A Picasso show from Pablo's daughter
Picasso, the youngest of Pablo Picasso 's four children, vividly remembers sitting on the floor of her father's studio, drawing on paper as he worked at his easel."Because I was a very quiet little girl, I was able to stay with him," she said in a recent interview. "He would let me stay next to him while he was painting because I could spend hours without uttering a word."I knew we were not supposed to touch anything," she added. "He would always say, 'You can touch with your eyes, but not with your hand.'"Now Picasso has helped organize a show of her father's work at Gagosian gallery . Some of the pieces in the exhibition have been in her possession and have never been seen by the public."The idea was to do a show where it wouldn't be chronological," she said. "It would be more the different works talking to each other."The show, "Picasso: Tete-a-tete," is an unusual role for Picasso, given that for the last 45 years she has focused on her jewelry collection for Tiffany & Co.About two years ago she took over the stewardship of her father's estate, after the death of her brother Claude Ruiz-Picasso (Ruiz was the name of Picasso's paternal grandfather). The Picasso Administration manages copyright issues and licensing deals.On a recent afternoon at 980 Madison Ave. -- the show is Gagosian's last in that building because it has been leased to other tenants -- Picasso walked through the gallery as her father's work was being installed.Among the highlights she pointed out was "Femme au Vase de Houx (Marie-Thérèse)," an oil and charcoal on canvas from 1937, which she used to keep in New York and then in Switzerland, where she now lives.She also paused before "Nu drappe, assis dans un fauteuil," a 1923 oil painting of Picasso's first wife, Russian ballerina Olga Khokhlova, nude and sitting in an armchair, that at first looks like a simple line drawing but that Paloma Picasso said is actually very layered. "It's a very touching, moving portrait," she said. "You can see that it's a real person who's there."The exhibition includes six drawings, 24 sculptures and 38 paintings. They date from throughout the artist's career, 1896 to 1972, and showcase Picasso's expansive range. (She refers to her father as "Pablo.")"Some of them are really special, beautiful examples of various periods -- from an incredible self-portrait to a later Marie-Thérèse," said Larry Gagosian, referring to Picasso's muse and mistress Marie-Thérèse Walter, a French model. "It's very exciting to show works by arguably the most famous artist that's ever lived that haven't been seen."Only a few pieces are for sale -- prices are not publicly disclosed -- and Picasso said she aimed to show the many attributes of her father through the artworks. "They can be both very soft and strong at the same time," she said. "It's all of the things that make Picasso who he is. I think we are really doing him justice here."Elegant and regal at 76, Picasso radiates deep affection and respect for her father, though she said she is well aware of the flaws that complicated his relationship to her mother, Françoise Gilot, a French painter 40 years his junior, who died in 2023."He was difficult at times, and I could see it with my own eyes," she said. "Most people don't behave well all the time. Why should we expect him to be perfect?"Paloma and her brother Claude were the children of the couple; Gilot left the artist in 1953, and angered him with her 1964 memoir, "Life With Picasso," in which she described his abuse, including an occasion when he held a lit cigarette against her cheek. Picasso severed contact with Claude and Paloma after the book's publication and never contacted them again, which Paloma Picasso has described as painful.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Not just a bag, it is the OG Birkin (made for Jane Birkin) going on sale
The first ever Hermes Birkin bag - yes, the one crafted specifically for British-French actress and singer Jane Birkin - is set to be auctioned in Paris on July is the bag from where it all began. The first prototype, made for the late British actress Jane Birkin, will be sold at the Auction House Sotheby's during the Paris Couture Week. There is no starting bid price available publicly, as yet. However, interested bidders have to register on the official website and then might get an estimated price only 'upon request.'advertisementHailed as the world's most coveted 'it' handbag, the Birkin is not just another designer accessory. Made by the French luxury house Herms, it is a symbol of status, craftsmanship and also investment value. Even those with money to afford it wait for years to own it. Of course, it's also known to test your patience (iykyk). The Birkin bag will be put for exhibition before the final bid in Paris (Photo: Instagram/Sotheby's) For a bag that can only be availed with premium exclusivity, for it to go on sale could make records. 'The original Birkin holds the potential to redefine records,' Morgane Halimi, Sotheby's global handbag and fashion head, said in a it on view during The Luxury Sales at #SothebysNewYork from 6 - 12 June in a free, public exhibition," reads the caption of the acution house Instagram where it all beganThe origin story of the Hermes Birkin bag stems from a simple, everyday problem—finding a handbag spacious enough to hold 1984, during a flight from Paris to London, actress Jane Birkin was seated next to Hermes CEO Jean-Louis Dumas. After a few of her belongings spilled from her bag, a conversation sparked between the two. Birkin shared her frustration - as a mother - about not being able to find a bag that was both practical and stylish. Inspired by this exchange, Dumas sketched a design on an airplane sick bag, and the rest, we all know, is history. Jane Birkin with her birkin bag (Photo: Getty Photo ) This bag hasn't always been this hyped. It wasn't until the 1990s that it gained the exclusivity and demand it holds hard to getThe rarity and exclusivity that brand created for this bag is one of the reasons that build onto the hype. It is hard to get and not just because of the money but due to its exclusive availability as well. For once, money might just buy happiness, but not the Hermes trend suddenly took off after it was featured in an episode of Sex and the City, when Samantha Jones tried to get her hands on the luxury bag, only to be placed on a 5-year waitlist. The iconic line, 'It's not a bag. It's a Birkin,' became a pop culture bag is made with precision saddle stitching and may take about 18 - 40 hours to create. Then, each bag has a code that documents the year of making, the workshop where it was made and about the artisan who crafted it too. Victoria Beckham flaunting her Birkin Bag in hot pink. (Photo: Reuters) The cost of bags may vary depending on the size, material and other factors. The price range can be from USD 10,000, approx Rs 8,57,279, to USD 450,000, approx Rs 3,85,77, recently, this exclusivity got Hermes into a lawsuit. As per a Reuters report, a lawsuit was filed last year against the brand. "Hermes only gives customers with 'sufficient purchase history' a chance to buy a Birkin bag, which is handmade and can cost thousands of dollars," Reuters just a bag, it's an investmentGetting your hands on one might be a daunting task. While there are no 'official' wait lists, it is recommended to visit a store to buy needs to make a proper appointment, identify the right piece for themselves, and then wait depending on availability. This is where social skills to establish a rapport with the salesperson might just come into elusive luxury bag is dubbed a better investment than gold. Deloitte and Credit Suisse reported that Hermes Birkin bags had an average return of 38 percent in 2020. The resale value of a Birkin in pristine condition has significantly outpaced in IndiaSeveral fashion enthusiasts in India, like Kareena Kapoor Khan, Sonam Kapoor, Janhvi Kapoor abed Shilpa Shetty, often flaunt their Birkin bags. Birkin bag spotted in India! (Photo: Instagram/Kareena Kapoor, Twitter, Instagram screengrab) advertisementAnd when it comes to luxury fashion, trust Nita Ambani to never be far behind. She proudly owns a Neige Snow Faubourg Birkin - just another addition to her unmatched bag collection.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
‘The Use of Photography' by Annie Ernaux and Marc Marie: A material representation of lovemaking
More than two decades after two classics on the subject of photography, Susan's Sontag's On Photography (1977), and Roland Barthes' Camera Lucida (1980, in French), the French Nobel Laureate Annie Ernaux's The Use of Photography (co-written with the late French photographer and journalist, Marc Marie) was published in the original French in 2005, and in English translation by Alison L Strayer in 2024. Sontag's is a historical and sociological examination of the role played by photography in 1970s America. While Sontag's critical exploration is objective, Barthes' narrative is pensive and personal. There are no photographs in Sontag's book, while Barthes often used photographs to illustrate an argument or reading. After love The Use of Photography introduces interesting departures from Sontag and Barthes. The presence and meaning of the human face are central to Barthes' observations on photography, and the photographs in the book accentuate it. In striking contrast, Eranux's project in collaboration with her lover, Marie, keeps the human body – or the human object in photographs – out of the scene. For Ernaux, the photographs taken by Marie and her were meant to 'preserve images of the devastated landscape that remains after lovemaking.' Annie and her lover were not satisfied with making love and 'needed to preserve a material representation of the act'. They did this by clicking pictures of the accidental mise en scène as a mark of pleasure. The unique architecture of the photographs included hurriedly cast-off clothes, underclothes and shoes lying on the floor, sometimes against a larger background of the room filled with other objects. It was, in Annie's words, 'the objective trace of our pleasure.' This postcoital act of photographing – sometimes immediately, sometimes later – became an obsession for them. The rule they established was simple: to touch nothing till they were photographed, like 'the cops would do after a murder', as Marie put it. If anyone touched anything accidentally, the scene wouldn't be photographed. It was being faithful to the crime, a pact of ritual honesty. Sometimes, Ernaux writes, they struggled to recollect the room and day of lovemaking from the photograph. It was in the course of this newfound passion that the idea of writing separately on the photographs occurred to them. They also made the rule of not showing their drafts to each other until they had finished the project. Eroticism is a game of rules, and erotic photography replicates it by devising a way to deflect the gaze from the obvious object (the naked human body) to objects that suggest the intense act of nakedness. Ernaux and Marie's project can be precisely found in what Barthes says about erotic photography in contrast to pornography: 'The erotic photograph, on the contrary (and this is its very condition), does not make the sexual organs into a central object; it may very well not show them at all; it takes the spectator outside its frame'. Erotic photography, then, is simultaneously about the absence of the body and the reminder of its presence. This creates the necessary space for memory games. Ernaux finds the act of writing on the photographs in relation to the fleeting, sexual memory associated with them 'a sort of new erotic practice.' It meant for her a risky act of transgression that was 'more violent than to open up your sex.' Writing, unlike sex, was a public exposure of a private act. Taking this risk to its extreme has been Ernaux's lifelong occupation. The element of shock in The Use of Photography comes from the revelation that Ernaux has breast cancer and is undergoing chemotherapy. Marc was obviously jolted when Ernaux broke the news to him in a matter-of-fact way while they were dining at a place on the cobbled street in Paris named Rue Servandoni. This aspect of their story and relationship adds a poignant and vulnerable layer to their project. Ernaux could lighten the effect by writing, 'Because of my totally smooth body he called me his mermaid-woman. The catheter like a growth protruding from my chest became a 'supernumerary bone''. Marie made it sensual by suggesting a haunting ménage à trois: 'For months, we live together as a threesome: death, A and me. Our companion was intrusive.' Eroticism, as Georges Bataille wrote in the introduction of Eroticism, Death and Sensuality (1962, in English translation by Mary Dalwood), is an affirmation of life to the point of death, which is quoted in the epigraph of Ernaux and Marie's book. But Bataille reads eroticism in a deeply religious manner. He connects eroticism to the desire to procreate, and finds it fundamentally violent in his imagination of human beings as discontinuous selves forcibly coming together in an act that violates their solitude. Since we die alone, Bataille thinks our attempts at making love are to transgress our existential limits and plunge into an act that borders on death, murder and suicide. Sex is the hastening of death by our attempts to escape it. Bataille hallucinates on sex. He would, however, have countered this by arguing that the briefly transgressive aspect of sex involves an element of hallucination. Octavio Paz appears more persuasive in the crucial distinction he makes between sex and eroticism in The Double Flame: Love and Eroticism (1995, translated from Spanish by Helen Lane): 'Eroticism is sex in action, but, because it either diverts it or denies it, it thwarts the goal of the sexual function. In sexuality, pleasure serves procreation; in erotic rituals, pleasure is an end in itself or has ends other than procreation.' Objects of recall The Use of Photography testifies to a double, psychological diversion after sex, through photography and writing. To divert the experience of something with another thing is to create modes of escape and intensification through which one can return – delayed – to what has been lost in time. The erotic nature of photography and writing in this project opens up the possibility to obsessively return to the original moment of desire. The 'use' of photography in that instrumental sense is to ensure that (modern) technology makes the afterlife of sexual memory possible. Here is a sample of Annie describing one of the photographs taken in her living room: 'Of all the things abandoned on the floor after lovemaking, shoes are the most moving – overturned, or upright but heading in opposite directions, or adrift on top of a heap of clothes but still far apart. The distance between them, when it can be seen in the photo, reflects the force with which they were flung off.' This description is reminiscent of André Breton's idea of 'convulsive beauty' in Mad Love (1987, translated from L'Amour Fou by Mary Ann Caws), where a certain art, or experience, involves 'affirming the reciprocal relations linking the object seen in its motion and in its repose.' Breton called it 'veiled-erotic, fixed-explosive, magic-circumstantial'. The fixed image of clothes and shoes flung in haste offers the surreal image of objects that convey both motion and stillness, activating a memory or a perception of time past. There is a moment when Annie makes one of those startling connections between sex, photography and writing and the material trace of life that pervades each act: 'I realise that I am fascinated by photos in the same way I've been fascinated, since childhood, by blood, semen and urine stains on sheets, or old mattresses, discarded on pavements; by the stains of wine and food embedded in the wood of sideboards, the stains of coffee or greasy fingers on old letters… I realise I expect the same thing from writing. I want words to be like stains you cannot tear yourself away from.' Some objects are objects of recall. They initiate the possibility of what Marcel Proust explored in Remembrance of Things Past (originally, 1913) as mémoire involontaire, or involuntary memory. The purely material use of the word 'stain' removes the moral stain attached to that word. Life is a series of fragilities, comprising intimate proofs left behind by vulnerable beings of hunger and pleasure. Those proofs are often discovered in what is no longer useful, in what has been forever discarded, left behind, or expressed in some form or other, as unalterable as a stain on a piece of cloth, a pavement, a sidewalk, a cup, or words in a book. Each trace is a reminder of life, the sign of its inevitable erasure. Close to the finish, Ernaux pauses over the philosophical ache of the project: 'The pain of the photograph. It comes from wanting something other than what is. The boundless meaning of the photograph. A hole through which the fixed light of time, of nothingness is perceived. Every photo is metaphysical.' The essence of the photograph does not lie in what it shows, but in what it hides. The shadow that falls on the page, or the photograph, on what is written or clicked by the human hand, is the imperceptible presence of death. Writing, love making, or photography are hieroglyphic acts of time. The body performs them to enact its pleasures on itself, and lose it forever at the moment of execution. The Use of Photography takes us to the heart of our most delicious crisis. Manash Firag Bhattacharjee's latest book Gandhi: The End of Non-Violence was published earlier this year by Penguin Random House India.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
WWE SmackDown results: Jimmy Uso pins JC Mateo to score an upset win
WWE SmackDown results: Jimmy Uso pinned JC Mateo in the opening match of WWE SmackDown on June 6 and added a major win to his name. The relative newcomer, who been on a roll since debuting at Backlash, dominated the tag team specialist for the majority of the match. However, some miscommunication between Mateo and Jacob Fatu led to the former's downfall. JC Mateo loses on SmackDown Jimmy Uso brought his A-game to the table as he went toe-to-toe against JC Mateo on the latest episode of SmackDown. He, however, did not have it easy as Mateo's allies Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu were ringside. Solo, in particular, kept asking him to join his faction. Mateo dominated Jimmy Uso, using his size to his advantage. "You can still come back, it ain't too late Jimmy, all you gotta do is come back. You wanna get your ass kicked, get your ass kicked." - Solo Sikoa to Jimmy UsoSOLO STILL WANTS JIMMY TO JOIN HIM 👀#SmackDown He even hit a standing moonsault on his rival. Jimmy, however, kept coming back for more and nailed the former Jeff Cobb with a 'Uso in the Air'. In the dying moments of the match, Solo and Fatu distracted their relative as he went for a splash. Mateo tried to take advantage but inadvertently ran into Fatu. This gave Jimmy Uso the opportunity to roll up the former AEW star for the win. What's next for Jimmy Uso? Jimmy Uso is expected to continue his feud with Solo Sikoa's faction in thew weeks to come. Solo, meanwhile, will be participating in the Money in the Bank match this Saturday (June 7). Similarly, as seen on SmackDown last week, Fatu could soon feud with Damian Priest.
