
Mind-reading device allows paralysed people to speak fluently
A mind-reading device that allows paralysed patients to speak fluently just by thinking has been developed.
The technology can quickly decode brain signals produced by the motor cortex when a person wants to say a word before translating them into sound waves that can be 'spoken' by a synthesised voice.
Although similar devices have been trialled in the past, there has always been a lengthy delay between a person thinking a word and it being said out loud, making it tricky to form coherent sentences.
However, a team at the University of California have used the same rapid speech-decoding capacity of AI devices such as Alexa and Siri to help speed up the process and produce more natural speech.
'Intercepting signals'
Cheol Jun Cho, a doctoral student at UC Berkeley, said: 'We are essentially intercepting signals where the thought is translated into articulation.
'So what we're decoding is after a thought has happened, after we've decided what to say, after we've decided what words to use and how to move our vocal-tract muscles.
'This proof-of-concept framework is quite a breakthrough. We will continue to push the algorithm to see how we can generate speech better and faster.'
Many people are unable to speak because of paralysis, disease or injury and current speech generators – which often involve gazing at individual words or letters on a screen – are time-consuming and laborious.
The new device was trialled on a paralysed patient named Ann, who had an electronic array implanted over her motor cortex, to pick up her brain signals.
She was then asked to look at phrases on a screen, such as 'Hey, how are you?' and silently attempt to speak the sentences.
The programme was able to pick out chunks of neural activity behind certain sounds so they could be reproduced as a synthesised voice.
Prof Gopala Anumanchipalli, an assistant professor of electrical engineering and computer sciences at UC Berkeley, said: 'Within one second, we are getting the first sound out. And the device can continuously decode speech, so Ann can keep speaking without interruption.'
He added: 'Our streaming approach brings the same rapid speech decoding capacity of devices like Alexa and Siri to neuroprostheses.
'Using a similar type of algorithm, we found that we could decode neural data and, for the first time, enable near-synchronous voice streaming. The result is more naturalistic, fluent speech synthesis.'
The team used samples of Ann's pre-injury voice for the synthesised audio so that it would sound more like her, and found that even when she was thinking quickly, the algorithm could keep up.
The researchers believe that the technology may also work without the need for invasive electrodes, by using sensors on the face to measure muscle activity.
They also want to improve the algorithm so that it can pick up and convey the changes in tone, pitch and loudness that occur during speech, such as when someone is excited.
'Long-standing problem'
Kaylo Littlejohn, a doctoral student at UC Berkeley's department of electrical engineering and computer sciences, said: 'Previously, it was not known if intelligible speech could be streamed from the brain in real time.
'That's ongoing work, to try to see how well we can actually decode these paralinguistic features from brain activity.
'This is a long-standing problem even in classical audio synthesis fields and would bridge the gap to full and complete naturalism.'
Edward Chang, the senior co-principal investigator of the study who leads the clinical trial at UC San Francisco, added: 'This new technology has tremendous potential for improving quality of life for people living with severe paralysis affecting speech.
'It is exciting that the latest AI advances are greatly accelerating brain computer interfaces for practical real-world use in the near future.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Cambrian News
2 days ago
- Cambrian News
Wellbeing Minister champions Ceredigion-based smart tech helping people stay at home for longer
It allows residents to explore and try tech such as vibrating or flashing fire alarms, voice-activated devices and smart speakers such as Amazon's Alexa, devices that remind people to take their medication, as well as offering support to allow people to connect remotely with their GP's for check-ups.


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Amazon settles State Farm lawsuit alleging it stole elder care technology
June 5 (Reuters) - Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab has settled a lawsuit by insurance company State Farm accusing the e-commerce giant of copying its patented technology to develop elder care services for Amazon's virtual assistant Alexa, according to a filing in Delaware federal court. The companies asked the court, opens new tab on Wednesday to dismiss the case with prejudice, which means it cannot be refiled. State Farm said in a statement on Thursday that the case had been settled under confidential terms. Spokespersons and attorneys for Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. Bloomington, Illinois-based State Farm sued Amazon in 2022, in what the insurance company said was its first-ever patent infringement lawsuit. According to the complaint, State Farm met with Amazon in 2019 and 2020 about incorporating its Sundial senior-care assistance technology into Alexa-enabled devices. The lawsuit had accused Amazon of copying patented Sundial features, including its "circle of friends" for coordinating caregiver responsibilities, a chatbot for seniors to interact with the platform, and check-in and monitoring services. Amazon had denied the allegations and argued that the patents were invalid. The case is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:22-cv-01447. For State Farm: Michael De Vries, Adam Alper, Akshay Deoras, Kat Li and Leslie Schmidt of Kirkland & Ellis For Amazon: Doug Lumish of Latham & Watkins, Adam Greenfield of White & Case Read more: State Farm lawsuit says Amazon stole elder-care technology


The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
‘Putting profit over people': big gas is waging war on a California clean air rule
This story is co-published with Floodlight. On a windy night in early January, Barbara Ishida, a second grade teacher, spotted the Eaton fire glowing in the hills behind her home in Altadena, California. Her mind turned to the deadly wildfires in Lahaina and Paradise and she thought, 'Let's get out – now.' Ishida and her husband evacuated safely, but the flames destroyed their home. An attribution study found that climate change, which is primarily caused by burning fossil fuels, made the January fires 35% more likely. She thought the least they could do is rebuild in a way that wouldn't compound the climate crisis that raised the fire risk. 'Building back is our only option at this point,' Ishida said, 'so we're going to build back super environmentally friendly.' Her vision is to build a fire-resistant home with no gas appliances. That approach is backed by a University of California Berkeley study in April that concluded all-electric construction is the best and most climate-friendly strategy to rebuild after the fires. But the gas industry is pushing back against this idea. Proposed rules that would have encouraged Ishida and other homeowners to buy furnaces and heaters that emit no nitrogen oxides (NOx) – a key pollutant from gas appliances – have been weakened and delayed by a coalition of groups that includes SoCalGas, the country's largest gas utility. SoCalGas has a history of lobbying hard against regulations that hurt its bottom line. After a fierce opposition campaign, the rules are going to a vote on Friday, 6 June. The rules are proposed by the south coast air quality management district (SCAQMD), the agency responsible for improving air quality in Los Angeles and nearby communities, one of the most polluted air basins in the United States. If passed, the rules are designed to create cleaner air and reduce planet-heating emissions by setting future targets for sales of new zero-emission space and water heaters. The rules would apply to manufacturers, distributors, sellers and installers. They are expected to prevent 2,490 premature deaths and avoid 10,200 asthma cases. 'Consumers will continue to have a choice of purchasing either a gas or electric space/water heaters when replacing their existing units,' explained Nahal Mogharabi, a spokesperson for the air-quality district. 'Importantly, consumers can continue to operate their existing units until the consumer chooses to replace it or the unit breaks.' SoCalGas defended its role in the opposition campaign. 'SoCalGas' stakeholder engagement and outreach efforts on this topic are a regular part of any rulemaking process where we share information that could affect Southern California customers,' Erica Berardi, a SoCalGas spokesperson, wrote in an email. BizFed, a business group that was also part of the opposition campaign, advocated for a delay in the rule-making process 'to allow for more transparency and sufficient public outreach to make Southern Californians aware of the significant costs associated with these changes', Elizabeth Daubel, communications director for BizFed, wrote in an email. At the same time that the opposition campaign ramped up, groups allied with the gas industry filed a lawsuit against the SCAQMD, aiming to undermine its authority to impose such regulations. The opposition is far from unique; a February report by a London-based thinktank InfluenceMap found that fossil fuel companies in the United States, European Union and Australia are waging parallel campaigns against laws that restrict use of gas in buildings – pushback that has largely succeeded in preventing and weakening these laws. Ishida signed a letter supporting the proposed SCAQMD rules because she believes they would encourage Altadena to build back in a sustainable way. When she heard about the organized opposition to the rules, Ishida felt angry. 'They're just putting profits over people,' she said. 'It's sad and it's selfish and it's not right.' Although progressive states like California are leading the transition away from fossil fuels, gas appliances remain ubiquitous in California homes and across the western United States. Buildings account for one-quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in California but are subject to local control, meaning that local regulators like the SCAQMD have a big role to play in lowering emissions. In 2023, recognizing the air pollution caused by gas appliances, the agency proposed amendments to two rules to encourage alternatives. Changes to Rules 1111 and 1121 would establish a zero-emission NOx standard for furnaces and water heaters. As originally written, the new rules would have impacted more than 10m gas-fired residential and commercial furnaces and residential water heaters. The rules would not affect gas stoves, a flashpoint in similar regulatory efforts. As they were written in October 2024, the proposed rules would have required all furnaces and water heaters installed to become zero emission by 2026 for new residential and commercial buildings. Existing buildings and mobile homes had a few more years to comply. But in recent months, SCAQMD staff have softened the proposed rules. The current version now requires manufacturers to meet zero-emission sales targets for residential buildings, starting at 30% in 2027-28 and rising to 90% by 2036. The rule no longer requires that all new furnaces and water heaters be zero emission by a certain date. The original rules would have reduced NOx emissions by 10 tons a day, which would have been the largest emissions reducing rule package adopted in over three decades by the SCAQMD. The revised rules would achieve a reduction of 6 tons a day of NOx emissions. Kim Orbe, senior conservation program manager at Sierra Club, said pushing back the compliance date would allow manufacturers to continue building gas-powered equipment for years to come. She described the rules as 'tremendously weakened'. In late 2024, an opposition campaign sprung up, prompting SCAQMD's board to push back a scheduled hearing and final vote by six months, to Tuesday 6 June. SoCalGas and groups aligned with the company helped delay the rule-making process by encouraging public officials to oppose the rules, according to records obtained by the Energy and Policy Institute and shared with Floodlight. Ahead of a major SCAQMD meeting on 20 December, SoCalGas employees sent 'urgent' requests to public officials, including mayors of cities in the south coast area, asking them to send letters, testify and pass resolutions opposing the rules. Their emails claimed – misleadingly – that the rules would prohibit the sale and installation of all gas furnaces and water heaters. Some of the letters that SCAQMD received from public officials were drafted by a consultant working for BizFed. Several city governments copied the consultant's draft letter onto their letterhead. Almost word-for-word letters were sent to the SCAQMD by the Orange county council of governments, the city of Lake Forest and the city of Loma Linda. The response to the rules was overwhelming, generating over 12,500 comments. But staff reported that many letters opposing the rules contained faulty information, including that the rules would mandate homeowners switch to all-electric appliances. The governing board delayed the vote and modified the rules to give more time to address concerns about 'cost, technology availability and consumer choice', Mogharabi wrote in an email. 'Even though the rule has been modified, as is typical during the rule-making process,' she added, 'the current NOx reductions are significant.' Mogharabi noted that this summer, the agency is launching a Go Zero rebate program that will provide more than $21m to help residents and small businesses install zero-emission heating appliances. On 10 January 2025, as unprecedented megafires burned out of control in Los Angeles – destroying thousands of homes and killing 30 people – SCAQMD officials held a public meeting to consider the proposed rules 1111 and 1121. The tone of the meeting was somber. Officials began by acknowledging the wildfires and smoke cloaking the city, offering condolences to a board member who lost his home to the flames. Minutes later, lobbyists including a representative of SoCalGas asked for the rules to be delayed or retracted, citing the lawsuit challenging SCAQMD's authority to make such rules. Jessi Davis, a SoCalGas lobbyist said, 'We think it would be prudent for the board to postpone this rulemaking until these issues are resolved by the courts.' In December, a coalition of groups, including homebuilders, restaurant owners and unions, filed the lawsuit against the SCAQMD, seeking to overturn a related rule that phases out large gas-fired furnaces and water heaters in commercial and industrial facilities. That rule is different from the proposed rules, which are specific to smaller residential and commercial furnaces and water heaters. 'The legal theories they're trying to push would undermine the ability of the (agency) to protect its residents,' said Adrian Martinez, an attorney at Earthjustice, an environmental nonprofit that is intervening in the case. 'They're attempting to strip local entities like SCAQMD of the ability to clean up pollution.' With another wildfire season on the horizon, Ishida is thinking about the future of Los Angeles if climate change continues to worsen. 'We're not going to be the only community that burns,' Ishida said. 'We're not going to be the last if we continue down this stretch.' Floodlight is a non-profit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.