Federal judges side with Oregon in striking down tariffs imposed by President Trump
A ruling by judges at the U.S. Court of International Trade on May 28, 2025 stops President Donald Trump's tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada and nearly all imports into the U.S. (Getty Images)
New tariffs imposed on nearly all imports into the U.S. since April were struck down Wednesday by three federal judges in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York City.
The judges ruled in favor of Oregon and 11 other states in their suit, as well as several businesses who filed a tandem suit, and against Trump, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its leader, Kristi Noem, and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and its leader, Peter Flores over the tariffs.
The attorneys general argued in State of Oregon et al v. Donald J. Trump et al, filed April 23, that Trump was misusing a 1977 law and falsely claiming an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the United States to justify the costly tariffs on nearly all imported goods.
The judges said that law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 'does not authorize worldwide and retaliatory tariffs,' and that, 'because of the Constitution's express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President.'
Lawyers for Trump and the federal agencies insinuated at a May 21 hearing they would appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court if things did not go their way at the international trade court.
Trump lawyers argued the Emergency Economic Powers Act, which gives the president broad latitude on financial regulation and foreign policy in the event of a national emergency, would address the threat of fentanyl getting into the country and the U.S.'s trade deficit. The attorneys general argued Congress, not the president, has the sole authority to set tariff policy and that the tariffs Trump imposed had no relationship to the threats he said he wanted to confront.
Oregon and the other attorneys general — from Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Vermont — specifically challenged four of Trump's executive orders since April that have added fluctuating tariffs on most imports from China, Mexico and Canada and a 10% retaliatory tariff on most all other goods imported from other countries to the U.S. The order from the international trade court Wednesday stops these new tariffs and more that Trump planned to impose by July 9.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a news release Wednesday that the ruling is a victory for people beyond Oregon and the states that sued.
'President Trump's sweeping tariffs were unlawful, reckless, and economically devastating. They triggered retaliatory measures, inflated prices on essential goods, and placed an unfair burden on American families, small businesses and manufacturers,' Rayfield said. 'We brought this case because the Constitution doesn't give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
U.K. to Build Up to 12 Submarines as Part of Shift to ‘War-Fighting Readiness'
Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain on Monday promised to bring his country to 'war-fighting readiness' as he announced plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest billions of pounds in nuclear and other weaponry as part of new military strategy for a more dangerous world. 'If you want to deter conflict, then the best way to do that is to prepare for conflict,' Mr. Starmer said in a BBC interview on Monday morning, ahead of the release of the government's strategic defense review that will outline plans to ramp up production of drones and increase stockpiles of munitions and equipment. Britain's ambitious rearmament plan comes against the gathering clouds of Russian military aggression in Ukraine, American disengagement from Europe and rising global tensions. Mr. Starmer presented his plans hours after one of the most intense aerial bombardments of the three-year war, with Ukrainian drones striking air bases deep in Russian territory. The review, led by George Robertson, a former secretary general of NATO, was set up last year soon after Mr. Starmer won a general election. But its task was given fresh urgency amid growing evidence of President Trump's weakened commitment to European security and his ambivalent and at times ingratiating attitude toward President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. The review is scheduled for release on Monday afternoon but among the recommendations made public in advance by the government were the procurement of up to 7,000 British-built long-range weapons and the creation of a new cybercommand, alongside an investment of a billion pounds, equivalent to $1.35 billion, in digital capability. Money will be invested in protecting critical British underwater infrastructure as well as in drones which have proved highly effective in the war in Ukraine. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Newsweek
44 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran Reviews US Nuclear Deal Offer Amid Rising Tensions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran says it is reviewing a formal U.S. proposal for a new nuclear deal between the two countries. The offer, delivered last week, represents the most significant step toward a potential agreement between Washington and Tehran since talks began in April, although both sides remain divided on critical issues such as uranium enrichment and sanctions relief. At the same time, The Wall Street Journal reported that the White House has ordered a freeze on new sanctions against Iran, effectively pausing President Donald Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign as officials reassess their approach amid ongoing diplomatic efforts. Newsweek has reached out the State Department and Iran's foreign ministry for comment. Why It Matters A potential nuclear deal between the U.S. and Iran could reshape the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and impact global non-proliferation efforts. Tehran's advancing uranium enrichment program raises alarms about nuclear weapon development, making the proposed agreement a pivotal development. The simultaneous freeze on sanctions underscores Washington's strategic shift toward diplomacy, balancing pressure with engagement. A woman in a hijab walks by an anti-U.S. mural in Tehran on May 3, 2025. A woman in a hijab walks by an anti-U.S. mural in Tehran on May 3, 2025. Kyodo/AP Images What To Know The U.S. proposal, crafted by President Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, sets out terms aimed at limiting Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran is carefully reviewing the offer—the first official U.S. deal since indirect talks began earlier this year. Central issues include Iran's right to uranium enrichment and the extent of sanctions easing. Araghchi confirmed on social media that Iran received the proposal via Oman's foreign minister, pledging a response "in line with the principles, national interests, and rights of the Iranian people." My dear brother @badralbusaidi, distinguished Foreign Minister of Oman, paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a US proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran. — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) May 31, 2025 Iran's uranium enrichment activities have intensified, with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reporting that Tehran now possesses over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity—close to weapons-grade levels. The IAEA also noted Iran's refusal to grant inspectors full access, raising questions about the true extent of its nuclear program. Iran denies any intention to develop nuclear weapons and insists its nuclear activities are peaceful. Sanctions Freeze and U.S. Strategy Meanwhile, the White House's decision to halt new sanctions reflects growing concerns that a hardline approach might derail negotiations. According to The Wall Street Journal, the freeze was communicated by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt to officials at the National Security Council, Treasury Department, and State Department. This pause allows Washington to reassess its strategy as it balances "maximum pressure" with diplomatic engagement. Iran's Position Iran has consistently maintained that any agreement must respect its right to uranium enrichment and lift sanctions imposed on its economy. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei defended Tehran's cooperation with the IAEA and dismissed criticism of Iran's nuclear record as politically motivated. Iran also condemned the recent IAEA report, calling it biased and reiterating its commitment to non-proliferation treaties. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on May 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. Leavitt discussed a federal court... White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on May 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. Leavitt discussed a federal court blocking U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs using an emergency powers law, the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" Act that was passed by the House of Representatives, and other topics. MoreWhat People Are Saying Abbas Araghchi, Iranian Foreign Minister: "My dear brother @badralbusaidi, distinguished Foreign Minister of Oman, paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a U.S. proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran." Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary: "President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb. It is in Tehran's best interest to accept a detailed and acceptable proposal that has been sent by the U.S." What Happens Next As Iran reviews the U.S. proposal, talks continue with both sides seeking common ground amid deep divisions. The freeze on sanctions could pave the way for further diplomatic engagement, but persistent concerns over uranium enrichment and verification remain key obstacles. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether a renewed nuclear agreement can be reached or if tensions will escalate further.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's safety research cuts heighten workplace risks, federal workers warn
Drastic cuts at a federal workplace safety research agency increase the risk of illness and injury for workers across the US and undermine preparations for public health emergencies, fired employees warn. The Trump administration ordered widespread layoffs at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, inside the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when it issued a 'reduction in force' notice to some 85% of the agency's 1,100 workers employees on 1 April. While some of those terminations were later reversed following pushback from labor unions and the public, only 328 employees were reinstated. Related: 'So many are devastated': Trump's federal firings and their ripple effect 'An immediate impact is that we're not as prepared for some type of public health emergency,' said Dr Micah Niemeier-Walsh, an industrial hygienist at Niosh in Ohio, who was fired, and then reinstated. 'Long term, the Trump administration talks about wanting to bring back or expand certain sectors of the economy like mining or manufacturing. Those are jobs that really rely on Niosh work.' Jennica Bellanca, for example, worked to train emergency responders in mining in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her role was terminated. 'It's such a hard thing. Everyone here works so hard to help support the health and safety of mine workers and other workers,' she said, noting that small companies do not have the resources to invest in alternative safety programs. 'I'm just concerned that nobody else is going to fill this gap. There's a reason that the government provides this safety net. 'In our case, the safety net is to help workers go home to their families every day and make sure that nothing bad happens.' Bellanca questioned a central argument for the cuts – efficiency in federal government spending – by noting that long-term research projects may now go unreleased. When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out Jennica Bellanca, former trainer for emergency responders 'When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out,' she said. 'And because we were so abruptly, sort of cut off in the middle of projects, all of this work that we've done, we're not able to get this out, released, as a full public product. In my mind, that's a waste of government money.' Niemeier-Walsh, the vice-president of American Federal of Government Employees Local 3840, said the reduction in force was the 'final, massive blow to our work' after earlier limitations on travel, communications and remote work imposed since Donald Trump took office in January. 'Our ability to be as successful as we have been as an institute relies on the rest of the Niosh employees coming back because our work is so interconnected,' said Niemeier-Walsh. 'I'm very, very concerned what this means for every single American worker if we're not able to fully restore Niosh. These cuts are not based in science. They're not based on the public health need. They're based on politics, and that's bad for the health of the American people.' Related: Mass resignations at labor department threaten workers in US and overseas, warn staff – as more cuts loom She cited as an example the employees in the health hazard evaluation program, which was established to reduce workplace risks and recommend ways to mitigate dangers, who were reinstated after earlier cuts. But they rely on chemists to develop analytical methods to measure chemicals in the workplace, and engineers to design solutions; these chemists and engineers have not been reinstated, she said. Since the agency was founded in 1970, recordable workplace illnesses and injuries and fatalities have been drastically reduced in the US. The rate of non-fatal workplace injuries and illnesses declined from 10.9 cases per 100 full-time workers in 1972 to 2.4 in 2023. The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US, and several other labor unions filed a lawsuit this month to restore the cut programs at Niosh, arguing the cuts 'directly threaten the lives of workers whose safety and health depend on Niosh' services that are congressionally mandated. Even though some of the initial cuts have been reversed,'we have deep concerns that the whole reason Niosh was started to begin with is still eliminated,' said Rebecca Reindel, the director of occupational safety and health at the AFL-CIO, who noted that the agency's founding mandate was to assure every man and woman in the US has safe and healthful working conditions. Reindel expressed particular concern about disruption to long-term research projects. Related: US workers feel effects of Trump cuts: 'I am seeing my work dry up' 'All of this research work that they do, where they have these big cohorts, they've been following people for 40 years,' she said. 'And now they're just cut off for these occupational prospective cohorts, where they follow them over years to see what kind of diseases are developing. 'If we're just staffing those cohorts now, we're really losing 40 years worth of work. Even if they restart them, we're going to have lost so many people to follow up.' A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services did not comment on the record. Its secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, was working to ensure Niosh critical services remain intact and continue as the agency streamlines its operations, they claimed.
