Pledge to stop women fleeing violence becoming homeless
More than one in four homeless applications from women are from those suffering domestic abuse.
James Dornan, SNP MSP for Cathcart, called for action to ensure women are not left homeless if they are forced to flee domestic abuse.
READ NEXT: Thousands expected for march and rally to support refugees in Glasgow
He asked Mhairi McAllan, the Housing Secretary, to ensure safe options are available for women.
He said: 'Given that domestic abuse is the leading recorded cause of women presenting as homeless in Scotland, accounting for around 23% of female-headed homelessness applications in 2023/24, what further specific steps are being taken to ensure safe, stable and immediate housing options are available to survivors?'
The Housing Secretary said steps were being taken under the Housing Act to strengthen the safeguards for women to help women remain in their home.
She said: 'Under the Housing Bill, we will introduce a duty on all social landlords to develop and introduce a domestic abuse policy.
'This should set out how they report their tenants experiencing abuse and it includes keeping the tenant in their home and removing the perpetrator if that is what they want.'
READ NEXT: Tenant-led campaign to halt rent hike praised by MP
'We will also update the definition of domestic abuse, as it applies in housing, to take account of an increased understanding of what actually constitutes domestic abuse and the bill also introduces a duty on social landlords to fully consider domestic abuse and support individuals experiencing it if its causing any financial arrears before any legal action to recover possession of a property on account of rent arrears can be taken forward.'
McAllan said the Bill would improve the rights of women in a domestic abuse situation.
She added: 'The measures in this act mark a critical shift in preventing women's homelessness in the first place by giving social landlords greater control to transfer tenancies to a victim survivor.
'I place great priority on protecting the housing rights of women and children and those suffering domestic abuse, so I'm always open to new ways that we can do that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Assisted dying law change - everything you need to know as MPs prepare to vote
A critical vote will take place in Parliament today on whether to legalise assisted dying as MPs have the chance to cast their verdict on the Bill after it passed its first hurdle in November MPs will take part in a make-or-break vote on whether to legalise assisted dying today(FRI). The landmark legislation has been undergoing intense Commons scrutiny since November, when it passed its first hurdle by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55. Today's vote is a critical test as to whether assisted dying will become legal in England and Wales. Passing the bill would usher in one of the biggest societal changes since the legalisation of same-sex marriage a decade ago. But it faces intense opposition from critics, and MPs remain divided on the proposals. Here's what you need to know. What Assisted dying is banned in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, carrying a maximum prison sentence of 14 years. In Scotland, it is not a specific criminal offence but assisting the death of someone can leave a person open to being charged with murder or other offences. How would the law change? The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, would change the law to allow adults with a terminal illness in England and Wales to apply for an assisted death. The person needs to have fewer than six months to live and have the mental capacity to make the choice. Their decision must be "clear, settled and informed" at every stage - and free from coercion. The application would be subject to approval by two doctors and an expert panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance to end their life. The bill doesn't specify what drug. This will be provided by a doctor but only the person can take it - they cannot be fed it by someone else. Doctors won't be forced to take part in assisted dying as MPs have inserted a new clause to make this explicit. This also applies to anyone else who could be involved, such as care workers and pharmacists. Independent advocates will be created to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions, as well as a disability advisory board. Other amendments made include banning assisted dying adverts and a ban on medics being able to raise the idea with anyone under 18. What happens in Parliament today? The Bill is back for third reading, which is the first time MPs will vote on the overall bill since November. Some amendments may be voted on before the debate turns to the whole Bill. At the last vote in November, MPs backed it by 330 to 275, majority 55, to give the bill second reading. Some MPs could change their vote so both camps have been closely monitoring the numbers. If it passes, then it will move onto the House of Lords for further scrutiny. It could return to the Commons if peers try to amend it, in a process known as "ping pong". But the Lords is not supposed to frustrate a piece of legislation passed by the Commons, as MPs are elected by the public and peers are not. If the bill doesn't pass, it falls - meaning it won't become law. It is unlikely another attempt to legalise assisted dying would be made for years if this one doesn't pass. A vote would be expected to take place mid-afternoon. What are the arguments for and against? Supporters say the ban on assisted dying is cruel, leaving dying people forced to suffer in pain and without dignity. They say terminally ill people deserve to have a choice to end their lives. Those who decide to go to Dignitas, in Switzerland, are faced with handling it alone or putting their families in a position where they could face criminal charges if they help them. But critics argue the bill does not have enough safeguards and has been rushed through. They worry about people being coerced into an assisted death, while some argue it could lead to a slippery slope with the legislation expanded over time. When could assisted dying become available if the law changes? The implementation period has been raised to a maximum of four years from royal assent - meaning it could not be until 2029 if the Bill passes until later this year. Ms Leadbeater said this was "a backstop" rather than a target and said she would put pressure on the Government to bring it in promptly if the Bill does pass. A Government impact assessment estimated between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. Establishing a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs "is not stated as an objective of the policy", the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. No funding has yet been set aside to resource an assisted dying service within the NHS as the Bill hasn't become law. What about the rest of the UK? The Isle of Man looks likely to become the first part of the British Isles to legalise assisted dying, after its proposed legislation passed through a final vote of the parliament's upper chamber in March. Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) in May voted in favour of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill. It will now face scrutiny at Holyrood - and can only become law if MSPs back it in a final vote later this year. In the Crown dependencies, the Isle of Man passed its proposed legislation in March, making it the first place in the British Isles to approve the right to die. The bill must receive royal assent before it can become law. Attempts to legalise assisted dying in Northern Ireland would have to be passed by politicians at Stormont.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Time to end Sheriffhall roundabout saga
Miles Briggs MSP As anyone who has used the Edinburgh City by-pass will know, the road is often at gridlock and has become a wholly inadequate ring-road for the Capital. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I have been campaigning with my colleagues to improve it my entire parliamentary career and continue to make the case for infrastructure investment for Lothian. One of the most notorious hotspots for congestion is the Sheriffhall roundabout. Failing a broader upgrade of the A720, my latest effort has been to press SNP Ministers to finally address this disastrous aspect of the Bypass, if nothing else. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the roundabout was being constructed 40 years ago, many people, including those involved in the original design, some of whom I have met, made it clear that a roundabout was not appropriate for a road of this size and would inevitably cause congestion. Sheriffhall roundabout heading west. Picture: Ian Georgeson An upgrade to the junction was first flagged as a priority by the Strategic Transport Projects Review in 2008, some 17 years ago. It then took the SNP Government a decade to commit to the funding. The proposed solution, a flyover separating local and through-traffic, was eventually allocated £120m in 2018. It promised smoother and safer journeys for Edinburgh and the surrounding region. In the seven years since and after more than £6m spent on consultations, not a single spade has hit the ground to alleviate the time, money and pollution being needlessly wasted in traffic every day. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Much of the delay was caused by Green party lobbying, which brought the project to a halt in 2020. Branding the much-needed upgrade a 'spaghetti junction', the Greens rallied their supporters to submit more than 2700 objections. These represented 97 per cent of the total objections submitted against the project. As my fellow Lothian MSP Sue Webber pointed out last week, the Greens have been allowed to stop a planned and funded project single handedly. What damage this has down to our local and national economy needs to be recognised. Sadly this was not the first time we have seen the tail wag the dog in the SNP-Green relationship and I suspect it won't be the last. It isn't clear to me how hours of stationary traffic and drivers opting to cut through the city to avoid that congestion, is better for our environment than cleanly flowing traffic, confined to the outskirts of the city. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nonetheless, the public inquiry into this matter pushed ministerial approval back yet again. A decision was expected a year ago, yet it remains under 'active consideration' according to the SNP. Twelve months without a decision is not consideration, it's procrastination. I held a debate in Parliament on this issue last week, having launched an online campaign the week before. I am glad that the Cabinet Secretary for Transport Fiona Hyslop has now agreed to meet with a cross-party group on this going forward but as expected, the Scottish Government would not assure me that a decision would be made before the 2026 election. Please get involved and sign my Sheriffhall campaign by visiting Next week will also see the council by-election take place in the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart ward following the death of Cllr Val Walker. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It has been a pleasure to meet with many local residents while I've been out and about with local Scottish Conservative candidate, Mark Hooley who has been working alongside local Cllr Christopher Cowdy and who would make a fantastic addition to the City Council. Miles Briggs, Conservative MSP for Lothian
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
SNP MSP Fergus Ewing to stand as independent in Scottish Parliament election
SNP MSP Fergus Ewing has announced he will stand as an independent candidate at next year's Holyrood election. Ewing has served as the constituency MSP for Inverness and Nairn since 1999 and is seeking election for the seventh time, ending over 50 years of association with the SNP. In a personal statement, the 67-year-old said it 'wasn't an easy decision', expressing concern about the SNP's direction and accusing the party of 'deserting many of the people whose causes we used to champion.' Ewing, who previously served as rural affairs secretary in government, also branded the power-sharing deal with the Greens a 'strategic blunder'. He cited delays to the dualling of the A9 from Perth to Inverness and A96 from Aberdeen to Inverness as a key factor in his decision to leave the party. Ewing's statement read: 'I have seen the Scottish Parliament at its best and its worst. I fear in recent years it has been at its worst. 'This has not been an easy decision. I have taken it because I love the people of Inverness and Nairn and the people of Scotland more than my party which I have been in for more than half a century. 'I believe the SNP has lost its way and that devolution itself – presently – is letting Scotland's people down. It doesn't need to be this way.' Ewing has previously disagreed with the party on several policy issues, including gender recognition reforms, the Deposit Return Scheme, and its level of support for the oil and gas sector. In 2023, he voted against Green minister Lorna Slater in a no-confidence motion, defying party whips and leading to his temporary suspension from the SNP group at Holyrood. Ewing described Holyrood as 'more fractious and tribal than ever before' and said 'too much power rests unchecked in the hands of party leaders'. He called for greater cooperation between Scotland's main political parties to tackle major challenges including economic instability, high energy costs, and public service reform. 'Ordinary people accept that they must work together in their own workplace – with everyone – whether they choose them as friends and allies or not,' his statement continued. 'It's time for politicians to do what the people customarily do – to work together for the interests of the nation. 'In short: It's time for Holyrood to grow up.' Ewing is the son of Winnie Ewing, whose victory in the 1967 Hamilton by-election marked a significant milestone for the SNP. He is the brother of Cowdenbeath MSP Annabelle Ewing. He was first elected to the Scottish Parliament in 1999, when it was reconvened, and went on to serve as a minister for 14 years under both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon. SNP Leader John Swinney said: 'It was with real sadness and deep regret that I heard of Fergus Ewing's decision to leave the Scottish National Party. 'We have both served the SNP and the cause of independence for many years, and I commend him for all that he achieved while serving in the SNP Government until 2021. 'Fergus had the option of standing at the forthcoming election for the SNP, given his status as an approved candidate. He chose not to accept that opportunity and I regret that he has ultimately decided instead to leave the party. 'The SNP approaches the 2026 election ahead in the polls, with growing support for independence, and I am looking forward to taking our positive, ambitious vision for Scotland's future to the people.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
