UK export of F-35 parts to Israel unlawful, Palestinian NGO tells court
Protesters demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of a legal challenge brought by the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq over Britain's exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, amid its conflict with Hamas, in London, Britain, November 18, 2024. REUTERS/Sam Tobin/File Photo
LONDON - Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was unlawful, a Palestinian rights group told London's High Court on Tuesday.
Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, is taking legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year.
The United Kingdom had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees, as the basis for its decision in September.
But, after the Ministry of Defence said suspending licences for F-35 parts would have an impact on international security and "undermine U.S. confidence in the UK and NATO", Britain decided to "carve out" F-35 licences.
Al-Haq, which documents alleged rights violations by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the Palestinians' self-rule body in the West Bank, argues that the ministry's decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva Convention.
The group's lawyer, Raza Husain, said its case at the High Court was being heard "against a backdrop of human calamity unfolding in Gaza", since Israel responded to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks with a devastating military campaign.
Nearly 53,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Hamas-run Gaza health authorities.
Husain said the vast majority of Al-Haq's case did not require the High Court to rule on "the lawfulness or otherwise" of Israel's actions in Gaza, but whether British ministers had misunderstood the law when it decided on the F-35 carve-out.
The British government, however, argues ministers were entitled to take "exceptional measures" to not suspend F-35 licences to avoid the potential impact on international peace and security.
Its lawyer, James Eadie, said in court filings that the decision was "consistent with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations".
Last year, a coalition of groups, including Al-Haq, asked a Dutch court to stop the Netherlands exporting weaponry to Israel and trading with Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.
Israel says it takes care to avoid harming civilians and denies committing abuses or war crimes in Gaza.
In March Israel ended a January ceasefire deal with Hamas, after the two sides could not agree on terms for extending it, and renewed its military operations. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Iran to be unveiled soon, minister says
Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Iran to be unveiled soon, minister says DUBAI - Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Tehran should be unveiled soon, Minister of Intelligence Esmail Khatib told state TV on Sunday, describing them as a "treasure trove" which will strengthen Iran's offensive capabilities. Iranian state media reported on Saturday that Iranian intelligence agencies had obtained a large trove of sensitive Israeli documents. Khatib said these were related to Israel's nuclear facilities and its relations with the United States, Europe and other countries, and to its defensive capabilities. There was no immediate official comment from Israel. It was not clear whether the information breach was linked to a reported hacking of an Israeli nuclear research centre last year which Tehran is only disclosing now amid heightened tensions over its nuclear programme. "The transfer of this treasure trove was time-consuming and required security measures. Naturally, the transfer methods will remain confidential but the documents should be unveiled soon," Khatib said, adding that in terms of volume, "talking of thousands of documents would be an understatement." In 2018, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israeli agents had seized a huge "archive" of Iranian documents that showed Tehran had done more nuclear work than previously known. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if Tehran did not come to an agreement with Washington over its nuclear programme. But Trump in April reportedly blocked a planned Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear sites in favour of negotiating a deal with Tehran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was "100%" against Iran's interests, rejecting a central U.S. demand in talks to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Western powers say Iran is refining uranium to a high degree of fissile purity close to the level suitable for atomic bomb fuel. Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Israeli military says it struck Hamas member in southern Syria
CAIRO - The Israeli military said on Sunday that it struck a member of the Palestinian militant group Hamas in southern Syria's Mazraat Beit Jin, days after Israel carried out its first airstrikes in the country in nearly a month. Hamas did not immediately comment on the strike. Israel said on Tuesday it hit weapons belonging to the government in retaliation for the firing of two projectiles towards Israel for the first time under the country's new leadership. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz held Syria's President Ahmed al-Sharaa accountable. Damascus in response said reports of the shelling were unverified, reiterating that Syria does not pose a threat to any regional party. A little known group named "Martyr Muhammad Deif Brigades," an apparent reference to Hamas' military leader who was killed in an Israeli strike in 2024, reportedly claimed responsibility for the shelling. Reuters, however, could not independently verify the claim. Israel and Syria have recently engaged in direct talks to calm tensions, marking a significant development in ties between states that have been on opposite sides of conflict in the Middle East for decade. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Japan flexes its military muscle at China, and Trump
Japan is transforming its long-restricted military into a potent force to operate alongside America's ships and soldiers. PHOTO: REUTERS OKINAWA - The ship-slaying missiles of the Japanese army's 7th Regiment are mounted aboard dark green trucks that are easy to move and conceal, but for now, the soldiers are making no effort to hide them. Created in 2024, the fledgling regiment and its roving missile batteries occupy a hilltop base on the island of Okinawa that can be seen for miles. The visibility is intentional. The 7th is one of two new missile regiments that the army, called the Ground Self-Defence Force, has placed along the islands on Japan's south-western flank in response to an increasingly robust Chinese navy that frequently sails through waters near Japan. 'Our armaments are a show of force to deter an enemy from coming,' said Colonel Yohei Ito, the regiment's commander. China is not their only target. The display is also for the United States, and particularly President Donald Trump, who has criticised Japan for relying too heavily on the presence of US military bases for its security. The missiles are part of a defence buildup that is central to Japan's strategy for appealing to Mr Trump. While Tokyo is now deep in negotiations with Washington over lifting new tariffs, its top priority is improving security ties. On June 6, Japan's trade envoy, Mr Ryosei Akazawa, met for 2 1/2 hours in Washington with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Mr Howard Lutnick, the secretary of commerce, for talks on a tariff-lifting deal that will probably see Tokyo promise large purchases of energy, computer chips and weapons. By adding new missiles and other advanced weapons, both American-made and domestically developed, Japan is transforming its long-restricted military into a potent force with the skills and technology to operate alongside America's ships and soldiers, to demonstrate that Japan is an indispensable partner. 'We want to be sure the US has our backs, and enhancing our conventional military capabilities is the way to do that,' said Mr Nobukatsu Kanehara, who was deputy head of national security policy from 2014 to 2019 under then-prime minister Shinzo Abe. 'We want to show President Trump that we are a valuable and essential ally.' Given the growing military strength of nearby China and also North Korea, Japan wants to upgrade the defence alliance with the US by becoming a fuller-fledged military partner and moving further from the pacifism enshrined in its constitution adopted after World War II. With the war in Ukraine stirring fears of a similar Chinese move on the democratic island of Taiwan, Japan announced in 2022 it would double spending on national security to about 2 per cent of gross domestic product. The resulting defence buildup is now underway. Japan is buying expensive weapon systems from the US like the F-35B stealth fighter and Tomahawk cruise missiles that will give Japan the ability to strike targets on enemy soil for the first time since 1945. The spending is also revitalising Japan's own defence industry. At a trade show in May near Tokyo, Japanese manufacturers displayed weapons currently under development, including a hypersonic missile, a laser system for shooting down drones, and a jet fighter to be built with Italy and Britain. Japan is also demonstrating a new resolve to fight alongside the United States during a future crisis. When he visited Tokyo this spring, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth praised a plan to create a new 'war-fighting headquarters' in Tokyo where Japanese and American commanders will work side by side. 'During our discussions, I told him how Japan is making our own strong efforts to drastically strengthen our defence capabilities,' Mr Gen Nakatani, the Japanese defence minister, said after meeting with Mr Hegseth. 'We face the most severe security environment that Japan has encountered since the end of the war.' It has been made even more severe by the uncertainty from Washington. While Japan's leaders and policymakers see strong support from Mr Hegseth and other hardliners on China, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, they remain worried about America First isolationists who could try to pull back the US military in Asia. There is also the unpredictability of Mr Trump. Their biggest fear is that the president might suddenly strike a grand strategic deal with China's leader, Mr Xi Jinping, that would cede Japan and its neighbours to Beijing's sphere of influence. 'We need to convince Mr Trump and the Maga camp that Japan is too good to give away,' said Professor Satoru Mori, a professor of international politics at Keio University in Tokyo. 'It's in the US interest not to let Japan fall into China's sphere.' The Chinese government has criticised Japan's acquisition of offensive weapons as a return to wartime militarism. Japan is hedging its bets by reaching out to other partners. In addition to the fighter plane jointly developed with Britain and Italy, it has strengthened defense relations with Australia, offering to sell it advanced Japanese-made frigates. Tokyo also sent a warship and soldiers to the Philippines in May to join a multinational military exercise for the first time. If Washington proves unreliable, Japan has an ultimate fallback: tons of plutonium stockpiled from its civilian nuclear power industry, which it could use to build a nuclear arsenal of its own. So far, the national trauma from the 1945 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has kept such an option off the table. 'We need to think about a Plan B, if the US does withdraw from Asia,' said Mr Kazuto Suzuki, director of the Institute of Geo-economics, a Tokyo-based think tank. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
