logo
Anxiety Aunt: Is it acceptable to be on FaceTime or speaker phone in a busy public place?

Anxiety Aunt: Is it acceptable to be on FaceTime or speaker phone in a busy public place?

West Australian2 days ago

Dear Aunty,
I frequent my local cafe regularly and usually sit at an outside table. It's a popular place so is usually noisy but it's a happy, busy atmosphere and we don't mind. Last weekend my husband and I met a friend there for her birthday, she's 77 and we're all getting a little hard of hearing, especially when it's noisy. We usually just talk louder. However, on this occasion a young mum with a toddler came and sat at the table next to us with her phone on speaker. She was on FaceTime with someone. She propped the phone on her water bottle and proceeded to have a very loud conversation. We all then found it hard to hear each other. I almost said something but didn't in the end. The person on the other end of the phone was even louder than the woman at the table. Is this bad cafe etiquette? If I get a call at a cafe, I move away to avoid disturbing others. What would your advice be if this happens again?
Yours Annoyed
Dear Annoyed,
Oh, it will happen again, my dear, it's just a matter of where and when.
Your Aunt isn't a fan of willy-nilly rules for everything but One would definitely consider a ban on being on speaker phone or FaceTime when in busy public places because it is rude, inconsiderate and smacks of self-entitlement.
One has seen people on FaceTime while wandering around shopping centres and airports. One has even seen it inside cinemas and on planes before take-off and again after landing.
If we were meant to spend our lives FaceTiming, evolution would have seen to it that our ears were at the front of our face and our eyes moved to the sides. But no, instead evolution is rewarding us with some kind of permanent horn thing on the back of our skulls because we all spend too long with our heads pointed down staring at our phones. Surely, if there was ever a warning against too much screen time, that is it!
And while in your anecdote it was a young woman, in your Aunt's experience this kind of obnoxious behaviour transcends generations. And it's not just FaceTiming or talking on speaker phone that is problematic; in the wrong environment even just having your screen illuminated is out of line.
One was recently at the theatre for a junior dance recital (the things One does for One's neighbours) where One witnessed a mother to One's right tell her teenage son to put his phone away when the gentleman to One's left (of baby boomer age) dug out his own phone.
He then proceeded to check his WhatsApp messages throughout the live performance.
One's blood pressure was already on the boil when he had the audacity to turn on his phone torch to check the program. It was like sitting next to a human lighthouse.
One could not get over his lack of respect for the young performers whose moment on stage was being hijacked by someone with enough life experience to know better but the selfishness not to care.
During a short break in performances, One took the opportunity to turn to the teen on One's right and loudly exclaim: 'well done on resisting the urge to touch your phone young man, if only others WHO SHOULD KNOW BETTER would follow your example'.
The older gent then gave your Aunt the stink eye and a loud 'harrumph' before grudgingly shoving his phone in his pocket.
The curtain wasn't even down before he'd retrieved it and was straight back on the WhatsApp chat. Probably complaining about an interfering old biddy at a theatre show.
Hopefully karma steps in and his horn grows quicker than anyone else's, although maybe it was the horn that had him on WhatsApp talking to some would-be lady love. Good luck to her!
But back to you, Annoyed. While evolution is certainly making changes to our physiology, it seems it can't meet our desire to transmit messages using only our minds. So, the only way to get people to realise their behaviour is unacceptable, causing offence or annoyance, is to speak up.
You don't have to be rude or confrontational about it, but if we all just sit in silence then the FaceTime set will only get emboldened and louder.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

泰國首位世界小姐冠軍誕生 22歲女積極推動防治乳癌(有片)
泰國首位世界小姐冠軍誕生 22歲女積極推動防治乳癌(有片)

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

泰國首位世界小姐冠軍誕生 22歲女積極推動防治乳癌(有片)

第72屆世界小姐選舉於周六(31日),在印度海德拉巴(Hyderabad)順利舉行,由泰國22歲代表Opal Suchata Chuangsri摘下后冠,成為泰國首位世界小姐冠軍。Chuangsri不僅是一名政治學系學生,還是「Opal for Her」防治乳癌倡議的創始人。 綜合報道,身高180公分的Chuangsri來自普吉府,精通中英泰三語,立志成為外交官。她推廣「Opal for Her」乳癌倡議組織計畫逾3年,盼藉世界小姐平台將其擴展至全球。結果Chuangsri在108位參賽者中脫穎而出,由去年冠軍捷克小姐Krystyna Pyszková為她加冕。她在賽後表示,這不僅是個人勝利,更是每個渴望改變的年輕女孩的共同夢想,她將利用此身份做出真正改變。 比賽中,Chuangsri憑藉「亞洲及大洋洲多媒體挑戰賽」冠軍直入40強。在關鍵問答環節,她以照料花園比喻代表角色,並強調以善良和行動領導的重要性,最終贏得評審青睞。世界小姐組織主席Julia Morley讚揚Chuangsri是位有目標的女性,世界已準備好聆聽她的聲音。衣索比亞小姐Hasset Dereje Admassu獲亞軍,波蘭的Maja Klajda獲季軍,來自法國海外大區Martinique的Aurelie Joachim則獲得殿軍。 Warm congratulations💐to @Opalsuchaaata (Opal Suchata Chuangsri ) from Thailand for winning the 72nd Miss World competition, hosted with pride in Telangana, grace, intelligence, and purpose have inspired millions around the globe. This prestigious victory not only… — Ponguleti Srinivasa Reddy (@INC_Ponguleti) May 31, 2025 原文刊登於 AM730

Christian Horner slams Nico Rosberg after Max Verstappen disqualification demand
Christian Horner slams Nico Rosberg after Max Verstappen disqualification demand

Daily Mirror

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Christian Horner slams Nico Rosberg after Max Verstappen disqualification demand

Nico Rosberg had suggested Max Verstappen should have been disqualified from the Spanish Grand Prix after the Red Bull Racing driver appeared to deliberately ram George Russell's Mercedes Christian Horner has snapped back at "sensationalist" Nico Rosberg after the Sky Sports pundit called for Max Verstappen to be disqualified. That request came shortly after the Spanish Grand Prix which ended in acrimony after Verstappen lost his head in the latter stages. Furious after contact with first Charles Leclerc and then Russell, the Dutchman believing the other driver had caused both, he then completely lost his temper when his Red Bull team, fearing that they were going to get a penalty for that first skirmish with Russell, asked him to cede a place to the Brit. ‌ Verstappen shouted furiously over the radio and then slowed down, appearing to comply despite his protests. But then, as Russell went around the outside of his Red Bull, the Dutchman appeared to deliberately turn to bang wheels with the Mercedes. ‌ Rosberg felt he had done it deliberately and said Verstappen should have been disqualified. The German said on Sky: "The first one, it was George's fault because he only complied with two out of those three things you have to comply with when you overtake, so Max could have stayed in front – he didn't have to give up that place. Sign up to our free weekly F1 newsletter, Pit Lane Chronicle, by entering your email address below so that every new edition lands straight in your inbox! ‌ "But then Red Bull told him to give up the place and that then caused his blood to boil over even more. And then it looked like a very intentional retaliation – wait for the opponent and then ramming into him, just like you felt he did to you. "And that is something that is extremely unacceptable, I think. The rules then would be a black flag, yes. If you wait for your opponent just to then ram into him, crash into him, that's a black flag." Asked about those comments, Red Bull chief Horner wouldn't be drawn into giving a full response, but made it clear what he felt of Rosberg's punditry style. The 51-year-old said: "Nico is quite sensationalist in the way that he commentates, so I'll leave it at that." ‌ Verstappen's moment of madness saw him slapped with a 10-second time penalty which dropped him to 10th place in the final classification. That meant he scored just one single point while his drivers' title rivals Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris accumulated maximum points by finishing first and second respectively. And the Dutchman is now also on the brink of a race ban. He now has 11 penalty points on his racing licence, having earned an extra three for his clash with Russell, meaning he will be forced to sit out one race if he picked up just one more point in the next two races. Two penalty points will then expire at the end of June, but the other nine he currently has won't begin to disappear until October, meaning Verstappen will had to tread a very fine line if he is to avoid that race ban.

Madagascar Courts UAE Investment to Offset US Tariff Threat
Madagascar Courts UAE Investment to Offset US Tariff Threat

Bloomberg

time17 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Madagascar Courts UAE Investment to Offset US Tariff Threat

Madagascar is seeking to boost investments from the United Arab Emirates to spur growth in its tourism and energy sectors, a partnership that's become more urgent as its faces steep tariffs from the US. President Donald Trump in April threatened a 47% reciprocal tariff — one of the world's highest — on the Indian Ocean island nation, before replacing it with a 10% universal levy. He's given most countries until July 8 to strike a deal or risk reinstatement of the tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store