As Rolex shrinks retail near new New York City flagship, Patek Philippe expands
[NEW YORK] After 45 years, Rolexes will no longer be sold at Wempe, the tony watch and jewellery dealer at 700 Fifth Ave, one of retail's most prestigious addresses.
The watches are not going far, though. Rolex is finishing construction on a new, 199,000-square-foot New York headquarters designed by David Chipperfield Architects two blocks away at 665 Fifth Ave.
Once it's complete, which the company has said should happen by the end of 2026, the space will host a multi-floor flagship that the company hopes will become a magnet for shoppers and curious tourists. As a result, the Swiss luxury timepiece behemoth is shrinking its retail network in that part of Manhattan to just the flagship plus emporiums owned by Bucherer, a previously independent retailer Rolex bought in 2023.
Wempe has some time left to offer its customers a Rolex.
'We will be doing business as usual until the end of the year, fulfilling every order that we can,' said Rudy Albers, president of Wempe, noting that the Rolex partnership will end at the end of 2025. 'However, we have not been sleeping at the wheel either. We will be partnering with Patek Philippe to open one of the biggest boutiques on the East Coast in 2026.'
Wempe has also sold Pateks since it opened its emporium in the Peninsula Hotel building in 1980, and has several retail locations in its home country of Germany. On Fifth Avenue, the footprint of the in-store Patek boutique will expand from 600 square feet to 1,600. There will be private showrooms and galleries, and according to Wempe the store's allocation-how many watches it's given to sell-will be increased.
'With the opening of the new Patek Philippe showroom, Wempe continues its longstanding, trusting relationship with the Swiss family-led company,' said Kim-Eva Wempe, owner and managing partner of her family's company, in a statement. Her grandfather Herbert started as an authorised Patek Philippe seller in Hamburg, Germany, in 1927.
As popular as Pateks are with New Yorkers, there are only four places to buy the brand's Nautiluses, Aquanauts and Calatravas in the city: Wempe, Tiffany & Co, the Bucherer TimeMachine on 57th Street and Watches of Switzerland in Hudson Yards.
In 2023, Patek Philippe boss Thierry Stern told Bloomberg he had begun reducing the brand's retail network by 30 per cent. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
UBS's US$26 billion capital hit isn't quite as bad as it seems
THE US$26 billion headline capital charge to protect Swiss taxpayers from the risk that UBS Group ever fails is worse than anyone expected. And yet UBS's shares jumped as much as 8 per cent on the news on Friday ( Jun 6) – what gives? It's not that investors now know the costs of Switzerland's beefed-up 'too big to fail' rules, which follow Credit Suisse's 2023 collapse. There's a lot of uncertainty about the draft law's final form. Most likely UBS shares have jumped because investor judge that the final bill will be lower – and because they know it's not due to be paid in full until 2034 at the earliest. The bank isn't happy. 'UBS strongly disagrees with the extreme increase in capital requirements that has been proposed,' it said in a statement. While it supported most of the changes in principle, the proposed capital increase is 'neither proportionate nor internationally aligned.' The draft law contains a lot that is sensible and with which UBS and most experts agree. It brings in a Senior Managers' Regime like the UK's, to ensure top executives can be held responsible for everything the bank does and that their pay can be clawed back when it errs. It also gives more power to Swiss regulators to intervene when a bank is being poorly managed: the lack of this ability kept watchdogs on the sidelines during Credit Suisse's long demise. The central bank gets more reliable powers to supply emergency liquidity, too, among other things. The contentious and costly part for UBS is the demand that it should fully capitalise its foreign subsidiaries, which the government and independent advisors calculated will require as much as US$23 billion of extra common equity tier one capital. (The other US$3 billion in the headline comes from capital quality changes that affect how banks can account for deferred tax assets and some other intangible assets.) There's plenty of opportunity for UBS to negotiate this change down during the parliamentary consultation and debate, which will begin later this year. That won't move quickly; the draft law isn't expected to be enacted until the start of 2028. Currently, UBS only needs capital at group level to cover about 60 per cent of the equity value of its foreign units, and only 45 per cent must be common equity; the rest can be additional tier one bonds. In the draft, 100 per cent will need to be common equity. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up UBS might be able to negotiate back to a mix of equity and additional tier one, or it might be able to get the coverage level reduced – but ultimately, this is going to deliver the biggest hit. As I've written before, it also makes sense as a policy. The bank will still have six to eight years from the law being enacted until it must meet whatever the new requirement ends up being, which is why 2034 is the earliest legal deadline. Andrew Coombs, an analyst at Citigroup, said the long lead time meant that billions of US dollars in share buybacks forecast for the next three years still looked plausible; the bank said Friday it will continue with this year's payouts as planned. UBS may argue that bank investors will judge its capital needs against the full target as soon as the law comes into force. That was the case for banks after the 2008 financial crisis, when many were seen as too weak and had to raise capital swiftly. I'm less convinced; analysts and investors are more likely to view it as a technical rather than necessary requirement, giving the bank time to adjust. That doesn't mean UBS's long-term profitability won't be hit, which will affect what its shares are worth. But the bank has ways it can adapt; they just involve tradeoffs. The most radical reaction would be breaking up its business in some way, such as spinning off its US arm, or partially listing its core Swiss business and moving its headquarters to another country with a more favourable regime. It could also change its holding company-parent bank legal structure in ways that could improve capital efficiency; but that would mean losing some funding cost and tax benefits. 'We expect that UBS might commence work to study the feasibility of strategic actions such as these,' wrote advisers at Alvarez & Marsal in a technical study commissioned by the government to support the draft law. Major surgery on the firm's structure or relocation remain extreme and unlikely in my view, unless UBS gets absolutely nothing out of the consultation process. 'UBS remains committed to its diversified business model and its unique regional footprint,' the bank said. UBS could also use more risk transfers or change its loan-led approach in foreign wealth businesses to reduce capital requirements. That would also alter its revenue and returns in good or bad ways. Even before all this, there are reasons to think the US$26 billion headline figure won't last or be as costly as it seems. For one, the bank has plans to repatriate about US$5 billion of capital from its overseas units already, which could be done in a way that reduces the carrying value of those subsidiaries and so also cuts their capital requirements at group level, the Alvarez and Marsal report points out. UBS's version of the headline hit included the benefit of this repatriation. On top of that, other changes in the law cut the amount of additional tier one UBS needs by US$8 billion, meaning a smaller net increase in total capital requirements, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. There is plenty to chew on before UBS and its investors can fully digest the implications of this proposed law – but there's a good chance that it all works out to be less painful for the bank than the big headline number suggests. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
UBS faces tough new Swiss banking sector rules
[BERN] The Swiss government on Friday (Jun 6) proposed stricter rules for UBS following its takeover of Credit Suisse, which could make it hold US$26 billion more in core capital, confirming some of the bank's worst fears about incoming new regulations. The key proposal, which the bank would have six to eight years to prepare for after it became law, is that UBS must fully capitalise its foreign units, confirming what many analysts, lawmakers and executives had been expecting. The government said its capital requirement proposal would allow UBS to reduce its holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds by US$8 billion. Today, UBS must only 60 per cent capitalise its foreign units and can cover some of the capital with AT1 debt. UBS executives say the additional capital burden will put the Zurich-based bank at a disadvantage to rivals and undermine the competitiveness of Switzerland as a financial centre. Shares in the bank rose after the government unveiled the proposals on Friday afternoon, climbing by more than 6 per cent. Such was the shock in Switzerland over the 2023 collapse of Credit Suisse that top politicians led by Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter vowed to introduce more robust rules that would protect taxpayers and prevent another meltdown in future. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Keller-Sutter now holds Switzerland's rotating one-year presidency and Friday's announcement will start a long period of political wrangling over the measures, which the governing federal council called 'targeted and proportionate.' 'They strengthen trust in the financial centre, which, in the view of the federal council, is central to its stability and competitiveness,' the council said in a statement. A parliamentary inquiry last year noted that since UBS bought Credit Suisse for US$3.65 billion in March 2023, it has had a balance sheet bigger than the Swiss economy, and urged the government to take the foreign units into account. The federal council said it would present drafts on the proposals for consultations with stakeholders in the second half of 2025. Finance Ministry officials say laws requiring parliamentary approval will not enter force before 2028. Separate measures known as ordinances that can be issued directly by the government could apply from the start of 2027. A six to eight-year transition period looked appropriate for UBS to meet new rules on capitalising foreign units from when they come into force, the government said. That could give the bank until the mid-2030s to comply. UBS's shares have lagged European peers in anticipation of the tougher rules and sources inside the bank have warned the new regulations could make it an appealing takeover target. Under the Swiss proposals, UBS' Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio could end up somewhat higher than those of global rivals, the government said. UBS's CET1 ratio of 14.3 per cent could rise up to 17 per cent, above rivals like JPMorgan at 15.8 per cent, Morgan Stanley at 15.7 per cent, and 15.3 per cent at Goldman Sachs, it said. Shares in UBS rose more than 60 per cent in the 12 months following its acquisition of Credit Suisse. But the stock has since sharply underperformed; UBS shares have lost about 5 per cent in the past year, while a top European banking index climbed 37 per cent. Analysts say the new regulations could trigger a rejig of UBS's business model, which now focuses on growth in the United States and Asia. To take the edge off the rules, the bank may be tempted to sell some assets, banking experts say. The Swiss government also set out piecemeal reforms to bolster the market regulator FINMA, which was heavily criticised for its response to the Credit Suisse collapse. These include measures aimed at holding bankers to account, giving the regulator the power to impose fines and making it easier to restrain pay and claw back bonuses. Still, the proposals come years after the European Union introduced similar measures in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The government also proposed making it easier for banks to access liquidity from the Swiss National Bank. Barriers to transferring collateral to the SNB will also be removed. REUTERS
Straits Times
3 days ago
- Straits Times
Rolex lovers splash out on used watches before Trump tariffs
Rolex watches on display at a store in New York on April 8. PHOTO: REUTERS Rolex lovers splash out on used watches before Trump tariffs LONDON – Watch enthusiasts snapped up used Rolex and Patek Philippe timepieces at the end of April, splashing out before possible tariffs from United States President Donald Trump. The watch dealer and trading platform Subdial often sees a flurry of activity after people get their pay cheques at the end of each month. In April, the post-payday spike was 160 per cent higher than normal trading levels, far above the average 112 per cent bump experienced on other pay days over the past year. The volume growth was particularly strong in the US and Britain, Mr Christy Davis, founder of London-based Subdial, said in an interview. 'People heard about the tariffs and went, 'Oh shoot, let's buy now,'' he said. 'They waited for pay day and then sales volumes just went through the roof.' The phenomenon echoed another trend seen in Switzerland, where watch exports jumped by nearly a fifth in April – with shipments to the US more than doubling ahead of expanded tariffs threatened by Mr Trump. Watches made from precious metals, steel and bimetallic materials – products also targeted by the US President – saw the most growth, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. The US jump was likely a one-off response by exporters seeking to avoid higher tariffs, rather than a structural increase in demand, Mr Jean-Philippe Bertschy, an analyst at investment management firm Vontobel, said in a note. Swiss watch exports fell 6.4 per cent to the rest of the world in the month, continuing a weak start to the year. The secondary watch market has continued its gradual rebound from February's post-pandemic lows. Since reaching that nadir, the Bloomberg Subdial Watch Index has risen about 5.3 per cent through late May, returning to levels last seen in October. It remains far from the levels it reached three years ago, when the prices of used luxury watches surged as Covid-19 lockdowns ended. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
