logo
Is AI making us forget how to think? Memory doctor raises concerns

Is AI making us forget how to think? Memory doctor raises concerns

Khaleej Times27-02-2025

Ever feel like your brain is a browser with too many tabs open? In today's hyper-connected world, we're bombarded with information, yet it often feels like we're retaining less than ever. With AI seemingly 'remembering' everything for us, are we slowly losing our own capacity to recall, to truly learn, to think? Memory expert Dr Charan Ranganath, author of Why We Remember, explores these very questions, sharing fascinating insights not just about the challenges AI poses to our cognitive abilities, but also about the surprisingly simple yet powerful tools we have at our disposal to cultivate a healthier memory.
From the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on technology to the transformative power of gratitude, Dr Ranganath delves into the intricacies of memory in the modern age, offering both a sobering look at the digital landscape and a hopeful path towards reclaiming cognitive control in a world that's constantly vying for our attention.
Edited excerpts from an interview:
Q. Let's start by exploring what drew you to study the human mind in such depth.
I never expected to go down this route. It wasn't part of my life plan. I initially pursued engineering because that's what my parents encouraged—become a doctor or an engineer. But in college, for the first time, I struggled academically because I hated engineering. It just didn't feel right. Eventually, I gravitated towards clinical psychology because it seemed more interesting.
During my work, I spent a lot of time testing people with brain damage, mostly for memory problems. About 85 per cent of the time, patients or their family members came in with memory concerns. Most clinical tests revolve around memory, and that experience showed me how crucial memory is—both subjectively, in how we define ourselves, and functionally, in how we navigate life. When people had serious memory problems, we had to assess whether they could live independently, and often, the answer was no. That was eye-opening.
At the same time, I was researching depression, and I realised how powerfully memory shapes our perception of the present. Recalling negative experiences gives us a bleak outlook, while remembering positive moments makes things seem brighter. That interplay between memory and mental health fascinated me.
Q. We often find ourselves asking, 'Why do we forget?' But what if we flipped the question around, as you do in your book, and asked, 'Why do we remember?'
The simplest answer is that memory helps us understand the present and prepare for the future. Our memories aren't designed to store everything; we prioritise what's important. I often use the analogy of packing for a trip—you only take what you need rather than carrying everything you own. Similarly, our brains don't store every experience, just the essential ones that help us navigate life.
Q. Can remembering too much be detrimental?
Absolutely. There's a condition called Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM), where individuals have an extraordinary ability to recall personal experiences in vivid detail. If you ask them about a random date years ago, they can tell you what the weather was like and what they were doing. You'd think this would be an advantage, but many of them describe it as a burden. They struggle to move on from past mistakes or slights because they remember everything so vividly. One person with HSAM even said, 'I wouldn't wish this affliction on anyone.' Living in the past can be paralysing.
Q. You also talk about the 'remembering self' in your book. How does it shape our decisions and daily lives?
The 'remembering self' is what we use to make future decisions, but it's only based on a fraction of our past experiences. Most of our daily experiences fade away, and what remains is a curated selection of memories. For example, if you're planning a holiday, you might remember the great time you had at the beach last year but forget the long airport queues or the lost baggage.
This bias makes you more likely to plan a similar trip. Daniel Kahneman, who introduced the idea of the 'remembering self', argued that it leads to irrational decision-making. But I disagree—I think our memories are all we carry with us, so we should invest in creating good ones. The key is to be present in the moment while forming meaningful memories.
Q. Nostalgia often gets an indulgent reputation. Why are some people more nostalgic than others?
People tend to remember past events more positively than they were, often with a self-enhancing bias. As we age, we become more optimistic, leading to a rosy recollection of the past. Nostalgia can be uplifting, but it can also be toxic if people use it to compare the past with a negatively perceived present.
We see this on a societal level too—political movements often weaponise nostalgia, urging people to 'return to the good old days'. One thing I appreciate about Dubai is its forward-thinking approach. Most places build museums dedicated to the past, but here, the focus is on the future.
Q. Does emotional state influence memory, or does memory influence emotional state?
Both. A low mood makes it easier to recall negative experiences and interpret past events more negatively. Conversely, remembering something negative can bring your mood down. This creates a feedback loop, which is why rumination—a key symptom of depression—can be so harmful.
Q. How can people break out of negative memory loops?
One effective method is gratitude practice. I don't mean forced gratitude, like 'I'm grateful my loved ones don't have cancer'—that just makes you think about the worst possibilities. Instead, I suggest reflecting on one small positive event from the last 24 hours. It could be as simple as enjoying a good cup of coffee. Once you start recalling positive experiences, your mood shifts, and more positive memories surface. This rewires your perspective over time.
Q. How does memory interact with habit formation?
Habit learning is distinct from memory recall—it happens without conscious effort. You don't brush your teeth because you remember a past cavity; you do it automatically. Good habits form through repetition, just like bad ones.
Q. With Gen-Z growing up in the 'attention economy'—constantly engaged with social media—what impact does that have on memory?
Digital habits mimic ADHD symptoms without the benefits. The way we interact with devices conditions our brains for immediate gratification. For example, I compulsively check my email, even when I'm not actively using my phone. The constant availability of distractions undermines our ability to focus on long-term tasks. Managing our environment—like removing certain apps from our phones—can help counteract this.
Q. Now that AI is 'remembering' everything for us, do we even need to remember anymore?
AI doesn't actually remember—it just generates responses based on patterns. But what worries me is how AI influences learning. For instance, when Gmail introduced predictive text, I started accepting 'good enough' suggestions. Over time, this shapes how we communicate. Generative AI, especially in writing, has a lowest-common-denominator effect—everything starts sounding the same. If people over-rely on AI, we risk losing individuality in our communication.
Q. The takeaway from all of this seems to be that it's not about remembering more but remembering better. So, how do we do that?
Memory isn't free—it takes effort. We should actively decide what we want to remember. For example, at a concert, instead of mindlessly recording everything on your phone, focus on moments that matter to you. Directing your attention shapes how you'll remember an experience, and in the end, memory is all we carry with us.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Virtual companions, chatbot-therapists: Is AI replacing human connections?
Virtual companions, chatbot-therapists: Is AI replacing human connections?

Khaleej Times

time15 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Virtual companions, chatbot-therapists: Is AI replacing human connections?

I was listening to the radio on my way to work when a well-known RJ on one of the channels here in the UAE mentioned how she couldn't sleep the previous night, so she chatted with ChatGPT until she finally drifted off. The point of mentioning this isn't to debate insomnia remedies (as the show did), but to highlight something deeper — our growing emotional and cognitive reliance on digital solutions. While social media platforms offer 'free' services quietly shaping our behaviours, the market constantly convinces us we need the latest smartphone, algorithms trap us in filter bubbles, feeding us only what aligns with our existing views. And now, artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots and virtual companions are being designed to fulfill human desires, companionship, validation, and even therapy. Yet as a society, we are experiencing a disconnect like never before. The question is no longer just whether technology is replacing human connection, but how much of our emotional lives we are willing to outsource. As loneliness surges, so do our efforts to fight it. It's instinct. With digital platforms around us so much of the time, we naturally turn to it. A 46-year-old woman living in a family-friendly neighbourhood shared her struggle with loneliness on social media. People had plenty of solutions, including making an AI friend. A growing number of AI-powered virtual companions are now available online, offering round-the-clock support without fear of judgment. These digital assistants have become a valuable resource for individuals hesitant to share their emotions and concerns with others due to social anxiety or fear of criticism. These services aren't just for early adopters anymore, they are going mainstream fast. Among them, Replika has gained significant attention and popularity. Marketed as 'the AI Companion who cares, always here to listen and talk, always on your side', the app's reassuring message has resonated with users. Several reputable news outlets have featured the program as well. Social media apps promote connectivity, but studies show that regular users frequently experience loneliness, indicating that the sense of connection may be superficial. The benefits of AI characters come with significant risks, particularly for adolescents. Emotional dependency on AI can erode real-world social interactions and coping skills, potentially isolating users from familial and communal networks. AI remembers every detail of the conversation and gives the illusion of being a sincere friend, says Dr Jihene Mrabet, a psychologist with academic expertise in AI. She elaborates that these mental health applications are capable of diagnosing psychological issues and even providing coaching advice. 'However, the concern is always about to what extent one can rely on these chatbots, since we don't know who is behind the technology, what their understanding of human psychology is, or how confidentiality is maintained in such interactions. We do not even know if the designers have proper guardrails,' Dr Jihene explains. A Florida mother, Megan Garcia, is holding AI accountable for her 14-year-old son's death. In a lawsuit against the company, Garcia alleges deeply personal AI exchanges contributed to her son's suicide. She's demanding accountability to shield other families from similar devastation. As we increasingly turn to AI for companionship, we must ask: Are we creating a world where technology replaces human connection. And if so, at what cost? Developers, policymakers, and mental health experts must collaborate to enforce ethical safeguards, especially for vulnerable users.

Red Cross booth at AI defence conference offers stark reminder of technology's potential threat to civilians
Red Cross booth at AI defence conference offers stark reminder of technology's potential threat to civilians

The National

time2 days ago

  • The National

Red Cross booth at AI defence conference offers stark reminder of technology's potential threat to civilians

The exhibition booth for the International Committee for the Red Cross at the AI+ military defence conference in Washington definitely stands out – that's the whole point. 'When technology makes it into a battlefield, it's going to have consequences,' Jonathan Horowitz, legal adviser to the Red Cross, said at the ICRC 's exhibit, which focused on the potential problems in the use of artificial intelligence conflicts. The ICRC's booth at the Walter E Washington Convention Centre was surrounded by exhibits from some of the world's most influential companies with US military defence contracts, along with other entities from around the world. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Google and Microsoft all had a large presence at the AI+ event. The three-day conference was organised by the Special Competitive Studies Project, which describes itself as a group that 'seeks to recapture the competitive mindset and unifying national mission from past eras, and then adapt them to the age of AI and 21st-century strategic rivalry'. Proponents of AI on the battlefield say that it can help minimise casualties and enhance capabilities, but critics say the technology is far from perfect, missing nuances that get lost in the fog of war and often including developers' biases. Critics also point out that the fast-developing implementations of AI in military landscapes have the potential to disregard international standards. "Just because technology is new doesn't mean you can use it in unconstrained ways," Mr Horowitz said. "We want to remind people here what those rules are, and you can find the rules in the Geneva Conventions, in international humanitarian law." He said that while the ICRC is concerned about the use of AI in war, it also sees its potential in improving the lives of civilians amid conflict. "It could give militaries better awareness of where hospitals or critical infrastructure are located, and with that knowledge militaries should know not to attack those locations," he explained. Yet the concern raised in recent months is that once AI platforms are handed over to various militaries, there's little accountability for how they're used. Microsoft recently carried out an internal review in response to recent accusations that its AI technology was being used to harm civilians in the war in Gaza. While it found "no evidence" its products were being used in such a way by the Israeli military, it pointed out the potential for the software and platforms to be used on highly secure, independent military networks of militaries, limiting the company's investigation. The company is not alone in facing criticism over how its AI technology is used. Alphabet-owned Google, Scale AI and Palantir have faced similar accusations. At the AI+ conference, demonstrators echoed concerns over the potential harm the technology poses to civilians, particularly in Gaza, with protesters interrupting various speeches and panel discussions. Mr Horowitz added that in the months ahead, ICRC will continue working to "solve the puzzle" with AI and militaries to "for the embedment of civilians, who often are the ones that suffer the most in armed conflict." "We include a new set of recommendations on AI decision support systems and the top of our priorities is the need to retain human control and judgment within those systems," Mr Horowitz said of the ICRC's updated guidance on the technology. The organisation recently submitted its AI military recommendations to the UN Secretary General. In that document, the ICRC expresses concern about the use of AI in automatic weapon systems along with the implementation of AI to expedite military decision-making. It also seeks to raise awareness about the potential for AI to increase the speed at which misinformation and disinformation spreads, potentially contributing to and even encouraging violence. "This submission is intended to support states in ensuring that military applications of AI comply with existing legal frameworks and, where necessary, in identifying areas where additional legal, policy or operational measures may be required," the document concludes.

Shookra Clinics launches in Dubai, ushering in new era of high-tech regenerative aesthetics
Shookra Clinics launches in Dubai, ushering in new era of high-tech regenerative aesthetics

Khaleej Times

time3 days ago

  • Khaleej Times

Shookra Clinics launches in Dubai, ushering in new era of high-tech regenerative aesthetics

Dubai's wellness sector has welcomed a major innovation with the launch of Shookra Clinics, a state-of-the-art regenerative aesthetics and longevity center that blends biotechnology, precision diagnostics, and advanced cellular therapies. Touted as a first-of-its-kind concept in the region, Shookra Clinics introduces a 4-phase medical protocol that leverages AI-powered diagnostics, stem cell-based treatments, and personalised longevity programmes — placing it at the intersection of healthtech, aesthetics, and preventative medicine. The clinic's protocol begins with in-depth testing — including AI-based skin, hair, and scalp scans, genetic and bloodwork profiling, and biological age assessments — to create an individualised treatment roadmap. Subsequent phases integrate cutting-edge procedures like stem cell infusions, exosome therapy, PRP, mesotherapy, and energy-based technologies such as Morpheus8 and fractional lasers. Unlike traditional aesthetic offerings focused on surface-level results, Shookra's data-led model is built for measurable transformation and long-term biological optimisation. "This is a protocol-based, diagnostic-first system designed to rejuvenate from the inside out," said a clinic spokesperson. "It reflects the future of wellness - personalised, preventative, and regenerative." Operating on an exclusive membership model, each Shookra client receives dedicated support through a medical supervisor and concierge advisor. AI-driven dashboards track progress quarterly, adjusting skincare and supplement plans based on ongoing diagnostics. This long-term approach emphasises biological resilience and internal rejuvenation, not just external enhancement. With investment from Terra-Invest and a business strategy focused on high-margin, loyalty-based care, Shookra is already preparing for regional expansion — with new branches planned across the UAE and Saudi Arabia in response to growing demand for regenerative healthcare among affluent consumers. Shookra's launch comes as the Middle East's wellness market undergoes rapid evolution. According to MEA Wellness Market Reports, the regional aesthetic and longevity sector is projected to exceed $5.4 billion by 2030. Shookra's blend of advanced diagnostics, personalised treatment pathways, and a scalable infrastructure position it to capitalise on this growth - offering a next-generation solution for consumers seeking proactive, data-informed wellness. With further plans to integrate with AI wellness platforms and roll out biologically tailored product lines, Shookra aims to set a new global benchmark in aesthetic medicine - not just offering services but creating a full operating system for aging well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store