Man banned from keeping animals after giving ‘rescued' birds marijuana and painting their claws with nail polish
A Scarborough man who took a bubble bath with an injured bird, gave it marijuana and painted another bird's nails with glitter nail polish has been banned from keeping wild animals.
Lee Jefferson, 30, failed to seek veterinary treatment for a wood pigeon and a jackdaw that he had collected and kept in a 'puppy pen' at his home in Malton, North Yorkshire.
An RSPCA inspector was called to Jefferson's property in June 2024 after receiving a report from a member of the public, who said that Jefferson was keeping injured wild birds at his home with no treatment, and could not afford veterinary care for his injured cat.
Upon arriving, Inspector Laura Barber found the 'quiet, withdrawn and lethargic' jackdaw with a metal bracelet around its neck, with Jefferson claiming that he had been treating it with an immune protection paste specifically used for cats.
The wood pigeon was found with a bloody injured wing, which Jefferson had attempted to fix with grey gaffer tape.
When receiving advice that he should always arrange for injured animals to be seen by a vet, Jefferson told Inspector Barber that he wished to open an animal rescue centre in the future.
Upon taking the animals to the vet, Inspector Barber was sent copies of social media posts made by Jefferson, with one showing the jackdaw standing on a red sponge in a bubble bath.
The post read, verbatim: 'Meet Raven, im her new surrogate father saved from immediate death (frize in the road with broken leg, slight head injury, and a damaged foot that with two days of a splint has made a recovery.
'She isn't a fan of syringe feed ( 3 days of practising). She has started calling for me when put outside…. Goung to teach her to wolf whistle, YO and Hey. Hopefully her brain recovers with signs of great improvement already. She's happy and with probably now follow me forever.'
The RSPCA officer described another of Jefferson's posts as 'awful to watch'.
She added '[The video] showed a man's left leg leant up by the taps of the bath, again containing bubbles, to the left was the jackdaw floating on the red sponge, like the previous image, but this time the jackdaw had bubbles on the top of her head.
'There was loud reggae type music being played and the bird was just sitting there.
'At one point the man's leg … moved … back into the water touching the side of the floating sponge, and the bird appeared scared and jilted to correct herself so she didn't fall into the water. [The bird's] eyes were half closed, and (she) appeared to be frozen still, and shut down.'
It was suggested in the comments that the jackdaw had ingested some 'weed'.
Upon being examined by the vet, the wood pigeon was put to sleep as its wound had become infected, and it would have been suffering 'acute pain' from the open fracture.
Meanwhile, the jackdaw was found to have glittery nail polish on its claws, and was treated for dehydration and a dislocated toe.
Commenting on the social media post that had featured the jackdaw in the bath and the commentary about her ingesting marijuana, the vet said: 'This video alarmed and concerned me for a number of reasons … it is completely irresponsible to place a bird species that is not water-fowl in a deep area of water, both due to risk of drowning due to a lack of water-proofing and due to intense unnecessary stress that the bird was likely to be feeling, as this was a completely abnormal environment for it to be in.
'Marijuana toxicity could explain the lethargic, glazed demeanour of this bird in an environment that would usually cause panic.'
The vet continued: 'I am shocked and appalled that not only was this allowed to happen, but that Mr Jefferson appears,from his social media comments,to find it funny.
'This is a wild bird. It is unacceptable to treat any animal in this way, but the stress levels induced by this environment are appalling'.
He was charged with causing unnecessary pain and physical suffering to both birds, with his defence team stating that Jefferson was diagnosed with autism, ADHD and suffers with mental health difficulties.
After pleading guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act, he was handed an 18-month community order requiring him to complete 30 days of rehabilitation activity requirements.
He has also been fined and handed a lifetime ban preventing him from keeping any wildlife.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Academics lose discrimination case over trans-critical film
Two academics have failed in their attempt to sue their union for stopping their trans-critical film from being shown to students at the University of Edinburgh. Dr Deirdre O'Neill, a lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire, and Michael Wayne, a professor at Brunel University, argued that they suffered unlawful discrimination when the University and College Union (UCU) opposed their film, Adult Human Female, which challenges claims made by trans rights activists. On Monday, Employment Judge Laidler, sitting with two side members, concluded the claimants were not treated detrimentally contrary to the Equality Act 2010, and were not subjected to harassment. Mary Senior, a UCU Scotland official, welcomed what she described as 'a sensible and common-sense decision'. She added: 'I am proud that UCU successfully defended this case in tribunal. It cannot be right that a trade union is not able to protest peacefully within the law and to employers when material is presented on campus which it believes attacks the human rights of others.' The tribunal, which was held remotely, heard that in November 2022, Dr O'Neill and Prof Wayne released their film examining claims made by trans rights activists that 'trans women are women and should be treated as women in all legal and social contexts'. The UCU's branch at the University of Edinburgh wrote to its principal, Prof Sir Peter Mathieson, asking the university not to host or facilitate the film screening, which it regarded as an 'attack on trans people's identities and not in line with the [university's] dignity and respect policy'. The tribunal was told that the union also published a series of social media posts denouncing the showing of the film, describing it as transphobic hate, and encouraging protests which twice blocked screenings in Edinburgh. The academics said the UCU's opposition amounted to unlawful discrimination on the basis of their gender-critical belief that there are only two sexes. Film 'contained misinformation' At the time, they wrote to Jo Grady, the union's general secretary, asking her to confirm they were entitled to their gender-critical beliefs and that UCU did not support preventing the showing of their film. Ms Grady confirmed that gender-critical beliefs were recognised to be legitimate philosophical beliefs protected under the Equality Act 2010. She also noted that UCU members held many opposing views and that it was not for the union to stand in the way of members and branches protesting certain expressions of protected beliefs. The tribunal noted that UCU Edinburgh was not objecting to the beliefs of the claimants but was protesting against a film which it believed presented misinformation about trans and non-binary people and that was damaging to trans and non-binary staff and students. Ms Senior added: 'It is welcome to have this positive decision at the start of Pride month, and at a time when trans and non-binary people feel under attack. 'This decision demonstrates that trade unions and others can stand up for trans rights and trans inclusivity, and our union is committed to continuing to promote a more equal and safe world for all people regardless of their gender identity'.
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
My sister took her own life after making sick pact with online chat room stranger who flew over from US to watch her die
A WRITER has described how a man flew from the US to watch her sister take her own life after meeting on a "sick" online forum. Adele Zeynep Walton, 26, told how her sister Aimee was discovered dead by cops in a hotel room in October 2022. 5 5 5 Aimee, who was just 21-years-old at the time, was found with a total stranger, who had flown from the US to watch her die. The sisters - who were raised in Southampton, Hampshire, both had active online lives growing up, but Aimee more so. Adele said that Aimee, who was neurodivergent, was bullied as a teenager and turned to online communities instead. When the pandemic hit, Aimee withdrew even further into the online world, her sister - writing in The Telegraph - explained. She broke up with her boyfriend and spent an increasing amount of time in her room. The first Covid lockdown in England was announced in March 2020, and the third was on January 2021. It was in October 2022 that Adele - who was 25 at the time - and her parents were told that Aimee was dead. Aimee was found in a hotel room in Slough, Berkshire, 60 miles away from her home - with a stranger. They had met through a sick online forum that "partners" up people looking to end their own lives. This forum was also how she got her hands on the substance that killed her - reportedly from Kenneth Law, who has been linked to 88 deaths in the UK. According to The New York Times, the forum was founded by two men who run several "incel" websites. Adele took it upon herself to visit the thread and said many of the posts said: "Your family don't care about you" and "You should do it." She told The Guardian that the man who was with her little sister could have been "living out a sick fantasy as an incel who wants to see a young and vulnerable woman end her life'. The man told police he had been working for the 11 days he spent in the hotel room with Aimee. Adele wrote in The Telegraph: "This forum has taken at least 50 UK lives, including my sister. "From looking at the forum myself, I can see just how easy it is to end up in a rabbit hole of despair, where vulnerable users are told their loved ones don't care about them. "Being informed by police that Aimee died in a hotel room with a stranger who she met on this forum, and who flew from the US to witness her death, still haunts me." Adele now campaigns about the harms of the online world and has written a book called Logging Off: The Human Cost of Our Digital World. If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this article, please call the Samaritans for free on 116123. 5 5
Times
22 minutes ago
- Times
Nick Kyrgios's role as Wimbledon pundit to end after only one year
Nick Kyrgios will not be part of the BBC's Wimbledon coverage this year and the Australian is set to miss the tournament as a player too. The BBC was criticised for hiring the 30-year-old for Wimbledon last year after he admitted assaulting an ex-girlfriend. Sources close to the broadcaster have confirmed that Kyrgios will not be part of the line-up for the 2025 event, which starts on June 30. Kyrgios confirmed last week that his hopes of playing in SW19 for the first time since 2022, when he reached the final, had been dashed by a setback in his recovery from injury. In 2023 Kyrgios admitted to assaulting his ex-girlfriend Chiara Passari when he pushed her over during an argument, but avoided a criminal conviction after a magistrate ruled that the offence was 'low-level'. He was also criticised for sharing social media posts by the misogynist influencer Andrew Tate — he later deleted them. Last year the BBC was forced to defend its decision to hire Kyrgios, saying: 'We are in no way condoning his cited previous actions or behaviours, on and off the court, and he is employed to share his views on tennis only.' Kyrgios has also been outspoken in recent months about the leniency of a three-month ban given to the French Open finalist and world No1 Jannik Sinner after two positive drugs tests in 2024. Kyrgios, who has been open about his mental health struggles, said the sanction showed that 'fairness in tennis does not exist'. Last year he told the interviewer Louis Theroux it was 'impossible' that the pyramids had been built by humans and also indicated he believed there was evidence to back up other conspiracy theories, including whether the moon landings had actually taken place.
