce. 'This funding has been provided on the clear agreement that meaningful progress is made on reducing teacher class contact time.' A Cosla spokesperson said: 'We are aware of the increased pressures across the whole local government workforce and the teaching profession is rightly greatly valued. As we continue to engage with teaching unions on the issue of workload, we have committed, along with Scottish Government, to exploring ways of reducing class contact time. 'The provision of high-quality learning experiences for children and young people depends on the education workforce being adequately supported, resourced, skilled and confident to respond to the learners in front of them. Cosla works closely with trade unions, Scottish Government, and partners, to enable the delivery of this. 'Reducing teachers' class contact time by 1.5 hours a week – equal to almost two weeks per year – will require additional resource, significant advance planning and actions to tackle existing problems such as recruitment and retention in rural areas and shortages of teachers of certain subject areas. There has to be a recognition that achieving the reduction in class contact time by maintaining teacher numbers as pupil numbers gradually decline is a challenge and will take time. 'In addition, councils will have to consider how to maintain other statutory services as the proportion of the salary bill required for teachers increases.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are
On 11 June, the government will unveil its long-awaited spending review, laying out how it wants to spend more than £600bn annually on public services over the next few years. That's about a fifth of the entire British economy. The choices made over funding for the NHS, schools, courts, prisons and much more besides will shape life in the UK in the coming years. It's no exaggeration to say this could be the defining domestic policy moment of this parliament. Rachel Reeves's first budget included a big tax rise and a two-year increase in borrowing to boost spending on public services. For future years, the chancellor has repeatedly reaffirmed her 'ironclad' commitment to borrow only to invest. Such is the dismal state of the public finances that even with tax revenues that are high by historical standards, spending growth in the coming years will be relatively modest. Overall day-to-day departmental spending is set to rise by an average of just 1.2% above inflation over the next three years. This will make the spending review tough. Allocating spending across departments will inevitably mean picking winners and losers. The single most consequential decision will be how much funding to allocate to the NHS. The NHS budget is big – it accounts for 40% of day-to-day spending on public services. That's comfortably more than is spent on schools, universities, the police, prisons and defence combined. For decades, the savings from declining defence spending were effectively ploughed into the health service. Those 'peace dividend' days are gone. The government has already committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of national income. It's unusual for health and defence spending to grow at once – and unheard of for it to happen in a period of low growth and high interest rates. If the government also chooses to prioritise the NHS budget alongside defence, other departments' budgets will see cuts. Consider this scenario: if the government increases defence spending as promised, and opts for a 3.4% annual increase in NHS funding – below the long-term average and far short of the 6% growth seen under Labour in the 2000s – it would probably be enough to hire the staff the government's workforce plan says the NHS needs and deliver improvements to NHS performance before the next election. But the wider implications would be stark: it would require cuts of 1% a year to the budget for all other departments. The government could, of course, allocate less to the NHS. That could jeopardise the promise to substantially reduce hospital waiting times by the next election and to build an 'NHS fit for the future'. But it would free up resources for its other missions to 'break down the barriers to opportunity', 'make Britain a clean energy superpower', deliver 'safer streets' and 'kickstart economic growth'. When funding is tight, more money for a shiny new initiative inevitably means less money for something else. The prime minister noted that achieving the five missions of his government will demand 'relentless focus and prioritisation'. We'll soon find out, when push comes to shove, what this government's priorities are. Some departments, and some ministers, are likely to be disappointed. Once the spending review settlements are revealed, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, may not be the only Labour MP calling for higher taxes to reduce pressure on spending. By autumn, however, disgruntled colleagues could be the least of Reeves's concerns. At the spring statement in March, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was significantly more optimistic about growth prospects than most other forecasters. Since then, global developments have been bad news for the UK's economic outlook. If the OBR downgrades its growth forecast, that could easily wipe out the chancellor's limited wiggle room against her fiscal rules – perhaps several times over. Last November, Reeves was adamant that she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. But unless she gets lucky, she will have to come back with something to avoid a breach of her rules for borrowing. Assuming her fiscal rules remain 'ironclad', Reeves will have three options. She could cut departmental spending, just a few months after settling multiyear spending plans with her cabinet colleagues. She could make further cuts to the social security budget, when there is pressure – not least from some MPs – to do the exact opposite. Or she could raise taxes again to pay for the spending that has already been pledged. It's clear why speculation about potential tax rises will continue. But we should not let speculation about the budget distract us from scrutinising the spending review itself. The government's decisions on how to allocate more than £600bn of spending a year for several years will be of great consequence, whatever happens in the autumn. And, since speculation about the budget will inevitably continue, the discussion should shift from simply how taxes could be tweaked to raise more revenue to how they could be reformed to be less damaging to growth. Delivering higher growth deserves its place as the government's number one mission and should be a central focus across all areas of policy. Reeves is yet to show any interest in tax reform. She is missing an opportunity. With challenging years ahead, we need a government that seizes every opportunity to drive up economic growth. Achieving that mission would make everything else easier. Helen Miller is the incoming director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Waspi campaigners say they have been given green light for High Court challenge
Waspi campaigners say they have cleared a hurdle in their battle for a High Court challenge. The Women Against State Pension Inequality group is seeking a judicial review to force the Government to reconsider its decision to rule out a compensation package for women affected by the way changes to the state pension age were communicated. The campaigners said they have received an update to say that their case is arguable, setting them on course for a court hearing. A previous report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PSHO) suggested compensation ranging between £1,000 and £2,950 could be appropriate for each of those affected. But in December 2024, the Government said that, while it accepted the ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for there being a delay in writing to 1950s-born women, a blanket compensation scheme, which could cost taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified. Waspi campaigners submitted arguments back in February for a legal case challenging the decision not to compensate women. Lawyers for the campaigners argue that the Government's reasons for concluding that people should not receive any remedy are a breach of legal principles. Waspi said it also expects a hearing to consider its application for a costs capping order, so that campaigners would not be forced to pay unknown costs to cover the legal fees should they lose. The group said that it may be forced to withdraw its challenge without this financial safeguard. It is also calling on supporters to help raise further funds for the legal challenge. Waspi chairwoman Angela Madden described the green light in its legal challenge as a 'landmark moment in our campaign'. She said: 'We are grateful for the funds raised so far and understand the country's purse strings are tight, but the Government cannot be allowed to brush this injustice aside.'
