Former Iraqi prime minister returns to Baghdad despite security threats
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, known for promoting the rule of law, returned to Baghdad Tuesday for the first time in more than two years despite ongoing security threats.
In 2021, he survived an assassination attempt in which two armed drones targeted his residence in Baghdad's Green Zone area. The attack came at a time of tensions sparked by the refusal of Iran-backed militias to accept parliamentary election results.
Al-Kadhimi left Iraq after his term as prime minister ended in 2022 and has been living in London and the United Arab Emirates.
The former prime minister did not immediately make any public statements upon his return.
Three officials with his office who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly said security threats against the former prime minister were still present. They said he had returned at the invitation of current Iraqi political leaders who hoped he could use his connections to help them confront a worsening economic crisis that threatens the country's stability.
Al-Kadhimi has good relations with the United States and Saudi Arabia. Iraq is currently looking to strengthen ties with both countries, particularly as regional upheavals over the past year have left Iran in a weakened position.
During his term, Baghdad hosted a series of talks between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which helped pave the way for the regional rivals to formally restore diplomatic ties in 2023 after a seven-year rift. He was Iraq's former intelligence chief before becoming prime minister in 2020 following mass anti-government protests that toppled the previous cabinet.
Iraq is also set to hold parliamentary elections later this year, raising the possibility that al-Kadhimi might be preparing to attempt a political come-back.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Iran obtaining IAEA documents is 'bad', shows poor cooperation, Grossi says
VIENNA, June 9 (Reuters) - Iran's acquisition of confidential U.N. nuclear watchdog documents is a 'bad' step that goes against the spirit of cooperation that should exist between the agency and Tehran, its chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday. The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a confidential report on Iran to member states on May 31 seen by Reuters that it had "conclusive evidence of highly confidential documents belonging to the Agency having been actively collected and analysed by Iran". The report said that "raises serious concerns regarding Iran's spirit of collaboration" and could undermine the IAEA's work in Iran, but Tehran said in a statement to member states last week that the accusation in the report was "slanderous" and had been made "without presenting any substantiated proof or document". The IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors is holding a quarterly meeting this week. The United States, Britain, France and Germany plan to propose a resolution for the board to adopt that would declare Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations over other failings outlined in the report. "Here, unfortunately, and this dates to a few years ago ... we could determine with all clarity that documents that belong to the agency were in the hands of Iranian authorities, which is bad," Grossi told a press conference. "We believe that an action like this is not compatible with the spirit of cooperation." Asked about the nature of the documents and whether they were originally Iranian ones that had been seized by Israel and supplied to the agency, Grossi said: "No. We received documents from member states, and also we have our own assessments on documents, on equipment, etc."
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Iran says it will release Israeli nuclear secrets as pressure grows to reimpose sanctions
Iran has has said it will soon start releasing information from a treasure trove of Israeli nuclear secrets it claims to have obtained, as European countries push for a vote this week on reimposing UN sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear programme. The unverified claims by Iranian intelligence of a massive leak of Israeli secrets may be designed to turn the focus away from what Iran argues is its own excessively monitored civil nuclear programme. On Sunday, Iran's intelligence minister, Esmail Khatib, claimed Tehran had obtained 'a vast collection of strategic and sensitive [Israeli] documents, including plans and data on the nuclear facilities'. He added evidence would be released shortly, and implied some of the documentation was linked to Israel's arrest of two Israeli nationals, Roi Mizrahi and Almog Attias. Even within Iran there is scepticism that Iranian agents will have obtained such dramatic intelligence. The claim may be designed to warn off Israel from acting on its repeated threat to bomb Iran's nuclear sites since Iranian insight into Israel's own nuclear programme would increase the risk of effective Iranian reprisals. European powers are preparing to press for a vote at the quarterly board meeting of the nuclear inspectorate the IAEA in Vienna, which starts on Monday, that could lead to the reimposition of UN sanctions in October. France, Germany and the UK will cite a 20-page comprehensive report commissioned from the IAEA secretariat on Iran's failure to comply with the nuclear deal agreed in 2015, and Tehran's years-long failure to answer questions about aspects of its previous nuclear programme. Members of the IAEA board will be asked to study a report showing Iran has enriched 400kg of uranium to a purity of 60%, close to weapons-grade, and judged to be enough to make 10 nuclear bombs. Moreover, the Iranian stockpile of uranium has increased by 50% since the last report in March. The three leading European powers will cite the report in calling for a motion declaring Iran is in violation of its safeguards obligations, the first such finding since 2005, and the necessary precursor to reimposing UN sanctions in October when the 2015 deal expires. Due to the way that deal was framed, Russia and China cannot veto the reimposition of UN sanctions. Iran has already threatened counter-measures if the IAEA board says Iran is in breach, likely to include a further cutback to access by UN weapons inspectors, and a further speeding up of enrichment. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said that since the last time the IAEA board censured Tehran Iran had increased 60% enriched uranium production sevenfold and launched 20 cascades of advanced centrifuges. If the motion is passed, the French, Germans, and British then have until 18 October to determine whether they wish to reimpose the sanctions provided for in the 2015 deal. The Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has warned: 'Falsely accusing Iran of violating safeguards – based on shoddy and politicised reporting – is clearly designed to produce a crisis. Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake, Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights. Blame lies solely and fully with irresponsible actors who stop at nothing to gain relevance.' The US and Iran have yet to name a new date for the resumption of bilateral talks on Iran's nuclear programme, focused on whether Iran should be permitted continue to enrich uranium domestically, an issue that Iran sees as central to its sovereignty. The US, in public at least, insists enrichment must stop altogether as the only sure way of preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb. Donald Trump has shown a surprising willingness to cut a deal with Iran, despite in 2018 taking the US out of the nuclear deal, which was signed with Iran by his predecessor, Barack Obama. The US president has reportedly set a 60-day deadline for the talks, which expires on 11 June, and has accused Iran of slow-walking the process, though previous Trump deadlines have turned out to be flexible. Rafael Grossi, the head of the IAEA, has said he believes both the US and Iran are sincere in seeking to seal a deal on Iran's nuclear programme. The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has offered to act as an intermediary, and Russia could be the destination for Iran's growing stockpile of uranium if an agreement was reached. One proposal is for Iran to suspend its enrichment programme temporarily, something it did before in 2004-05.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump's travel ban could cement racism as his most dangerous legacy
This month marks exactly 10 years since Donald Trump coasted down an escalator at Trump Tower, declared his run for US president and accused Mexico of sending drugs, criminals and rapists into the homeland. The past decade has been exercise in normalising. When Trump threatened to terminate Elon Musk's government contracts, and Musk linked Trump to the child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, all because of a petty clash of egos, people were riveted but unsurprised. Likewise, when Trump ordered a travel ban on a dozen countries, many reacted with a collective shrug: well, of course he did. There was little sign of the collective uprising and airport protests that greeted Trump's so-called 'Muslim ban' – an executive order that barred travel to the US States for 90 days from seven predominantly Muslim countries – in January 2017. The president's spectacular blow-up with Musk ensured the attention cycle quickly moved on. Yet travel ban 2.0 is no less pernicious. The proclamation signed by Trump last Wednesday bans the citizens from many of the world's poorest nations, supposedly to protect the US against 'foreign terrorists' and other security threats. The countries affected are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries – Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela – will be partially restricted. 'We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,' Trump said. He cited the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado, where a man tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. An Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, has been charged in the attack. Yet Egypt is not on the list of countries facing travel limits, nor is Syria, whose Ahmed al-Sharaa was described by Trump as a 'young, attractive guy' after their recent meeting. Alex Berrios, a co-founder of Mi Vecino, a community empowerment organisation, and the son of a Cuban immigrant, said: 'Trump targeted countries with Black, Brown and Muslim populations. There is no clear national security basis for the ban, but there is a clear pattern of targeting people of color. Latino and immigrant communities recognize this as a racist policy, plain and simple.' Indeed, the list points to a 78-year-old president who continues to view large swaths of the world as drug-dealers, criminals and rapists, who finds new and ingenious ways to play white identity politics, whose 'Make America great again' mantra is coded nostalgia for an era of American apartheid. In 1973, Trump and his father, Fred, were sued for discriminating against Black applicants by refusing to rent apartments to them in predominantly white buildings in Brooklyn and Queens. The case was settled with no admission of guilt but a requirement that the Trumps change their practices. In 1989, after five Black and Latino teenagers were accused of assaulting and raping a white jogger in New York's Central Park, Trump took out full-page ads in several newspapers calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty. The Central Park Five were convicted and later exonerated but even last year Trump continued to assert they were responsible for the crime. From 2011 to 2016, Trump was a leading proponent of the debunked 'birther' theory, falsely claiming that Barack Obama was not born in the US and therefore was ineligible to be president. After Obama released his birth certificate, Trump admitted the truth but never apologised and continued to refer to Barack 'Hussein' Obama. After a 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a counter-protester was killed, Trump said there were 'very fine people on both sides' and blamed 'many sides' for the violence. He later tweeted: 'I condemn all types of racism and acts of violence. Peace to ALL Americans!' In a 2018 White House meeting on immigration, Trump reportedly asked, 'Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?', referring to Haiti and African nations, and suggested more immigrants from places such as Norway. During 2020 protests over George Floyd's murder in Minneapolis, Trump sent national guard troops to Washington and deployed federal officers to Portland, Oregon, leading to injuries. He also called Covid-19 the 'Chinese virus' and 'kung flu', linked by critics to a surge in anti-Asian hate crimes. At last year's National Association of Black Journalists convention, he falsely claimed that Kamala Harris 'turned Black' for political gain, questioning the vice-president's heritage. And on the campaign trail Trump said immigrants are 'poisoning the blood of our country', echoing the rhetoric of Adolf Hitler. Since returning to the White House, Trump has issued executive orders that aim to restrict or eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He even baselessly blamed DEI for undermining air safety after an army helicopter pilot was involved in a deadly midair collision with a commercial airliner. With the help of Musk's unofficial 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), Trump has slashed foreign aid and gutted the development agency USAID, causing death and devastation for people in Africa and elsewhere. Meanwhile the immigration crackdown has included the deportation to El Salvador of hundreds of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members, as well as efforts to deny enrollments of some foreign students and deport others. The US granted refugee status to around 50 white South Africans, claiming they were victims of racial persecution and 'white genocide'. Trump ambushed South African president Cyril Ramaphosa, who is Black, with a video that falsely portrayed 'burial sites' and articles that included an image of body bags from the Congolese city of Goma. He has also repeatedly singled out 'Congo' in Africa for emptying its prisons and sending criminals to the US. During a meeting last month with Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, he said: 'Many, many people come from the Congo. I don't know what that is, but they came from the Congo.' Factcheckers have found no evidence to support this claim. Trump's travel ban includes the Republic of Congo but not the much bigger Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is currently negotiating a minerals deal with Washington. The Republic of Congo said the country's inclusion was a 'misunderstanding'. Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic strategist, says: 'This is just another page from the catalogue of racism, bigotry, hate and white supremacy that Trump flips to and uses as his guide so often. 'He needs to keep putting coins in the rightwing machine because that is what keeps them going. In many ways he has to do this in order to stay true to who he is and his candidacy and Trumpism, because one of the key ingredients of Trumpism is racism, and we've seen that confirmed over and over again.' After a decade of Trump dominance, none of it comes as a surprise any more. What was once outrageous and taboo is now routine. And that numbness, shifting of the Overton Window and reordering of US political culture may be his most dangerous legacy of all.
