Israel-Iran War News Live: Flight Services Resume In Several Gulf Nations After Iran Hints At Truce
Israel-Iran War News Live: As Israel-Iran conflict entered Day 12 on Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran will stop its attacks if Israel stops its airstrikes by 4am local time. Araghchi's statement is being viewed as the first official remark by Iran to President Donald Trump's claimed ceasefire between Iran and Israel.
Meanwhile, as the conflict widens, Iraqi military on Tuesday claimed one of its military base was stuck by a drone.
Tensions flared up in the West Asia after Israel launched attacks on Iran on June 13, triggering destruction and casualties in both the nations. The ongoing conflict was further compounded by United States strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities– Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Reacting to US's 'Midnight Hammer' operation against it, Iran said it will remain firm in developing its nuclear sector.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel–Iran conflict: Proxy to open engagement
The long-standing strategic rivalry between Israel and Iran has escalated significantly in recent weeks. What was once defined by covert operations and proxy engagements has shifted into direct military confrontation. This development marks a turning point in the regional security dynamics of West Asia, with implications extending beyond the immediate actors involved. Emergency personnel work at an impacted residential site, following a missile attack from Iran on Israel, amid the Israel-Iran conflict in Be'er Sheva, Israel June 24, 2025. REUTERS/Amir Cohen(REUTERS) Tensions between Israel and Iran have existed for decades, largely driven by Iran's support for groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, and Israel's concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Over the years, both countries have engaged in cyber operations, targeted killings, and sabotage, often through intermediaries. Iran's nuclear programme and Israel's policy of pre-emptive action have remained central to this antagonism. The situation evolved after the 2018 US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which had previously set limits on Iran's nuclear development. Since then, Iran has increased uranium enrichment, while Israel has intensified intelligence and sabotage efforts. In June 2025, Israel launched a series of airstrikes on Iranian targets, including military infrastructure and nuclear facilities in Natanz, Isfahan, and near Tehran. These operations, reportedly involving F-35 fighter jets and drones, were aimed at degrading Iran's ballistic missile and nuclear capabilities. Iran responded with ballistic missile and drone strikes targeting military and infrastructure sites in Israel. Over 150 missiles and more than 100 drones were launched. Israeli air defence systems intercepted a majority of these threats, minimising casualties and infrastructure damage. The conflict has highlighted advanced military technologies on both sides. Israel's defence relied on a multi-layered system. The Iron Dome is for short-range rocket and drone threats. The David's Sling is used for mid-range missiles. While Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 are used for long-range ballistic missile interception. These systems, supported by real-time intelligence and regional coordination, reportedly neutralised approximately 99% of the incoming projectiles. Iran deployed a variety of offensive assets, including the Shahed-series drones, Fateh and Khaibar ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles. The Shahed drones are designed for long-range strikes with loitering capabilities. Ballistic missile ranges vary, with some models capable of reaching over 2,000 kilometres. Cruise missiles such as the Soumar and Hoveyzeh are reported to have high accuracy. In terms of defence, Iran has developed systems such as the Bavar-373, an indigenous long-range air defence system, and the Khordad-15, which is capable of detecting and engaging multiple aerial targets. Iran also employs electronic warfare tactics, including radar jamming and signal interference. Additionally, Iranian military strategy includes decentralisation of assets and mobile launch platforms to complicate enemy targeting. The US later participated in joint operations with Israel, striking Iranian facilities linked to its nuclear programme. These operations included the use of bunker-busting ordnance such as the GBU-57, designed for hardened underground targets. Reports have also indicated limited use of cluster munitions in areas of military concentration. Cluster bombs, which disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area, are controversial due to the risk of unexploded ordnance and potential impact on civilian populations. While neither Israel, Iran, nor the US are parties to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions, the use of such weapons continues to draw scrutiny under international humanitarian law, particularly regarding the principles of distinction and proportionality. Both parties have justified their actions under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which permits the right to self-defence in the event of an armed attack. The legality of pre-emptive self-defence, while not universally accepted, has been invoked in past international incidents involving comparable threats. Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits the development of nuclear weapons. While Iran maintains its programme is peaceful, recent developments have raised concerns about enrichment levels. Israel is not a signatory to the NPT and has maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity regarding its nuclear capabilities. The use of weapons such as bunker busters, drones, and advanced missile defence systems is not inherently prohibited under international law. However, their use is subject to principles of proportionality and distinction under the Law of Armed Conflict. The reported use of cluster munitions has added to the legal and humanitarian considerations, particularly in densely populated or dual-use zones. Civilian casualties and infrastructure damage are being monitored by international agencies, though independent verification remains limited. The escalation has broader implications. US involvement signals strategic alignment with Israel's security concerns. European nations have called for de-escalation and have urged both sides to return to diplomatic channels. Regional actors are closely observing the situation, with concerns about potential disruptions to energy trade routes and broader instability. Iran has made statements regarding the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil supply, although no action has yet been taken in that direction. The United States, while directly involved in select operations, has also indicated a preference for limiting escalation. U.S. officials have reiterated the need to maintain open channels with regional actors and avoid a prolonged or expanded conflict. The recent developments mark a shift in the nature of the Israel–Iran conflict from indirect engagement to direct confrontation. Advanced military technology and coordinated defence systems have played a key role in the operational dynamics. While both nations cite self-defence under international law, the situation underscores the limits of deterrence and the increasing complexity of modern conflict. As of now, diplomatic efforts have not yielded any ceasefire or de-escalation agreement. The continuation of hostilities will likely depend on both military calculations and political decisions in the coming weeks. Monitoring compliance with international humanitarian law and engaging in strategic dialogue will be essential to preventing further regional destabilisation. This article is authored by Ananya Raj Kakoti, scholar, international relations, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iraq's Taji Base Bombed With Drones; Radar System Damaged As Iran-Israel Agree For A Ceasefire
A drone strike has targeted Iraq's Taji military base, north of Baghdad, in the latest escalation of aerial attacks on military facilities in the country. The drone hit a section operated by the Iraqi army, with no casualties reported, according to senior military officials. Reports suggest a French-made radar system may have been the target. This marks the third drone incident in recent days, following similar attacks on Balad Air Base and the Camp Victory Complex. Sirens blared and security forces were placed on high alert as fears grow over a widening campaign of strikes.#tajiairbase #Iran #unitedstates #DroneStrike #MilitaryStrike #MiddleEastCrisis #IraqNews #DefenseAlert Read More
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ceasefire in Words, Missiles in Air: Rising tensions between Israel and Iran threaten India's billion-dollar Middle East trade
Despite US President Donald Trump's announcement of a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran, the two warring sides continue to trade deadly missiles targeting each other's cities. This has put the Indian trading community in a state of uncertainty regarding the fate of their shipments into the region, which is a market for the country. Traders say that with Iran now launching rockets—most recently the attack on the Al Udeid base in Qatar—the situation remains volatile and uncertain for them. 'Freight costs are going up—now by 20-25% for all major trading destinations. For the Gulf (Jebel Ali port of Dubai), a 40-ft container shipment, which was previously $50, now costs $550. And it's not just Dubai; this holds true for all neighbouring ports,' says Ghaziabad-based home textile exporter Ananat Srivastava , describing the acute toll on his Middle East-bound shipments in the wake of the widening Iran-Israel conflict. Even before the US bombed key Iranian nuclear sites, Srivastava, who is also Director of the Home Textile Exporters Association, says Indian traders were already facing disruptions. 'Lots of apparel and home textile products go to Israel. Transit time has increased by 30%, and freight rates are up by 50%. Vessel planning for containers has gone haywire. When the vessel will arrive, nobody knows. This applies to all routes, including Europe and the US, and holds particularly true in the case of the Middle East. Whatever schedule I get from the forwarder or vessel, it's now showing a delay of 2-3 weeks.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ödeme? Dieses simple Haushaltsmittel reduziert Flüssigkeit Venen Kompass Weiterlesen Undo According to Srivastava, Israel-bound shipments are facing highly erratic port scheduling. He notes that shipping lines are no longer able to provide reliable schedules. Another key point he highlights is that while freight costs have increased, insurance costs remain unchanged. The reason: war and war-related damages are not covered under any policy. Rajat Mehra, Co-convenor of the CII UP MSME Panel and Director at Rajat Chemicals Industry, affirms the increase in costs, noting that in addition to sky-high freight charges, he is also witnessing significant delays. 'A consignment that the importer had assured would be shipped to us last week is now reportedly delayed by another week as of this morning,' he says. Live Events The escalation of the war is already impacting shipping freight rates and insurance coverage for shipments, according to Sumit Jain, Managing Director of New Delhi-based Kanin Originals, an MSME manufacturing cotton garments. As things escalate further, the burden of increased supply chain costs will have to be borne by traders and end consumers, he cautions. 'A lot of India's exports move via Dubai's free zones, which serve as warehousing hubs for the Middle East, Africa, and GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) nations. Traders catering to Gulf-bound markets are bound to suffer a blow due to this disruption. Any potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz will also cripple energy supply lines, particularly oil, used by Indian firms,' Jain adds. India's strategic trade ties with the region India's bilateral trade with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, Iran, and Israel accounts for a significant share of its global trade . In FY 2024-25, India-GCC bilateral trade reached $178.56 billion, accounting for 15.4% of India's total global trade. The UAE is India's top GCC trading partner, followed by Saudi Arabia, with both countries contributing the bulk of this trade through energy imports, gems and jewellery, machinery, electronics, and food products. The GCC, as a bloc, is also a major source of foreign direct investment into India. Trade with Iran, though diminished by sanctions, remains important. India was the third-largest importer of Iranian goods in 2023, with exports to Iran, mainly basmati rice, bananas, soya meal, Bengal gram, and tea, totalling $1.24 billion in FY 2025. Imports from Iran have sharply declined since 2019 due to US sanctions, but Iran remains a strategic partner, especially for agricultural exports and as a transit hub through the Chabahar Port. With Israel, India's trade has grown steadily, reaching $6.53 billion in FY 2024 (excluding defence), with India exporting $4.53 billion worth of goods (including chemicals, machinery, and agricultural products) and importing $2 billion in high-tech, electronics, and defence-related items. India is now Israel's second-largest trading partner in Asia and seventh globally. Shipping companies forecast cost increases With Iran's parliament approving the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a new worry point has emerged for the Indian trading community. This is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints for global trade, especially for energy supplies. Approximately 20 million barrels of oil—about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption—pass through the Strait every day, making it the single most important route for seaborne oil exports. About 60-65% of India's crude oil imports transit through Hormuz, making energy security the most vulnerable sector. Disruptions would drive up oil and LNG prices, increase shipping and insurance costs, and trigger inflation across the Indian economy. Sectors heavily reliant on Middle Eastern energy—refining, chemicals, fertilisers, and transport—would be directly hit. Additionally, agricultural exports to Iran (notably basmati rice, bananas, and tea) are already being affected, with large consignments stranded at ports due to payment and shipping disruptions. Overall, any escalation would cascade through India's trade with the entire West Asian region, impacting both energy and non-energy sectors. Hector Patel, Chief Operating Officer–Sea, at Jeena and Company, is of the view that oil shipments may need to be re-routed, and international shipping lanes could be severely disrupted if tensions rise. 'While only 2-3% of global container volumes pass through the Strait of Hormuz waterway, a direct container market impact would primarily affect the Middle East. This will affect the redirection of transshipment volumes, particularly impacting Dubai's Port of Jebel Ali, the busiest hub in the Gulf. This could cause congestion in alternative South Asian ports and elevate freight rates.' Jitendra Srivastava, CEO of Triton Logistics & Maritime, is of the view that the escalating Israel-Iran tensions are driving a sharp surge in marine insurance premiums and disrupting lifeline shipping routes, especially through the Strait of Hormuz. 'It can double insurance rates for a Rs 50 crore bulk cargo shipment from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs 6.5 lakh when war risk cover is needed to transit through risk-prone zones such as the Red Sea. Regular marine premiums are 0.3% of cargo value, of which war risk is 0.1%. This rise in insurance costs, combined with greater security risk, is compelling freight rates to jump by 30–50% as shipping lines transfer costs to customers.' According to Srivastava, countries such as India, with extensive trade links with West Asia, are facing higher logistics costs and supply chain disruption risks. 'Exporters are now using alternative, longer routes to avoid risk zones, adding once more to transit time and cost.' Notably, ratings agency Crisil has cautioned that a prolonged or escalating conflict, especially if it disrupts energy supplies, could aggravate risks, raise inflation, and pressure margins in oil-dependent sectors. Energy-intensive sectors and those with exposure to global shipping and insurance costs should be monitored closely for any escalation or supply chain disruptions, it stated in its latest report.
