logo
'It belongs to all of us': Advocates rally in support of protecting Arizona's public lands

'It belongs to all of us': Advocates rally in support of protecting Arizona's public lands

Yahoo28-03-2025

Environmental groups and public lands advocates rallied at the Arizona Capitol March 27 to call on local, state and national elected officials to protect public lands as concerns grow over Trump administration plans to open those lands to mining and natural resource extraction.
Addressing a crowd of about 200 people, the message from organizers was clear: "Keep public lands in public hands."
The Arizona Rally for Public Lands and Waters was the work of multiple groups with interest in preserving public lands, including American Hunters and Anglers Action Network, CHISPA AZ and Canyon Coolers. The nonpartisan rally also featured former Havasupai Tribal Council member Carletta Tilousi, a lifelong advocate for the Grand Canyon.
"You need to call your congressional people and let them know, do not touch our lands over here, because they were put aside for a reason," Tilousi told the crowd. "It's not just a Havasupai issue, it's not just an Indigenous people issue, it's an Arizona people issue."
About 38% of Arizona's land is managed by federal agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Defense, according to the Congressional Research Service.
In recent weeks, federal actions have targeted Arizona's federal public lands for domestic mining expansion, transfer to private ownership and workforce reductions.
A 2024 Grand Canyon Trust poll showed 91% of Arizonans believed that the government has a responsibility to protect public land. The same poll showed 75% of Arizonans disapprove of selling public lands, including a 57% of Republicans.
According to a report from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, outdoor recreation contributed over $14 billion to Arizona's economy in 2023 and employed over 100,000 people.
"There could be nothing more democratic than our public lands. They're available to all, but only if we keep them that way," said Land Tawney of American Hunters and Anglers Action Network when speaking to the crowd. "It belongs to all of us, it's a shared heritage."
Since taking office, President Donald Trump has issued several executive orders calling for increased mining on federal public land, citing economic needs and national security.
Trump issued an order March 20 to expedite mining on federal lands to reduce reliance on foreign minerals, and in February, another order called for an investigation into the national security implications of importing copper.
Public lands: Copper Creek mine foes say project would disrupt San Pedro River conservation
Arizona is the biggest producer of copper in the U.S., so the orders could mean more mining in the state under an expedited permitting process that advocates fear could damage wildlife, waterways and fragile ecosystems.
"Arizona and the Southwest is under threat of existing mining and future mining, which often puts economic interest above indigenous communities and public lands in general," said D.J. Portugal, organizing director of CHISPA AZ, a grassroots environmental justice advocacy group. "It's really important that we make sure that that push and fight for clean energy doesn't directly impact public lands."
One of Interior Secretary Doug Burgham's first secretarial orders called for a review of national monuments and other public lands where new national resource extraction is prohibited. Arizona is home to 19 national monuments, including six that have been created since 2000. The Antiquities Act of 1906 gives presidents the power to create national monuments from existing federal lands.
Reports have indicated that Trump administration may attempt to rescind two recent National Monument designations in California, leaving advocates for the Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument concerned that protected area may be next.
"This administration doesn't seem to have that knowledge or perspective of leaving something behind for our next generation to enjoy," said Tilousi, who spent years advocating for the monument's designation, in an interview after the rally. "If other monuments are on the chopping block, there's a great chance that all monuments are on the chopping blocks."
Public lands cuts: Mass firings halt work, raise safety concerns in Arizona's national parks and forests
Among the issues raised at the rally was the Trump administration's recent mass firings of federal employees working for the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service across the country.
Described as a "Valentine's Day Massacre," the mass firings in February saw an estimated 1,000 probationary employees terminated from the National Park Service by the Department of Interior, including interpretive rangers, biology technicians and visitor center staff at Arizona's National Parks. An estimated 3,400 employees were terminated from the Forest Service the same weekend.
Protests and rallies in support of the fired employees were organized nationwide, including crowds at Arizona's Grand Canyon and Saguaro National Parks.
The sudden loss of employees meant some public land offices struggled with daily activities. Immediately following the terminations, reports of long lines at the south entrance to Grand Canyon National Park gained national attention. On Febr. 20, Saguaro National Park announced that both its visitor centers would be closed on Mondays until further notice. The park's statement did not provide a reason for the closure, but some commenters speculated the reduction in hours was due to the mass firings.
Essential news every Tuesday: Sign up for AZ Climate, The Republic's environment and climate newsletter
On March 13, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate the terminated probationary employees, but advocates worry that the confusion from the firings, resignations and buyout offers are coercing staff to leave of their own will or face an uncertain future.
"We're surrounded by public lands all around. I can walk out my back door and be on public lands. It's just been a large guiding part of my life, like exploring trails, being in the Grand Canyon. They're all reasons why I live in Arizona," said Neha Khurana, a Flagstaff resident who attended the rally.
"I don't think people realize how much we need our forest and park staff to help maintain access to these places," Khurana said. "Not only are there so many people who have lost their jobs, but we'll see those effects in our parks very soon."
John Leos covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to john.leos@arizonarepublic.com.
Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Advocates rally at Capitol to support protecting Arizona's public land

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian drones and missiles target Ukrainian city of Kharkiv
Russian drones and missiles target Ukrainian city of Kharkiv

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russian drones and missiles target Ukrainian city of Kharkiv

A large Russian drone and missile attack has targeted the city of Kharkiv in Ukraine, killing at least three people and injuring 21, local Ukrainian officials said. The Russian barrage – the latest in near daily widescale attacks by Moscow – included deadly aerial glide bombs that have become part of fierce Russian attacks in the three-year war. Kharkiv's mayor Ihor Terekhov said the attack also damaged 18 blocks of flats and 13 private homes. Citing preliminary data, he said Russia used 48 Shahed drones, two missiles and four aerial glide bombs in the attack. The intensity of the Russian attacks on Ukraine over the past weeks has further dampened hopes that the warring sides could reach a peace deal soon – especially after Kyiv recently embarrassed the Kremlin with a surprising drone attack on military airfields deep inside Russia. The attack also came after US President Donald Trump said his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, told him Moscow would respond to Ukraine's attack on Sunday on Russian military airfields. It was also hours after Mr Trump said it might be better to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' before pulling them apart and pursuing peace. Mr Trump's comments were a remarkable detour from his often-stated appeals to stop the war and signalled he may be giving up on recent peace efforts.

Russia won't let Ukrainian forces rest until Putin's demands are met – Russian deputy foreign minister
Russia won't let Ukrainian forces rest until Putin's demands are met – Russian deputy foreign minister

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia won't let Ukrainian forces rest until Putin's demands are met – Russian deputy foreign minister

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has stated that Moscow will not allow the Armed Forces of Ukraine to "use any pause to rest and regroup" without "eliminating the root causes of the conflict". Source: Ryabkov in an interview with Kremlin-aligned Russian news agency TASS Details: Ryabkov emphasised that US President Donald Trump's return to the White House has become a "reason for cautious optimism" in Russia regarding the normalisation of relations with the United States. He said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin during phone conversations with Trump "confirmed the basic directive on the necessity to eliminate the root causes of the conflict within the framework of political and diplomatic efforts". Ryabkov noted that if the Kremlin's conditions are not met, Russia will act to prevent the Armed Forces of Ukraine from taking advantage of "any pause to rest and regroup". According to him, the Kremlin's position is well known to Washington and threats of sanctions will not change it. "It is strange that hotheads in the US Senate, who have lost their last remnants of common sense, are ignoring this reality. We will continue efforts to achieve the objectives of the special military operation [Russian propaganda term for the war in Ukraine – ed.]. Thus, the decision and the choice are up to Washington, up to Trump," Ryabkov concluded. Background: On 3 June, Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council and former president of the Russian Federation, declared that the true purpose of the so-called peace talks with Ukraine in Istanbul is to ensure Russia's swift and complete victory. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

West Wing Civil War Erupts Over Who Caused Trump-Musk Explosion
West Wing Civil War Erupts Over Who Caused Trump-Musk Explosion

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

West Wing Civil War Erupts Over Who Caused Trump-Musk Explosion

A top White House aide nursing a grudge against Elon Musk is being partly blamed for igniting President Donald Trump's war with the Tesla CEO. Sergio Gor, the White House director of presidential personnel, urged Trump to rescind his nomination for Musk's personal friend Jared Isaacman to lead NASA, sparking a rift between the president and the world's richest man that erupted in public Thursday, the New York Post reported. 'The NASA guy was the straw that broke the camel's back,' a White House source told the Post, suggesting that Gor wanted 'to bury the knife in [Musk's] back.' Four sources inside or close to the White House told the outlet that Gor, 38, has been holding a grudge against Musk, 53, ever since the billionaire 'humiliated' him in front of the Trump Cabinet for not moving fast enough on staffing the administration. 'Sergio was upset about Elon dressing him down at the meeting and said he was going to 'get him,'' another source said. '[Pulling Isaacman's nomination] was the modern-day equivalent of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Sure, Sergio got a scalp, but what did POTUS get?' Gor reportedly developed a deep personal dislike of Musk while the tech mogul was still on friendly terms with Trump, and gleefully celebrated dips in Musk's wealth when Tesla stock plunged, according to three of the sources. 'He'd go around showing Tesla stock prices going down and laugh about it,' one White House source told the Post. The outlet said Gor denied taking pleasure in Tesla's falling stock or ever seeking revenge against Musk. Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon backed up Gor, saying the Trump-Musk feud had been simmering for months over issues like Musk's opposition to Trump's tariff strategy. 'Did Elon have a problem with Sergio?' Bannon, a longtime Musk antagonist told the Post. 'Yes, the fact that we are not hiring enough—guess what—liberal f---ing progressive Democrats.' He argued Trump engaged in the bitter spat because he's 'upset' over Musk's failure to deliver significant savings at DOGE and his reported drug use. Yet, Trump and Musk heaped praise on each other at a congenial send-off last Friday, following the conclusion of Musk's term as a special advisor. It wasn't until Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination shortly after Musk—his biggest financial backer in 2024—left the White House, that the billionaire launched a sharp attack on the president's cherished 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in an X post on Tuesday. The Trump administration has cited Isaacman's past donations to Democrats as the reason for Trump rescinding his nomination just days before his Senate confirmation. But Isaacman, another billionaire in Trumpworld, questioned that explanation, noting his donations have long been public knowledge. 'I don't blame an influential adviser coming in and saying, 'Look, here's the facts, and I think we should kill this guy,'' Isaacman said on the All-In podcast Wednesday. 'And the president's got to make a call and move on.' For now, it seems the administration is sticking with Gor. The Post said that White House Communications Director Steven Cheung called Gor 'a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none.' One source close to the White House speculated, however, that Gor could become the fall guy and help mend the Trump-Musk relationship—if Musk can be convinced that the president was merely being 'played' by Gor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store