
Iran sleeper cell threat hits U.S. soil after base attack? Trump's sudden G7 exit linked to terror warning, reports say
Iran sleeper cell threat is now a growing concern in the U.S. after Donald Trump suddenly left the G7 summit, reportedly due to intelligence warning of possible attacks on American soil. Following Iran's missile strike on a U.S. base, and America's retaliatory bombing of key nuclear sites, top officials fear sleeper agents inside the U.S. may be activated. The Department of Homeland Security has issued a national alert, and cities are stepping up their security.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Did Trump leave the G7 because of Iran's sleeper cell threat?
What cities are considered most at risk in the U.S.?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What are sleeper cells and why is this story gaining traction?
What did DHS and CBP say about the sleeper cell threat?
What kind of plots has Iran tried before in the U.S.?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Is Iran planning to activate sleeper cells now?
What data shows we're serious
More than 150 individuals on terror watchlists have been stopped at the U.S.–Mexico border in 2025—a record high .
individuals on terror watchlists have been stopped at the U.S.–Mexico border in 2025—a record high . The DHS bulletin warns the threat remains elevated until at least Sept. 22, 2025.
CBP has documented thousands of Iran nationals entering the U.S., some possibly linked to sleeper networks.
Should Americans be worried?
This sleeper cell threat isn't a rumor — it's a real national security concern
The story around Iran's sleeper cell threat in the U.S. has turned urgent after Iran launched a missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar earlier this month. According to multiple reports, President Donald Trump was briefed on credible sleeper cell threats while attending the G7 summit in Italy, leading to a sudden and early departure from the event. Shortly after leaving, he authorized retaliatory U.S. strikes against Iranian targets.Fox News, quoting senior U.S. officials, said Iran had delivered a direct warning: if America responded militarily, dormant sleeper cells in the U.S. could be activated. That message reportedly reached Trump during the summit, prompting urgent consultations with national security advisers.Yes, according to classified briefings confirmed by Fox News and Daily Mail, Trump's G7 exit was not due to diplomacy issues — it was tied to the Iranian threat. During the G7 discussions on Middle East stability, U.S. officials received intelligence that Tehran might retaliate for past strikes using terror cells it has embedded in Western nations, including the U.S.The decision was immediate. Trump cut his schedule short, flew back to the U.S., and ordered strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran within 48 hours. Not long after, Iran responded by firing more than a dozen ballistic missiles at U.S. military sites in Qatar and Iraq.While no city has been officially named, experts saycould be prime targets due to their population, economic importance, and past surveillance activity.Rodney Scott, a former CBP commissioner, recently said, 'The threat has never been this real.' U.S. agencies are currently on high alert, especially after the retaliation following Iran's base attack and America's recent military operation.Sleeper cells refer to undercover operatives planted by a hostile nation or terror group inside a foreign country. They live quietly, often for years, waiting to be activated.U.S. agencies have long suspected Iran — through its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and proxy group Hezbollah — of maintaining such cells in the United States. These fears go back at least to 2017, when the FBI arrested Ali Kourani and Samer el Debek. Both were collecting intelligence on U.S. landmarks and infrastructure and had ties to Hezbollah's Unit 910, which handles overseas operations.In the days after the Iran–U.S. escalation, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Troy Miller warned in a press conference that the 'threat of sleeper cells has never been higher'. He emphasized that Iran has the means and motive to strike the U.S. through unconventional means.The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a "heightened threat environment" bulletin running through September. It warns of possible retaliation on U.S. soil, particularly from foreign terror-linked networks that could exploit border gaps.Recent data shows that, in the first half of 2025, more than 150 individuals on the U.S. terror watchlist were apprehended at the southern border — a sharp rise compared to 2023.Iran has a record of targeting U.S. figures. In 2022, federal agents foiled a plot to assassinate former National Security Adviser John Bolton, allegedly ordered by a member of Iran's Quds Force. A separate plot aimed at former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was also uncovered.These attempts were seen as retaliation for the 2020 drone strike that killed Qasem Soleimani, the top IRGC commander. U.S. officials fear that Iran has never abandoned its plans for revenge — it may have just been waiting for the right moment.It's possible, but not confirmed. Intelligence officials have told CNN and ABC News that no specific plot has been detected, but they are treating all threats as credible. Surveillance and counterterror operations have ramped up in major cities, including New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago.Former CIA officer Daniel Hoffman said, 'Iran is under pressure. If they feel backed into a corner, activating sleeper cells becomes a very real option.'Authorities say there's no need to panic, but people should stay aware. The FBI, DHS, and local law enforcement are closely monitoring for any signs of activity. Citizens are urged to report anything unusual, especially around airports, government buildings, and synagogues.Trump has not publicly commented on the exact nature of the intelligence he received at the G7, but multiple sources — including Fox News and Daily Mail — confirm he acted on direct warnings about potential sleeper cell retaliation.The story of Iran's sleeper cells in the U.S. has moved from theory to urgent risk. Trump's G7 exit, Iran's missile attacks, and the intelligence briefings all point to a serious situation. While no active plot has surfaced, the U.S. government is treating this threat with full attention — and Americans should too.Stay updated, stay aware, and trust that law enforcement is doing all it can behind the scenes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump must offer Iran more than bombs, rage and humiliation
DONALD TRUMP was elected to keep America out of foreign wars. But on June 22nd American forces joined Israel's campaign against Iran, striking three nuclear sites. The president's task now is to press Iran's leaders into avoiding a ruinous regional escalation and, as a complement to that, to persuade them to abandon any thought of trying to get a nuclear weapon. Neither will be easy. America's assault, early on Sunday morning local time, involved waves of B-2 bombers repeatedly attacking facilities at Fordow and Natanz. Submarine-launched cruise missiles also struck Isfahan. Mr Trump hailed the success of the mission, saying that Iran's programme had been 'completely and utterly obliterated'. He also warned Iran not to retaliate. The bombing raid appears to have done serious damage to the three sites, but the president cannot be sure how much—not even Iran will have yet had time to assess its full extent. He is certainly right to be worried about Iranian retaliation. That risk explains why The Economist argued that rushing in was the wrong choice for America. We feared that the tradeoffs were, on net, negative: bombing would set back Iran's programme by an uncertain amount, but Iran, its proxies or terrorist cells could go on to kill American troops and civilians, terrorise the Gulf states and send energy prices soaring by, say, making the Strait of Hormuz too dangerous for tankers. Now that Mr Trump has rushed in, he must minimise the chances that the region spirals out of control. Fortunately, the strike itself appears designed to do just that. In the past nine days Israel has attacked a range of targets that are political, military and economic, as well as nuclear. It has also suggested that it might seek to trigger regime change. America, by contrast, focused exclusively on nuclear sites, some of which are thought to be beyond the reach of Israel's air force. Mr Trump has made clear that he is not attempting to overturn the regime—at least for as long as Iran shows restraint. Mr Trump should urgently turn to diplomacy. In his address he declared that 'now is the time for peace'. If he means what he says, he should immediately offer Iran an alternative that leads away from launching retaliatory missile strikes at American bases and Arab states. That means following up on the call by Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defence, to get Iran to return to talks about its programme. These would be more likely to get under way if, while insisting that Iran give up its stocks of enriched uranium and submit to intrusive international inspections, Mr Trump was open to the principle that Iran can have some enrichment capacity, probably as part of a regional consortium that operates outside the country. If Mr Trump fails to seize the moment, Iran will be more likely to redouble its efforts to become a nuclear-weapons power, in an even more clandestine fashion. A first, unwelcome step would be for it to say that it was leaving the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This would signal that the effect of American and Israeli bombing was to inflame its nuclear ambitions. Quitting the NPT would also put future efforts beyond the scrutiny of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Nobody knows whether the regime has managed to stash enriched uranium and key components before America and Israel attacked. After the damage from the attacks, the IAEA will never be able to account for Iran's stocks. If Iran restarts its programme, progress towards a bomb could span several years, or it could be rapid. Either way, America will face the prospect of repeatedly having to help Israel strike it, or—as Sunday's mission suggests—doing the job itself. One motive for Iran to punish America today would be to complicate such future operations by showing that they carry a cost. The immediate offer of talks could help reduce any Iranian retaliation to face-saving strikes. If so, Mr Trump should ignore them and press Iran to come to the table. And lastly, Mr Trump should launch a drive to shift the Middle East out of a pattern of continual war. With this bombing, he has badly shaken his Arab allies. After his visit to the Gulf in May, they came to believe that he would restrain Israel while he continued to negotiate. The prospect of repeated attacks on Iran by Israel supported by America is a grave threat to their vision of a region that finds peace through prosperity. Mr Trump should attempt to rebuild trust using his new influence over Israel. Having helped its prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, by bombing Fordow, Mr Trump now enjoys unprecedented leverage over him. He should apply this not just to end the attacks of the Israeli air force on Iran—where it is anyway running out of nuclear targets—but also to get it to immediately end the war in Gaza, where it has reduced Hamas to ashes at the cost of tens of thousands of Palestinian lives. There has never been a more propitious moment for a comprehensive peace plan, nor a more urgent one—including for the Palestinians. In the past 20 months Israel has devastated Iran's malign control of a crescent of militias and client regimes in the region. Now it has weakened the other pillar of its defiance of America and the West: its nuclear programme. Iran was always an obstacle to the 'prosperity agenda' of the Gulf states. Now is a good time to discover if that has changed. Even if Mr Trump offers all this, Iran could nonetheless prefer to cause mayhem. Its leaders have just been humiliated. They were already unpopular at home, and have now left their people open to attack. The regime may calculate that, if it does not strike back, the coming months could bring a palace coup or a challenge from the streets. That would put America in a quandary. If Iran killed a lot of Americans Mr Trump would be forced to respond. His war aims would shift to requiring Iran to stop attacking, or even to demanding regime change. And yet, using air power alone, even America would struggle to impose either of those. An operation with the welcome aim of stopping nuclear proliferation could thereby end up accelerating it. How much better for Mr Trump, after a dazzling display of American power, to pour all his efforts into seeking diplomacy without delay. Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.


New Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump says Iran and Israel have agreed to a phased-in ceasefire over next 24 hours
Trump's announcement comes just before he leaves Tuesday for a NATO summit in the Netherlands, where he will likely make the case that his mix of aggression and diplomacy has succeeded. Never shy to suggest he deserves the Nobel Peace Price, Trump went so far as to give the conflict between Israel and Iran the name of the '12 day war,' a title that seemed to reference the 1967 'Six Day War' in which Israel fought a group of Arab countries including Egypt, Jordan and Syria. As Trump described it, the ceasefire would start with Iran and then be joined by Israel 12 hours later, with the president writing that the respective sides would 'remain PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL.' The phased-in ceasefire was set to begin at roughly midnight Washington time and culminate within 24 hours. 'This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!' Trump said. The exact terms of the ceasefire other than the timeline provided by the Trump remained to be seen. On Sunday, the Trump administration had insisted that Iran abandon its program to enrich uranium for possible use in nuclear weapons as a condition of any lasting peace. While the bombings of the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan facilities were a powerful show of force, it remained uncertain just how much nuclear material Iran still possessed and what its ambitions would be going forward.


Hans India
37 minutes ago
- Hans India
No basis for aggression
Moscow: Russian President Vladimir Putin met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Moscow amid the ongoing conflict between Tehran and Tel Aviv. Putin, reiterating Russia's stand on the attack on Iran, said Iran has been attacked without pretext. Putin said the Iranian people will decide to change the regime, not any other country as the US repeatedly asked Iran to surrender. Putin also lashed out at the US and said Russia deeply regrets and condemns the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. He also said that Russia is ready to help the Iranian people. "Dear Minister, I am very glad to see you. You are visiting Russia at a difficult time, at a time of sharp aggravation of the situation in the region and around your country," Putin said. Russia has extended support to Iran and openly condemned US strikes on its nuclear sites. Speaking on the same, Putin reiterated that there is no justification for the "aggression provoked against Iran". "Our position on the current events is well known. It is clearly stated, articulated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on behalf of Russia and, you know, the opposition that we have taken in the Security Council of the United Nations. The aggression provoked against Iran has absolutely no basis and no justification. We have long-standing good, reliable relations with Iran. We, for our part, are making efforts to provide assistance to the Iranian people," Putin added. The Iranian Minister thanked Russia for its stand in condemning the assault. "We appreciate Russia's stance in condemning this assault. The attack carried out by the United States is, first and foremost, an attack on the UN Charter, as it is entirely in violation of it," he said. "It is an attack on international law, an attack on legal norms and frameworks, and most importantly, an attack on the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the non-proliferation regime as a whole,' he added.