They locked a Newfoundland church so it wouldn't be sold. Its fate is now in court.
ST. JOHN'S – The fate of a rural Newfoundland church is in the hands of a judge after lawyers argued today its parishioners must hand it over to be sold to compensate survivors of historical abuse in St. John's.
Lawyer Geoffrey Spencer said members of a community group in Portugal Cove South, N.L., were trespassing when they changed the locks on the doors of the Holy Rosary church last year in an effort to claim ownership of the building and block its sale.
Spencer represents the Roman Catholic archdiocese in St. John's, which is selling its properties across eastern Newfoundland as part of bankruptcy proceedings to compensate survivors of abuse at the former Mount Cashel orphanage. Cynthia Power and George Power of the Portugal Cove South Historical Corporation stand in a provincial Supreme Court room in St. John's, Tuesday, May 6, 2025. They're fighting a court application asking them to hand over a church in their community so it can be sold to compensate survivors of historical sexual abuse. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sarah Smellie
Lawyer Kyle Rees countered that the Portugal Cove South Historical Corporation reasonably believed that it — not the archdiocese — owned the church since it had taken on its repairs about a decade ago.
Justice Garrett Handrigan said he would consider the archdiocese's application for an injunction against the group and provide a ruling at a later date.
Winnipeg Free Press | Newsletter
A Supreme Court of Canada ruling in 2021 cemented the archdiocese's liability for physical and sexual abuse at the former orphanage between the 1940s and the 1960s.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 6, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
2 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Kilmar Abrego Garcia returned to the US, charged with transporting people in the country illegally
Article content Abrego Garcia's attorneys called the case 'baseless.' 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said. Federal Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville, Tennessee, determined that Abrego Garcia will be held in custody until at least next Friday, when there will be an arraignment and detention hearing. Abrego Garcia appeared in court wearing a short-sleeved, white, button-down shirt. When asked if he understood the charges, he told the judge: 'Si. Lo entiendo.' An interpreter then said: 'Yes. I understand.' Democrats and immigrant rights group had pressed for Abrego Garcia's release, with several lawmakers — including Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, where Abrego Garcia had lived for years — even traveling to El Salvador to visit him. A federal judge had ordered him to be returned in April and the Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal by directing the government to work to bring him back.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia while on death row for 37 years is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled late Friday. Ralph Leroy Menzies, 67, was sentenced to die in 1988 for killing Utah mother of three Maurine Hunsaker. Despite his recent cognitive decline, Menzies 'consistently and rationally understands' what is happening and why he is facing execution, Judge Matthew Bates wrote in a court order. 'Menzies has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his understanding of his specific crime and punishment has fluctuated or declined in a way that offends the Eighth Amendment,' which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, Bates said. Menzies had previously selected a firing squad as his method of execution. He would become only the sixth U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1977. The Utah Attorney General's Office is expected to file a death warrant soon. Menzies' lawyers, who had argued his dementia was so severe that he could not understand why he was being put to death, said they plan to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'Ralph Menzies is a severely brain-damaged, wheelchair-bound, 67-year-old man with dementia and significant memory problems,' his attorney, Lindsey Layer, said in a statement. 'It is deeply troubling that Utah plans to remove Mr. Menzies from his wheelchair and oxygen tank to strap him into an execution chair and shoot him to death.' The U.S. Supreme Court has spared others prisoners with dementia from execution, including an Alabama man in 2019 who had killed a police officer. Over nearly four decades, attorneys for Menzies filed multiple appeals that delayed his death sentence, which had been scheduled at least twice before it was pushed back. Hunsaker, a 26-year-old married mother of three, was abducted by Menzies from the convenience store where she worked. She was later found strangled and her throat cut at a picnic area in the Wasatch Mountains of northern Utah. Menzies had Hunsaker's wallet and several other belongings when he was jailed on unrelated matters. He was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. Matt Hunsaker, who was 10 years old when his mother was killed, said Friday that the family was overwhelmed with emotion to know that justice would finally be served.
CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
B.C. babysitter must be acquitted in toddler's 2011 drowning death, Supreme Court rules
Johna Baylon Tammy Marion Bouvette was caring for a 19-month-old girl in Cranbrook in 2011 when the toddler drowned The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a woman originally convicted in the 2011 drowning death of a toddler in her care must be acquitted. Tammy Marion Bouvette was babysitting 19-month-old Iyanna Teeple in Cranbrook, B.C., in 2011 when the toddler was found unresponsive in the bath. Teeple was flown to a hospital in Calgary, where she later died. Bouvette was originally charged with second-degree murder in the child's death, then later pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of criminal negligence. She was sentenced to 12 months in jail. But an independent review of the case determined that the Crown hadn't disclosed all the evidence to Bouvette or her counsel before she entered her guilty plea. In 2023, the B.C. Court of Appeal quashed her conviction and ordered a stay of proceedings, but declined to enter an acquittal. Bouvette appealed and, in a ruling released Friday morning, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded she should be immediately acquitted on the grounds that the Crown also sought an acquittal and said it would call no evidence at a new trial. 'A miscarriage of justice' The case became the subject of an investigation by CBC's The Fifth Estate in 2020 after CBC journalists uncovered a report that criticized pivotal pathology evidence in the Crown's case against Bouvette. Bouvette has maintained she did not abuse or kill the child and told The Fifth Estate she had wanted to avoid a lengthier prison sentence for a murder charge when she made her plea. In 2023, the B.C. Court of Appeal determined that the B.C. Prosecution Service had failed to disclose to Bouvette's defence lawyers several items of key evidence, including the pathology evidence report, which supported Bouvette's claim that she had not hurt or neglected the child. Bouvette's former defence lawyer told The Fifth Estate that he had not received that report from the Crown during the prosecution. At the time, the judges wrote that they "make no finding of bad faith or malice on the part of the Crown. But neither can we ignore that the disclosure breaches were not isolated or confined to information of dubious value to the appellant." B.C. Court of Appeal quashes conviction of woman in toddler's death, calling it 'miscarriage of justice' "As a consequence of material non-disclosure, the appellant was deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision about how to plead, apprised of the strengths and weaknesses of the case against her on fundamental issues." The court ruled that Bouvette's criminal negligence conviction, causing the toddler's death, was "the product of a miscarriage of justice," and ordered a stay of proceedings because retrying her case would be an "abuse of process." 'Conviction would be unreasonable... with no evidence' The Supreme Court's Friday decision says the circumstances of Bouvette's case "weigh heavily in favour of an acquittal." "[Bouvette] has already served the entirety of her sentence. The victim's family fully supports an acquittal, and the conviction resulting from her false guilty plea has had a devastating impact on her life," the decision reads. The judges were unanimous in their decision that Bouvette should be acquitted, if for different reasons. Writing for the majority, Justice Nicholas Kasirer said the first possible ground for an acquittal under the Criminal Code is where there's a lack of evidence to ground a reasonable conviction. The second possible ground is where the Crown seeks an acquittal and says it would call no evidence at a new trial. Kasirer said Bouvette was acquitted on this second ground. The judgment notes that when Bouvette appealed to the court to seek an acquittal, the Crown also "made significant concessions" and agreed that she should be acquitted. It notes that the Crown clarified in submissions to the Supreme Court that if a new trial were ordered, it would 'call no evidence.' WATCH | B.C. Court of Appeal says Bouvette's conviction was a miscarriage of justice: "Unless it would be contrary to the public interest, an appellate court must acquit, thereby giving effect to circumstances that would lead directly to an acquittal if a new trial were ordered, because conviction would be unreasonable on a record with no evidence," the decision reads. Kasirer goes on to write that "rather than forcing the parties to go through pro forma proceedings to achieve this result [the acquittal], or standing in the way of this result by entering a judicial stay, the just result is for the acquittal to be entered now, even though there is evidence on the record that could lead a reasonable jury, properly instructed, to convict [Bouvette] at a new trial."
