Criminals not able to wipe record with gender change, MSPs told
Criminals are not able to wipe clean their conviction record by changing gender, Justice Secretary Angela Constance has told MSPs. It follows reports that a murderer's criminal past was not disclosed in court files after they altered their gender identity while in prison.Constance said the "isolated" incident was "not reflective of broader issues" in the justice system. She told parliament Police Scotland had been asked to review its procedures following the error.
Constance was quizzed about the case of Alex Stewart, formerly called Alan Baker, who was jailed for murdering father-of-two John Weir in 2013.The Daily Record reported that the error with his criminal record was identified when a lawyer requested his file. The request was made ahead of a case relating to violence inside HMP Greenock in which the inmate was named as a witness. However, the criminal record under Stewart's new name was blank.The previous criminal activity only appeared when a search was done under the old name, Alan Baker, according to the Record.
Conservative MSP Meghan Gallacher asked Constance how many transgender prisoners' criminal records had been "erased" following changes to their birth name.The justice secretary said: "A change of name does not under any circumstances alter a person's criminal record."All criminal records are maintained in accordance with established retention and sharing protocols and remain fully accessible to the justice system."Police Scotland has acknowledged an error in one case reported in the media and acknowledges this should not have occurred."Constance said she had been assured that this was "an isolated incident and not reflective of broader issues in their recording practices".
'Inaccurate and misleading'
Gallacher replied: "This should not have happened in the first place."We are talking about convicted criminals, some of them violent or sexual offenders."She added: "We cannot have further instances of this happening in the future."We need to ensure that victims, women's' groups and the wider public have faith in the justice system."Asked to assure parliament that it was an isolated incident, Constance said: "This was an error in one case."It was a failure to disclose and not a reflection on data recording systems."In response to a question from Tory MSP Sharon Dowey, the justice secretary said it would be "utterly inaccurate and misleading ... if not disgraceful, to suggest that Police Scotland wipe criminal records".
Asked about the case on Monday, First Minister John Swinney said that a criminal record "must continue to be associated" with any individual regardless of changes they make to their name or gender.Swinney told journalists that it was important to have a clear understanding of what had happened in this instance.He added there was "a need for there to be public confidence about this question".A Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service spokesperson said: "Information about previous convictions is provided to COPFS by the police following a check of the relevant databases."Although the initial witness check showed no previous convictions, on further inquiry by the procurator fiscal this was corrected prior to trial."COPFS have asked Police Scotland to review and confirm the processes for recording and sharing information on previous convictions".A Police Scotland spokesperson said that the issue relating to Stewart's file had been "rectified" and that work was "ongoing to prevent similar scenarios taking place in the future".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
'Britain's darkest secret': Grooming survivor calls for apology from Starmer
A rape survivor who was abused by dozens of men has called on the prime minister to apologise for the delay in calling for a national inquiry into the grooming scandal. "Elizabeth", whose name we have changed to protect her identity, was abused by a gang of men in Rotherham from the age of 14. She was also trafficked to other cities and says she was raped by so many men over the course of more than three years she doesn't know the exact number. She says all her abusers were of Pakistani heritage. After Louise Casey's explosive report revealed the ethnicity of perpetrators had been shied away from by the authorities, Elizabeth says Sir Keir Starmer owes survivors an apology "not just for holding back on the inquiry, because he could have done this six months ago, but also for the insults that followed". She says it was incorrect of the prime minister to accuse people of jumping on a "far-right bandwagon". "Survivors and families have not done that. You have whistleblowers, you know, it's concerned people wanting justice for child abuse," she says. She also believes that had the authorities been prepared to confront concerns about the ethnicity of offenders and investigate communities more closely, she could have been spared the abuse she suffered. "Going back, the intelligence, everything, I should never have been a victim," she says. Many are angry it has taken 11 years for politicians to accept the issue Shockingly, in Rotherham, the truth has been known for more than a decade. In 2014 a report by Alexis Jay, who went on to chair a national inquiry into the wider issue of child sexual exploitation, found there were at least 1,400 victims of grooming in the town, with the perpetrators predominantly of Pakistani heritage. 4:18 Many here, including Elizabeth, are angry it has taken 11 years for politicians to accept the issue, despite scandals emerging in a number of towns and cities across Britain. "It's a question still that needs to be answered. I do think it was because they wanted to be politically correct," she says. 'They silenced the wrong people' She's disappointed but unsurprised by the revelation that Whitehall officials wanted to help the authorities in Rotherham cover up the scandal: "It does explain a lot because I've always thought that how organised Rotherham was - how possibly could they have pulled it off themselves?" She believes the result of years of denial by the authorities has meant perpetrators were protected. She describes the survivors of grooming as "Britain's darkest secret", adding, "they silenced the wrong people and we need the truth. Why did they do it?". Sir Keir 'frustrated' with politicians who 'shout and scream but do nothing' Sir Keir said he gets "frustrated" with politicians who "shout and scream but do nothing" as he defended past comments about a grooming gangs inquiry. 7:56 Speaking to Sky News's political editor Beth Rigby, the prime minister was asked if he regretted saying in January that those calling for a national probe into paedophile rings were "jumping on a far-right bandwagon" - given he has now agreed to one. Sir Keir said he was "really clear" he was talking about the Tories, who were demanding an inquiry they never set up when they were in government. He said: "I was calling out those politicians. I am frustrated with politics when people shout and scream a lot and do nothing when they've got the opportunity to do it. It's one of the worst aspects of politics, in my view."
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Man who was 'tortured to death' in his own home was discovered naked in his hallway with ankles bound with duct tape, court hears
Man who was 'tortured to death' in his own home was discovered naked in his hallway with ankles bound with duct tape, court hears A man who was allegedly tortured to death in a brutal attack at his own home was found naked and bound in his hallway, a court has heard. Thomas Campbell, 38, was discovered by shocked neighbours the morning after he was subjected to a harrowing and violent assault in Mossley, Tameside. Jurors at Manchester Crown Court were told the father-of-two was ambushed by a gang of three men as he arrived home late on the evening of Saturday, July 2, 2022. One of the men, John Belfield, 31, is accused of being the ringleader behind the plot. He denies being at the scene and has pleaded not guilty to murder and conspiracy to rob. Another attacker, Reece Steven, has already been convicted of murder, while the third man involved has never been identified. The court heard the 'horrific' killing was the result of 'very careful planning by a team of highly organised criminals' who used a tracking device placed on Mr Campbell's car and carried out reconnaissance on his home in the days before the assault. Prosecutors claim Belfield had a personal motive for targeting Mr Campbell, including a desire to steal 'items of value' and jealousy over a relationship between Mr Campbell and Belfield's ex-girlfriend. Thomas dealt cocaine and was prosecuted for money laundering offences Coleen (pictured) broke up with Thomas after he cheated on her with a friend Pictured is Reece Steven, who was convicted of murder and was jailed for life with a minimum of 37 years Pictured is Stephen Cleworth, one of the killers. He was was found guilty of manslaughter and jailed for 12 years The court was told that Mr Campbell's ex-wife, Coleen Campbell, was among those previously convicted in connection to his death. During a 2023 trial, she was found guilty of sharing crucial details about her former husband's movements — including information passed on by their children — with Belfield. Stephen Cleworth, from Heywood, who acted as a driver for Belfield, was also convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. He was responsible for planting the tracker on Mr Campbell's vehicle and assisting with surveillance though he was not present during the murder. Steven, described by prosecutors as Belfield's 'right-hand man', was convicted of murder and conspiracy to rob following the same trial. As Belfield's trial continued this week, the jury heard from forensic pathologist Dr Philip Lumb, who carried out the post-mortem examination on Mr Campbell's body. Dr Lumb described the chilling scene where he found the 38-year-old victim lying dead in the hallway of his home. Campbell is pictured outside Manchester Crown Court during an earlier hearing relating to her husband's death Thomas Campbell, 38, was ambushed by three men as he opened his front door in Mossley, Greater Manchester Thomas Campbell, 38, (pictured with Coleen on holiday) was ambushed by three men as he opened his front door in Mossley, Greater Manchester The expert said Mr Campbell had sustained injuries consistent with 'restraint' and 'asphyxia', and had suffered a 'sustained blunt sharp force physical assault' to the head and neck. Jurors also heard Mr Campbell had suffered burn injuries to his thigh and buttocks, believed to have been caused by 'a hot liquid such as hot water'. A large stab wound to his upper arm had bled heavily, and a makeshift tourniquet had been found on the limb. Dr Lumb concluded that the medical cause of death was a combination of multiple sharp force injuries, blunt force head injuries, and pressure to the neck. Belfield, of no fixed address, continues to deny murder and conspiracy to rob as the trial proceeds.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I paid £83.50 for just an HOUR of parking after firm fined me for a 'stupid reason'
A mental health support worker paid £83.50 for just an hour of parking - after a firm fined him for not buying a ticket, even though their machine was out of order. Lenny Samms, 63, of Eastbourne, told MailOnline he received an £85 charge in early January for the totally accidental breach in October last year. He parked at Iceland - but with the payment machine not working, he could not buy a ticket: 'I thought, "There's other cars here, I'll just get on with my day".' Mr Samms was only away from his car for an hour, which normally costs £1.50 - so with an £85 charge, he essentially paid £83.50 more than he should have had to. That comes in at a pricey £1.40 per minute - nearly the normal hourly rate, thanks to the fine issued by Horizon Parking. He explained the machine was out of order when he received the charge - but with no proof, he ended up just paying it: 'I didn't want to go to court and try to explain it. 'I didn't take a photograph of the machine saying out of order when I should have.' But he said: 'I felt sort of isolated, I'm sure that other people have gone through it but I had no support or a witness or anyone else I knew that had gone through it. Lenny Samms (pictured), 63, of Eastbourne, told MailOnline he received an £85 charge in early January for the totally accidental breach in October last year He parked at Iceland (pictured) - but with the payment machine not working, he could not buy a ticket: 'I thought, "There's other cars here, I'll just get on with my day"' Mr Samms was only away from his car for an hour, which normally costs £1.50 - so with an £85 charge, he essentially paid £83.50 more than he should have had to 'That's why I was thinking, "Should I reach out to anyone on Facebook who had gone through a similar thing?" 'Because it's a local town, Eastbourne is not that big and I wondered if anyone had gone through it but then you feel quite isolated really. And it's annoying really.' He continued: 'When you're getting a parking charge like this, it can be quite intimidating, threatening you with court procedures and all this. 'I just wish I had the proof but I know next time to get proof, you need evidence. 'It was a hard lesson to learn, really, then I probably wouldn't have had to pay it.' But Mr Samms never thought he would have to go on to prove the machine was not working - with CCTV cameras in the car park to already show that was the case. The 63-year-old continued: 'I just naively thought that the machine and the camera sort of liaise together. I didn't expect a ticket to come through the post.' And it was only after paying the charge and discussing it with an Iceland employee that he discovered there is a second payment machine in the car park. But Mr Samms never thought he would have to go on to prove the machine was not working - with CCTV cameras in the car park (pictured, a sign in the Iceland car park) to already show that was the case But it is not visible unless you are entering the supermarket - which he was not - and there is no notice in the car park informing customers it is there. Drivers facing trouble with unexpected charges from parking firms has become an increasingly well-documented issue in recent times. In fact, analysis by MailOnline has shown 'cowboy' parking firms are now doling out a record number of tickets. Government figures suggest private operators issued 12.8million fines in 2023/24 – one every two seconds. This is up nearly 90 per cent in just five years, despite the Government repeatedly vowing to stop predatory operators. With 2024/25 on track to be even worse, ministers are facing renewed calls to get tough on the ruthless firms causing misery for millions of motorists. Simon Williams, head of policy at the RAC, said it was 'scandalous' how motorists were being stung by broken technology and firms deploying sneaky signs to take 'advantage of law-abiding citizens'. He revealed he was working with parliamentarians to stop parking firms 'marking their own homework' by overhauling the current complaints process. Mr Samms said: 'When you're getting a parking charge like this, it can be quite intimidating, threatening you with court procedures and all this'. Pictured: The machine in the Iceland car park Mr Williams said: 'We want a truly independent single appeals service that only the Government backed private parking code of practice will deliver. 'We also want a scrutiny board which will ensure private parking operators conform to the rules and will face consequences if they do not.' Mr Samms echoed this sentiment too: 'The parking companies are known to be quite greedy and misleading, aren't they? So, it's no surprise, it's all about money... 'When you work hard for your money and you've got a mortgage to pay and bills to pay and the cost of living is going up, the last thing you want is to have to find £85.' The support worker, who has lived in Eastbourne all his life, has said parking in the town has become noticeably more expensive in recent years. He said: 'I've seen Eastbourne changed, like most towns are getting bigger, whereas years ago, you used be able to park in town without paying.' Payment has only come in the last ten or 15 years he said: 'Before, you could just park freely, but now, in and around the town, the radius, where you can't park for free anymore, you've got to park way outside of town if you want to park for free.' He also often visits Brighton, only a 20-minute drive away - but finds it very expensive to park there too. He continued: 'I just wish I had the proof but I know next time to get proof, you need evidence'. Pictured: A sign in the Iceland car park Your browser does not support iframes. Mr Samms said: 'It was the Green Party that made Brighton expensive to park to encourage tourists to use public transport but in fact what it was doing was keeping people away from Brighton. 'The parking was so expensive, you could spend £30 for a few hours. So, you do your shopping and things and you have a £35 bill.' Private parking firms are on course to issue a record 14.5million tickets to drivers in Britain in a year – with just five companies responsible for nearly half of them. And the firm behind Mr Samms' charge, Horizon Parking, is one of them. The RAC found car park management firms' requests to the DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency) reached 7.2million in the six months to the end of last September. That is up 12 per cent from the same period a year earlier and represents an average of 41,000 requests per day. The RAC added if the rate continued for the following six months, 14.5million tickets will have been issued over a year. The five parking companies which issued 45 per cent of tickets between April and September last year were ParkingEye (1,129,000), Euro Car Parks (892,000), Horizon Parking (440,000), Smart Parking (424,000) and APCOA Parking (367,000). Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes. Private companies chase vehicle owners for alleged infringements in private car parks, such as at shopping centres, leisure facilities and motorway service areas. Each ticket can be up to £100, meaning the daily total cost to drivers may be near £4.1million at the current rate. But private parking firms have been accused of using misleading and confusing signs, aggressive debt collection and unreasonable fees. An investigation by the PA news agency earlier this year found drivers across England say they are being sent parking charge notices (PCNs) because of faulty machines, which one campaigner claiming the devices are 'set up to trap people'. A Bill to enable the introduction of a Government-backed code for private parking companies received royal assent under the Conservative government in March 2019. The code was withdrawn in June 2022 after a legal challenge by parking companies. Horizon Parking told MailOnline: 'We manage the car park on behalf of the landowner to ensure that their customers are able to park and utilise the facilities as required. This helps prevent abuse including ensuring disabled bays are kept free for those who need them. 'There is a clearly set out appeals process which motorists can follow if they feel that they should not have received a Charge. We are members of the British Parking Association and adhere to the Private Parking Sector Single Code of Practice. 'Without further information such as Parking Charge reference or vehicle registration we are unable to investigate this matter or comment any further. 'If a motorist receives a Parking Charge in these circumstances it is possible to investigate any issues with the payment machines from the back-office system, however without a specific date it is not possible to do so. 'Please note that payment on arrival is required and payment at the machine would not be possible if a motorist had remained in the car park for longer than the permitted maximum stay of 1 hour which is why it may have appeared not to be working. There is also the option to pay via our Horizon Parking app or website at by entering the location code advertised in the car park.'
