The Military Is Rolling Out New 'Sex-Neutral' Testing Standards. Here Are All The Moves.
This week, the U.S. Army announced its plans for an updated fitness test that requires men and women in combat positions to meet the same physical standards. In the past, men and women in combat roles had to meet gender-based fitness standards.
The new Army Fitness Test (AFT) is 'designed to enhance soldier fitness, improve warfighting readiness, and increase the lethality of the force,' according to a press release from the Army. 'The change reflects the Army's continued focus on building a physically ready force capable of meeting operational demands in austere environments,' the release said.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth does not think that women should be in combat roles in the military. 'I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles,' he said on The Shawn Ryan Show in November. 'Hasn't made us more effective. Hasn't made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated.'
In his book, The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free, Hegseth also wrote that 'women cannot physically meet the same standards as men.'
'Dads push us to take risks. Moms put the training wheels on our bikes,' he continued, as reported by the Associated Press. 'We need moms. But not in the military, especially in combat units.'
The 'sex-neutral' testing, which will begin rolling out on June 1, is expected to reduce the number of women in combat roles.
The news is raising a lot of questions about military testing, as well as whether physical differences could prevent men and women from meeting the same standards. Here's what we know.
Meet the expert: Caitlyn Mooney, MD, is a sports medicine physician and assistant professor at Vanderbilt Health.
The revamped test is similar to the existing one, but focuses on the following five events. A RAND Corporation analysis and Army data from about 1 million test records helped guide the new standards, according to the release:
Three-repetition maximum deadlift
Hand-release push-up arm extension (starting from a prone position on the ground, you push your body up into a high plank, then lower your body back to the ground and extend your arms out to a T before returning to the start position; you can't pause or rest on the ground)
Sprint-drag-carry (which involves sprinting, dragging a sled, taking lateral steps, and carrying two kettlebells, for varying distances)
Plank
Two-mile run
Combat soldiers need to score a minimum of 60 points per event and an overall minimum score of 350 under the new standards. However 'combat-enabling' troops need to get an overall minimum score of 300.
Troops who are in active duty have until January 2026 to meet the requirements, and National Guard and Army Reserve members have until June 2026.
Service members who don't meet the standards twice in a row could be removed from the Army.
The existing Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT), which will be replaced by the new AFT test, has a couple different exercise move requirements, and different scoring standards, for men and women. (The new test no longer includes the ball yeet, where you throw a medicine ball over your head backwards, reportedly due to injury risk and its inefficiency in measuring power.)
But the biggest change is that the new AFT test will involve women getting graded on the same scale as men in order to qualify for combat roles. So, for instance, women will need to deadlift heavier and run faster than they did with the ACFT testing scale to meet the measures being used to score the men.
Data suggest this may not encourage gaining more women in the military—or, at least, in combat roles. A 2017 study found that 'gaps in cardiorespiratory and muscular performances between men and women' should be addressed with targeted training programs to help minimize differences between the sexes.
A 2022 study from Rand Corporation also found that women and older members of the military failed the previous fitness test at much higher rates than men and younger service members.
Want to conquer the pull-up? Get the WH+ Ultimate Pull-Up Plan here.
It's important to point out that this won't keep women from joining the military. But it will likely limit how many qualify for combat roles or for positions that support combat roles. 'There is also the potential for this to eventually apply to combat support roles such as physicians, lawyers, etc., which could mean a shortage in these military professions, even though meeting these standards would minimally affect their job performance,' says Caitlyn Mooney, MD, sports medicine physician and assistant professor at Vanderbilt Health.
'Fitness and readiness are critical for the armed forces, but there is likely an unclear correlation between these fitness tests, performance, and lethality,' Dr. Mooney says. 'Peer-reviewed research has not found a correlation between fitness requirements and combat readiness.'
The reality is, physiological sex differences exist between men and women that often put women at a strength disadvantage compared to men. For example, 'deadlifts are a strength event where women would likely perform, on average, 70 to 80 percent less than men when corrected for body weight,' Dr. Mooney says. 'Additionally, women, on average, weigh less than men, further potentially handicapping their performance.'
Hand-release push-ups, sprint, drag, and carry tasks, and planks are other events where women would, on average, have a harder time meeting standards compared to men, Dr. Mooney says. 'The two-mile run would be a more cardiovascular event, typically having women perform at 80 to 90 percent of their male peers.'
Dr. Mooney says that the limits on a woman's performance are 'multifactorial' due to factor like body size, muscle mass, less muscle distribution in the upper body, and lower levels of hormones like testosterone.
'It is important to reiterate that these specific tasks do not necessarily correlate with the ability to perform in combat,' Dr. Mooney says. 'Additionally, these readiness tasks do not test muscular or cardiovascular endurance, which are likely more critical in prolonged combat settings, and primarily test power and forceful maneuvers.'
Dr. Mooney points out that the gap between women and men 'shrinks' with longer-distance endurance events. 'Women would be more likely to perform better with flexibility and endurance, which are not tested, and thus, this test likely would be biased against women,' she says. 'Given that women, on average, perform the selected tasks at a lower capacity than men, fewer women in the armed forces will likely meet these qualifications than men.'
But these changes may also make military recruitment, as a whole, even tougher, Dr. Mooney says. 'There have been ongoing issues with the military's recruitment as fewer people meet the health and fitness standards required,' she says, due to rising rates of obesity, sedentary behavior, and metabolic disorders. With these ongoing recruitment issues, I would worry that changing the AFT to be gender-neutral would further restrict the military's ability to recruit young, fit individuals to combat roles where they likely would be otherwise qualified to function.'
You Might Also Like
Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream
These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows
Airmen who watched over America's nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles in Cold War-era facilities faced marginally higher risk of cancer due to contaminants found there and more workplace oversight is needed, according to the latest findings of an Air Force health study. Air Force Global Strike Command, during a town hall event Wednesday, released the latest data showing the slightly elevated cancer risk as part of its ongoing probe into health concerns for America's missileers, maintainers and other support roles at several bases in the Midwest and Western U.S. The lifetime cancer risk for all Americans is around 39%, and the Air Force's Health Risk Assessment found rates of 39.9% to 40.13% for men and women if they would have served anywhere from eight to 70 years in those jobs. Service officials said consistent workplace inspections and monitoring would likely be necessary to address the risks, which are caused by the presence of chemicals and toxins. Read Next: Army Faces Backlash over Plan to Divert Barracks Funds to Border Mission Contaminants linked to cancer were found during a series of environmental studies at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, and Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. "In summary, this health risk assessment characterizes the health risk as low but not zero," Col. Ric Speakman, the commander of the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, said during the town hall presentation. "Therefore, the appropriate action is to include missile alert facility workers in an occupational surveillance." Air Force Global Strike Command is still in the process of an ongoing epidemiological study and is gathering more data from states as well as national cancer registries before more definitive cancer and health conclusions can be made. Last year, reported in an investigative series that past probes by the Air Force into cancer concerns roughly two decades ago went ignored, and past and current missileers and nuclear missile maintainers raised alarms about the environmental conditions, toxins and chemical dangers they faced while in uniform. They believe the conditions made them sick. In the wake of reporting, the service announced changes that included new workplace inspections and health record tracking, and the spouse of a missileer who died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma was able to secure Department of Veterans Affairs benefits related to his death. While polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, were one of the known outlawed carcinogenes that the Air Force's remediation efforts focused on, research shown during Wednesday's town hall showed there were other toxins detected as well that were factored into the service's health risk assessment. "Although only PCBs were detected at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency's standards for cleanup and remediation, the environmental sampling was sensitive enough to detect chemicals such as benzene and chloroform at levels well below standards for remediation," a Thursday news release from Air Force Global Strike Command following the town hall said. The Torchlight Initiative, a grassroots organization that began shortly after a Space Force officer and former Air Force missileer raised concerns about non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates at Malmstrom, released its own independent study in April examining the rates of blood cancer reported in its online health registry. That study found that service members were diagnosed at younger ages compared to the wider population. Air Force Global Strike Command officials briefly mentioned that study at the town hall, stating that, "while this study is separate from the missile community cancer study, it does add to the work advocacy and the well-being of the missile community." Representatives from the Torchlight Initiative were on Capitol Hill in early April alongside other advocacy groups, and made a plea to lawmakers in hopes of expanding the PACT Act -- a 2022 law that mostly covered veterans sickened by toxic exposure in war zones -- to cover those who experienced health issues stateside as well. "The Torchlight Initiative is happy to hear that Global Strike and U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine are still working on their long-term study and research," the organization said in a statement to on Thursday. "However, our focus and energy remains with the families who are disproportionately affected by these cancers and illnesses." The remaining data in the ongoing health study is slated to be released in late 2025. Gen. Thomas Bussiere, the head of Air Force Global Strike Command, said during the town hall he would advocate for a registry, if the VA also supported such a move, based on the study's findings. "The level of interest and oversight with the Department of the Air Force and Congress has not waned, and I'm very thankful and happy with the interest and actions on the part of the VA," Bussiere said in a news release after the town hall. "They've been great partners, and I anticipate they will continue to be great partners." Related: Independent Study Raises Alarm About Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma at Malmstrom Air Force Base


Fox Sports
2 days ago
- Fox Sports
Whitecaps report illness following CONCACAF Champions Cup final
Associated Press The Vancouver Whitecaps said a 'significant number' of players who traveled to Mexico for last weekend's CONCACAF Champions Cup final have become ill. The Whitecaps canceled practice Wednesday and had a modified session for cleared players Thursday after both players and staff reported gastrointestinal symptoms. 'The health and well-being of our players and staff remain a top priority. Each player has been provided with an individualized program by the medical and performance staff to support their continued preparation and recovery,' the team said in a statement. The Whitecaps are scheduled to play the Seattle Sounders in a Cascadia Cup rivalry match at BC Place on Sunday. The Whitecaps lost 5-0 to Cruz Azul on Sunday in the CONCACAF Champions Cup final in Mexico City. Last year in the tournament final, players for the Columbus Crew also became ill. The Crew lost to Pachuca 3-0 in Mexico. ___ AP soccer: recommended in this topic
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
How long can you hold a plank — and how does it stack up to others in your age group? That's the question that was posed on "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning, when co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Lawrence Jones competed in a plank challenge. A plank is an isometric move where the person holds a push-up position for a set period of time. Army Unveils New Fitness Test With Tougher Standards — Could You Pass It? Both held a low plank for well over a minute, exceeding the thresholds for their ages, although Kilmeade held his for a few seconds longer. A fitness expert at Lifetime in New York City provided the below targets for how long you should be able to hold a plank by age. Read On The Fox News App 20s: 1 to 2 minutes 30s: 1 to 2 minutes 40s: 1 minute or longer 50s: 30 to 60 seconds 60s and above: 20 to 30 seconds Planks are often touted as an abdominal exercise, serving as an alternative to traditional sit-ups and crunches, which can strain the back and neck. However, the isometric move benefits the body in many other ways beyond just sculpting a six-pack. In addition to working the abdominals, planks also strengthen the muscles in the arms, legs, chest and back, according to Healthline. They can also help improve posture while sitting or standing and can boost flexibility by stretching the lower half of the body, the above source stated. While Kilmeade and Jones both held low planks, some may opt for a high plank, which is where the arms are straight and the person balances on the palms of the hands. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter For those who are still working up to holding a full plank, the move can be modified by dropping the knees to the floor. There are also variations of the plank that target different parts of the body. Those include side planks, knee touches (touching alternating knees to the ground), hip dips and leg/arm extensions. For more Health articles, visit If you've just started planking, experts recommend starting with 15 to 30 seconds and gradually increasing the duration, with two minutes generally regarded as a good article source: Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength