logo
Oil Advances in Risk-On Mood Ahead of OPEC+ Committee Meeting

Oil Advances in Risk-On Mood Ahead of OPEC+ Committee Meeting

Yahoo5 days ago

(Bloomberg) -- Oil rose alongside equity markets ahead of an OPEC+ committee meeting, while traders monitor the prospect for more US sanctions on Russia.
UAE's AI University Aims to Become Stanford of the Gulf
NY Wins Order Against US Funding Freeze in Congestion Fight
Brent climbed toward $65 after closing 1% lower on Tuesday, while West Texas Intermediate was above $61. The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee, which tracks market developments, meets later Wednesday before a group led by Saudi Arabia convenes on Saturday to decide on output policy for July.
Members held preliminary talks last week on making a large production hike for a third consecutive month, according to delegates.
The ramp up of idled production by OPEC and its allies has stoked fears about oversupply and added to the pressure on prices. Parts of the futures curve for Brent are in contango — a bearish structure that signals ample supply.
'Crude fundamentals remain under significant pressure,' said Gao Jian, a Shandong-based analyst at Qisheng Futures Co. 'The early-session rally could be driven by improved macro risk sentiment.'
Oil has trended lower since mid-January, with sweeping tariffs from the Trump administration and retaliatory measures from targeted countries adding to bearish headwinds, raising concerns over an economic slowdown. However, there has been some signs recently of easing trade tensions.
President Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned in a social media post on Tuesday that Russian leader Vladimir Putin was 'playing with fire', as the US weighed whether to target Moscow with additional sanctions.
Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back?
Why Apple Still Hasn't Cracked AI
Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce
Inside the First Stargate AI Data Center
How Coach Handbags Became a Gen Z Status Symbol
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rwanda nears migrant hosting agreement with U.S.
Rwanda nears migrant hosting agreement with U.S.

Business Insider

time4 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Rwanda nears migrant hosting agreement with U.S.

As part of President Donald Trump's escalating efforts to curb illegal migration, the United States is reportedly in final talks to designate Rwanda as a potential host nation for asylum seekers and migrants turned away at the U.S. border. The United States is considering a partnership with Rwanda to host asylum seekers and migrants rejected at the U.S. border. Concerns have arisen regarding Rwanda's ability to manage the asylum seeker population and potential issues with human rights adherence. The U.S. has reportedly already tested Rwanda as a deportation destination, citing an incident involving the deportation of an Iraqi national. The Trump administration appears to be positioning Rwanda as the latest addition to a growing list of partner nations—including El Salvador, Mexico, and most recently, South Sudan—willing to accept deportees as part of its intensified migration crackdown. The US appears to be adopting a version of the UK's previously discarded plan to deport asylum-seekers to certain countries. San Diego-based immigration lawyer, Jacob Sapochnick notes that space in U.S. detention centers is not only running out but also driving up costs as per Bloomberg. In response, the State Department is seeking to establish 'transfer agreements' with more countries to alleviate the strain on domestic facilities. UK's botched Rwanda deportation scheme The UK's "Rwanda scheme," introduced by the Conservative government in 2022, was met with controversy and ultimately scrapped by new Prime Minister Keir Starmer shortly after taking office, with him labeling it a "gimmick" that was ineffective. Despite spending approximately £715 million—including £290 million paid directly to Rwanda, £50 million on flights that never took off, and £95 million on detention centers—The plan had only resulted in a few voluntary removals. In 2024, the newly elected Labour government terminated the scheme, labeling it a costly failure. Rwanda has since demanded an additional £50 million, claiming unmet obligations. Around 280 contractors were laid off as operations wound down. US moves to adopt similar template The US now seems to be following a similar approach, looking to partner with Rwanda to accept deportees. Bloomberg reports that the U.S. administration appears to have already tested Rwanda as a deportation destination. Earlier this year, reports emerged that the U.S. deported an Iraqi national, Omar Abdulsattar Ameen, to Rwanda, paying $100,000 to cover relocation costs. Ameen has long been a controversial figure, having drawn attention since the Trump administration's earlier attempt to extradite him to Iraq. Despite these developments, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has not been briefed on any formal U.S.-Rwanda agreement. UNHCR spokeswoman Kathryn Mahoney stated that while no proposal has been presented, ' any transfer arrangement should ensure access to asylum and due process.' According to Bloomberg, Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe revealed earlier this month that the country is ' in talks with the United States about a deal on migration. ' While a State Department spokesperson declined to confirm the discussions, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly stated that the U.S. is 'actively searching for other countries to take people'—preferably, he added, 'the further away from America, the better, so they can't come back across the border.'

Supreme Court leaves in place state bans on some semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity gun magazines
Supreme Court leaves in place state bans on some semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity gun magazines

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

Supreme Court leaves in place state bans on some semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity gun magazines

The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments in a significant Second Amendment challenge to Maryland's ban on certain semi-automatic weapons, a move that leaves the state's law in place. Maryland's ban, enacted after the deadly 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, prohibits the sale or ownership of certain semi-automatic weapons such as AR- and AK-style rifles. The law was challenged by David Snope, a state resident who wants to purchase those rifles for self-defense and other purposes. The Supreme Court also declined to hear a challenge over Rhode Island's ban on high-capacity gun magazines, leaving that law in place. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented from the court's decision not to hear the pair of cases. The 2022 Rhode Island law prohibits the possession of large-capacity feeding devices or magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. It requires owners of such devices to either modify them to fit the 10-round limit, sell them to a firearms dealer, remove them from Rhode Island or hand them over to law enforcement. The law required such action to be taken within 180 days of its passage, after which time violators faced up to five years in prison. In the Maryland case involving automatic rifles, the Richmond-based federal appeals court upheld Maryland's law over the summer, finding that the guns at issue are 'dangerous and unusual weapons' and therefore are not covered by the Second Amendment's protections. The majority also concluded that there were historical analogues to the Maryland statute that were adopted by state legislatures across the country in the 19th and 20th century.

U.S. steelmakers' shares jump after Trump hikes industry tariffs to 50%
U.S. steelmakers' shares jump after Trump hikes industry tariffs to 50%

CBS News

time13 minutes ago

  • CBS News

U.S. steelmakers' shares jump after Trump hikes industry tariffs to 50%

Stocks of major U.S. steel companies jumped Monday after President Trump announced he would double tariffs on steel and aluminum. Cleveland-Cliffs steel manufacturer was up 25.2% in pre-market trading. Nucor Corp., one of the nation's largest steel manufacturers, and Steel Dynamics, a steel producer and metals recycler, were both up 10% before the bell. The surge in steel stocks followed an announcement by Mr. Trump on Friday that he would double tariffs on steel and aluminum from the current rate of 25% to 50%. The 25% tariffs, announced in February, were enacted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which gives the president authority to restrict imports he deems a national security threat. The new 50% tariffs are slated to take effect on June 4. The European Union on Monday said it is preparing "countermeasures" against the United States in response to Mr. Trump's higher tariff announcement which has roiled global markets. The 27-country trading bloc is currently in negotiations with the U.S. and has demonstrated that it is eager to strike a deal. Mr. Trump in May announced a "planned partnership" between U.S. Steel and its Japanese competitor Nippon Steel. Few details have emerged about what exactly the $14 billion deal will look like, although the White House has said it will create "at least 70,000 jobs" and that it will "ensure steel is made in America for decades to come." Equity markets were not faring well early Monday. Stocks were mixed in early trading as investors continue to wrestle with uncertainty as a result of the Trump administration's on-again, off-again tariff policy. The markets experienced heightened volatility last week after the Court of International Trade on Wednesday sued to block tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on China, Mexico and Canada. Stock initially jumped Thursday after the decision was announced, but ultimately finished lower on Friday after a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. temporarily suspended the trade court's decision. As the legal battle unfolds, the administration's levies remain in place. The trade court's lawsuit does not affect tariffs introduced under Section 232, which include the steel and aluminum tariffs. contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store