
Labour threatens to ban Serco over blunders
Labour has threatened to ban Serco from any new Government contracts after its blunders led to criminals going untagged for months.
Lord Timpson, the prisons minister, said the global contracting giant could be blocked from future public contracts if there was 'another episode of similar poor performance'.
It follows an undercover investigation by Channel 4 Dispatches, which found that criminals including a murderer had gone untagged for months under the £51 million-a-year contract Serco had with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).
An undercover reporter hired to fit and monitor electronic ankle tags on newly released prisoners was repeatedly sent to the wrong addresses for criminals including a murderer and paedophile.
The reporter also discovered that a murderer had gone without a tag for at least two months after claiming that his legs were too swollen for an ankle monitor.
Another criminal was accused of taking off her tag to go on holiday and boasting about it to almost 200,000 TikTok followers. Another was overheard claiming that he had ripped his tag off and could do what he wanted.
'Serco could be excluded from bidding'
At present, a total of 20,000 people are tagged, and the technology – which allows a freed offender to be tracked via GPS – is central to the Government's plans to expand the use of community punishments as an alternative to jail.
The plans could see the number of people tagged more than double as thousands more prisoners are released early from jail. Up to 40,000 criminals convicted of lower-level crimes could also be spared prison in favour of community orders.
In a letter to the Commons justice committee, Lord Timpson said new legislation – which came into force in February – would enable ministers to bar companies from being awarded contracts or securing procurements for up to five years.
It also enabled public authorities to exclude contractors from bidding for contracts if they were judged to be unreliable in delivering work or where public confidence could be undermined by the 'honesty, integrity and probity' of suppliers.
Lord Timpson said: 'In the event of another episode of similar poor performance [as defined in the Act] by Serco after the Act came into force, or a new occurrence of poor performance by Serco after the Act came into force, then Serco could be excluded from bidding or being awarded a future public contract through either the debarment or exclusion regimes.'
In a statement to Channel 4, Antony King, the managing director of Citizen Services at Serco, said: 'We are proud of the challenging work our people do, working with multiple partners across the criminal justice system in delivering an essential and critical public safety service, often with complex and ever-increasing requirements.
'Our performance continues to improve, which the MoJ recognise, and we continue to monitor record numbers of people in the community supporting our colleagues in probation and the Home Office.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
London Luton Airport: Person hurt in airport car park incident
A person has suffered serious injuries after an "incident" involving a vehicle at a multi-storey car park at London Luton Airport, police services were called to the car park shortly before 11:00 Police said their officers, ambulance and fire crews are still on the force urged any witnesses to contact them. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Warning issued to Sainsbury's customers after two years of Nectar points stolen
Experts have issued a fresh warning to Sainsbury's customers after a shopper reported having two years of her Nectar points stolen. This is Money revealed earlier this year that Nectar had introduced a 'lock' feature on its loyalty card scheme, meaning any account can be freezed until the customer decides to spend their reward points. The announcement came after an investigation revealed that 12.5 million Nectar points worth nearly £63,000 had been stolen from our readers over the period of a year. And just last week, another customer reported on social media that 3,000 points had been stolen from her account after they were used in a Twickenham branch. She posted: 'Someone has stolen 3,000 of my Nectar points? 'I have never been to Twickenham in my life and I have been saving these points for two years to help pay for Christmas. Please look into this.' The claims have prompted cybersecurity experts to urge customers to take a fresh look at their accounts in order to prevent potentially criminal activity. 'It's especially important to monitor accounts more often just before Christmas,' Jake Moore, Eset's Global Security Advisor told The Sun. 'This is usually when criminals target accounts with points that have been accumulated over the year.' He added that accounts should be checked 'frequently to detect and report any unauthorised actions promptly'. Only primary users of the account should be able to lock and unlock spending on their Nectar accounts with the new locking feature, while additional collectors will only be able to collect points. It was brought in to allow customers to start saving their points again without fear of them being stolen by fraudsters. Thankfully most of the customers affected in This is Money's investigation were refunded by Sainsbury's, which owns Nectar. A Nectar spokesperson today told MailOnline: 'Nectar is one of the UK's biggest loyalty schemes, with over 23 million members. 'The security of our customer accounts is our highest priority and the proportion of those impacted by fraud each year is very small. 'We have a range of measures which detect, and in many cases prevent fraud, including our Spend Lock feature. 'Our Nectar Helpline team are on hand to support any customer who suspects they may have been a victim of fraud.'


Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If Sadiq Khan wants money for policing, he could trim his legions of overpaid bureaucrats
The Mayor of London is not happy. Despite the Chancellor's alarmingly profligate Spending Review announced this week – with commitments worth an estimated £600 billion – the Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan remains 'concerned' with insufficient funding for the Metropolitan police. If Sir Sadiq's concern is keeping London safe, funding need not be a problem. We can provide him with a catalogue of fat to trim, which would free up taxpayers' money to better serve the public. In its City Hall Rich List published last year, the TaxPayers' Alliance revealed that the Mayor-led Greater London Assembly (GLA) and its subsidiary bodies employed at least 1,146 people who received over £100,000 in total remuneration in 2022-23. A whopping 143 of these employees received over £150,000. The same report also revealed that the number of employees at the Met Police (including the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime or MOPAC which oversees it) who received total remuneration of over £100,000 totalled at 301 in 2022-23. The number had almost quadrupled compared to that in 2018-19, when 80 employees received that amount. However, the crime rate per 1,000 people in London had gone up in that period. Could the money instead have been spent more efficiently on simply recruiting more old-fashioned bobbies on the beat? There are more savings to be made. In January, the Conservatives in City Hall put forward an amendment to the GLA budget that would see £22.4 million from the MOPAC fund being reallocated to the Metropolitan Police. Alas, it did not pass. Compared to the rest of England and Wales, the Met already 'receives the most funding per head of population' according to the Home Office. In 2024-25, it received up to £3.5 billion, which was an increase of up to £119 million on the previous year. However, early this year, the Met's Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley warned that his police force needed an extra £140 million 'to address the racism, misogyny and homophobia identified by the Casey Review '. It would appear that the nearly £3.7 million the Met spent on 'staff (and the number and cost of those staff) and non-staff initiatives for Diversity, Equality and Inclusion' between April 2024 to Feb 2025 had fallen short of delivering the intended results. In the light of these revelations, Waste Watch readers might be wondering if instead of demanding more money, the Mayor might have better luck keeping the capital safe by carrying out an audit of his priorities. I have every confidence that the Mayor would take this advice in the spirit in which it is meant, being the humble man he is. After all, he did graciously forgive the King for taking so long to dub him a knight.