Shreyas Iyer fails in IPL 2025 final, Virat Kohli erupts in ecstatic celebration
Punjab Kings captain Shreyas Iyer chose the wrong moment to falter with the bat. In the IPL 2025 final, the star batter was dismissed for just 1 during a high-pressure chase of 191 against Royal Challengers Bengaluru at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad. Shreyas looked devastated as he walked off after edging behind in the 10th over of the innings.advertisementIyer was undone by a fine delivery from part-time pacer Romario Shepherd, who hit a good length and got the ball to seam away at the last moment. The Punjab skipper offered a tentative poke, and Romario immediately went up in appeal. The on-field umpire had no hesitation in raising his finger. IPL 2025 Final: UpdatesShreyas didn't even consider a review and walked back, disappointment writ large across his face. Punjab were 79 for 3 at the time, slipping into trouble just as the asking rate was beginning to climb.
Understanding the significance of the wicket, Virat Kohli, fielding inside the 30-yard circle, burst into unrestrained celebration. He sprinted towards the pitch and leapt in the air, fist-pumping with Romario Shepherd in a moment of raw emotion.Shreyas had headed into the final after having smashed 87 off 33 in the Qualifier 2 against Mumbai Indians. Iyer, however, was not able to use the momentum in the final, paying the price for a half-hearted approach.Romario strikes GOLD!Massive moment! Sarpanch Shreyas departs and #RCB would look to get on top from this stage!Who takes control from here?LIVE NOW https://t.co/XmOkxMNq4t#IPLFinals #RCBvPBKS on Star Sports Network & JioHotstar pic.twitter.com/gI0P3JdDsz— Star Sports (@StarSportsIndia) June 3, 2025advertisementRCB had earlier put up a disciplined bowling performance after posting 190 on a surface that was two-paced. At the halfway mark, questions were raised as to whether the total would be enough given Punjab's explosive batting line-up.However, RCB's bowlers stepped up. Josh Hazlewood delivered early, removing Priyansh Arya and breaking an opening partnership of 43.Prabhsimran Singh had an off-day, struggling to time the ball before falling to Krunal Pandya, who turned the tide with his crafty spin. The left-arm all-rounder delivered a match-defining spell, choking the scoring and striking at crucial junctures.Josh Inglis was the only Punjab batter who looked fluent, finding boundaries with ease. But with wickets tumbling at the other end, the pressure caught up. Inglis fell for 39 off 23 balls in the 13th over, miscuing a big shot off Krunal.Krunal Pandya finished with figures of 2 for 17 from his four overs, a crucial performance in the final.Earlier, Virat Kohli had faced criticism for playing a restrained knock. The RCB star made 43 off 35 balls, opting for a more cautious approach in the early stages of the innings.Stay updated on IPL 2025 with India Today! Get match schedules, team squads, live score, and the latest IPL points table for CSK, MI, RCB, KKR, SRH, LSG, DC, GT, PBKS, and RR. Plus, keep track of the top contenders for the IPL Orange Cap and Purple Cap. Don't miss a moment!Trending Reel
IN THIS STORY#IPL 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Crowd management is not an optional job
The tragic loss of lives in the recent stampede in Bengaluru — coinciding with the IPL cricket tournament — underscores a disturbing and recurring reality: crowd management and police bandobast (security deployment) are still too often treated as routine, symbolic, and reactive. At times, they are reduced to photo opportunities rather than the collaborative, preventive effort that public safety demands. While each event has unique features, there are certain non-negotiable principles that must govern crowd safety to prevent tragedy. Organisers must be held to higher standards As per licensing rules, no event should be conducted without official permission from the local administration. Organisers are expected to submit a realistic estimate of the expected turnout, along with details of promotional strategies used for mobilisation. This estimate forms the foundation of all safety and security planning. Once submitted, the police department develops its own plan in coordination with other civil agencies, under the leadership of the chief secretary and the director general of police (DGP). Organisers must be fully co-opted into this process and certify the infrastructural readiness of the venue — including holding capacity, structural condition, maintenance, availability of emergency exits, and suitability of location. Free-entry events or overselling tickets often attract unpredictable crowds, increasing the risk of stampedes. Organisers must also provide details on event timing — especially if held after sunset — and submit plans for safety measures during those hours. Adequate signage to guide spectators to exits, restrooms, and medical services is essential. Backup power supply, clean drinking water, sanitation, and clear crowd dispersal protocols are basic requirements. Parking for buses, cars, and two-wheelers must be well-organised with signage and token systems to regulate flow and deter theft. Private security must be hired to supplement police deployment. Surveillance tools such as CCTV systems should be mandatory, and organisers must establish a control room for real-time monitoring with proper logging and preservation of footage. If the event is profit-oriented, the organisers must bear the cost of policing, as per standard protocol. These funds are rightly routed to police welfare. Police bandobast While organisers bear the initial burden of preparation, the ultimate responsibility for law and order lies with the political leadership and civil administration. Planning begins at police headquarters, where senior officers coordinate with sister agencies — municipal bodies, fire departments, medical teams, and disaster response units. This integrated effort must be led by the chief secretary. Manpower needs are assessed based on the event's nature, location, and expected crowd size. Venues should be mapped and divided into manageable sectors, each under the charge of designated officers as per an official, written deployment plan. Every officer must receive clear verbal and written briefings outlining their duties, assigned positions, and key points of contact. Importantly, potential 'X-factor' scenarios — such as sudden surges, VIP movements, weather disruptions, or technical failures — must be anticipated and planned for. Contingency planning is not a luxury; it is an operational necessity. Senior officers must ensure seamless coordination with political leadership, especially for high-profile or sensitive events. However, they must also retain professional autonomy when it comes to enforcing safety norms. Any directive that compromises crowd safety should be firmly resisted. Breakdowns in communication between top-level commanders and ground-level personnel are among the most dangerous and common causes of failure during large events. This gap must be eliminated through continuous updates, situational awareness, and robust feedback loops during the event. Who pays the price when systems fail? These protocols are not theoretical — they are drilled into police officers during training. So why are they often ignored when it matters most? In the case of the IPL tragedy, both political pressure and commercial interest appear to have played a role. Truth will emerge with time, with the hurried announcement of suspension of the police commissioner. Whatever the cause, the result is the same: ordinary citizens pay with their lives, while VIPs remain protected in cushioned zones, issuing statements and announcing ex gratia payments — not from their own pockets, but from the public exchequer. Time for structural accountability The ongoing inquiry must answer key questions- was the required application for conducting the event submitted?Were red flags raised by the police ignored? Who overruled safety objections — and why? We must demand accountability. Law and order is not a discretionary favour to the public — it is a core duty of the state. Public safety is what the police and civil administration are trained, recruited, and paid to ensure. Tragedies at public events are not 'accidents' if they were predictable and preventable. They are institutional failures — of planning, of enforcement, and sometimes, of courage. It is time we asked: Who failed? And who paid the price? And perhaps it is time to name and shame — not out of vindictiveness, but in pursuit of genuine accountability and reform. (The writer, India's first female IPS officer, is former lieutenant governor of Puducherry)
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Major stadium disasters over the years - a timeline of tragic incidents in sport
Royal Challengers Bengaluru's maiden Indian Premier League title triumph turned tragic when 11 people lost their lives in a stampede during victory celebrations outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru. The deceased had gathered around the stadium, waiting for entry inside to catch a glimpse of the winning RCB team, but the uncontrollable crowd resulted in the fatalities as several scores of people got injured. There have been similar tragic incidents in sport involving fans across countries, either caused by a stampede, clashes with the police, or structural collapses inside a stadium. Happy Valley Racecourse fire (1918) More than a century ago, Hong Kong witnessed a horrific fire at the Happy Valley Racecourse which claimed more than 600 lives. Several accounts of the tragedy online suggest that it was caused when the stands at the club, made largely of bamboo and wood, collapsed and caught fire after coming in contact with food stalls at the venue. Estadio Nacional disaster (1964) Lima was hosting Argentina in an Olympic qualifying football match. Argentina was leading when an equaliser was disallowed by the referee. This sparked spectators throng the field in anger which saw the local police resort to tear gas. According to The Guardian, at least 263 people, including women and children, lost their lives. Hillsborough disaster (1989) One of the most fatal stadium incidents in Britain's history, the Hillsborough disaster took place in April 1989 during an FA Cup semifinal match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest. It occurred when thousands of fans, trying to enter the stadium, were asked to wait in a small waiting pen. Due to paucity of space and overcrowding, 97 people lost their lives, many due to suffocation. Indonesia stadium tragedy (2022) At least 174 people died at an Indonesian football stadium when thousands of angry home fans invaded the pitch and police responded with tear gas that triggered a stampede. The tragedy in the city of Malang, which also left 180 injured, was one of the world's deadliest sporting stadium disasters. Arema FC supporters at the Kanjuruhan stadium stormed the pitch after their team lost 3-2 to the visiting team and bitter rival, Persebaya Surabaya. Police, who described the unrest as 'riots', said they tried to force fans to return to the stands and fired tear gas after two officers were killed. Liverpool parade (2025) Several Liverpool supporters were recently severely injured when a van rammed into them during celebrations surrounding the team winning England's Premier League this season for a record-tying 20th top-flight title. As the parade was wrapping up, a minivan turned down a cordoned-off street just off the parade route and ploughed into the sea of fans wrapped in their red Liverpool scarves, jerseys and other memorabilia. A video on social media showed the van strike a man, tossing him in the air, before veering into a larger crowd, where it ploughed a path through the group and pushed bodies along the street before coming to a stop. According to BBC, more than 100 people were left injured.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
This player got Rs 107500000 for bowling just three overs in IPL 2025, his name is.....
Lucknow Super Giants captain and wicketkeeper batsman Rishabh Pant and Kolkata Knight Riders batsman Venkatesh Iyer are being criticized a lot. People are criticizing them fiercely during the IPL and even after this tournament, because these players got huge amounts from IPL teams, but their performance was very poor. If you look, you will forget the performance of Rishabh Pant and Venkatesh Iyer, because there is also a player who has got huge amount for bowling just a few overs. In fact, Rishabh Pant became the most expensive player of IPL, who got crores of rupees from Lucknow Super Giants. At the same time, Venkatesh Iyer was among the players sold at the highest price in the history of this league. We all saw how bad the performance of both of them was. Pant scored less runs than expected throughout the season and Venkatesh Iyer could also score very limited runs. However, there is one bowler who got crores of rupees for bowling just a few overs. Actually, this bowler is none other than T Natarajan, who was bought by Delhi Capitals in the IPL mega auction for Rs107500000, but this bowler got a chance to play in only two matches. In one of these matches, bowling was not required because the match was washed out due to rain. He got to bowl in one match, in which he bowled only a few overs out of his quota of overs and conceded a lot of runs. He did not get any wicket either. In this way, this bowler proved to be the most expensive for Delhi Capitals. T Natarajan's performance was completely opposite to expectations. The expectations with which Delhi Capitals had spent such a huge amount were not fulfilled at all, which raised questions on the team's strategy and selection process. However, the IPL rules state that the percentage of matches you play in the league phase is the percentage of money you get.
