logo
This Southern City Has the Lowest Cost of Living in the U.S.—and It's Close to the Beach

This Southern City Has the Lowest Cost of Living in the U.S.—and It's Close to the Beach

Doing just about anything feels expensive these days. From the price of daily treats like a latte, reaching $5.46, to the cost of larger ticket items, like a vacation, hitting record highs, everything can feel out of reach. There is, however, one way to make life feel a bit more affordable, and that's by relocating to an area where the cost of living is still reasonable.
Each year, Niche.com ranks the cities with the lowest cost of living across the U.S. after considering key factors, including housing, food and gas costs, and the median tax rates. After analyzing all the data, Niche.com named Brownsville, Texas, as the city with the lowest cost of living in the U.S.
The city in Cameron County, home to approximately 188,000 residents, is situated at the tip of the state, near the Gulf Coast, on the U.S.-Mexico border. More importantly, though, it is known as the "taco capital of Texas" and has its own taco trail.
Brownsville also ranked highly (No. 16 overall) on Niche's list of the Best Cities to Buy a House in America, thanks to its affordable pricing, with a median home value of just about $122,000 and a median rent of $906. It's also a great place for families, ranking No. 77 on the website's list of Cities with the Best Public Schools in America, with many of its public schools earning A or A+ grades. A,nd it's not just Niche that's singing its praises, residents are, too.
"I've lived in Brownsville my whole life, and if you are looking for a small city, this is the city for you," one community member shared on the site. "It has beautiful culture and history, with multiple beaches nearby, making for a small tourist area. It's the perfect balance between a small city and urban landscape, where community is strong."
Last year, investment website Insider Monkey named Brownsville the best Southern city to retire in for less than $1,500 a month, reporting that its cost of living is 25 percent lower than the national average.
However, Brownsville isn't the only city in Texas that made it to the top of Niche.com's list—Wichita Falls, a town located north of Fort Worth, ranked second. Evansville, Indiana; South Bend, Indiana; and Dayton, Ohio; rounded out the top five.
See the full report at niche.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Developer could buy, rehab Monroe Plaza senior affordable housing for up to $27.5 million
Developer could buy, rehab Monroe Plaza senior affordable housing for up to $27.5 million

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Developer could buy, rehab Monroe Plaza senior affordable housing for up to $27.5 million

A developer interested in buying and rehabbing Monroe Plaza Apartments, the 1970s-era affordable housing complex for seniors at 400 N. Monroe Ave., is looking to the Green Bay Housing Authority for the funds to pursue its project. The housing authority on June 19 will consider a request by Monroe Plaza Housing I LLC, whose principal office is based in Manhattan Beach, California, to access up to $27.5 million in revenue bonds to cover the cost of acquiring and rehabilitating the 197-unit apartment complex. Here's what to know. The official request is for the housing authority to give the developer up to $27.5 million in "tax-exempt conduit revenue bonds." Simply put, the housing authority has the power to raise money by issuing bonds, and gives the raised money to businesses or nonprofits to finance their affordable housing projects. For the private entities, they get lower interest rates this way than by taking out a traditional loan to fund the project. For the housing authority, the arrangement provides affordable housing for the community without the financial burden. The housing authority currently has three such agreements, according to the housing authority agenda: two with University Village Housing from 2020 and 2023 to build the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay's latest residence hall, as well as one with Gateway Collective in 2024 to construct workforce housing downtown. Combined, the housing authority takes in over $55,000 per year in bond fees from these agreements. Should the latest bond request be approved for the full $27.5 million, it would give the housing authority up to an additional $27,500 every year, the agenda noted. The project "will provide much-needed affordable housing for seniors," according to the housing authority agenda, and the developer is "committed to renovating and preserving affordable housing to the highest standards." The developer has already completed over 45 similar projects to buy and rehab affordable housing properties across the country, the agenda noted. The developer reached out several months ago with the request, according to Cheryl Renier-Wigg, the housing authority's executive director. However, no details were immediately available on the specific rehabilitation plans, if residents would need to move, if there would be a new property manager, or on the current condition of the building. "The (housing authority) meeting on Thursday will be our first opportunity to review the project and ask some of these same questions (of the developer)," Renier-Wigg said. About 80 people applied by July 5, 1975, to move into the city's first downtown apartments built explicitly for senior citizens, according to a Green Bay Press-Gazette article from the time. Most of them, the article noted, were single women. Milwaukee-based developer Harold Rosenthal hired Stevens Construction Co. to build the complex to the tune of $3.5 million (or $20.7 million in 2025 dollars) with 20 apartments per floor and 457 square feet of living space in the one-bed, one-bath apartments. It was built with the latest fire protection codes, full carpeting, garbage disposals, and laundry rooms on every even-numbered floor. Individuals making less than $4,200 qualified for discounted rent between $67.17 and $110.42, which included all utilities except landline phone service. Otherwise, the full monthly rent was $224. Jesse Lin is a reporter covering the community of Green Bay and its surroundings, as well as politics in northeastern Wisconsin. Contact him at 920-834-4250 or jlin@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Green Bay Housing Authority considers senior affordable housing rehab

Green Bay Housing Authority likes Monroe Plaza revamp plan but has management concerns
Green Bay Housing Authority likes Monroe Plaza revamp plan but has management concerns

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Green Bay Housing Authority likes Monroe Plaza revamp plan but has management concerns

Monroe Plaza at 400 N. Monroe Ave. ― a downtown apartment complex that gives elderly and disabled residents a place to call home through federal Section 8 housing vouchers amidst a national housing crisis ― could be a California-based affordable housing developer's first Wisconsin project. SDG Housing Partners secured an initial commitment of up to $27.5 million in government bonds through the Green Bay Housing Authority after the authority liked its first look at renovation plans on June 19. The developer, once given the bond revenue, will be wholly responsible for paying the debt back, according to the initial resolution. The authority had anticipated the presentation by Michael Arman, SDG's director of development, and attorney Lynda Templen would answer questions about the developer's vision for the 1970s-era building ― which it did ― but some members were also left with nagging concerns about property management for the vulnerable population of residents. Since its founding in 2016, SDG has bought and rehabbed 45 other affordable housing projects across the country, according to the housing authority's June 19 agenda. SDG would bring its "passion to recreate communities to the highest standards" to Green Bay as it did in another Section 8 housing project in La Puente, California, located in Los Angeles County, said Arman to the housing authority. And in much the same way as in La Puente, the developer was coming before the Green Bay Housing Authority asking for tax-exempt revenue bonds to, "try to make [Monroe Plaza] look like a modern, market-rate property," Arman said. Arman described a plan with freshly installed windows, an energy-efficient roof, a paint job and new light fixtures. There will be a gazebo, resident gardens, "colorful" landscaping, a dog park, resident-tended gardens, a grilling area and an ADA-compliant sidewalk. In the interior common areas, there will be a renovated community kitchen, tables for bingo, billiards and cards, a library, a TV space, and computer stations ― all ADA-accessible. Laundry and management offices would be renovated, and each floor adorned with art. Security cameras would be upgraded and key fob access at the entrance would add to the security measures. "Just because it's affordable housing, there's no need to look like affordable housing," Arman said, appearing to refer to the connotations over decades of public housing units being associated with squalor and having sparse design ― though, their stripped back construction had been considered an architectural model when they were first built and appropriately functional, not frilly, for its working-class residents. Oshkosh-based ACC Management Group would manage the newly renovated Monroe Plaza, and the process of hiring six on-site staff members was already underway, Arman said. There would be two office personnel, a service coordinator, two maintenance personnel and a janitor at Monroe Plaza Mondays through Fridays, according to Arman. Residents would remain on-site in what the developer called "hotel units": several furnished, unoccupied apartments inside the complex that residents would move to until their own apartment rehabilitation was finished. The developer would have to submit documentation to the Department of Housing and Urban Development as it was the federal department's property, Arman said, adding that "there will be no permanent relocation, just temporary relocation." The developer had not yet walked through to inspect the conditions of the apartments, but, "there will be some unit work. That scope will be determined a little bit later,' Arman said. To do so, the developer, "will have to go around to every single unit to understand what we're dealing with." Asked by housing authority members how it knew it would need $27.5 million in bond money if the condition of the apartments was unknown and there were no plans presented to rehab the apartments, Arman said the developer generally knew the scope of work and that the money would also go toward rehabbing apartment units. Templen added the $27.5 million was an "aggressive, not-to-exceed" estimate for the project, and that a more defined scope of work, renderings and project details would be hashed out before the housing authority adopts a second, final resolution. "And so we will be working through those details, and undoubtably when we come back with the final resolution, it will be some other amount," Templen said. "It won't be $27.5 [million]. Of course, we want to maximize it, to the extent that we can." This first resolution was the "first step" to getting further financing for the project, Templen said. The developer will be able with the resolution to go to a bank willing to lend to SDG, Templen added. For-profit affordable housing developers must also go to the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority for what's called a "volume cap," according to Green Bay Housing Authority executive director Cheryl Renier-Wigg. The cap is a federal limit to how many tax-exempt bonds a state can issue to prevent misuse. Templen said the developer expects to hear back from WHEDA the size of the volume cap by the end of June. Depending on when the volume cap and the bank commitment were known, the developer could be in a position to close on buying the property by mid-September, Templen said. And with all documents in hand, Templen said the developer will come back for a final resolution with final bond figures from the housing authority, as well as an authorization from the city itself. Remodeling would begin by summer 2026, according to Arman, by which time the developer hopes to have secured additional tax credits to finance the project. Once Arman and Templen had left with the initial resolution approved, several members of the housing authority expressed concerns with ACC Management Group being the property manager, citing anecdotal experiences of how it treated disabled residents and a lack of communication. However, there had been plenty of issues at the complex over the years from security, to bedbugs, to management, according to Renier-Wigg and former City Council member Randy Scannell; the new choice of management, it was agreed, could be brought up at a later time. Jesse Lin is a reporter covering the community of Green Bay and its surroundings, as well as politics in northeastern Wisconsin. Contact him at 920-834-4250 or jlin@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Green Bay Housing Authority gives first OK for Monroe Plaza renovation

Best CD rates today, June 24, 2025 (Lock in up to 5.5% APY)
Best CD rates today, June 24, 2025 (Lock in up to 5.5% APY)

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Best CD rates today, June 24, 2025 (Lock in up to 5.5% APY)

The Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds three times in 2024. As a result, deposit account rates are on the decline. The good news: You can lock in a competitive return on a certificate of deposit (CD) today and preserve your earning power. In fact, the best CDs still pay rates above 4%. Read on for a snapshot of CD rates today and where to find the best offers. CDs today typically offer rates significantly higher than traditional savings accounts. As of June, the best short-term CDs (six to 12 months) generally offer rates around 4% to 4.5% APY. As of June 24, 2025, the highest CD rate is 5.5% APY, offered by Gainbridge® on its 5-year CD. There is a $1000 minimum opening deposit required. The following is a look at some of the best CD rates available today from our verified partners. The 2000s were marked by the dot-com bubble and later, the global financial crisis of 2008. Though the early 2000s saw relatively higher CD rates, they began to fall as the economy slowed and the Federal Reserve cut its target rate to stimulate growth. By 2009, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, the average one-year CD paid around 1% APY, with five-year CDs at less than 2% APY. The trend of falling CD rates continued into the 2010s, especially after the Great Recession of 2007-2009. The Fed's policies to stimulate the economy (in particular, its decision to keep its benchmark interest rate near zero) led banks to offer very low rates on CDs. By 2013, average rates on 6-month CDs fell to about 0.1% APY, while 5-year CDs returned an average of 0.8% APY. However, things changed between 2015 and 2018, when the Fed started gradually increasing rates again. At this point, there was a slight improvement in CD rates as the economy expanded, marking the end of nearly a decade of ultra-low rates. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 led to emergency rate cuts by the Fed, causing CD rates to fall to new record lows. The situation reversed following the pandemic as inflation began to spiral out of control. This prompted the Fed to hike rates 11 times between March 2022 and July 2023. In turn, this led to higher rates on loans and higher APYs on savings products, including CDs. Fast forward to September 2024 — the Fed finally decided to start cutting the federal funds rate after it determined that inflation was essentially under control. Today, we're beginning to see CD rates come down from their peak. Even so, CD rates remain high by historical standards. Take a look at how CD rates have changed since 2009: Traditionally, longer-term CDs have offered higher interest rates compared to shorter-term CDs. This is because locking in money for a longer period typically carries more risk (namely, missing out on higher rates in the future), which banks compensate for with higher rates. However, this pattern doesn't necessarily hold today; the highest average CD rate is for a 12-month term. This indicates a flattening or inversion of the yield curve, which can happen in uncertain economic times or when investors expect future interest rates to decline. Read more: Short- or long-term CD: Which is best for you? When opening a CD, choosing one with a high APY is just one piece of the puzzle. There are other factors that can impact whether a particular CD is best for your needs and your overall return. Consider the following when choosing a CD: Your goals: Decide how long you're willing to lock away your funds. CDs come with fixed terms, and withdrawing your money before the term ends can result in penalties. Common terms range from a few months up to several years. The right term for you depends on when you anticipate needing access to your money. Type of financial institution: Rates can vary significantly among financial institutions. Don't just check with your current bank; research CD rates from online banks, local banks, and credit unions. Online banks, in particular, often offer higher interest rates than traditional brick-and-mortar banks because they have lower overhead costs. However, make sure any online bank you consider is FDIC-insured (or NCUA-insured for credit unions). Account terms: Beyond the interest rate, understand the terms of the CD, including the maturity date and withdrawal penalties. Also, check if there's a minimum deposit requirement and if so, that fits your budget. Inflation: While CDs can offer safe, fixed returns, they might not always keep pace with inflation, especially for longer terms. Consider this when deciding on the term and amount to invest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store