US acted alone, Albanese declares while abandoning neutral stance on attack
The US acted alone to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, Anthony Albanese has declared, as he refused to say whether Australia received advance notice but departed from the government's neutral position to back US President Donald Trump's strikes.
The shift was confirmed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Monday, a day after an unnamed government spokesperson released a statement that called for peace and remained neutral on the strike.
Wong and Albanese declined to say how close Iran was to making a nuclear bomb or whether the joint US-Australia intelligence base at Pine Gap in the Northern Territory was used to garner intelligence for it at a press conference at which they were peppered with questions.
'The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that – that is what this is,' Albanese said. 'The US action was directed at specific sites central to Iran's nuclear program. We don't want escalation and a full-scale war.
'We are upfront, but we don't talk about intelligence, obviously, but we have made very clear this was unilateral action taken by the United States,' Albanese repeatedly answered when asked whether Australia had been briefed on the US' decision to strike Iran.
Loading
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has confirmed he was briefed just before the strike. Albanese said: 'The UK has been one of the countries that's been at the negotiating table with Iran for many years on its nuclear weapons program'.
The government's shift from neutrality to full support emphasises Australia's close alliance with the US, echoing its stance before the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
When Trump confirmed the strikes on the weekend, the Australian government gave a statement that reiterated Iran's missile and ballistic missile programs were dangerous, but was neutral on the US decision to attack them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Woman who reported NSW MP Gareth Ward's alleged sex crimes cross-examined
A woman who reported NSW MP Gareth Ward's alleged sexual abuse of two men to police has admitted she may have provided incorrect details. Warning: This story contains discussion of suicide. Mr Ward, the independent MP for Kiama, has pleaded not guilty to five charges, including sexual intercourse without consent, relating to alleged incidents in 2013 and 2015. The trial has entered its fifth week, with the NSW District Court sitting for its 15th day on Monday. The woman, who reported Mr Ward to police in 2021 based on what she said the two men told her, faced sustained questioning about inconsistencies in her evidence. Last week, she told the court the older complainant disclosed the alleged sexual assault during a night out in 2020. She said she had reached out to him after seeing a Facebook post that appeared to reference a suicide attempt. The woman initially told police the older complainant had gone to Mr Ward's parliamentary suite with another man, that all three drank together, and that the second man later left, leaving the complainant alone with Mr Ward. But under cross-examination by Mr Ward's defence barrister, David Campbell SC, the woman said she may have been wrong about who was present and the sequence of events. "I conceded last week I may have got those details wrong," she told the court. The defence also pressed her on her understanding of what the older complainant disclosed to her about the alleged assault. The Crown has previously alleged the assault took place in an apartment Mr Ward rented in Potts Point. The defence has said the incident never happened. "You told police that after the second man left, and while the complainant was alone with Mr Ward in that parliamentary suite, Mr Ward forcibly had penile anal sex with him — that's what you told police," Mr Campbell said. "I don't remember telling police that," the woman replied. "But that is what the complainant told you, isn't it," he said. "He told me he had been anally raped, I didn't ask him specific questions about that," she said. She was also questioned about where the alleged incident took place. "The extent of the evidence you can give as to where this occurred is completely silent — you don't know," Mr Campbell said. "Yes. I did not ask him those details," she replied. "And he did not tell you," Mr Campbell asked. "No. I did not ask him, and I would not push him on it — he found it incredibly difficult to tell me that," she said. Mr Campbell put to her that she had never spoken to the complainant about the conversation or its content since that night. "Not that I can recall, no," she said. "Never sought any clarification," he asked. "Why would I seek clarification from someone who has attempted suicide," she replied. The woman was also asked who she had spoken to about parts of her evidence last week. "I have not spoken to anyone about that evidence. I know not to speak to people about it," she told the court. In re-examination by the Crown, the woman said her father had encouraged her to report the allegations to police. Asked why she found doing so extremely traumatic, she became visibly emotional. "Mostly, I was worried the older complainant would take his own life if he knew I breached his confidentiality," she told the court, through tears. The woman is expected to continue her re-examination on Tuesday, with the jury told they were also likely to hear from the younger complainant. The trial continues.
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Katina Curtis: Australia out of the loop and off the agenda for US action
Anthony Albanese was at pains to emphasise that the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend were a unilateral action. He said it five times in less than 10 minutes during a short press conference on Monday to address the escalation in the conflict. Did Australia get a heads-up on the attacks? Were any of our military involved? Were joint facilities such as the Pine Gap intelligence and surveillance base involved? 'This was a unilateral action by the United States,' the Prime Minister repeated. These were reasonable questions given the precedents. Australia provided support for US strikes on Houthi facilities in Yemen last October, which the ABC reported included offering air-to-air refuelling for the B-2 stealth bombers, the same ones used this time. In 2018, the Americans gave Australia advance notice when a US-led force that included the UK and France bombed targets in Syria aimed at ending the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has confirmed he knew about the attack on Iran ahead of Sunday's strike, although the UK was not involved. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot revealed his country, which brought the Iranians in for peace talks at the end of last week, was similarly not involved with either the strikes or their planning. While neither Albanese nor Foreign Minister Penny Wong directly said that we had no idea what was coming, they sure gave that impression. This latest escalation in the already messy Middle East conflict doesn't directly bear on the US-Australia alliance. But it doesn't give much confidence that any of the tensions already there are easing. Albanese hasn't spoken to Donald Trump since the US President abandoned the G7 summit halfway through proceedings last week ( reportedly after getting a cable from the Iranians threatening to activate sleeper cells within America), cancelling their first scheduled face-to-face talks. With the Middle East dominating Trump's agenda, as this column noted last week before the meeting snafu, despite Australia's main character energy when it comes to how important we are to the US, the reality is we are down the list of priorities. Way down below a UFC bout and 'the most magnificent (flag) poles' installed at the White House, if Trump's social media posts are anything to go by. Australian officials are trying to line up a replacement meeting date with Trump sooner rather than later. The 'later' option looks like being in late September, when Albanese intends to travel to New York for the UN's annual general assembly leaders' week. Something sooner is more difficult given he's got to fit in four weeks of Parliament, Jim Chalmers' productivity round table, the Pacific Islands Forum and a likely trip to China before then — plus the general grind of domestic governing when he's pledged to prioritise delivering election promises. Albanese and his team are chafing at the tea-leaf reading over his interactions — or lack of — with Trump. But the President places high value on making one-on-one connections. After all, a phone call doesn't make good television. His first-term national security adviser, HR McMaster, describes Trump as a 'conversational learner' who loves to charm people when they meet in the flesh. Albanese is more similar on this front than he would like to think; he frequently speaks about the value of being able to make personal connections with other leaders to promoting Australia's interests. Australians don't trust Trump, according to the latest Lowy poll results, but they recognise we need the US alliance for our national security. Trump's consistent message to all of America's friends is that they should be prepared to look after their own backyards. The defence strategic review the Albanese Government commissioned makes a very similar point. For Australia, that's not the Middle East — not that any request to join in there has come, at this stage. 'We aren't a central player in this conflict, that's just a fact,' Albanese said on Monday. Australians generally agree with him. The Lowy poll also showed about twice as many people saw conflict between the US and China over Taiwan as a critical threat to Australia, compared with conflict in the Middle East. But a key complaint from the White House is that Australia isn't sufficiently backing its words about looking after the Indo-Pacific with cold, hard cash. And while Trump is preoccupied with the Middle East, Australia won't be climbing up his to-do list.
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Global travel warning: Smartraveller warns Australian travellers about risk, not just in the Middle East
The Australian Government has warned Aussies that the 'unpredictable' situation in the Middle East may put them at risk or leave them stranded and unable to get home, regardless of where they are globally. On Saturday night (local time), US President Donald Trump dropped a barrage of tactical bombs on uranium enrichment nuclear facilities across Iran, the first direct involvement from the superpower in the Israel-Iran war. In the wake of the strike, world leaders are calling for diplomacy as fears of retaliation grow. On Monday, Smartraveller, which is part of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, warned Australians about the 'global impacts of conflict in the Middle East'. 'The situation in the Middle East is unpredictable. It could get worse with little warning. Security risks may increase. There may be travel disruptions within the region and globally,' Smartraveller said. The advice followed a US State Department 'worldwide travel warning' issued on Sunday night. The new information from Smartraveller warned Aussies that they could be caught up in conflict 'even if your destination is not in the Middle East'. 'Closure of airspace around transit hubs in the Middle East may impact flights globally. It may cause flight delays and cancellations,' the warning said. 'If you travel to or through the Middle East, you may be unable to leave if conflict escalates. 'Local security situations could get worse with little warning. Flights can change or stop at short notice. Roads and borders can close.' Australians are being warned about safety and security globally, not just in the Middle East. 'Conflict in the Middle East could impact safety and security elsewhere. There is a risk of reprisal attacks and further escalation,' Smartraveller said. 'Protests and civil unrest may happen globally. The risk of terrorist attacks can increase, particularly around areas where foreign tourists gather, embassies and other foreign interests.' The new alert included information on the risks of armed conflict, terrorism, kidnapping, protests and civil unrest. United States issues 'worldwide travel warning' On Sunday night, the United States Government warned its citizens of increased risk globally. 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East,' the US State Department said in a statement. 'There is the potential for demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad. 'The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution.' What should Australian travellers do amid Middle East conflict? Before Aussies leave the country, they should contact their airline to ensure the flight is still planned. Smartraveller also encourages Aussies to check their travel insurance policy before travel. If Australians leave the country or are overseas, while travelling, they are encouraged to stay alert to possible threats, monitor local and international news for new threats, take official warnings seriously and follow the instructions of local authorities. Are there disruptions to flights because of the Israel-Iran war? Yes. There are currently large impacts on airline services due to the Middle East conflict. Flight routes were changed when war between Israel and Iran escalated and missiles were launched. Many airlines have temporarily suspended flight on some routes. Airlines including Etihad, Emirates, Flydubai, Wizz Air, Air Arabia, Watar Airways, Oman Air, Kuwait Airways, Gulf Air, Syrian Airlines, EgyptAir, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, Air Canada, Air France, KLM, Ryan Air, Swiss Air Lines, Lufthansa, Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Aeroflot have current suspensions on services. Virgin Australia and Qantas are understood to be monitoring the situation closely, both for any direct flights and those carried out with partner airlines.
