logo
Jersey eastern cycle path won't be like west, minister says

Jersey eastern cycle path won't be like west, minister says

BBC News2 days ago

It would be difficult for a cycle path in the east of the island to replicate the cycle tracks connecting western parishes to town, Jersey's Minister for Infrastructure has said.A recent freedom of information request revealed the States of Jersey has spent nearly £2.5m funding an Eastern Cycle Network.Constable Andy Jehan said recently this money has been spent on "steady improvements" to the Gorey part of the cycle path, including new signs.He said work on the Eastern Cycle Network was "progressing well" but acknowledged there was "more to do".
'Safe routes'
Previous governments had hoped a cycle track would extend from the east of the island to the centre of town.In the west of the island, there is an equivalent traffic-free path that travels along the south coast from St Aubin into St Helier.Jehan said the government was focusing on identifying safe routes for people to cycle on as part of an eastern cycle route.He said: "In the longer term, when we look at the sea coast defences then we will be able to do something more substantial. "In the short term we are looking to find ways where we can encourage people to use quiet roads and lanes to get from A to B."He said the infrastructure department was currently working with Grouville and St Saviour's parish road committees to make it easier for people to get from Gorey to St Saviour's school.He said it had also put up signs and made it easier to cycle on Maupertuis Lane.
In the 2024 Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, 8% of people who responded said they cycled to work. This was a 2% increase from the year before.
Aaron Lappage, who runs a bike shop in St Helier, said he doesn't think much work has been done on the eastern cycle route in Jersey.He said it was easier for commuters to get into town from the west of the island than those based in the east.There should be more, quieter routes for cyclist cycling from the eastern parishes into St Helier, he added.He also suggested that the two roads from St Helier to the east, La Route du Fort and the coast road, each be made one-way. One travelling into town, the other travelling out."We have too many car on the road and that's the thing," he said."In Europe, you get a lot of civil planning being done around the bicycle first. The car doesn't have that first priority, cycling and walking does - that's where you can make a safer network."
Peter Hargreaves, a keen cyclist who lives in Grouville, said "not nearly enough" has been done on the Eastern Cycle Network.He said there was not enough space in the east of the island to create a separate cycle path, so the government should focus on connecting parish by-roads and lanes.He also said speed limits on parish roads should be reduced to keep cyclists safe."The injury rate here on the roads is worse even than the UK, it's atrocious, it's appalling and it is unacceptable," he said."People are forced off the road by injuries from being cyclists."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project

The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump — who canceled nearly $1 billion in federal dollars for the project in his first term — said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' California Democratic U.S. Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff called the administration's announcement a 'devastating' blow for 21st century transportation and an effort to punish a heavily Democratic state that didn't support the Republican president in the election. 'High-speed rail is the future of transportation with the potential to bring customers to new businesses, businesses to new employees and to connect communities hundreds of miles away with affordable and faster transit,' they said in a joint statement.

Will Miliband deliver higher energy prices but still not hit net zero?
Will Miliband deliver higher energy prices but still not hit net zero?

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Will Miliband deliver higher energy prices but still not hit net zero?

Ed Miliband is at odds with the Chancellor over how much money his department will receive in the rest of this parliament. Rachel Reeves is finalising her spending plans for the next four years, to be announced next week, and has told her colleagues that they will not all get what they want. Indeed, apart from protected budgets like the NHS and an increase in defence spending, paid for out of the overseas aid budget, all Whitehall ministries face a hit if the Chancellor is to avoid putting up taxes. But Mr Miliband is in a quandary because he has pledged to decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030. His difficulty is that this timetable lacks any credibility. A report from the House of Lords industry committee says it will require 'building more energy generation and network infrastructure at a faster pace than Great Britain has managed in recent years'. The committee suggests Mr Miliband could make his sums work through so-called 'zonal pricing'. Peers say this would enable better use of existing capacity and reduce the amount of grid – ie pylons and other connectors – thereby circumventing planning battles in the countryside. This would involve splitting the single energy market into regions with the price determined by supply and demand within each area. It would mean increasing bills in London, the South East and the Midlands, where renewables are in short supply, while they would fall in Scotland because of its plentiful wind farms. The likelihood, therefore, is that Mr Miliband will miss his targets while putting up the electricity bills of millions. That should go down well at the next election

Major M5 project 'unlocks' thousands of homes at J10 Gloucester
Major M5 project 'unlocks' thousands of homes at J10 Gloucester

BBC News

time4 hours ago

  • BBC News

Major M5 project 'unlocks' thousands of homes at J10 Gloucester

Thousands of new homes could be built thanks to major improvements to a motorway junction. It was announced on Wednesday that development consent had been granted to a £229m project at Junction 10 of the M5 near Gloucester. Currently drivers can only access the M5 northbound from the junction, but the redevelopment will see access granted on and off the major route in all directions. The plans also include a new road linking Junction 10 to west Cheltenham, and the widening of the A4019 Tewkesbury Road. Leader of Gloucestershire County Council Lisa Spivey told BBC Radio Gloucestershire she was "absolutely thrilled" the work was going ahead. "There's been a lot of work on this and on this and we see this as a real key milestone in unlocking the fabulous potential here in Gloucestershire," she added, explaining that it could also bring new job opportunities, including in cyber and AI. As well as upgrades to the road network the money is also planned to fund flood mitigation measures and "active travel" facilities. The scheme has been funded by the government's housing infrastructure fund, alongside developers whose planned sites are set to benefit from improved links, with Gloucestershire County Council in charge. Rebecca Marshall, a senior project manager at National Highways - which is partnering with the council on the development - said: "This scheme will create smoother and safer journeys for all and improve travel times in the area. "It will also unlock housing and business development opportunities, as well as improving access to and from the motorway for emergency services. Public information events are set to be held during the summer, with construction getting underway from spring 2026. Completion, the council said, is expected in 2028.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store