
Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers
John Hamer, president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, makes store fixtures for big retailers like Ross Dress for Less and Ulta Beauty.
He sources many of the goods from China, which until recently meant he paid 70% in tariffs on metal fixtures.
"The media was saying it was 30%, but that was never true," he said, referring to the tariff rate for China announced in May as part of a truce between the Trump administration and Beijing as it negotiated a broader deal.
That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture.
When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war.
The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks.
Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law.
The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse.
'Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who've been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,' he said, 'because it's been all over the map.'
'HERE'S THE TARIFF BILL'
Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He's checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs.
"The customers pay the tariff," said Hamer. "When it comes in, we say, 'Here's the tariff bill.'"
Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump's imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration's appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months.
Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes.
Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. 'We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,' he said. 'Same with toys.'
The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a 'play table' from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking.
Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world's two largest economies.
The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.'s trading partners.
PASSING COSTS THROUGH
On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term.
'It sounds like that's the way he's thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products," said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington.
Ramon van Meer's business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain.
That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram.
When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff.
It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely.
'At least I can afford to pay it,' said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. "And I don't have to raise the price by that much."
(Reporting by Timothy Aeppel in New York with additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington. Editing by Dan Burns and Michael Learmonth)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
‘UAE stands for dialogue, for de-escalation and diplomacy,' Dr Sultan Al Jaber says
Dr Sultan Al Jaber, XRG's executive chairman and Adnoc's managing director and group chief executive, delivered a keynote address on Tuesday at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Washington


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Russia warns of 'unpredictable consequences' if Iran-Israel conflict escalates
Russia 's ambassador to the UN said on Tuesday he sees no willingness from Israel to engage in mediation efforts to end its conflict with Iran, warning of 'unpredictable consequences' as hostilities intensify. 'This thing should be stopped, because it has absolutely unpredictable consequences, given that we're talking about nuclear sites that are under threat and given that the ballistic exchange continues with heavy casualties on both sides,' Vasily Nebenzya told reporters in New York. The remarks come as retaliatory attacks between Israel and Iran continue, and as international calls grow for de-escalation. It also comes as President Donald Trump has indicated the US could enter the conflict. Moscow is seeking to be a mediator, but its overtures have yet to translate into concrete talks. 'There was a conversation between President [Vladimir] Putin and President Trump the other day, and President Putin said that we are ready to do what we can to facilitate … so in that sense, yes, we are co-ordinating, but we don't have any mediation efforts on the ground,' he said. Iran provided critical drone support to Russia during the first year of Moscow's war in Ukraine, helped it establish a domestic drone factory, and signed a 20-year strategic partnership in January, deepening defence and political ties between the two allies. Yet months after that agreement, as Iran faces unprecedented Israeli strikes threatening its stability, Russia has offered little beyond diplomatic statements and phone calls, leaving Tehran increasingly isolated. Moscow is walking a tightrope, Iulia-Sabina Joja, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told The National, as it weighs support for Tehran against protecting its broader regional interests amid Iran's declining influence. Any prolonged instability in the Middle East, especially involving Iran, could undermine Russia's delicate balancing act in the region, Ms Joja said. 'Russia has to play now a very difficult balancing game,' she said. 'On the one hand, they want to support Iran but have to be on the winning side in the Middle East to pursue their interests, and Iran is looking weak, with its interests on the losing side across the region, particularly in Syria with the Assad regime and other elements.' At the same time, Moscow's immediate priority remains its war in Ukraine, where it aims to prolong the conflict while stringing along the US with illusory negotiations. 'For them to be able to do that for as long as possible, which is their aim, they have to play nice, or at least pretend to play nice, with the United States,' Ms Joja said. 'That's why we're seeing them take a step back or adopt a more reluctant position than some expected in their partnership with Iran.' If the US joins Israel in striking Iran, Ms Joja said direct Russian intervention is unlikely. 'The US and Israel have the upper hand,' she said of their air superiority. Still, any escalation of the conflict would necessarily make Moscow uncomfortable, as it would jeopardise Russia's goals in Ukraine and its broader Middle East ambitions, including access to warm-water trade routes, she added.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
America's big bunker-buster that could sink Iran's nuclear programme
The key weapon that America would bring to a conflict with Iran is its undoubtable ability to smash the country's nuclear centres buried deep below ground. The US Air Force is the only military to have the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator that weighs an astonishing 18,600kg and can penetrate up to 100 metres of reinforced concrete. It is as close nearest thing to a nuclear bomb without being one. The US also has heavy bombers that are virtually the only aircraft that can drop it – the B-2 Spirit and the B-52. There have been reports backed up by satellite photos of six B-2s and four B-52s stationed at the Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean, 4,000km from Iran. Washington can also provide a fleet of air-to-air refuelling tankers to assist Israel's fighters, as well as the world's biggest and most advanced air force. But given that the Israeli air force has pummelled Iran's surface-to-air missiles and radar defences, the number of targets is diminishing. Already there are reports of the main refuellers – the Boeing KC-46A Pegasus and Boeing KC-135 Stratotankers – heading to Europe. 'Istar soak' But another key feature that America can provide is its extensive military surveillance satellite system that delivers what is called 'Istar soak'. While Israel has three spy satellites the US has dozens that give it persistent Istar (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) coverage that will allow it to track Iranian missile launches as well as senior commanders, regime figures or nuclear scientists. This will enable 'dynamic strikes' in which commanders see a target of opportunity and can bring immediate firepower in. They will also potentially help track where Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles might be, as well as centrifuges used in their manufacture. Tomahawk attack The US has fleet of about eight Arleigh Burke DDG-51 guided-missile destroyers in the region, most guarding the aircraft carrier the USS Carl Vinson. The US Navy warships each carry between eight and 10 Tomahawk cruise missiles. If it was decided that more Iranian airbases had to be destroyed, Tomahawks would be sent in, much as they were in the scene from Top Gun Maverick. The USS Nimitz carrier, with its 90 aircraft, is also steaming to the area from the Pacific and will arrive in days. America can also offer its special forces for strike missions, its intelligence and surveillance aircraft and its military satellites that would vastly increase the information-gathering mission. There is also the possibility that America will send more of its own air defences to Israel and possibly the Gulf. It has a Thaad high-altitude interceptor battery near Tel Aviv and Patriot missile batteries in the region. There is also the Central Command based in Doha, Qatar, staffed by high-ranking US and western officers who would be able to co-ordinate all of the offensive operations. War spreads? While others have remained apart from the conflict, countries such as Britain could be drawn in if, for example, Tehran was to fire one of its Fatah-1 hypersonic missiles on to the UK's airbase in Cyprus. This would be to cause a political problem and to destabilise the western alliance as the UK would have to choose whether to join Israel in the war, despite being at diplomatic loggerheads over the country's conduct in Gaza. Similarly, France has a number of military bases in the region that could be attacked and, alongside Britain, warships in the area.