logo
Court finds impeached judge John Hlophe unfit to serve on JSC

Court finds impeached judge John Hlophe unfit to serve on JSC

The Citizen2 days ago

The court set aside a decision by the National Assembly last July to endorse the recommendation of the MK party to have Hlophe serve as one of its six Parliamentarians.
Former Judge President and MK party Member of Parliament (MP) John Hlophe has been dealt a blow after the Western Cape High Court ruled that Parliament's decision to appoint the impeached to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) was unconstitutional.
The ruling follows legal challenges brought by Freedom Under Law, Corruption Watch, and the DA, who argued that appointing an impeached judge to the JSC threatened judicial independence.
The challenge against the impeached former judge succeeded with costs.
Judgement
The Western Cape High Court found Parliament violated the Constitution by designating Hlophe to take up a seat on the Commission because as a previously impeached judge who breached his judicial oath, was found to be unfit to continue serving as a judge which undermines the integrity and compromises the legitimacy of any Judicial Services Commission (JSC) process he may be involved in to appoint further judges.
The court found that the Judiciary is 'essential to the maintenance of constitutional democracy.'
'It plays an important role in our country's constitutional balance of powers.
'The National Assembly failed to properly exercise its discretion, thereby compromising the integrity of the judiciary. Appointing an impeached judge to the JSC undermines the very body entrusted with upholding judicial integrity and accountability,' the judgement read.
ALSO READ: MK Party calls decision to bar John Hlophe from JSC a 'lynching'
Costs
The court declared that the National Assembly may not designate Hlophe to serve on the JSC in terms of section 17 (1)(h) of the Constitution.
'Dr Mandiakayise John Hlophe and the Umkhonto Wesiwe Party are ordered to pay the applicants costs, including the costs reserved in Part A, on an attorney and client scale, including the costs of two counsel on Scale C'.
DA 'victory'
In December 2024, the same court dismissed John Hlophe's leave to appeal an interim order preventing him from being a member of the JSC.
DA federal chair Helen Zille said the Western Cape High Court order to bar an impeached judge from serving on the JSC is a 'victory for the rule of law, and the Constitution.'
'The Judicial Services Commission must play its role as an interviewing and disciplinary body for the judicial arm of Government through members who are themselves fit and proper and above reproach.
'The judgment of the High Court stresses that 'public confidence in the judiciary's composition and administration of justice is vital' – a sentiment with which the DA firmly agrees,' Zille said.
ALSO READ: Hlophe's JSC gig halted after court ruling
Impeachment
Hlophe, who became the first judge in the country's history to be impeached, was elected in July 2024 to serve on the JSC, a body that appoints judges and regulates their ethical and professional conduct in South Africa.
In April 2021, the Judicial Conduct Tribunal found Hlophe guilty of gross misconduct. The decision was confirmed by the JSC, which recommended that parliament impeach him. He was impeached in February after a vote in parliament.
Hlophe's conviction resulted from his attempts to unlawfully influence two judges of the Constitutional Court, judges Bess Nkabinde and Chris Jafta, in 2008 to rule in favour of Jacob Zuma in cases before them.
NOW READ: AfriForum makes progress in a case to get Hlophe kicked off JSC

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City of Cape Town adopts controversial motion calling for policing devolution
City of Cape Town adopts controversial motion calling for policing devolution

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

City of Cape Town adopts controversial motion calling for policing devolution

Mayoral Committee Member for Safety and Security JP Smith Bongani Maqungwana, Mzwakhe Mqavashe and Councillor Yusuf Mohamed during Wednesday's Safety and Security Portfolio Committee briefing on the motion calling for the devolution of policing in the Western Cape. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Media The City of Cape Town's Safety and Security Portfolio Committee has adopted a motion calling for the devolution of targeted policing powers from the national government. The motion further mandates that, if negotiations through the Intergovernmental Relations Framework (IRF) fail to yield results, the City Manager should initiate legal adjudication to secure these powers through the courts. The document presented to the committee states: 'If the formal process through the Intergovernmental Relations Framework fails to achieve outcomes, that the City Manager proceeds to begin an adjudication process through the courts to devolve policing powers, thereby empowering the City of Cape Town with investigating powers to assist the SAPS adequately in addressing the scourge of gun violence.' This comes amid ongoing concerns over gang violence, extortion, and the effectiveness of policing in the metro. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The motion was presented by Democratic Alliance (DA) Councillor Yusuf Mohamed and seconded by United Democratic Movement (UDM) Councillor Bongani Maqungwana. It calls for a formal request to the national government to devolve specific policing functions to the City, including investigative powers for gang-related crimes, drug trafficking, extortion, and firearm offences, as well as crime intelligence and forensic testing of firearms. 'We're not calling for full policing powers, but for targeted, urgent powers that enable the City to fill the gap left by SAPS,' said Mohamed. 'The Constitution already allows for this under Section 99, and we have shown that with the right resources and accountability, we can get results.' Councillor Mzwakhe Nqavashe, Chairperson of the committee, said communities were struggling under the weight of violent crime and lawlessness. 'Our communities are plagued by crime at all levels, and it is clear that more is needed – from the South African Police Service and the City. The situation is untenable as our residents continue to live in fear, children cannot venture outside, and criminals run our streets.' The City has, in recent years, expanded its investment in crime prevention through the Law Enforcement Advancement Plan (LEAP), the establishment of the Metro Police Gang and Drug Task Team, and increased use of surveillance technologies. Nqavashe said these efforts required formalised powers to be more effective. 'We can contribute in tackling crime in our city and in giving an answer to the victims... especially on firearms, which are circulating at an alarming rate.' The motion also recommends that national government formalise the work of the technical task team created under the 2024 Safety and Security Cooperation Agreement, which was signed at Erica Park in Belhar by President Cyril Ramaphosa, Minister Senzo Mchunu, and Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis. The agreement included nine workstreams based on the Safe Cities framework. Alderman JP Smith, Mayoral Committee Member for Safety and Security, said progress on the workstreams had been slow. 'I still quibbled to the minister... that we must set 31 December as a deadline – a Christmas present for citizens. But now we're almost a year in with no progress.' Smith said the City did not receive real-time crime intelligence from SAPS, which impacted the effectiveness of its operations. 'We only see crime stats months later – it's a history lesson, not a tool for public safety.' He also noted the growing impact of extortion on City operations. 'The contractors are saying, 'we're not safe'.' Smith said over 400 officers were now escorting service teams. 'We are now at the point where every service team may need a police escort. That doubles our operational cost. It's unsustainable.' He said the City had assisted in certain kidnapping cases but was still limited in its scope. 'I cannot go to a public meeting without someone raising this. And I'm tired of telling people saying 'it's not within our powers'.' The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) opposed the motion. Councillor Banzi Dambuza said: "We are against the devolution of policing powers to the City. The DA has proven that they are not able to deal with issues of crime. They are utilising this as a bargaining chip.' He added, 'The City came with a budget that will give six law enforcement personnel per ward, whereas they know that the major issue is within black and coloured areas. "The DA has failed to deal with gangsterism, extortion, and any other issue related to crime. As the EFF we are anti the move of SAPS going to the City, who are entering the position of taking under the wing, making sure they use the power which will be abused; misused and not used to the benefit of our poorest of the poorest.' GOOD Party councillor and Caucus Whip Jonathan Cupido also expressed concerns about the proposal. 'As GOOD, we do not oppose decentralisation. There is a compelling argument for bringing decision-making closer to communities, especially where services are failing. But to suggest that devolving select policing functions will resolve Cape Town's crisis of violent crime, without simultaneously addressing the root causes of that violence, is dangerously misleading,' he said. Between January and March 2025, 1,068 people were murdered in the Western Cape, with 81% of those killings taking place in Cape Town. Gang-related killings in the City accounted for 197 of the 240 gang murders recorded nationally during that period. Cupido said, 'These are the outcomes of systemic failure. A result of entrenched poverty, youth unemployment, addiction, and the spatial legacy of apartheid that continues to shape life in the Cape Flats. These are the conditions in which gangs thrive, not because of a lack of devolved powers, but because we continue to treat crime as a policing problem rather than a social one.' The motion will be tabled at the next full Council meeting for formal adoption.

‘Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs
‘Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

‘Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs

Dr Nkabane said she was fully engaged in parliamentary sessions, despite videos circulating of her allegedly chewing gum. A spotlight has been cast on some bad manners that South African parliamentarians display while serving their constituencies in the National Assembly. This comes after ANC MP and Minister for Higher Education and Training, Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, shocked the country this week as she participated in a Q&A session in a committee on Higher Education and Training while chewing what appears to be bubble gum. Following some backlash from the public, the minister moved quickly to explain why she was chewing. 'I spent the entire morning & most of the afternoon in the portfolio committee meeting, engaging with MPs on matters affecting higher education & training. 'The chair gave members permission to eat while proceedings continued. I was present, committed to answering questions,' she said on her X account. Nkabane is not the first minister to carry herself inappropriately during a parliamentary session. A few years ago, former EFF MP Mbuyiseni Ndlozi confronted the then minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane for sleeping in parliament. At the time, it was described as 'unparliamentary'. Theo Neethling, a political analyst, told The Citizen that South African politicians should be careful not to send a negative perception of public servants. This could manifest as sleeping, chewing gum, or disengaging while on duty. MPs must have high standards 'As elected representatives, parliamentarians are expected to uphold the highest standards of conduct and serve as role models for the public. 'Their behaviour not only reflects on their individual commitment, but also directly influences public trust and the perceived legitimacy of democratic institutions. 'By consistently demonstrating professionalism—especially Cabinet ministers—they contribute to a culture of accountability and foster confidence in political processes and governance,' he said. Neethling said he believes chewing gum in parliament is not acceptable. 'While I see this as unacceptable, I do not believe the minister needs to issue a formal apology. 'At the same time, it may be appropriate for the chief whip of her party to reinforce expectations around professional behaviour. He might remind all members of his party that chewing gum, eating, or otherwise displaying informal conduct during parliamentary sessions is inappropriate and does not uphold the dignity of parliament,' he said. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends US trip amid economic criticism during Q&A Social media reaction Meanwhile, on X, some users were disturbed by a circulating clip of Nkabane chewing during a parliamentary session. 'Zero tolerance for leaders who think they can get away with arrogance. We don't need nor want Trumpism. 'Make Minister Nobuhle Nkabane go back on live TV and answer the question posed,' said Annika Langa. Former DA MP Phumzile van Damme said she was also disturbed by the minister's behaviour. 'This rubbed me the wrong way in a major way. Is it just me? Is chewing gum in any professional setting while answering questions acceptable? In parliament? It's a deliberate act to express 'IDGAF.' It's a middle finger,' she said. NOW READ: Was Ramaphosa heckling EFF's payback for White House embarrassment?

MK proposes major constitutional changes: land, elections, compulsory military service
MK proposes major constitutional changes: land, elections, compulsory military service

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

MK proposes major constitutional changes: land, elections, compulsory military service

The MK Party's proposed constitutional amendments seek to reclaim land, recognize indigenous languages, and prioritize South African citizens, framing the Constitution as a transformative tool for justice and sovereignty. Image: Tumi Pakkies/Independent Media The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has submitted a comprehensive set of proposed constitutional amendments to the Constitutional Review process for 2025 that will see changes to how South Africa elects its leaders, land redistribution, a state bank and compulsory military service. The party says its proposals aim to "affirm national sovereignty" and reframe South Africa's Constitution as a "transformation document which puts the interests of the citizens first and addresses historical injustices committed against the indigenous majority." According to MK Party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela, 'South Africa belongs to all its citizens, united in our diversity.' This revised clause sets the tone for the rest of the proposals, which the party frames as citizen-centred and de-colonial in nature. Key among the proposed amendments is the revision of Section 25 of the Constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation. The MK Party argues the current framework protects the property rights of the beneficiaries of "colonial and apartheid land theft" and forces the state to compensate for stolen land. The land issue remains deeply contentious in South Africa and has drawn international attention. This comes after President Donald Trump controversially claimed there was a genocide in South Africa. This claim resurfaced when a second, small group of white Afrikaners quietly arrived in the US under Trump's offer to resettle them amid false claims of white genocide and persecution. IOL reported that during a high-level meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa last month, Trump asserted that he had received numerous complaints about the treatment of Afrikaners, alleging brutal murders and land seizures. These claims were widely criticised by the South African government as unfounded and inflammatory. The MK Party also wants to introduce direct presidential elections, giving voters the power to elect the president outside party structures, without abolishing party-based processes. Language inclusion is another focal point. The MK Party proposes that Khoi and San Nama languages be officially recognised, aiming to safeguard indigenous heritage. The party also proposes enshrining the right to full employment, rather than just access to job opportunities. In the realm of marriage, the MK Party seeks to constitutionally differentiate traditional marriages from other unions, classifying the latter as civil unions while maintaining their full legal protections. In terms of public services, the party proposes prioritising South African citizens ' access to healthcare, housing, and education. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Earlier this week ActionSA's parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, said his party also seeks to amend sections of the Bill of Rights to limit the state's obligation to non-citizens. Trollip said: 'The current universal application of Section 26 has led to unintended consequences,' referencing municipal housing pressures. He further cited health clinics in Johannesburg reporting that over 70% of patient files belong to foreign nationals and that court-ordered school enrolments are straining education resources. The MK Party also proposes restricting citizenship rights to those born of two South African citizen parents and limiting voting rights to individuals with only South African citizenship, citing a need to "ensure patriotism and allegiance to the South African Republic." The party wants to introduce term limits for ministers, premiers, and mayors to promote accountability. It proposes relocating Parliament from the Western Cape to align with the executive and judiciary, arguing this move will harmonise governance structures. In line with promoting national identity and discipline, the party calls for compulsory military service for citizens aged 18 to 25. Another major shift proposed is the nationalisation of strategic mineral resources and the creation of a sovereign wealth fund to manage and distribute the nation's mineral wealth equitably. The MK Party also supports establishing a state bank with constitutional authority to print currency, which it says will contribute to the decolonisation of the economy and end the monopoly of white capital. The party further proposes realigning Chapter Nine institutions by merging the Office of the Public Protector with the Special Investigating Unit and elevating the National Prosecuting Authority into a Chapter Nine institution. It says these changes will improve the functionality and coordination of oversight institutions. 'These amendments seek to strengthen a citizen-centred constitutional dispensation to forge a constitutional arrangement that puts the citizens first,' said Ndhlela. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store