
Israel's Gaza push spurs Europe leaders to turn on Netanyahu
Some of Israel's most loyal supporters in Europe are increasingly speaking out against the war in Gaza, with several nations, including Germany, considering trade sanctions and curbs on arms sales.
In recent weeks, the U.K., Netherlands and France have started mulling such moves against Israel to help end the 20-month conflict, which has destroyed much of Gaza and sparked what international aid agencies say is a hunger crisis. Germany's pivot was the most surprising due to its historical position that protecting Israel is a post-Holocaust obligation.
German anger with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government grew when it intensified military operations against Hamas in mid-May and continued blocking aid to Gaza, according to information obtained by Bloomberg. In the German government's first such comments since the start of the war, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the humanitarian situation could "no longer be justified by a fight against Hamas terrorism.'
Merz spoke to Netanyahu on Sunday and said it was "necessary to allow sufficient humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip immediately.'
The condemnation is symbolic of the shift in Europe and of Israel's increasing isolation.
Opinion polls show growing discontent. In a survey last week by Civey for Germany's Tagesspiegel newspaper, more than half the respondents said it was wrong for Berlin to export weapons to Israel.
The sentiment is similar in several other nations and protests have escalated. Last month, the Netherlands saw one of its biggest protests in years, with tens of thousands of people calling for the war to stop.
Displaced residents look at damage to a school following an Israeli airstrike in the Al-Daraj district of Gaza City on May 26. |
Bloomberg
"It's simply become impossible for most European governments to continue supporting Israel's war despite strong ongoing commitments to Israel's security,' said Julien Barnes-Dacey, program director for the Middle East and North Africa at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
More countries are taking action and calling for the European Union to adopt sanctions on Israel. The EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, in May said there is "a strong majority' in favor of reviewing the bloc's trade agreement with Israel. Merz subsequently said Germany — one of Israel's main arms suppliers — is considering restrictions on military exports.
The EU is Israel's largest trading partner, with the two exchanging $47 billion of goods last year, according to the International Monetary Fund, and a change in policy would have a palpable impact on the Jewish state's economy, which is under strain because of the war.
The U.K. announced plans to pause free-trade talks with Israel and sanctions against a handful of individuals and entities it said were engaged in violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Still, European governments remain supportive of Israel's right to defend itself and EU sanctions would likely face opposition from the likes of Hungary. In addition, any measures to cut weapons exports could hurt European defense companies, while risking reciprocal action from Israel, which sells air-defense and other military equipment to Europe.
Outrage in Europe escalated over a Israel— and U.S.-backed proposal to restart aid distribution to Gaza. The United Nations said the plan would supply nowhere near enough food and medicine to the territory's more than 2 million Palestinians and politicize handouts.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Swiss-based nonprofit running the program, started distribution last week and says enough meals will be available as more centers open.
Israel says the plan's necessary to avoid supplies falling into the hands of Hamas. It also says its escalation of ground and air attacks in Gaza are needed to force Hamas to surrender and release the 58 hostages it still holds.
Iran-backed Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the EU, triggered the war when thousands of fighters crossed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 250.
More than 54,000 Gazans have been killed in the war, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in the Palestinian territory. Israel has lost more than 400 troops in Gaza combat.
Images of hungry and injured children and a territory reduced to rubble have spread across news bulletins and social media, intensifying protests and prompting more pressure on Israel to increase aid supplies and stop its bombardment. On Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron said that Europe will have to harden its collective stance toward Israel unless the situation in Gaza improves soon.
Displaced Palestinians collect food from a community kitchen in Jabaliya, northern Gaza, on May 19. |
Bloomberg
"The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable,' France said in a joint statement with the U.K. and Canada on May 19. "We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions.'
France, home to both the largest Jewish and Muslim communities in Europe, is seeking to rally international support for Palestinian statehood and this month it is set to co-chair a U.N. conference in New York with Saudi Arabia. The French president will be in Rome later Tuesday for a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, where he is likely to bring up the issue.
Although Italy recently urged Israel to end the war, Meloni's government is unlikely to support Palestinian independence and has maintained support for Netanyahu.
The French public is largely supportive of the initiative, with a poll by Odoxa last month showing nearly two thirds of people favor a Palestinian state and 61% would back political and economic sanctions on Israel. According to the same poll, Macron's approval rating improved largely due to his shift on Gaza.
For now, Israel's most important ally, the U.S., is standing by Netanyahu's government. Still, U.S. President Donald Trump has consistently spoken of wanting to stabilize the Middle East and has said he wants the conflict in Gaza to end.
Trump "could actually strengthen the Franco-Saudi push for Palestinian statehood because Palestinian statehood cannot happen without a ceasefire in Gaza,' Rym Momtaz, editor in chief of Carnegie Europe's blog Strategic Europe, said.
Netanyahu has lashed out at Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, accusing them of "inviting more such atrocities' on Israel.
For the EU, forging consensus is often a long process, with several rounds of horse trading. Yet Germany's comments are "a real marker' of how things have moved, according to Barnes-Dacey of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
"But Europeans will need to back up their statements of condemnation with real material steps,' he said, "if they want to be taken seriously and are genuinely seeking to shift Israeli positioning.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Arab media: Israeli attacks kill over 30 in Gaza
Arab media are reporting that Israeli attacks have left more than 30 people dead in Gaza. Qatar-based broadcaster Al Jazeera reported that at least 34 people were killed on Friday alone. The attacks came at the start of Eid al-Adha, one of Islam's most important holidays. Palestinians were seen praying at mosques that were destroyed. Also on Friday, the US-led Gaza Humanitarian Foundation announced it will halt distributing food in the enclave, citing overcrowding at distribution sites. The group began the operation on May 27. Gaza authorities announced that eight people were killed by Israeli attacks around food distribution sites on Friday. The Israeli military has explained that its troops fired warning shots to those who had approached them around distribution sites.


Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
U.S. mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation
The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80% of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing toward their positions.


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Cards in Deck: Trump Keeps Stack of Orders Ready to Play as Needed
Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office on May 23. Months before President Donald Trump issued a travel ban on individuals from more than a dozen countries, his team of lawyers and advisers had already started crafting the ban, a process that was underway before he stepped back into the Oval Office in January. Trump announced the proclamation Wednesday night, three days after an Egyptian man with an expired tourist visa was charged with attacking pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado. Trump said the crime 'underscores the danger posed to our country by foreign nationals not properly vetted.' 'We don't want 'em,' Trump said in a video announcing the ban. But a White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that Wednesday night's proclamation 'was not a direct response to' the Colorado attack. Trump was always going to implement a travel ban, his advisers say. The announcement was the latest example of how the Trump administration has dipped into its large reserve of proclamations and executive orders – many of which have been long in the making – to drive its chosen narrative, push the president's priorities and sometimes change the subject when news coverage focuses on topics that Trump officials prefer to downplay. Throughout Trump's second term, White House staff have maintained a stash of executive orders and proclamations they can deploy depending on the themes of the moment and the narratives they want to shape, a senior White House official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about internal strategies. Some orders are put into the calendar well in advance, the official said. Others are teed up the night before they are signed depending on impulse, political strategy and the overall mood within the White House, the official said. On this occasion, Trump invoked the recent attack in Colorado as an example of why the new measure was needed, even though Egypt is not one of the countries listed in the proclamation. Wednesday evening was the time the president and his team chose to hit the go button on the long-planned travel ban – making the announcement as Trump and his White House team were pushing Congress to embrace his sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill legislation, and as Elon Musk, who until recently was a top Trump ally, was increasing his criticism of Trump's bill. During Trump's first term, he implemented a similar travel ban just a week after taking office. It was later revoked by President Joe Biden. A number of the executive orders Trump has signed this term were written during the presidential transition. Wednesday's travel ban had been in the works since soon after Trump reentered office this January, four White House officials told The Washington Post. Broad plans to implement such a ban were underway even earlier, as Trump's lawyers crafted an executive order he signed on his first day in office, requiring the Cabinet to begin developing a potential travel ban. Some of the president's recent executive actions sat in the pile for much less time: Two other proclamations issued Wednesday night were the result of the White House quickly springing into action to seize on recent events. One restricted international students and scholars from entering the country to attend or teach at Harvard University. The other ordered the White House counsel to open an investigation into whether Biden and his staff covered up his cognitive decline. Those orders were 'new,' a White House official said. The Harvard proclamation came just days after a federal judge blocked an earlier effort by the administration to revoke the university's ability to host foreign students and scholars, a critical source of money for Harvard. The order to investigate Biden and his use of the autopen – a tool presidents have long used to sign certain documents and executive orders – followed a flurry of news coverage in recent weeks alleging Biden's cognitive state was in decline throughout his time in office. Trump has alleged without evidence that Biden's staff used the autopen to sign documents without the president's knowledge. Trump's approach to executive action has differed notably from that of his predecessors, who resorted to it at times but never with the intense frequency of Trump's first months in office. In less than five months, Trump has signed 157 executive orders and 62 proclamations, according to data from the Federal Register, a pace faster than any modern president. Trump surpassed the pace of his first term, when he signed an average of 55 orders a year, according to data compiled by the American Presidency Project. White House staff secretary Will Scharf is responsible for managing the flow of orders onto Trump's desk. When orders and proclamations are signed publicly, Scharf, standing at Trump's side, serves the role not only of a lawyer, but something akin to a game show host sidekick – placing each leather-bound order in front of Trump and announcing what every order accomplishes. Trump, meanwhile, will grab a thick black marker from a small box of them placed by his right hand, positioning himself in the stance to begin signing as Scharf gives his summary. Trump has already signed more orders than President Barack Obama in either term, and at the current clip, is likely to surpass this year Biden's sum of 162 orders over four years. Trump's use of the executive order mirrors Franklin D. Roosevelt, who signed an average of 307 orders a year during his more than 12 years in office. However, FDR also worked with Congress to implement his agenda through legislation. Trump signed just five bills into law in the first 100 days of his presidency.