logo
New Jersey Transit Engineers Strike, Idling Trains and Upending Commutes

New Jersey Transit Engineers Strike, Idling Trains and Upending Commutes

New York Times16-05-2025

The first statewide transit strike in New Jersey in more than 40 years left a fleet of passenger trains parked in rail yards and thousands of commuters stranded, annoyed and bewildered Friday morning.
The strike followed months of negotiations between New Jersey Transit, the nation's third-largest commuter rail network, and the union that represents train drivers, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. Union members began picketing at stations on Friday after contract talks broke down late Thursday night.
State officials said they hoped to resume negotiations with the union over the weekend so that the strike would end before Monday.
Gov. Philip D. Murphy apologized to commuters whose trips had been disrupted and blamed union leaders for refusing to accept an offer that he said was fair to their members and fiscally responsible for the state.
'It is frankly a mess of their own making and it is a slap in the face of every commuter and worker who relies on NJ Transit,' Mr. Murphy, a Democrat, said at a news conference in Aberdeen, N.J.
Thomas Haas, the union's general chairman, said his negotiating team had been optimistic about reaching an agreement until late Thursday.
'They decided to walk away,' Mr. Haas said. 'It's definitely frustrating, but we're willing to go back to the table.'
Some commuters did not learn about the shutdown until they arrived at their local train stations early Friday.
Leslie Bell, 34, was stuck at the station in Trenton, trying to get to his job as supervisor at a Wawa store in Newark. He had bought NJ Transit tickets in advance and his only option for getting to work on time for his 8 a.m. shift was an Amtrak train that would cost $110.
'I can't pay $110 to get to Newark on Amtrak, plus all the tickets are sold out,' Mr. Bell said. 'This is ridiculous.'
NJ Transit's contingency plan called for providing chartered buses from four spots in the state as substitutes for the idle trains. But the buses could only accommodate about one-fifth of the displaced train riders, and they were not scheduled to start running until Monday.
On a typical weekday, about 70,000 commuters ride NJ Transit trains into New York City. But Kris Kolluri, the agency's chief executive, said the shutdown of the train lines would affect all 350,000 NJ Transit riders, including those who take buses and light rail.
Mr. Kolluri, who has been leading management's bargaining team, said on Friday that he believed the two sides were 95 percent of the way to a deal. The last major sticking point has been a union demand that NJ Transit engineers be paid on par with their counterparts at the other passenger railroads that serve New York City, Amtrak, the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad.
Mr. Haas said his members earned $10 an hour less than engineers at the other railroads. NJ Transit's offer, the union said, amounted to annual increases of about 2.7 percent over 7.5 years, compared with average annual raises of 4.87 percent it recently negotiated with Amtrak.
Mr. Kolluri said NJ Transit had offered the engineers a contract that would have brought their starting hourly wage to nearly $50, close to what the L.I.R.R. pays. He said a tentative contract that union members overwhelmingly rejected last month would have raised their average annual pay to $172,000 from $135,000.
Union officials disputed those figures, saying that the engineers' annual base pay was only $89,000 and that most earned less than $100,000 a year.
Mr. Kolluri, who called the striking engineers his 'colleagues,' said he expected talks to resume on Sunday, if not sooner.
While Mr. Kolluri and Mr. Murphy spoke to reporters in Aberdeen, a half-dozen striking engineers stood across the street holding signs. They said they loved their jobs and wanted to get back to work as soon as a deal could be reached.
'I feel bad for the people we move every day, the worker bees and the sports fans,' said Michael Delatore, 37, who drove a Coast Line train on its last run to Long Branch Thursday night. He said he was anxious and 'stressed' about being on strike and was willing to return to work 'immediately.'
By taking the drastic action of walking out, the engineers probably gained the upper hand in the bargaining, at least temporarily, Bill Dwyer, an associate teaching professor at the Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations, said in an interview on Friday.
'If there's a power imbalance, I think it goes in favor of the union at this point,' he said.
Shutting down the railroad 'gives the union additional leverage because the ridership is not going to be happy,' Professor Dwyer said. The transit agency's customers, he added, are 'going to be very impatient' about having their service restored.
Still, he said, that advantage may be short-lived if New Jersey Transit retaliates by cutting off payments for the engineers' health insurance. Striking workers would start to feel the financial pinch of not getting paid after a couple of weeks, he said. Having to cover their own health-care costs could compound that discomfort quickly.
'They are escalating the situation,' Professor Dwyer said, referring to the union, 'and the bigger guns might start coming out.'
Matt Stratton, 47, a banker from Glen Ridge, N.J., who takes a train into Manhattan regularly, said he dreaded what would happen if the strike continued into next week.
'I have no idea how I'm getting to work on Monday,' he said while standing on a platform at Pennsylvania Station in Newark. 'I'm actively looking into figuring out what to do.'
Mr. Stratton expressed no sympathy for either side in the dispute.
'We just had a fare increase, and reliability is terrible,' he said. 'I was delayed every day last week. It's hard to be sympathetic just based on the poor service.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Cuban says left-leaning Bluesky's ‘lack of diversity of thought' driving users back to Elon Musk's X
Mark Cuban says left-leaning Bluesky's ‘lack of diversity of thought' driving users back to Elon Musk's X

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban says left-leaning Bluesky's ‘lack of diversity of thought' driving users back to Elon Musk's X

Mark Cuban says Bluesky has 'grown ruder and more hateful' and warned that a 'lack of diversity of thought' on the platform is pushing users back to Elon Musk's X, the social network formerly known as Twitter. The billionaire entrepreneur and longtime tech enthusiast had been one of Bluesky's most visible champions, but now says the platform's predominantly left-leaning user base has created a hostile echo chamber where dissenting or even mildly nuanced opinions are met with outrage. 'The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage,' Cuban wrote this week in a series of critical posts. 'There used to be great give and take discussions on politics and news. Not so much any more. Doesn't have to be this way.' Cuban, the tech billionaire who once owned the NBA's Dallas Mavericks and who recently concluded a lengthy stint as one of the investor 'sharks' on the hit reality show 'Shark Tank,' posted a link to a Washington Post opinion piece titled: 'The Bluesky bubble hurts liberals and their causes. In the piece, columnist Megan McArdle argued that the platform's left-leaning user base fosters a political silo. Cuban agreed with the piece's assessment. 'The moderation and block tools on here are so advanced, if you see someone you don't want to see on here, just block them. Don't attack them,' he added. He supported Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential election but didn't donate to her campaign, joined Bluesky in late 2024 and has posted nearly 2,000 times since. His first post — 'Hello Less Hateful World' — set a hopeful tone. But that optimism has since faded. 'Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist,' Cuban wrote. 'We are forcing posts to X.' He said even small disagreements are met with outsized hostility. 'Even if you agree with 95% of what a person is saying on a topic, if there is one point that you might call out as being more of a grey area, they will call you a fascist etc.,' Cuban wrote. According to Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Cuban's net worth stands at approximately $8.35 billion. Some users didn't take kindly to Cuban's critiques — and they made their feelings known in blunt, often profane language. In response to his concerns, one user wrote, 'Go wipe your crocodile tears with a wad of hundreds you tw-t. People are over the idea of 'cool' billionaires.' Another told him, 'Man if I were as rich as you I'd probably be less of a p—y,' while a third simply said, 'F–kin leave then, p—y.' Yet another post, which Cuban also reposted, read: 'It's like you, as a billionaire, are a despicable bastard and we want you to stop pushing AI and big business here and just Go Away.' Bluesky launched as a decentralized social media alternative and saw explosive growth in the aftermath of Elon Musk's full-throated endorsement of Donald Trump's reelection campaign in late 2024. Musk's backing of Trump triggered an exodus from X, driving millions of liberal-leaning users to Bluesky in search of a quieter, more ideologically aligned environment. Between November 2024 and May 2025, Bluesky's user base tripled — from roughly 10 million to over 30 million — according to Pew Research Center. That analysis also found that many of the platform's most prominent news influencers lean left politically. Bluesky CEO Jay Graber acknowledged the politically driven migration in a June 4 podcast interview with Vox's Peter Kafka. 'It's people wanting to just try something new. It's people finding their community here,' she said. 'I think in general it's both people looking for something and people looking to get away from something.' But for Cuban, that community appears to have turned inward. He now worries the platform is discouraging debate and becoming a digital echo chamber. The Post has sought comment from Bluesky.

JetZero plans to build $4.7B plant in North Carolina, aims to create 14,500 jobs
JetZero plans to build $4.7B plant in North Carolina, aims to create 14,500 jobs

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

JetZero plans to build $4.7B plant in North Carolina, aims to create 14,500 jobs

GREENSBORO, N.C. — JetZero Inc. announced plans Thursday to build its first manufacturing plant for a next-generation passenger jet in central North Carolina, a project that if successful would create more than 14,500 jobs there in a decade. The California-based startup intends to build the factory at Greensboro's airport, investing $4.7 billion. The planned hirings from 2027 through 2036 would be the largest job commitment in North Carolina history, according to Gov. Josh Stein. The company previously identified Greensboro as one of three finalists for the factory to build its fixed-wing — also known as all-wing or blended-wing — Z4 aircraft, which JetZero says will be 50% more fuel-efficient than traditional tube-and-wing airliners. JetZero has said it's already received about $300 million in investment in the Z4 project, including a U.S. Air Force grant to build and fly a demonstrator model by 2027. United Airlines and Alaska Airlines also are project investors and have made conditional purchase agreements for their fleets, the company said. JetZero aims for the planes to go into service in the early 2030s, with a goal of completing 20 airplanes per month at full production. Stein, on hand with JetZero executives and other officials for the formal announcement at Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, cited North Carolina's robust aerospace industry and the first manned powered flights at Kitty Hawk by the Wright brothers in 1903. 'North Carolina is the perfect location,' Stein said. 'North Carolina was first in flight. We are also the future of flight.' The jobs would pay minimum average salaries of more than $89,000, according to the state Department of Commerce, which provided details of the project earlier Thursday to a state committee that awards economic incentives. State and local monetary and training incentives for JetZero and the project described at the committee meeting could exceed $2.35 billion by the 2060s if investment and job-creation thresholds and other requirements are met. A portion of state incentives awarded by the committee — more than $1 billion over 37 years — is based on a percentage of income taxes withheld from plant workers' paychecks. The incentives also include up to $785 million from Guilford County and Greensboro and $450 million from the General Assembly to help with infrastructure, officials said. The project includes a research facility for composite structures. A commerce department official said that JetZero, headquartered in Long Beach, California, looked for over a year for a plant location, examining 25 sites in 17 states. JetZero, currently with just 225 workers, enters a jet purchasing market dominated by industry behemoths U.S.-based Boeing and European Airbus. 'We have already shown strong commercial interest and momentum to meet the real airline demand for this aircraft,' CEO Tom O'Leary said. 'So this is more than just a factory. It's a launchpad for a new chapter of American aerospace.' While a variant of the Z4 would have tanker and transport uses in the military, JetZero has said that it would focus first on building a commercial jetliner with about 250 seats and a range of 5,000 nautical miles. The 5-year-old company says the plane's shape will reduce drag and the mounting of engines on the top and back of the plane will make it much quieter than traditional airliners. The Z4 would run on conventional jet fuel but could be converted to hydrogen fuel, according to JetZero. JetZero says Z4 travelers will board through larger doors and into shorter but wider cabins, and aisles will be less congested as bathrooms will be far away from galleys where meals are prepared. 'It's going to deliver a better passenger experience than you've ever had before on any other plane,' O'Leary said. The state is already home to more than 400 aerospace companies. And the Piedmont Triad airport has emerged as an industry hot spot, with Honda Aircraft placing its headquarters there and Boom Supersonic building its first full-scale manufacturing plant for next-generation supersonic passenger jets. The central location and easy access to interstates also lured Toyota to build an electric battery plant in adjoining Randolph County. North Carolina's previous largest economic development project, measured by employment, was revealed in 2022, when Vietnamese automaker VinFast announced plans to build an electric vehicle manufacturing plant in Chatham County, promising 7,500 jobs.

Do Californians Really Pay Trump's Bills?
Do Californians Really Pay Trump's Bills?

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Do Californians Really Pay Trump's Bills?

In his escalating conflict with President Trump, Gov. Gavin Newsom suggested last week that California had some leverage over the federal government. 'We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back,' he wrote on X. 'Maybe it's time to cut that off.' His office followed up with a news release titled 'Californians pay Trump's bills.' In case you missed it, California is the biggest 'donor state' in the country — providing around $83 billion more to the federal government than it receives from the federal government — nearly three times as much as the next biggest 'donor state.' Though Mr. Newsom has since said he wouldn't ask state residents to withhold federal taxes, he said he still felt the need to respond to Mr. Trump's threats to cut off federal funding to the state and to the deployment of active duty military to Los Angeles amid protests. The term 'donor states' might be relatively obscure, but it captures a dynamic that underlies many national policy debates. And it taps into longstanding philosophical questions about whether it's fair that some states prop up the country more than others — and whether that's the right way to look at things in the first place. Most of the donor states are rich, blue states. Think Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington and, yes, California. The 'recipient states' are mostly poor states like New Mexico, West Virginia and Mississippi. There are a few exceptions, like Virginia, a blue state whose residents receive, on net, about $12,000 in federal contracts and wages more than they pay in taxes. On average, residents from recipient states receive about $3,000 more than they pay. There are a few different ways one could calculate these figures (more on that later), but the Rockefeller Institute has been tabulating estimates for years, and its numbers, shown above, are often the ones cited by politicians themselves. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store