
Judge says DHS "unquestionably" violated order with attempted South Sudan deportations
The Trump administration on Wednesday said it placed eight migrant detainees with serious criminal records on a deportation flight that lawyers alleged was destined for the violence-plagued African country of South Sudan, in its latest attempt to deport migrants to countries that are not their own.
The administration has not publicly disclosed the whereabouts of the flight, which a federal judge on Wednesday said "unquestionably" violated a court ruling blocking deportations to third countries without allowing detainees to contest their removal.
Top Department of Homeland Security officials said the eight men were in the U.S. illegally and hailed from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam. The department shared case information indicating all the would-be deportees had criminal convictions, including for homicide, attempted murder, sexual assault, lascivious acts with a child and robbery.
In a statement Wednesday evening, DHS released the names of the eight men. They were identified as Dian Peter Domach of South Sudan, Enrique Arias-Hierro of Cuba, Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones of Cuba, Thongxay Nilakout of Laos, Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez of Mexico, Kyaw Mya of Myanmar, Nyo Myint of Myanmar and Tuan Thanh Phan of Vietnam.
On Tuesday, immigration lawyers told the federal district court in Massachusetts that at least two men from Myanmar and Vietnam were likely being deported to South Sudan, saying the reported deportation flight would violate an order by federal judge Brian Murphy that blocked deportations to third countries unless detainees were provided certain due process rights.
During a briefing in Washington on Wednesday to discuss a migrant flight to South Sudan, top DHS officials confirmed a deportation flight had left Texas on Tuesday, saying the eight detainees from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam were being transported as part of "a diplomatic and military security operation."
The officials, however, declined to confirm the final destination of the flight or any formal arrangement with South Sudan's government, citing operational and safety concerns. The officials also said they could not disclose the exact whereabouts of the detainees.
Following an emergency motion by the lawyers who alerted him of the potential deportation flight to South Sudan, Murphy, the federal judge in Massachusetts, ordered the Trump administration late Tuesday to retain "custody and control" of the would-be deportees.
In a written order Wednesday, the judge also ordered the government to give six deportees "reasonable fear" interviews, which usually assess whether a migrant is legally entitled to stay in the U.S. because of a risk of persecution or torture. If they express a fear that falls short of that standard, they must get at least 15 days to "reopen immigration proceedings to challenge the potential third-party removal," the judge said.
The Trump administration was also ordered to provide status reports every seven days, and to maintain custody over the deportees.
On Wednesday, top DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said the eight men who had been placed on the deportation flight that departed Texas remained in U.S. custody.
McLaughlin also sharply criticized Murphy's ruling. "It is absolutely absurd for a district judge to try and dictate the foreign policy and national security of the United States of America," McLaughlin said, accusing Murphy of "trying to force" officials to bring back dangerous individuals to the U.S.
During a hearing Wednesday, a Justice Department lawyer told Murphy the flight in question had landed somewhere and also confirmed the men remained in U.S. custody but said the current location of the flight could only be discussed in private, out of earshot of the press.
The Justice Department said the situation was dangerous for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees on the flight because of the severity of the detainees' criminal records.
After a private conversation with both parties, Murphy said that the government's attempted deportations "are unquestionably violative of this court's order." He noted that the detainees were put on the deportation flight less than 24 hours after being told they would be deported to South Sudan.
"I don't see how anybody could say that these individuals had a meaningful opportunity to object" to their removal, Murphy said. "They did not offer any opportunity to object." Murphy noted the detainees were put on a deportation flight less than a day after being told they would be deported to South Sudan.
The Justice Department attorneys arguing the case said Murphy's orders in the case were "not specific enough," which gave rise to "misunderstanding."
Murphy did not rule out holding the Trump administration in contempt of court for violating his order, but said that issue would be "left for another day."
As part of its immigration crackdown, President Trump's administration has staged an intense diplomatic effort to convince nations around the world to accept migrants who are not their own citizens, approaching nations like Libya and Rwanda to take in third-country deportees.
Early on in Mr. Trump's second term, U.S. officials deported African and Asian migrants to Costa Rica and Panama, and Venezuelan deportees accused of being gang members to El Salvador, where they remain detained at a notorious mega prison.
CBS News and other outlets reported earlier this month that the Trump administration was preparing to send migrants to Libya, but that flight never materialized once those reports surfaced.
Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the immigration reporter at CBS News. Based in Washington, he covers immigration policy and politics.
contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration bans travel from 19 countries as San Diego prepares for peak tourism season
SAN DIEGO, Calif. (FOX 5/KUSI) — The Trump administration announced a travel ban against a dozen countries on Wednesday and restrictions on seven others, citing national security concerns as a major reason for the restrictions. 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,' President Donald Trump said in a video posted to social media. The proclamation signed Wednesday bans people from the following countries: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen It also restricts travel to the United States from these countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela That makes traveling to San Diego potentially more difficult or impossible for visitors from these nations. 'In order for this ban, this travel restriction to stand up in court, it has to be tied to legitimate reasons, and the president is tying it to issues of national security,' said Wendy Patrick, FOX 5 and KUSI legal analyst. This isn't the first time Trump imposed a controversial travel ban. In 2017, during his first term in office, he also restricted travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries. 'It can't be tied to demographics that are impermissible such as religion, race, national origin,' Patrick said. 'It has to be tied to an issue for which these powers exist.' Advocacy groups like the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans criticize the ban, saying, 'At a time when immigration enforcement agents are abducting immigrants and tearing families apart, this ban only magnifies the inhumane treatment of people under this administration.' Sen. Alex Padilla echoes these concerns, saying in a statement, 'This senseless, prejudicial policy is an abuse of power that also threatens U.S. citizen relatives from the targeted countries.' The administration cites a report from the Department of Homeland Security that tracks the number of visa overstays, singling out nations with the highest overstay rates and countries with what the administration calls a significant terrorist presence. 'In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign visa overstayers,' Trump said. Patrick says that clarity could make upholding the ban in court more successful, but not foolproof. 'The first ban had a time limit on it — 90 days, 120 days. This one doesn't. It's open-ended, and that in and of itself could form the basis for a lawsuit,' Patrick said. The San Diego Tourism Authority says it's too early to predict the impact, adding, 'It's worth noting that international visitors comprise a relatively small portion of San Diego's overall tourism economy — only about 10 percent of overnight visitors. This gives us more stability than other gateway cities.' 'Lawyers and citizens from all over the world who are seeking to enter the U.S. are going to try to get clarity and try to get court action between now and the next term,' Patrick said. This travel ban is set to take effect on Monday, giving airports time to prepare, but that also leaves plenty of time for lawyers to file lawsuits against the proclamation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Venezuelan family feels full force of Trump's crackdown
Mercedes Yamarte's three sons fled Venezuela for a better life in the United States. Now one languishes in a Salvadoran jail, another "self-deported" to Mexico, and a third lives in hiding -- terrified US agents will crash the door at any moment. At her zinc-roofed home in a poor Maracaibo neighborhood, 46-year-old Mercedes blinks back tears as she thinks about her family split asunder by US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. "I wish I could go to sleep, wake up, and this never happened," she says, as rain drums down and lightning flashes overhead. In their homeland, her boys were held back by decades of political and economic tumult that have already prompted an estimated eight million Venezuelans to emigrate. But in leaving, all three brothers became ensnared by politics once more, and by a US president determined to bolt the door of a nation once proud of its migrant roots. For years, her eldest son, 30-year-old Mervin had lived in America, providing for his wife and six-year-old daughter, working Texas construction sites and at a tortilla factory. On March 13, he was arrested by US immigration agents and summarily deported to a Salvadoran mega jail, where he is still being held incommunicado. The Trump administration linked Mervin and 251 other men to the Tren de Aragua -- a Venezuelan gang it classifies as a terrorist group. Washington has cited tattoos as evidence of gang affiliation, something fiercely contested by experts, who say that, unlike other Latin American gangs, Tren de Aragua members do not commonly sport gang markings. Mervin has tattoos of his mother and daughter's names, the phrase "strong like mom" in Spanish and the number "99" -- a reference to his soccer jersey not any gang affiliation, according to his family. - The journey north - Mervin arrived in the United States in 2023 with his 21-year-old brother Jonferson. Both hoped to work and to send some money back home. They had slogged through the Darien Gap -- a forbidding chunk of jungle between Colombia and Panama that is one of the world's most dangerous migration routes. They had trekked north through Mexico, and were followed a year later by sister Francis, aged 19, who turned around before reaching the United States and brother Juan, aged 28, who continued on. When the brothers entered the United States, they registered with border officials and requested political asylum. They were told they could remain legally until a judge decided their fate. Then US voters voted, and with a change of administration, at dawn on March 13, US immigration agents pounded the door of an apartment in Irving, Texas where the trio were living with friends from back home. Immigration agents were serving an arrest warrant when they saw Mervin and said: "You are coming with us too for an investigation," Juan recalled. When the agents said they had an arrest warrant for Mervin too, he tried to show his asylum papers. "But they already had him handcuffed to take him away," Juan said. He was transferred to a detention center, where he managed to call Jonferson to say he was being deported somewhere. He did not know where. Three days later, Jonferson saw his brother among scores of shorn and shackled men arriving at CECOT, a prison built by El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele to house alleged gang members. Jonferson saw his handcuffed brother kneeling on the floor staring off into space. He broke down crying and called his mother. She had also seen Mervin in the images. "My son was kneeling and looked up as if to say: 'Where am I and what have I done to end up here?'" said Mercedes. "I have never seen my son look more terrified" she said. - The journey south - After his brother's arrest, Jonferson had nightmares. The fear became so great that he fled to Mexico -- what some euphemistically describe as "self-deportation". There, he waited a month to board a Venezuelan humanitarian flight to return home. "It has been a nightmare," he told AFP as he rode a bus to the airport and from there, onward home. Juan, meanwhile, has decided to remain in the United States. He lives under the radar, working construction jobs and moving frequently to dodge arrest. "I am always hiding. When I go to the grocery store I look all around, fearful, as if someone were chasing me," he told AFP asking that his face and his whereabouts remain undisclosed. As the only brother who can now send money home, he is determined not to go back to Venezuela empty-handed. He also has a wife and seven-year-old son depending on him. But he is tormented by the thought of his brother Mervin being held in El Salvador and by the toll it has taken on the family. "My mother is a wreck. There are days she cannot sleep," Juan said. "My sister-in-law cries every day. She is suffering." - The journey home - Jonferson has since returned to Maracaibo, where he was greeted by strings of blue, yellow, and red balloons and a grateful but still forlorn mother. "I would like to be happy, as I should. But my other son is in El Salvador, in what conditions I do not know," Mercedes said. But her face lights up for a second as she hugs her son, holding him tight as if never wanting to let him go. "I never thought the absence of my sons would hit me so hard," she said. "I never knew I could feel such pain." For now, the brothers are only together in a screen grab she has on her phone, taken during a video call last Christmas. mav-mbj/lbc/dw/arb/tc
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conservative Torches ICE Chief's ‘Pathetic' Excuse for Agents Wearing Masks
Conservative commentator and longtime political strategist Bill Kristol blasted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents for wearing masks during recent operations, calling the practice a tool of fear—not protection. Appearing on CNN's NewsNight on Monday, Kristol—who has often decried the values of the Republican Party since its MAGA makeover—dismissed ICE's justification for the face coverings, slamming the practice as 'ridiculous' and 'pathetic.' 'I mean, it's pathetic to pretend that, 'Oh, we're so concerned about their safety, they have to wear masks,'' Kristol, editor at large at The Bulwark and co-founder of the anti-Trump nonprofit Defending Democracy Together, said. Kristol, who also served as former chief of staff to Vice President Dan Quayle under President George H.W. Bush, added: 'I grew up in New York City—40,000 cops, extremely dangerous circumstances. None of them were masked except in extremely rare occasions when they were going after some gang leader who might have relatives who go after them. ICE agents have functioned in this country. They didn't wear masks. They shouldn't wear masks. 'It's total nonsense, and it's for intimidation. It's not really for their protection. It's ridiculous.' Kristol's comments come amid growing scrutiny of ICE's enforcement tactics, particularly the use of face coverings that obscure agents' identities during arrests. Critics argue that such anonymity undermines accountability and fosters fear within immigrant communities. Tim Walz, governor of Minnesota and Kamala Harris' running mate in the 2024 presidential election, even likened the agency's officers to Gestapo agents. Dan Goldman, a Democrat who represents New York's 10th Congressional District, also called the masked raids 'Gestapo-like behavior.' The Gestapo, short for Geheime Staatspolizei or 'Secret State Police,' served as Nazi Germany's notorious internal security force and routinely detained individuals without charge. ICE Director Todd Lyons defended the policy, citing officer safety in the wake of public anger over a May 30 raid at Buona Forchetta, a family-owned Italian restaurant in San Diego's South Park neighborhood. 'I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' he said. Witnesses said about 30 masked agents stormed the restaurant, cuffing workers indiscriminately. 'They took people,' one tearful employee told local news. 'They took some of our employees. There was no stopping them.' The raid sparked instant community outrage. Neighbors flooded the scene chanting, 'Shame! Shame! ICE out!' One bystander told NBC7: 'The entire community was disgusted, infuriated and enraged. They don't want people in military tactical gear playing soldier, playing like they are in Afghanistan, coming in here and just screwing with people on a nice Friday afternoon.'