logo
‘Polygraph finished, passed on all fronts': Hans Niemann claims ‘lie-detector' test failed to prove over-the-board cheating

‘Polygraph finished, passed on all fronts': Hans Niemann claims ‘lie-detector' test failed to prove over-the-board cheating

Indian Express08-05-2025

American Grandmaster Hans Niemann claimed on Wednesday that he has undergone a lie detector 'Polygraph' test, as challenged by Russian GM Daniil Dubov and 'passed it on all fronts' as the test failed to prove any over-the-board (OTB) cheating done by him.
Announcing on X, he wrote, 'Polygraph finished, passed on all fronts. Have you ever cheated over the board? No Verdict: True. I think it's time for a rematch with Dubov. I'll be in Moscow again in 2 weeks!'
Polygraph finished, passed on all fronts.
Have you ever cheated over the board? No
Verdict: True. I think it's time for a rematch with Dubov. I'll be in Moscow again in 2 weeks!
— Hans Niemann (@HansMokeNiemann) May 7, 2025
Niemann also called for a rematch against Dubov and said 'chess always speaks for itself.'
In another post, he wrote, 'Mental gymnastics of my detractors: 'You refused the polygraph that proves everything' Then switching to 'polygraphs are pseudoscience this proves nothing'. Some people will always twist everything to fit their perspective. The only constant is that the chess always speaks for itself.'
Niemann was supposed to undergo a lie-detecting polygraph test after losing an 18-game blitz match against Dubov. Niemann had challenged Dubov to a showdown in Russia to settle their World Rapid and Blitz dispute, with the condition that the loser had to answer one question with a polygraph test.
In March, Niemann faced Dubov and lost the 18-game challenge by a margin of 8.5-9.5, resulting in him facing the polygraph test.
This came after Dubov's 'no show' at the World Rapid and Blitz Championship against Niemann, citing that he fell asleep.
Following the incident, Niemann extended an open challenge to Dubov. 'Happy to play Dubov in a blitz match under ANY conditions. I will pay for his travel/accommodation and offer a $10,000 reward to a charity of his choice if he wins,' Niemann had posted on X.
Dubov accepted the challenge after Niemann's quarterfinal loss to Norway's Magnus Carlsen but with specific conditions.
In an Instagram post, Dubov proposed a lie detector test for Niemann. 'I'm ready to play, under the following conditions: You agree to a lie detector test with a trained professional… Test to feature only questions about cheating, with the results to be communicated to the community at large. If the test comes out clean, I will admit my decision was rash and play a 24-game blitz match against you, 8 games a day, $2,000 per point,' Dubov wrote.
Later, Magnus Carlsen added fuel to the controversy by suggesting that Dubov's absence may have been deliberate to 'prove a point.' That came amid lingering tensions after Carlsen accused Niemann of cheating in 2022. Although Carlsen later retracted his claims following a $100 million defamation lawsuit from Niemann.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'NBA stars will be forever stained': Stephen A. Smith torches today's players as league makes last-ditch effort to save All-Star Weekend
'NBA stars will be forever stained': Stephen A. Smith torches today's players as league makes last-ditch effort to save All-Star Weekend

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'NBA stars will be forever stained': Stephen A. Smith torches today's players as league makes last-ditch effort to save All-Star Weekend

Image via Garrett Ellwood/ Getty Images The NBA's annual All-Star Game, once a midseason spectacle fans eagerly awaited, is now teetering on the edge of irrelevance. As viewership declines and player participation grows more passive, the league is scrambling to revive the tradition. In a bold pivot, Commissioner Adam Silver confirmed that the 2026 NBA All-Star Game will adopt a new U.S. vs. World format. But some, including outspoken ESPN personality Stephen A. Smith, warn this could be the league's final shot before pulling the plug on the entire weekend. NBA unveils bold U.S. vs. World format for 2026 All-Star Weekend as Stephen A. Smith slams player effort amid rising backlash When Adam Silver revealed the latest change in format during a recent interview, the timing wasn't surprising. The All-Star Game , which once thrived on competitive fire and entertainment value, has slowly devolved into a glorified shootaround. Over the past decade, the NBA has tried nearly everything—from team captains drafting their squads to mini-tournament concepts—hoping something would reignite player intensity and bring back fan excitement. Now, the 2026 edition is expected to pit American stars against top international talent. With the NBA's global presence stronger than ever, it's a format that could spark fresh intrigue. But the real hurdle remains unchanged: getting players to actually compete. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo Image via X Stephen A. Smith didn't hold back. Speaking on ESPN shortly after the announcement, he warned, 'If this doesn't work, I think you're going to see the NBA do away with All-Star weekend. And this era of players will forever be stained for the rest of their lives because All-Star weekend was banished because of a lack of effort.' Stephen A. proclaims 'this is the last hope' for NBA All-Star weekend to SURVIVE 👀 | First Take Smith's comment hits at a deeper issue—today's players treat the All-Star break as a vacation instead of a stage to compete. And while the criticism isn't new, it's becoming harder to ignore. Athletes understandably want to avoid injury in an exhibition, but fans are also demanding more than half-speed highlights and uncontested dunks. The lack of effort isn't just a perception—it's visible. Defense is nonexistent, ratings are falling, and excitement is fading. The league hopes this new national pride format will recapture some of the energy seen in global competitions like the Olympics and the FIBA World Cup. Still, there's no guarantee this new format alone will fix the disconnect between fan expectations and player priorities. The 2026 All-Star Weekend—location still to be announced—will likely determine whether the event survives or gets shelved entirely. Also Read: 'A lot closer than people think': NBA legend Magic Johnson fires off bold warning to Oklahoma City Thunder not to underestimate Indiana Pacers ahead of NBA Finals Game 1 The NBA is betting big on a format overhaul to breathe life back into a fading tradition. But as Stephen A. Smith bluntly warned, if this change flops, the All-Star Game could soon become a memory. With 2026 looming, the pressure is now on the players to prove it still matters.

"Caught with red hands": Shashi Tharoor on evidence of Pakistan's involvement in Pahalgam attack
"Caught with red hands": Shashi Tharoor on evidence of Pakistan's involvement in Pahalgam attack

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

"Caught with red hands": Shashi Tharoor on evidence of Pakistan's involvement in Pahalgam attack

Washington DC [US], June 5 (ANI): Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who is leading an all-party delegation to the United States on Thursday, addressed questions about Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack, stating that India had convincing evidence but was not asked to provide it by any country. He said this while responding to his son, Ishan's, questions about whether any country had asked the delegation for evidence of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack at an event organised by the Council on Foreign Relations. Tharoor highlighted Pakistan's 37-year history of terror attacks accompanied by denials, citing examples like the Mumbai attacks and Osama bin Laden's safe house in Pakistan. He said, 'There were 3 particular reasons-- The first is that we've had a 37-year pattern of repeated terror attacks from Pakistan, accompanied by repeated denials. The Americans haven't forgotten that Pakistan didn't know, allegedly, where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a Pakistani safe house right next to an army camp in a Cantonment city. That's Pakistan. Mumbai attacks- They denied having anything to do with it. One of the terrorists was captured alive. His name, his identity, and his address are in Pakistan. Everything was revealed under interrogation. He told us where he was trained and what was done.' Tharoor further emphasised that Pakistan's past actions demonstrate its willingness to dispatch terrorists while denying involvement until caught. 'The US intelligence, as well as ours, recorded the chilling voice of the Pakistani handler giving minute-by-minute instructions to the killers in Mumbai, telling them where to go, and they were monitoring Indian TV and saying there are people hiding on the 3rd floor of that hotel, go and shoot them there. This kind of thing is going on. Your (American) sources recorded this too, so we know what Pakistan's all about. They will dispatch terrorists. They will deny they did so until they're actually caught with red hands. That's the first,' he added. Elaborating on the second point, Tharoor mentioned how the Resistance Front claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack twice before rolling back their statement. He said, 'Within 45 minutes or so of this(attack) happening, a group called the Resistance Front claimed credit. Who is the Resistance Front? They're a well-known proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a banned organisation listed by the United Nations and the US State Department, which enjoys safe haven in the town of Muridke in Pakistan. India presented the evidence about the Resistance Front and its doings to the UN Committee on Terrorism in December 2023 and again in 2024. Uh, but the problem was that Pakistan was also a member of that committee. The UN did not list the Resistance Front, but its identity was known and publicised. These people then claimed credit within a time span.' India was pursuing the listing of TRF in the United Nations by the UN Security Council's UNCC 1267 sanctions committee. He added, 'The world hadn't even learned about this (attack) when they claimed credit, so that was itself a smoking gun. They repeated that claim 24 hours later, and having repeated that claim 24 hours later, then their handlers must have woken up to the gravity of this and told them to take it off their side, so they did, but the fact is the credit claim was on record and the world has seen it.' In the third observation, Tharoor said, 'When the first strikes happened on the terrorist camps, funerals were conducted, including for members of key organisations, the Jaish-e-Mohammad and the Lashkar-e-Taiba. The funerals were conducted, and photographs have emerged on social media showing Pakistani generals and police officers in uniform attending these funerals being conducted by relatives of these terrorists. So we're looking at 3 concrete pieces of evidence as far as India is concerned'. Tharoor asserted that India would not have taken action without convincing evidence, but the international community seemed to be already aware of Pakistan's role. Tharoor further noted, 'India is not the kind of country that would undertake a military operation without a solid basis. This was not some random terror attack. I must say our government counted 24 terrorist attacks in the last year emanating from Pakistan, but none of them required this kind of response. We dealt with them. We either got the terrorists or killed them, minimal damage, very little loss of life. We dealt with it. This showed all the hallmarks of a sophisticated, planned, deliberate operation with reconnaissance, with intelligence work, with a modus operandi worked out, this cynical exercise of asking people their religion, shooting them between the eyes. This is not an ordinary terrorist, some bearded fanatic blowing himself up outside a supermarket. This is not that. This is a serious quasi-military style operation, and it required a military response.' (ANI)

Trump administration imposes sanctions on four ICC judges in unprecedented move
Trump administration imposes sanctions on four ICC judges in unprecedented move

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump administration imposes sanctions on four ICC judges in unprecedented move

WASHINGTON/THE HAGUE - President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the war tribunal's cases regarding alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan and over the court's issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Washington designated Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler of Slovenia, according to a statement from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. "As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel. The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies," Rubio said. The ICC slammed the move, saying it was an attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution that provides hope and justice to millions of victims of "unimaginable atrocities." Both judges Bossa and Carranza have been on the ICC bench since 2018. In 2020 they were involved in an appeals chamber decision that allowed the ICC prosecutor to open a formal investigation into alleged war crimes by American troops in Afghanistan. ICC judges also issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant and Hamas leader Ibrahim Al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. Alapini Gansou and Hohler ruled to authorize the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, Rubio said. The move deepens the administration's animosity toward the court. During the first Trump administration in 2020, Washington imposed sanctions on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and one of her top aides over the court's work on Afghanistan. Sanctions severely hamper individuals' abilities to carry out even routine financial transactions as any banks with ties to the United States, or that conduct transactions in dollars, are expected to have to comply with the restrictions. But the Treasury Department also issued general licenses, including one allowing the wind-down of transactions involving those targeted on Thursday until July 8, so long as any payment to them is made to a blocked, interest-bearing account located in the U.S.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store