Generative AI gains ground in higher edu: Study
Vadodara: Students in Gujarat tend to use generative AI tools like Grammarly more frequently to correct their grammar, spellings, and punctuation marks or to create posters, brochures, and presentations using tools like Canva compared to their counterparts in Assam in the eastern belt of the country.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In contrast, university students in Assam more often use Meta AI and ChatGPT compared to the university students in Gujarat. A study on the perceptions of university students from the Northeast and western region of India revealed how the usage of generative AI varies amongst students enrolled in higher education institutes in the two extreme corners of India.
Interestingly, the study revealed that despite different usage patterns, 95% of students did not receive formal training on generative AI tools.
"The study was carried out to understand how students enrolled in higher education institutes perceive AI and their knowledge regarding the applications of generative AI in their academics," said Jigyasha Deka, who, as a master's student, completed the study under the guidance of Dr Varsha Parikh from the Department of Extension and Communication of M S University's Faculty of Family and Community Sciences.
The research was conducted among 220 students from five departments of Faculty of Family and Community Sciences and the College of Community Science of Assam Agricultural University.
"The objective was to assess the generative AI usage pattern from the students of Gujarat and Assam and to assess the knowledge level regarding the application of generative AI in higher education among the students," Deka said.
The study revealed that around as 96.8% of students in both states were highly aware and familiar with usage of generative AI tools. Almost 94.5% of students use generative AI in academic work, with ChatGPT being most popular.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Students primarily use generative AI for idea generation, homework, and information search (73.2%).
"Most students (63.6%) used generative AI for over a year, learning through self-exploration and peer networks. Surprisingly, 95% of students did not receive formal training on generative AI tools. These findings highlight the growing reliance on generative AI in higher education and the need for structured training programmes," she said.
The study showed the majority of students have a good understanding of generative AI. Categorised as "knowledgeable" — 64.1% — students fall in this category. However, 35.9% of students have a limited understanding of generative AI in higher education.
The study recommends that higher education institutes should develop clear policies and guidelines on generative AI use, provide comprehensive training for students and staff, and address concerns around academic integrity and bias.
"By taking these steps, institutions can effectively integrate generative AI into curricula while ensuring fair learning opportunities," the study states.
"AI literacy, training, and ethical guidelines can enhance technology integration while addressing students' needs and concerns to ensure successful integration of generative AI tools in academics," the study states.
INSET
Guj banks on tie-ups,
Assam govt on app
Vadodara: The study states that while the Gujarat govt has made efforts to improve artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities through strategic partnerships with prominent IT firms, while the Assam govt has established the Shiksha Setu App to promote communication in the educational sector. It highlights that the Gujarat govt has inked MoUs with IBM and Microsoft to build an AI cluster in Gujarat to promote innovation and collaboration in the financial technology sector by exploiting advanced AI technologies.
The app launched by the Assam govt, however, makes it easier to access instructional resources and manage attendance to increase school transparency and efficiency, which in turn is expected to improve student outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is AI sparking a cognitive revolution that will lead to mediocrity and conformity?
HighlightsThe rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping cognitive processes in various fields, prompting concerns about the potential loss of originality and depth in creative work as reliance on AI tools increases. Generative AI, while capable of producing competent-sounding content, often lacks true creativity and originality, as it predominantly reflects and rearranges existing human-created material. The challenge posed by the cognitive revolution driven by artificial intelligence is not only technological but also cultural, as it raises questions about preserving the irreplaceable value of human creativity amid a surge of algorithmically generated content. Artificial Intelligence began as a quest to simulate the human brain . Is it now in the process of transforming the human brain's role in daily life? The Industrial Revolution diminished the need for manual labour. As someone who researches the application of AI in international business , I can't help but wonder whether it is spurring a cognitive revolution , obviating the need for certain cognitive processes as it reshapes how students, workers and artists write, design and decide. Graphic designers use AI to quickly create a slate of potential logos for their clients. Marketers test how AI-generated customer profiles will respond to ad campaigns. Software engineers deploy AI coding assistants. Students wield AI to draft essays in record time - and teachers use similar tools to provide feedback. The economic and cultural implications are profound. What happens to the writer who no longer struggles with the perfect phrase, or the designer who no longer sketches dozens of variations before finding the right one? Will they become increasingly dependent on these cognitive prosthetics, similar to how using GPS diminishes navigation skills? And how can human creativity and critical thinking be preserved in an age of algorithmic abundance? Echoes of the industrial revolution We've been here before. The Industrial Revolution replaced artisanal craftsmanship with mechanised production, enabling goods to be replicated and manufactured on a mass scale. Shoes, cars and crops could be produced efficiently and uniformly. But products also became more bland, predictable and stripped of individuality. Craftsmanship retreated to the margins, as a luxury or a form of resistance. Today, there's a similar risk with the automation of thought. Generative AI tempts users to conflate speed with quality, productivity with originality. The danger is not that AI will fail us, but that people will accept the mediocrity of its outputs as the norm. When everything is fast, frictionless and "good enough," there's the risk of losing the depth, nuance and intellectual richness that define exceptional human work. The rise of algorithmic mediocrity Despite the name, AI doesn't actually think. Tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini process massive volumes of human-created content, often scraped from the internet without context or permission. Their outputs are statistical predictions of what word or pixel is likely to follow based on patterns in data they have processed. They are, in essence, mirrors that reflect collective human creative output back to users - rearranged and recombined, but fundamentally derivative. And this, in many ways, is precisely why they work so well. Consider the countless emails people write, the slide decks strategy consultants prepare and the advertisements that suffuse social media feeds. Much of this content follows predictable patterns and established formulas. It has been there before, in one form or the other. Generative AI excels at producing competent-sounding content - lists, summaries, press releases, advertisements - that bears the signs of human creation without that spark of ingenuity. It thrives in contexts where the demand for originality is low and when "good enough" is, well, good enough. When AI sparks - and stifles - creativity Yet, even in a world of formulaic content, AI can be surprisingly helpful. In one set of experiments, researchers tasked people with completing various creative challenges. They found that those who used generative AI produced ideas that were, on average, more creative, outperforming participants who used web searches or no aids at all. In other words, AI can, in fact, elevate baseline creative performance. However, further analysis revealed a critical trade-off: Reliance on AI systems for brainstorming significantly reduced the diversity of ideas produced, which is a crucial element for creative breakthroughs. The systems tend to converge toward a predictable middle rather than exploring unconventional possibilities at the edges. I wasn't surprised by these findings. My students and I have found that the outputs of generative AI systems are most closely aligned with the values and world views of wealthy, English-speaking nations. This inherent bias quite naturally constrains the diversity of ideas these systems can generate. More troubling still, brief interactions with AI systems can subtly reshape how people approach problems and imagine solutions. One set of experiments tasked participants with making medical diagnoses with the help of AI. However, the researchers designed the experiment so that AI would give some participants flawed suggestions. Even after those participants stopped using the AI tool, they tended to unconsciously adopt those biases and make errors in their own decisions. What begins as a convenient shortcut risks becoming a self-reinforcing loop of diminishing originality - not because these tools produce objectively poor content, but because they quietly narrow the bandwidth of human creativity itself. Navigating the cognitive revolution True creativity, innovation and research are not just probabilistic recombinations of past data. They require conceptual leaps, cross-disciplinary thinking and real-world experience. These are qualities AI cannot replicate. It cannot invent the future. It can only remix the past. What AI generates may satisfy a short-term need: a quick summary, a plausible design, a passable script. But it rarely transforms, and genuine originality risks being drowned in a sea of algorithmic sameness. The challenge, then, isn't just technological. It's cultural. How can the irreplaceable value of human creativity be preserved amid this flood of synthetic content? The historical parallel with industrialisation offers both caution and hope. Mechanisation displaced many workers but also gave rise to new forms of labour, education and prosperity. Similarly, while AI systems may automate some cognitive tasks, they may also open up new intellectual frontiers by simulating intellectual abilities. In doing so, they may take on creative responsibilities, such as inventing novel processes or developing criteria to evaluate their own outputs. This transformation is only at its early stages. Each new generation of AI models will produce outputs that once seemed like the purview of science fiction. The responsibility lies with professionals, educators and policymakers to shape this cognitive revolution with intention. Will it lead to intellectual flourishing or dependency? To a renaissance of human creativity or its gradual obsolescence? The answer, for now, is up in the air.
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Salman Rushdie says he has never used AI, warns it could replace writers but first it needs to learn comedy
When OpenAI launched ChatGPT in 2023, the reaction was mixed. On one hand, everyone was excited to see cutting-edge technology and what artificial intelligence could do for humans. On the other, fears began to linger about AI replacing humans in various jobs. One of the roles people were most concerned about was that of writers, as AI platforms like ChatGPT and Gemini could write everything from essays to novels. And since then these tools have become much famous writer Salman Rushdie believes that writers shouldn't fear AI — at least not for now — as it lacks one very important skill: a sense of humour. Speaking at the Hay Festival in Wales, Rushdie quipped that writers are safe from being overtaken by machines, at least until a bot can write a book that genuinely makes people laugh.'I've never tried AI,' he said. 'I pretend it doesn't exist. It has no sense of humour, you don't want to hear a joke told by ChatGPT. If there's ever a moment when a funny book is written by ChatGPT, I think we're screwed.' Rushdie's comments on AI came during his first major in-person appearance in the UK since he was seriously injured after he was stabbed while on stage in the United States. The attack left him blind in his right eye, but he has continued to make public appearances and comment on developments in literature and writers have been among the first white-collar professionals to raise the alarm about the rise of AI and its potential to replace humans in writing work. In recent years, several prominent authors have voiced concerns that AI companies are training language models using their copyrighted works, without permission or 2023, a group of more than 8,500 authors came together and signed an open letter to tech companies asking them to stop using their books for training AI tools.'These technologies mimic and regurgitate our language, stories, style, and ideas. Millions of copyrighted books, articles, essays, and poetry provide the 'food' for AI systems, endless meals for which there has been no bill,' they wrote in the growing tension between technology and creativity is even prompting many in the literary community to call for regulation and transparency. Writers argue that while AI can mimic sentence structure and tone, it lacks the emotional nuance, lived experience, and cultural insight that define truly impactful literature.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Reliance only Indian firm in highly valued global technology companies list
Billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries is the only Indian firm to have made it to the listing of top 30 publicly traded global technology companies, as per a 340-page report, titled 'Trends - Artificial Intelligence', that delves into the rapid global adoption and transformative impact of AI technologies. The report lists global technology companies by market capitalisation. Top eight slots on the list are occupied by US technology giants - Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Tesla and Broadcom. Taiwan's TSMC is ranked 9th, followed by China's Tencent. Reliance, with a market capitalisation of USD 216 billion, is ranked 23rd, according to the list. "Over the past 30 years (1995-2025), just five companies remained on the top 30 most highly valued publicly traded global technology companies - Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco, IBM and AT&T," the report said. It went on to list Reliance alongside the likes of Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, Alibaba, Salesforce and China Mobile as the new entrants. "In 1995, the USA had 53% (16 of 30) of the most valuable tech companies and 70 per cent (21 of 30) in 2025," it said. In 1995, Japan had 30% (9 of 30) of top tech companies and zero in 2025. The UK, Singapore, Hong Kong, Mexico and Malaysia had 1 each, but now none are on the list. "In 2025, new geographic entrants include China with 3, Germany with 2, Taiwan with 1, Netherlands with 1, South Korea with 1 and India with 1," it said. Taiwan has only one company on the list - TSMC - the company produces 80-90% of the world's most advanced semiconductors and 62% of global semiconductors. According to the report, India has the most number of ChatGPT mobile app users in the world. It accounts for 13.5% of monthly active users of the artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot developed by OpenAI. It is ahead of the USA (8.9%), Indonesia (5.7 %) and Brazil (5.4%). Pakistan has 3% of users. India also accounts for 6.9% of active global users of Chinese AI app DeepSeek, behind China (33.9%) and Russia (9.2%). "Artificial intelligence is reshaping the modern landscape at breakneck speed. What began as research has scaled into emerging core infrastructure across industries - powering everything from customer support to software development, scientific discovery, education, and manufacturing," the report said. AI, it said, is accelerating, touching more domains, and becoming more embedded in how work gets done. "Catalysing this growth is the global availability of easy-to-use multimodal AI tools (like ChatGPT) on pervasive mobile devices, augmented by a steep decline in inference costs and an explosion in model availability. Both closed and open-source tools are now widely accessible and increasingly capable, enabling solo developers, startups, and enterprises alike to experiment and deploy with minimal friction," it said. Large tech incumbents are weaving AI deeper into their products - rolling out copilots, assistants, and even agents that reframe how users engage with technology. Whether through embedded intelligence in SaaS or agentic workflows in consumer apps, the interface layer is being rewritten in real time. On the compute side, investment continues to scale dramatically. Capital expenditures across major cloud providers, chipmakers, and hyperscalers have hit new highs, driven by the race to enable real-time, high-volume inference at scale. The investment is not just in chips, but also in new data centres, networking infrastructure, and energy systems to support growing demand. "Whether this level of capital expenditure persists remains to be seen, but as AI moves closer to the edge - in vehicles, farms, labs, and homes - distinction between digital and physical infrastructure continues to blur," the report said. PTI
