Scientists sound alarm over massive underwater force threatening to accelerate city collapse: 'Potentially double or triple the effects'
Rising sea levels and subsiding shorelines are putting New Zealand's coastal communities at risk.
A new study revealed that human activities heighten and expedite the risks of sinking cities.
As Forbes reported, a group of New Zealand researchers studied how the island's cities and shorelines are sinking. This is concerning because sinking cities may be affected by rising sea levels sooner than previously anticipated.
In New Zealand and globally, sea levels are rising due to our warming climate and melting ice in polar regions. Meanwhile, localized instances of human activity, such as groundwater extraction, land reclamation, and dredging, are causing coastal lands to sink.
Kyoto University researcher Jesse Kearse said these activities can "potentially double or triple the effects of sea-level rise in certain places."
The researchers determined that coastal infrastructure is at risk because of this sinking effect and rising sea levels. In their study, they used satellite-based mapping and radar images to assess the physical properties of surfaces and measure ground deformation.
Focusing on vertical land movement at urban coastal strips between 2018 and 2021, they observed coastal strips decreasing in all of New Zealand's major population centers. Some areas are experiencing subsidence rates of over 15 millimeters per year.
This revelation is significant because billions of people live near coastlines. No coastal city, in New Zealand or elsewhere, is immune to rising sea levels.
With supercharged weather events becoming more common as our climate warms, people living along the coast face considerable danger.
This study also stands out because it highlights humans' impacts on at-risk coastlines. The researchers noted that areas of reclaimed land in New Zealand are particularly vulnerable to the land's stability.
What would you do if natural disasters were threatening your home?
Move somewhere else
Reinforce my home
Nothing
This is happening already
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Land reclamation involves filling water-submerged areas with soil, rock, or other materials to create new land where water once flowed.
The researchers concluded by pointing out many unanswered questions regarding subsidence rates and how long they will persist. They also warned about the risks of future development in coastal areas due to vertical land motion patterns.
Research studies like this one raise public awareness about coastal community risks and the threats of rising sea levels, especially when extreme storms hit.
Fortunately, governments and businesses are working on technologies to adapt and plan ahead.
For example, innovators use predictive artificial intelligence and smart reefs to protect residents from floods. Architecture firms have designed floating homes as practical solutions for people living in flood-prone areas. Meanwhile, officials have developed plans to protect coastal lands by planting mangroves and adding sand piles.
If you live along the coast, there are steps you can take to protect yourself and your home.
Preparing for hurricanes and floods is crucial, so keep a go bag packed if you need to evacuate. To prepare for future power outages, you can install solar panels or sign up for a community solar program. (Solar is also a type of clean energy. In other words, the photovoltaic panels don't generate any troublesome heat-trapping pollution when turning sunlight into power.)
Hurricane-proofing your house by raising it and installing a custom seawall can help as well as reinforcing your home with durable materials to boost its resilience and give you peace of mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
June's Strawberry Moon ushers in best time of year to view the Moon
Known as the Strawberry Moon, the last full Moon of spring rises early Wednesday, beginning the best time of year to enjoy our celestial neighbor. Dr. Tyler Richey-Yowell, a postdoctoral fellow at Lowell Observatory in Arizona, said this is the first Moon to appear this low on the horizon in about a year. June's full Moon is the last of astronomical spring, even though if you ask a meteorologist, summer is already in full swing. "The Moon going across the night sky is always going to be a little lower because, in the summertime into the summer, the Sun goes higher and higher in the sky just because of our orbit. And so the Moon, being completely opposite of that, gets lower and lower," she said. Moon Shot: 7 Tips On How To Photograph The Moon The Strawberry Moon gets its name from the time when the berry is ready for picking, but it also corresponds with the slight hue as the Moon is lower in the sky. "When it spends more of that time in that lower portion of the sky, you're looking through more of Earth's atmosphere, which makes these moons generally look redder and more golden. And also, they appear bigger," Richey-Yowell said. "The atmosphere actually bends some of the light. And so while there's not really any astronomical significance to moons in the summer, we do actually get cooler, bigger, prettier moons in the summer." For some in the northern tier and Southeast, the Strawberry Moon may be especially colorful this year. Saharan dust arriving to Florida and crawling up the Southeast coast can also scatter light in a way that creates vibrant sunrises and sunsets, as well as a tint to the Moon. In the North, wildfire smoke from Canada has reduced air quality but also had the same effect on the sky color. Richey-Yowell said the best time to enjoy the Moon throughout the summer is right after sunset, when the Moon is peeking up over the horizon. During this time, the Moon can appear to have a reddish tint. For the Strawberry Moon on Wednesday, it will be at its biggest and brightest after midnight (Pacific time) and after 3 a.m. (Eastern time). How To Photograph The Moon With Your Phone "If you're a night person, that would be the time to go up and see it," she said. With an earlier time of day to see the Moon in late spring and this summer, it's a good chance to practice photographing our only satellite. If you plan to use a smartphone or camera, Richey-Yowell recommends finding something to stabilize your device. "Turning down the saturation on your phone is typically what I do. The Moon's actually just really good for holding up to a telescope as well," she said. "They also make some really nice like phone holders that you can attach to your own personal telescope." The Strawberry Moon will make good practice for next month. The full Buck Moon appears at its fullest just after 4 p.m. ET on July 11, which will make for a spectacular sunset and article source: June's Strawberry Moon ushers in best time of year to view the Moon
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'
Coastal communities are experiencing excessive flooding — a form of extreme weather — at alarming new rates, and scientists are sounding the alarm about wildly insufficient infrastructure in low-lying urban areas. Researchers from UC Santa Cruz and the United States Geological Survey teamed up to identify novel flood mitigation strategies, citing an urgent need to shore up coastlines, and their joint findings were published in the journal Scientific Reports. "By 2050, the coastal flooding from extreme storms we currently consider once-in-a-lifetime events could occur every other year due to sea level rise," said in their coverage of the study. "Further, the flooding expected today from a once-in-a-lifetime event could occur daily by the end of the century." Coastal habitats like marshes and coral reefs "have been shown to effectively mitigate flood risk," but decades of development eroded those natural protections. "We've built cities and communities and our world under the assumption that these habitats will continue to protect us," explained lead author Rae Taylor-Burns, "and yet we degrade them." Researchers explored horizontal levees to mitigate flood risk in the San Francisco Bay area and found they were up to 30% more effective than traditional levees at mitigating flood risk. Coastal flooding has always occurred, but rising temperatures have made these extreme events more frequent and more deadly. Climate tech investor and journalist Molly Wood has said that "climate isn't weather, and weather isn't climate," likening human-influenced climate impacts to "steroids for weather." "Whatever was already going to happen, like droughts, floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, heat waves, snowstorms, rain — all that is still going to happen," Wood explained. "But when it happens, it's going to be worse." Echoing the study's researchers, she continued. "Also, extreme versions of what used to be normal weather are going to happen more often." Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. According to Climate Central, the "annual frequency of high tide flooding in the U.S. has more than doubled since 2000 — and is projected to more than triple again by 2050 as sea levels continue to rise." Around 30% of Americans live near a coastline, foregrounding an imminent need to identify accessible flood mitigation strategies and make coastal communities more resilient. Actions like installing solar panels are one way to ensure your home is more resilient in the face of natural disasters that could knock out infrastructure — and EnergySage not only offers quotes from trusted local installers, but can also save consumers up to $10,000 on new solar installations. Getting your power from the sun also helps to avoid contributing to the type of pollution that leads to increasing global temperatures. At the study's conclusion, researchers cited previously published findings that supported nature-based flood defenses for both efficacy and costs. They noted that structural properties like vegetation "could reduce levee investment cost by $320 billion on a global scale," adding that previous research "suggests that restoring marsh habitat in front of seawalls" could be far less costly than raising seawalls. "Horizontal levees could be a less expensive way to reduce the risk of levee failure with climate change, as opposed to increasing the height of the levees themselves," Taylor-Burns remarked. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Forbes
18 hours ago
- Forbes
Are We Paying Too Much Attention To Machines?
Are we paying too much attention to machines? As we delve into everything that artificial intelligence can do today, we also run into some questions about what we choose to offer to the technology. In some ways, you could boil this down to talking about the attention mechanism. Stephen Wolfram is a renowned data scientist and mathematician who often talks about the ways that AI curates human attention, or the ways that we can direct it to focus on what's useful to us. Here's a bit of what he said in a recent talk that I wrote about a few weeks ago: 'Insofar as we humans still have a place, so to speak, it's defining what it is that we want to do, and that's something that you can specify that more precisely computationally,' Wolfram said. 'That's how you get to (the answer) that is precisely what we want.' Interested in the intersection of human and AI attention, I typed the following question into Microsoft Copilot: 'are we paying too much attention to machines?' Here are the five fundamental sources that the model used to reply. The first one is from one of our own authors at Forbes, Curt Steinhorst, who asked: how will we keep people at the center of business? 'We seem to believe that we are only one 'life hack' away from limitless productivity, that the skilled use of human focus can be reduced to a productivity system, and that if we simply want it bad enough, we can beat the machines at their own game,' Steinhorst writes. 'But this attitude amounts to a passive indictment of our innate humanity, and it is a problem. We will never catch machines and digital tools in the ways they excel—but there is reason to believe that technology will never catch up to humanity in the ways that we excel. The key is to understand and nurture the differences, rather than pursue the parallels.' The second source Copilot shows is a scientific paper in the International Journal of Information Management that asks: what is it about humanity that we can't give away to intelligent machines? I'm going to quote from the conclusions of the study: 'Humans must retain the role of meaningful, responsible critique of the design and application of AI, and the intelligent machines it can create. Critique is a vital concept that humanity can retain as a means to ensure liberation from intelligent machines. Suppose intelligent machines are used to help shape decision processes in life-changing situations, such as criminal court proceedings, or to aid emergency care first responders in disaster situations. In that case, they should serve only as referees or expert guides and not as decision-makers. It is critical that such machine 'referees' or 'guides' should be subject to constant human critique. Second, a human must be kept in the loop of intelligent machine decision-making processes. This involvement is vital to preserve our ability to systematically reflect on the decisions we make, which ultimately influence our individuality, a central feature of humanism.' I think that's useful, too. The third source is a LinkedIn piece from Shomila Malik noting that the brain looks for information about 4 times per second, and talking about how our human attention is paid. I think this is leading toward the next piece that I'll summarize next. Here, there's sort of an emphasis on prolific media and stimulus 'flooding the zone' and overwhelming our human attention spans. There's an interesting proposition in the fourth link that I found talking about the recent work of pioneers like Ezra Klein. The author also reveals a theory from professor of psychiatry Joel Nigg. In a nutshell, it's that our attention is being degraded through attentional deficits caused by things like a pathogenic environment, inadequate sleep, unhealthy diets, air pollution, lack of physical activity, other health conditions, overwork, excessive stress, early trauma, relationship strains, and smoking cigarettes. In the last of the links at the New York Times, Stephen Hawking is quoted, saying artificial intelligence could be a real danger and explaining the problem that way: 'It could design improvements to itself and outsmart us all,' Hawking theorized. I'll let that comment speak for itself. (Be sure to check out Hawking's words on 'killer machines' and frightening scenarios, and remember, this guy is a renowned scientist.) In a recent talk at Imagination in Action, David Kenny talked about applying lessons from IBM Watson's performance on Jeopardy, and other landmarks of AI design. In general, he noted, we're moving from the era of inductive reasoning, to one of deductive and affective reasoning. He mentioned a weather app giving probabilities in percentages, rather than a clear answer, and the need to prompt engineer in order to get results from LLMs, instead of just accepting whatever they say the first time. A new generation, he said, is generally becoming more trustful of AI for data on medical conditions, relationships, financial strategies, and more. 'There's just been an enormous trust put in this,' he said. 'It's all working for them on a very personalized basis. So we find that there are people getting their own information.' Human interactions, he said, like dating and marriage, are reducing, and people trusting the machines more can be good, or in his words, 'super-dangerous.' '(Humans need to) build critical thinking skills, build interpersonal skills, do things like this that bring them together with each other, spend time with each other in order to take full advantage of the AI, as opposed to ceding our agency to it,' he said. 'So while the last 15 years were largely about technical advances, and there's a lot of technical advances we're going to see today and invest in, I think it's even more urgent that we work on the human advances, and make sure that technology is actually bringing communities back together, having people know how to interact with each other and with the machine, so that we get the best answer.' And then he went back to that thesis on inductive versus deductive reasoning. 'It takes a humility of being able to understand that we're no longer about getting the answer, we're about getting to the next question,' Kenny said. For sure, there's a need to celebrate the human in the loop, and the inherent value of humanity. We can't give everything away to machines. All of the above tries to make some through lines in what we can give away and what we can keep. Maybe it's a little like that Marie Kondo thing, where if it sparks joy, we reserve it for human capability, and if we need help, we ask a machine. But this is going to be one of the balancing acts that we have to do in 2025 and beyond, as we reckon with forces that are, in human terms, pretty darn smart.
