logo
Federal Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking

Federal Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking

Herald Sun6 hours ago

Journalist Antoinette Lattouf will today learn her fate after she sued the ABC over their decision to take her from the air in the wake of a series of pro-Palestine social media posts.
Ms Lattouf sued the ABC in the Federal Court after she was sent home for the final two days of a five-day stint on ABC Radio's Sydney Mornings program in the lead up to Christmas in 2023.
Ms Lattouf was called up as a fill-in host for five shifts starting on Monday, December 18, but was told not to come in for the final two shows.
She had claimed she was unlawfully dismissed after sharing a post on social media by Human Rights Watch reading: 'HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war.
'The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a weapon of war in Gaza'
She says that she was sacked after sharing the post about the Israel-Gaza war and as a result of a flurry of emails from pro-Israel supporters.
Justice Darryl Rangiah is due to hand down his findings in the Federal Court on Wednesday morning.
The ABC argued that Ms Lattouf's employment was not terminated and that when she was told that she was not required to appear on air on Thursday, December 21 and Friday, December 22, it was not motivated by her political opinions.
Ms Lattouf's legal team argued that she was rendered 'pretty much unemployable' as a result of the saga having been accused of misconduct by the ABC.
She argues that she suffered 'significant pain, hurt, humiliation and distress as a result of the egregious treatment meted out to her by the ABC' and that her 'reputation was sullied'.
Ms Lattouf was asking the court for $100,000 to $150,000 for non-economic loss.
In the Federal Court her legal team alleged former ABC chair Ita Buttrose, then-managing director David Anderson and head of content Chris Oliver-Taylor made the decision to axe her after receiving a host of complaints about her pro-Palestinian politics.
During the blockbuster trial, the court heard that Ms Buttrose fired off an email to managing editor David Anderson on Tuesday, December 19.
'Has Antoinette been replaced. I am over getting emails about her,' Ms Buttrose said in the email.
During her evidence, Ms Buttrose denied that this was proof that she wanted Ms Lattouf fired.
'If I wanted somebody removed, I'd be franker than that,' Ms Buttrose told the court at the time.
The court heard that Mr Anderson replied: 'Antoinette will finish up on Friday. It's a managed exit given the situation. I can explain more tomorrow.'
Ms Buttrose followed it up with another email at 9.59pm: 'I have a whole clutch more of complaints. Why can't she come down with flu? Or Covid. Or a stomach upset? We owe her nothing, we are copping criticism because she wasn't honest when she was appointed.
'Managed exit. Really.
'I don't like emailing you late but I am wrapping present. We should be in damage control not managed exits David.'
Much of the case centred on what Ms Lattouf was told in a telephone conversation with her boss, then ABC Radio Sydney content director Elizabeth Green, on the afternoon of Monday December 18 – the day of the first of her five shifts.
Ms Green told the court that she told Ms Lattouf: 'Obviously as an ABC presenter, you need to be impartial, that includes on social media. I wouldn't give anyone any ammunition for complaints, so would be best if you don't post anything related to the Israel/Palestine situation on social media while you're with us.'
While Ms Lattouf told the court that she was told by Ms Green: 'It's probably best that you keep a low profile on Twitter and maybe don't tweet anything.'
The court heard that following the discovery of some of Ms Lattouf's social media posts, Mr Oliver-Taylor texted Mr Anderson on Wednesday, December 20 saying that Ms Lattouf had: 'breached our editorial policies while in our employment.
'She also failed to follow a direction from her producer not to post anything while working with the ABC. As a result of this, I have no option but to stand her down.'
Ms Lattout was paid for all five shifts.
'On Wednesday, 20 December 2023, Ms Lattouf was advised that she would not be required to present on Thursday, 21 December 2023 and Friday, 22 December 2023, being the last two shifts of the engagement,' the ABC's lawyers said in its submissions to the court.
'That is, the ABC altered the work that Ms Lattouf was required to undertake on the last two shifts by not requiring her to undertake any work – as it was contractually expressly entitled to do.'
The ABC has asked the court to dismiss Ms Lattouf's lawsuit.
Originally published as Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared

Sydney Morning Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared

If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.

An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared

The Age

time24 minutes ago

  • The Age

An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared

If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.

Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire
Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire

Sky News AU

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire

President Trump was formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday for his efforts in securing the Israel-Iran cease-fire. In a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) recommended Trump for the prestigious prize 'in recognition of his extraordinary and historic role in brokering an end to the armed conflict between Israel and Iran and preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.' 'President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible,' added Carter, who has represented the Peach State's Savannah-based 1st District since 2015. 'His leadership at this moment exemplifies the very ideals that the Nobel Peace Prize seeks to recognize: the pursuit of peace, the prevention of war, and the advancement of international harmony. 'In a region plagued by historical animosity and political volatility, such a breakthrough demands both courage and clarity. President Trump demonstrated both, offering the world a rare glimpse of hope.' Trump, 79, on Monday evening announced a cease-fire between Iran and Israel — and proposed naming the conflict the '12 Day War' — just two days after ordering an unprecedented US attack on three Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israeli strikes. Members of national parliaments, university professors, and others can submit nominations for the award, though Trump has made clear he doesn't expect to win it. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social after his administration helped broker a peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo.' In remarks to reporters, Trump noted the Abraham Accords of 2020, in which his administration brokered diplomatic relations between Israel and four Arab nations. 'I should have gotten it four or five times… They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals,' he said. Three sitting presidents have won the Nobel Peace Prize, including Republican Teddy Roosevelt in 1906 for brokering a peace deal between Russia and Japan. The other two commanders-in-chief to win the prize were Democrats Woodrow Wilson (1919) and Barack Obama (2009), with the latter receiving the award fewer than nine months after he took office. 'Among the reasons it gave, the Nobel Committee lauded Obama for his 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples'. Emphasis was also given to his support — in word and deed — for the vision of a world free from nuclear weapons,' the peace prize's website says of the award. Obama's award drew criticism — including from Trump and fellow Republicans — as he presided over expansive US drone warfare, provided arms for bloody extremist-led rebellions in Libya and Syria and supported a $1 trillion plan to rebuild the US nuclear arsenal. Former President Jimmy Carter was honored in 2002 for 'decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts,' and former Vice President Al Gore scooped the prize in 2007 for popularizing public concern about climate change. Originally published as Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store