
Lindsey Graham Wants to Make Sure Trump's Qatar Plane Deal 'Is Kosher'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is calling for a closer look into reports that President Donald Trump may accept a luxury jumbo jet from Qatar.
"Air Force One is the symbol of America," Senator Graham told reporters Monday. "When it lands or flies, it is America flying or landing, and I want to make sure this whole thing is kosher. Time will tell."
Newsweek reached out to Senator Graham's office for further comment Monday afternoon via email.
Why It Matters
Qatar's offer of a $400 million aircraft to the President of the United States has prompted backlash across the political spectrum.
Critics have raised alarms over a foreign government providing such an extravagant gift, especially one from a regime that has faced criticism for its human rights record and relationships with controversial entities in the Middle East.
Some conservative commentators have framed the situation as a potential influence-buying tactic by Qatar.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., talks with reporters after the senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 11, 2025.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., talks with reporters after the senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 11, 2025.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
What To Know
The proposed aircraft, which would be used in place of Air Force One, reportedly includes a gold-plated interior and advanced communications systems. The jet, which had originally been customized for the emir but remained unused, was repurposed for U.S. presidential use in what Qatar said was a gesture of international cooperation.
Multiple reports state that when Trump leaves office, the Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet will be transferred to his own presidential library foundation, creating the potential for his continued personal use. Trump has said he does not plan to use it.
The president is facing increasing scrutiny over the gift, including furious backlash from Democrats, but also questions from Republicans and his own MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporters.
Graham said on Monday he wants to ensure the arrangement meets all legal standards and avoids potential conflicts, emphasizing the need to ensure the deal "is kosher."
Laura Loomer, one of Trump's staunchest allies, told Politico the announcement was "concerning."
"If the initial reports are factual, I think it's concerning. Qatar is not our friend," she said.
Trump has dismissed concerns over the plane, calling critics "losers" and framing the jet as a future replacement for aging Air Force One aircraft.
During a Monday White House event, Trump told reporters, "I mean, I could be a stupid person and say, 'No, we don't want a free, very expensive airplane,'" Trump said. "But I thought it was a great gesture."
Ali Al-Ansari, Qatar's Media Attaché to the U.S., told Newsweek on Sunday that the gift reports are "inaccurate" and said that the move is currently under review by both country's legal departments.
The aircraft remains parked in Basel, Switzerland, where it was being retrofitted. U.S. officials have not confirmed whether the jet will be incorporated into the existing presidential fleet.
Is It Legal?
White House lawyers and the Department of Justice have reportedly advised the Trump administration that the deal is legal.
However, critics and ethics experts warn that the unprecedented foreign gift amounts to foreign influence and may require congressional approval under the Emoluments Clause.
Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, a progressive consumer rights advocacy group, said in a statement to Newsweek that the move was "blatantly unconstitutional."
"A textbook violation of the emoluments clause," he said. "The concern with foreign gifts is that they can sway a president's policy and predilections—and there's little doubt that Qatar wants to gift Trump a 'palace in the sky' for exactly that reason...Even in a presidency defined by grift, this move is shocking. It makes clear that US foreign policy under Donald Trump is up for sale."
House Democrats are already calling for an ethics probe into the matter, citing potential violations of federal ethics laws.
What People Are Saying
President Donald Trump responded to criticism on Truth Social: "So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane. Anybody can do that! The Dems are World Class Losers!!! MAGA."
Democratic California Senator Adam Schiff, on X: "The president considers it a great imposition to ride on Air Force One. Poor thing. It lacks the amenities of an 'air palace.' He says he'd be 'stupid' to turn it down, which is how he views abiding by the Constitution."
Democratic Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, on X: "Whether he's accepting a luxury plane from Qatar or auctioning off access to the White House through his family's crypto schemes, Trump is making clear that he's willing to sell his presidency for personal gain to the highest bidder. Kleptocracy in action."
What Happens Next
Trump is preparing to visit Qatar on Tuesday for the first major foreign trip of his second term. However, the jet will not be gifted to him during that trip, Al-Ansari, Qatar's media attaché, has confirmed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Budget Drops Protections For State Medical Cannabis Programs
The White House budget request for 2026 omits language that has protected state-regulated medical ... More cannabis operators from federal prosecution for more than decade. The Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year drops provisions that have protected state medical cannabis programs for more than a decade, online cannabis news outlet Marijuana Moment reported on Monday. The budget provision has blocked federal law enforcement agencies from spending resources to investigate or prosecute businesses operating in compliance with state-authorized medical cannabis programs, despite the continued prohibition of marijuana under federal law. 'This provision, which has been in place since 2014, protects patients, caregivers, and medical cannabis providers in the 39 states that have legalized medical access from federal interference or criminal prosecution,' the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) wrote in a statement. 'Prior to the passage of this protection, federal prosecutors routinely took actions against patients and dispensaries in legal states.' The budget restriction was first adopted by Congress in 2014 and has been included in the federal budget every year since. But the Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year released last week does not include the language. Similarly, the budget requests for each of the four years of President Donald Trump's first term omitted the protections for state-regulated medical cannabis operators. The administration of President Barack Obama also left the language prohibiting federal interference with regulated medical marijuana businesses out its budget requests following the initial adoption of the provisions. By contrast, the administration budget requests for all fours years of Joseph Biden's presidency included the protections for state-legal medical marijuana businesses. While the budget request illustrates the Trump administration's spending policies and priorities, Congress has the constitutional responsibility and authority for appropriations legislation. The congressional budget has included the language every year since 2014, despite attempts by both Democratic and Republican administrations to drop the provision. 'Today, more than half the country, including 36 states and Washington, D.C., have embraced medical marijuana, and for the past 10 years, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment has prevented the Department of Justice from using federal funds to stop states from implementing their medical marijuana programs,' Laura A. Bianchi, co-founding partner of the cannabis and psychedelics law firm Bianchi and Brandt, writes in an email. 'Rolling back these protections would mark a significant setback for marijuana reform. Ultimately, Congress will have the final say, and the industry remains hopeful that they will uphold these vital safeguards.' When Trump signed previous appropriations bill including the protections for medical cannabis operators after requesting they be removed, his administration issued a statement that it 'will treat this provision consistent with the President's constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.' The statement, which was issued on three separate occasions, was widely interpreted to suggest that the Trump administration might ignore the budget restriction. The omission of the protections for state-legal medical cannabis programs in the Trump administration's 2026 budget request is likely to disappoint supporters of cannabis policy reform who were encouraged by the president's apparent support for decriminalizing marijuana during the 2024 election campaign. In September, Trump suggested he supported reclassifying marijuana under federal drug laws and that he would back state efforts to legalize recreational cannabis. 'As President, we will continue to focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug, and work with Congress to pass common sense laws, including safe banking for state authorized companies, and supporting states rights to pass marijuana laws, like in Florida, that work so well for their citizens,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, according to a report from Marijuana Moment.


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China In Wait and See Mode: Cameron Johnson
US-China trade talks do not appear to be progressing as President Trump said via social media, China's leader Xi Jinping is "extremely hard to a deal with." Tidalwave Solutions Senior Partner Cameron Johnson has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNN
10 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico last month is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. OCG, a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.