logo
'Seed oil-free' restaurants and foods get healthy stamp of approval

'Seed oil-free' restaurants and foods get healthy stamp of approval

Fox News22-03-2025

As more patrons of food service establishments embrace the Make America Healthy Again movement today, more restaurants also appear to be answering the call by promising seed oil-free dining experiences.
But while plenty of restaurants can claim to be free of seed oil, there hasn't really been a way to reassure customers officially of that – until now.
The Seed Oil Free Alliance was founded in 2023 "to raise awareness, improve transparency and educate consumers about the prevalence of seed oils in our food supply," according to the group's website.
Co-founders Corey Nelson and Jonathan Rubin discovered that "there was no certification to verify that foods are actually seed oil-free," Nelson told Fox News Digital.
They soon "realized there was an opportunity here to not only help consumers, but also to help companies – because it's more expensive to eliminate seed oils from most foods."
The Seed Oil Free Alliance, based in Florida, is an independent certifying organization with a coalition of public health and nutrition experts as advisors.
"Any legitimate certification body does have certifying standards," Nelson said.
Those range from pre-certification testing to "post-certification surveillance where we can actually test foods once they're on the shelf," he said, "to ensure that companies are doing what they say that they're doing and that consumers can trust the seal."
All foods and restaurants with the seal undergo laboratory testing to ensure they are free from all seed oils, including soybean, corn and canola oil.
Olive oil, avocado oil, coconut oil, butter and other refined animal fats are permitted.
Sometimes, seed oils are detected within ingredients that restaurant owners didn't anticipate.
"We give them the choice," Nelson told Fox News Digital.
"You know, you can walk away, no harm done, if it's not the right time to make the switch. Often, companies do switch, so then we have this opportunity to help them meet our standards."
Erin Leeds, who owns the Garden Butcher in Boca Raton, Florida, said her restaurant was on track last year to be the first restaurant to receive the certification – that is, until the avocado oil she was using didn't pass the rigorous lab testing.
"The tests indicated that [it was] not just the oil we were using, but many other avocado oils we were willing to switch to — all were adulterated in some way [and] suspected to have traces of sunflower oil," Leeds told Fox News Digital.
"Where there's a will, there's a way."
After over six months of trying to find a cost-effective solution, Leeds made progress with the help of Nelson and Rubin. She turned to algae oil from a company in California.
"We bring in two pallets of algae oil every couple of months and use a storage facility to hold them," Leeds said. "Where there's a will, there's a way."
On the other side of the country, Jennifer Peters had been going through the same testing at her Colorado restaurant.
After doing so, Just BE Kitchen became the first restaurant in America to receive the certification. (See the video at the top of this article.)
Peters said she was in the process of opening a second location when Nelson and Rubin gave her the news.
"They actually called and said, 'Oh, you know what? There was oil adulteration in another company's oil and yours has passed. So you're the first restaurant that's seed oil-free certified,'" Peters told Fox News Digital.
"That was pretty cool," she added.
The Seed Oil Free Alliance doesn't just certify restaurants, though.
Products like TruBar – a snack food made with all-natural ingredients like cassava flour and brown rice protein – have also received the certification.
"I knew that I wanted to make that change."
"I knew I wanted to change," Florida resident Erica Groussman, who owns TruBar, told Fox News Digital.
"We only had a very small amount in our bars, but I knew that I wanted to make that change."
For more Lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle
While businesses must pay a fee to become certified, Nelson said the price points "work really well for emerging brands like in the packaged foods industry or mom-and-pop-size restaurants."
"I think from the consumer perspective, restaurants and packaged foods are equally important if you're looking to avoid seed oils," Nelson said.
"But I think from the owner perspective, it's just much harder to get all the seed oils out of a restaurant as opposed to a packaged food."
The goal, ultimately, Nelson said, "is to advocate and advance the availability of seed oil-free food options."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. Fires Entire Panel of Vaccine Experts
RFK Jr. Fires Entire Panel of Vaccine Experts

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. Fires Entire Panel of Vaccine Experts

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired a panel of 17 medical and public health experts that advised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccine policy, and is expected to replace them with individuales aligned with his own vaccine skepticism. In a statement issued on Monday, the Department of Health and Human Services wrote that the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices will be restaffed with 'new members currently under consideration.' 'A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,' Kennedy wrote, alleging the committee — which helped coordinate the CDC's annual flu prevention program — had been compromised by conflicts of interest. Members of the committee are required to file ethics disclosures, which are prominently displayed on its website. 'The Biden administration appointed all of the 17 sitting ACIP members. Thirteen of them were appointed in 2024. These appointments would have prevented the current administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028,' Kennedy added. The move comes after Kennedy promised Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that he would make no changes to the committee in order to secure the senator's support for his confirmation. Earlier this year, the annual meeting of the ACIP was postponed without explanation and rescheduled for June. The months-long delay prompted concerns that the timeline for passing along recommendations to manufacturers and communicating with insurance companies would have negative repercussions to patients. In an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, Kennedy wrote that 'the new members won't directly work for the vaccine industry. They will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry — unafraid to ask hard questions.' Last month, Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' commission released a report that reiterated his own conspiracies about vaccines — and was riddled with citation errors and outright fake research. The so-called MAHA report alluded to disproven claims from vaccine skeptics that the vaccine schedule recommended for children in the United States is overloaded and potentially harmful. The attack against the independent vaccine advisory board is the latest instance in which Kennedy has attempted to mold the nation's leading public health systems around his own pseudoscientific agenda — with the health of millions of Americans in the balance. More from Rolling Stone RFK Jr.'s MAHA Report Cites Research Studies That Don't Exist Why Are Health Influencers Drinking Raw Milk and Honey Shots at the White House? RFK Jr. and Republicans Are Dismantling a Health Achievement: Fluoride in Water Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director
In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

June 9 (UPI) -- Hundreds of scientists via the National Institute of Health signed a published letter in protest to NIH leadership and recent cuts by the Trump administration. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political moment over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," more than 300 scientists wrote Monday to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya in a so-called "Bethesda Declaration" published by Stand Up For Science in rebuke to Trump administration research funding cuts and staff layoffs. They added in the letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress overseeing NIH that they "dissent" to Trump's policies that "undermine" the NIH mission, "waste" public resources and harm "the health of Americans and people across the globe." In the open letter, they said the current endeavor to "Make America Healthy Again" referred to "some undefined time in the past." "Keeping NIH at the forefront of biomedical research requires our stalwart commitment to continuous improvement," the letter's writers said, adding that the life-and-death nature of NIH work "demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted." According to the letter, the Trump administration terminated at least 2,100 NIH research grants since January, totaling around $9.5 billion and contracts representing some $2.6 billion in new research. "We urge you as NIH Director to restore grants delayed or terminated for political reasons so that life-saving science can continue," the letter added in part. "This undercuts long-standing NIH policies designed to maximize return on investment by working with grantees to address concerns and complete studies," it said. It further accused the White House of creating a "culture of fear and suppression" among NIH researchers. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor and health researcher, called the agency the "crown jewel of American biomedical sciences" and said he had the "utmost respect" for its scientists and mission during his confirmation hearing in March. On Tuesday, Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify before the Senate's Appropriations Committee on Trump's 2026 NIH budget proposal which seeks to cut roughly 40% of NIH's $48 billion budget. "This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research," the scientists penned to Bhattacharya. The letter goes on to characterize it as "dissent" from Trump administration policy, quoting Bhattacharya during his confirmation as saying "dissent is the very essence of science." "Standing up in this way is a risk, but I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," says Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. "If we don't speak up, we allow continued harm to research participants and public health in America and across the globe," Norton said in a statement, adding that if others don't speak up, "we allow our government to curtail free speech, a fundamental American value."

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director
In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

UPI

time14 hours ago

  • UPI

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

June 9 (UPI) -- Hundreds of scientists via the National Institute of Health signed a published letter in protest to NIH leadership and recent cuts by the Trump administration. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political moment over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," more than 300 scientists wrote Monday to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya in a so-called "Bethesda Declaration" published by Stand Up For Science in rebuke to Trump administration research funding cuts and staff layoffs. They added in the letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress overseeing NIH that they "dissent" to Trump's policies that "undermine" the NIH mission, "waste" public resources and harm "the health of Americans and people across the globe." In the open letter, they said the current endeavor to "Make America Healthy Again" referred to "some undefined time in the past." "Keeping NIH at the forefront of biomedical research requires our stalwart commitment to continuous improvement," the letter's writers said, adding that the life-and-death nature of NIH work "demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted." According to the letter, the Trump administration terminated at least 2,100 NIH research grants since January, totaling around $9.5 billion and contracts representing some $2.6 billion in new research. "We urge you as NIH Director to restore grants delayed or terminated for political reasons so that life-saving science can continue," the letter added in part. "This undercuts long-standing NIH policies designed to maximize return on investment by working with grantees to address concerns and complete studies," it said. It further accused the White House of creating a "culture of fear and suppression" among NIH researchers. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor and health researcher, called the agency the "crown jewel of American biomedical sciences" and said he had the "utmost respect" for its scientists and mission during his confirmation hearing in March. On Tuesday, Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify before the Senate's Appropriations Committee on Trump's 2026 NIH budget proposal which seeks to cut roughly 40% of NIH's $48 billion budget. "This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research," the scientists penned to Bhattacharya. The letter goes on to characterize it as "dissent" from Trump administration policy, quoting Bhattacharya during his confirmation as saying "dissent is the very essence of science." "Standing up in this way is a risk, but I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," says Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. "If we don't speak up, we allow continued harm to research participants and public health in America and across the globe," Norton said in a statement, adding that if others don't speak up, "we allow our government to curtail free speech, a fundamental American value."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store