
Starbucks baristas go on strike following new rule change
More than 1,000 Starbucks baristas across 75 US stores are currently on strike as they challenge the coffee giant's newly implemented dress code,
The new dress code, effective from Monday, restricts what baristas can wear beneath their signature green aprons.
Employees at company-operated and licensed stores in the US and Canada are now required to wear solid black shirts and bottoms limited to khaki, black, or blue denim.
Previously, baristas enjoyed a more relaxed dress code, permitted to wear a wider array of dark colors and patterned shirts.
Starbucks maintains that the updated policy is designed to highlight the green aprons and foster a sense of familiarity for customers, contributing to a warmer, more welcoming atmosphere in its stores.
However, Starbucks Workers United, the union representing workers at 570 of the company's 10,000 company-owned US stores, argues that the dress code should be a subject of collective bargaining.
'Starbucks has lost its way. Instead of listening to baristas who make the Starbucks experience what it is, they are focused on all the wrong things, like implementing a restrictive new dress code,' said Paige Summers, a Starbucks shift supervisor from Hanover, Maryland.
'Customers don't care what color our clothes are when they're waiting 30 minutes for a latte.'
Summers and others also criticised the company for selling styles of Starbucks-branded clothing that employees are no longer allowed to wear to work on an internal website. Starbucks said it would give two free black T-shirts to each employee when it announced the new dress code.
Starbucks said Wednesday that the strike was having a limited impact on its 10,000 company-operated US stores.
'Thousands of Starbucks partners came to work this week ready to serve their customers and communities,' the company said in a statement. 'It would be more productive if the union would put the same effort into coming back to the table to finalize a reasonable contract.'
Starbucks Workers United has been unionizing US stores since 2021. Starbucks and the union have yet to reach a contract agreement, despite agreeing to return to the bargaining table in February 2024.
The union said this week that it filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board alleging Starbucks' failure to bargain over the new dress code.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Succession battle erupts at America's biggest bank as young bucks jostle to replace Jamie Dimon
JPMorgan Chase is making moves behind the scenes to eventually replace its longtime CEO Jamie Dimon, who is expected to retire within five years. Dimon, 69, indicated in a Monday interview with Fox Business that he intends to step away from America's largest consumer bank in 'several years,' adding that he loves the job. On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that JPMorgan put Marianne Lake in charge of strategic growth and the firm's international consumer bank. Lake, 56, is one of the leading contenders to replace Dimon when the time comes, and her promotion suggests that she may be first in line. Lake took over from Sanoke Viswanathan, 50, who left to become the CEO of data company FactSet. She's now the head of JPMorgan's consumer and community banking division, which serves 84 million customers in the US. Doug Petno and Troy Rohrbaugh, who together lead JPMorgan's commercial and investment banking operations, are also vying for the top job. What Petno has going for him is his length of service. He's been at the bank for 35 years and has held numerous roles at the company. By comparison, Lake has been at JPMorgan for 25 years, while Rohrbaugh has been there for 20 years. Jenn Piepszak was a real possibility to become CEO several months ago. She effectively took herself out of the running when she accepted the COO job in January. Piepszak replaced former COO Daniel Pinto, who will serve as the company's president until he retires in 2026. Pinto, too, was once considered someone who could step into the CEO role, as he previously assumed those responsibilities when Dimon had to undergo emergency heart surgery in 2020. Mary Erdoes, CEO of asset and wealth management, is considered a dark horse in the leadership race. She has been at the firm for nearly 30 years. JPMorgan could surprise everyone and go with an outside hire, but that is very unlikely. Daily Mail reached out to the bank for comment. In April, the bank's Board of Directors identified potential successors to Dimon and all of them were internal candidates. Dimon himself was an internal hire. In 2000, he became the CEO of Bank One, overseeing that firm's operations until it merged with JPMorgan in 2004. He was first selected to be COO at JPMorgan before being hired as CEO in December 2005. All this jockeying at JPMorgan comes as Dimon made a headline-grabbing appearance Friday at the inaugural Regan National Economic Forum, where he talked with his usual brash candor about today's hot-button political issues. On a panel with CNBC's Morgan Brennan, he sounded the alarm about the ballooning national debt and warned that if the United States doesn't take its role as the world's sole superpower seriously, the US dollar could cease being the world reserve currency. He also advanced the idea that leaders at every level of government are bungling the country's future. 'The amount of mismanagement is extraordinary - by state, by city, for pensions, and that stuff is going to kill us,' he said. All these statements and more got Brennan to ask Dimon whether he'd consider running for office, a question that got many in the audience to gasp. 'What would be the scenario that you would entertain to consider public service?' she asked. Dimon paused for a beat, then said, 'Alright, ready? I'll tell you. If I thought I could really win, which I don't think I could.' That response apparently caught the eye of Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a professor at the Yale School of Management, who wrote a lengthy article about why Dimon could be a dynamic choice to be the next president. Anthony Scaramucci, a financier who served as White House communications director for 10 days in 2017 before being fired by Trump, posted about Sonnenfeld's Tuesday piece in Fortune Magazine, calling it 'spot on.' Sonnenfeld argued that Dimon is a commanding presence and a sensible moderate who could, if he decided to run as a Democrat, unite a party that is in complete disarray. The conventional wisdom is that the Democrats are largely without a true leader after Vice President Kamala Harris lost to Donald Trump in November. A CNN/Gallup poll released on Sunday seems to bear that out, with just 16 percent of Americans believing the Democratic party has strong leaders. Sonnenfeld also cast Dimon as an unapologetic truth-teller even when it doesn't suit him, writing that this is a 'rare quality found only in the best leaders.' As an example, he pointed to a leaked recording of Dimon at a company town hall, where he launched into a foul-mouthed rant against employees who wanted to continue working from home. Dimon also has a realistic claim to the centrist label, Sonnenfeld wrote, as he criticized both Democrats and Republicans. Although Dimon, a registered Democrat, continues to praise Trump for growing the economy in his first term, he hasn't been shy to slam the president for his Liberation Day tariffs and his decision to establish a strategic bitcoin reserve. In January 2024, he was far more conciliatory, saying, 'Take a step back, be honest. He was kind of right about NATO, kind of right on immigration. He grew the economy quite well. Trade tax reform worked. He was right about some of China.' Back then, he was warning that Democrats' incendiary rhetoric about Trump and MAGA could cost them the upcoming election. Whether or not the Democrats' approach to Trump supporters was the main factor in them losing, the fact is, Trump cruised to a second term relatively handily. Sonnenfeld wrote that Dimon could be the antidote to Trumpism, essentially saying that while Trump plays the role of a titan of industry, Dimon is the real deal. He pointed to Trump's multiple business bankruptcies, despite inheriting nearly half a billion from his father, Fred Trump. Meanwhile, JPMorgan stock has risen nearly 1,100 percent since Dimon became CEO. Adding to Dimon's potential as a leading political figure, he is not accustomed to having someone telling him what to do, very much like Trump. When speculation bubbled up last year that both the Harris and Trump campaigns were considering Dimon as Treasury Secretary, he had this to say: 'I've not had a boss in 25 years and I am not ready to start now.'


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Vance jokes after being called ‘intellectual'
Published: Updated: Vice President JD Vance joked that he was offended after being described as an 'intellectual' who previously wrote for the anti-Trump conservative magazine National Review. The vice president made his remarks during a black-tie gala sponsored by the conservative think tank American Compass as he sat down with founder Oren Cass. 'I am thrilled to have this opportunity to talk with you and so grateful that the work you're doing and, in a sense, so in awe of it because there are politicians out there who are, they've just been politicians,' Cass began. 'But you are someone who was an intellectual first. Some people don't like the word "intellectual." But I mean it in the good sense of the term. You were writing for National Review. You were at the bar late at night arguing about and helping shape these ideas that you are now.' 'I come here for free and you insult me,' Vance joked. 'And you call me an intellectual, remind me that I wrote for National Review. What an [expletive] this guy is!' The audience laughed and applauded as Cass replied, 'That's fair. I will admit that I, too, wrote for National Review.' The National Review was a widely respected conservative magazine that vociferously opposed Trump in the 2016 election. The vice president previously took shots at National Review during an interview with CBS' Face the Nation where host Margaret Brennan cited an article critical of one of the president's nominees for his cabinet. 'These are publications that attacked Donald J. Trump obsessively, but those publications don't determine who the president is, the American people do and Donald J. Trump is the person who determines who his cabinet is, not these publications that I think, frankly, have lost relevance,' Vance said. Vance was involved in the founding discussions of the American Compass group, an attempt to put an intellectual and policy framework behind some of Trump's 'America First' agenda. During the gala, Vance said that when he got to the White House, he asked for analysis on supply chains in America, eager to identify key industries to bring back to the United States. 'What is so crazy about the hyper globalized era is that you had these basic questions about the brittleness of our supply chains that were completely un-investigated by the very people who supported globalizing those supply chains,' he said to applause from the audience. 'We were actually governed by complete morons and we didn't even realize it until the Trump administration started getting under the hood of our government.' The organization, founded in 2020, is working for Republicans to think differently on policy questions, including by grabbing the third rail of sacrosanct political principles that have traditionally been the core ideals of the conservative movement. The organization credits Vance and his policies for lifting up their status in Washington. 'No figure in American politics has more effectively advocated for American families and workers than Vice President JD Vance,' American Compass communications director Theresa Braid said to the Daily Mail. She cited Vance's work in the Senate and the White House as well as his book Hillbilly Elegy, which chronicles the struggles that working class voters in America face. 'Vice President Vance has led the charge to speak for the Americans that our elites have forgotten,' she continued. 'It is an honor to have him join our celebration of the movement that he has helped build.' Other prominent Republicans on the right who are connected with the group include Secretary of State Marco Rubio who spoke at the event, and Senators Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Todd Young and Jim Banks from Indiana, and Bernie Moreno from Ohio.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Stanley Cup Final 2025: Florida Panthers look for rare repeat while the Edmonton Oilers hope to claim the cup for Canada
If we can paraphrase Roger Daltrey: Meet the 2025 Stanley Cup Finals, same as the 2024 Stanley Cup Finals. Just like the year prior, the Florida Panthers and the Edmonton Oilers are meeting once again to fight for the greatest trophy in all of sports. The two teams will face off against each other for the second year in a row - only the third time since the NHL expanded to 21 teams that the same opponents will meet in consecutive Stanley Cup Finals. Of course, the two teams aren't exactly the same as they were last year. Different players have had drastically different regular season and playoff performances than they did last year, leading to a re-analysis of both teams. Plus, home ice belongs to a different team this year - which could play a major role if this series goes to seven games once again. Here, previews the 2025 Stanley Cup Final - and predicts who will come out on top. Florida's Road to the Cup Sure, the Panthers weren't as much a juggernaut this season as they were the one prior. However, there was no post-Cup 'hangover' that some Stanley Cup champions have been victim of in the past. In a top-heavy Atlantic Division, the Panthers finished third with 98 points - good for 11th in the league's standings overall. Florida stayed consistent throughout the regular season, never truly dipping in form for any extended period of time. The only month where they finished with a losing record was April, when they lost back-to-back games to end the season. They pulled off the Gentleman's Sweep of the in-state rival Tampa Bay Lightning in the first round and then doomed the Toronto Maple Leafs by beating them in their own barn in seven games. In the Eastern Conference Final - their third in as many seasons - they once again throttled the Carolina Hurricanes in five games while outscoring them 21-10. Their identity - physical, scrappy, and relentless - has not changed from years prior and sets them up for a possible back-to-back title defense. Florida players to watch To borrow a phrase from hockey writer and podcaster Pete Blackburn, the Panthers may be the most 'built for this s**t' playoff team we have seen in a while. Like last year, the Panthers' top line has shined - with Aleksandar Barkov, Sam Reinhart, and Evan Rodrigues combining for eleven goals and 40 points in these playoffs. Unlike last year, the scoring is much more spread out. Carter Verhaeghe has been bumped down to the second line as of late to play alongside Sam Bennett. When you run the scrappiest unit in the league, what else is there for you to do but get scrappier? Enter Brad Marchand. The former Boston Bruins captain was flipped to Florida at the deadline and he has brought all his experience to score four goals and 14 points from the third line in these playoffs. Turning to defense, the top pair of Gustav Forsling and Aaron Ekblad have been stellar at slowing down rushes. But Forsling's offensive numbers are down, which could spell trouble. Panned at the time, the trade for Seth Jones has seemed to work well for the Cats so far - owing to a +9 rating and seven points. Unlike this time last season, Sergei Bobrovsky has been stellar in the playoffs. His 2.11 goals against average is the second-best mark among netminders who played more than 10 playoff games - as is his save percentage of .912. The biggest question? Matthew Tkachuk. Sure, on the surface, his five goals and 11 assists are big numbers. But consider that he has scored only two goals in the last 12 games. If Florida is going to win back-to-back cups, they need one of their biggest stars to get going again. Edmonton's Road to the Cup Last year, Edmonton had a false start out of the gate, fired their coach, reset, and made a run to the Finals. This year, barring a five-game February skid on either side of the 4 Nations Face-Off, Edmonton was a wagon in the Pacific Division. Yet, they still finished third despite putting up 48 wins and 101 points en route to a playoff appearance which was well deserved. After dropping the first two games of their series against the Los Angeles Kings, Edmonton won four straight to set up a second round against the Vegas Golden Knights. Edmonton got one over on the team that won their division, beating them in five games to set up a re-match with the Dallas Stars. Unlike last year when Edmonton needed six games to clinch the Campbell Bowl, the Oilers knocked out Dallas in five to reach back-to-back cup finals for the first time since 1988. Edmonton Players to Watch Just like last year, we start with Connor McDavid. In a year where the best hockey player in the world already won a medal with Team Canada, etching his name on the Stanley Cup would be the crowning achievement of his career. His 26 points lead all scorers in the playoffs. In fact, Edmonton has four of the five highest scorers in the playoffs. Joining McDavid is partner-in-crime Leon Draisaitl (7 goals, 25 points), line mate Ryan Nugent-Hopkins (5 goals, 18 points), and defenseman Evan Bouchard (6 goals, 17 points). Just like last year, the balance between the top and bottom six is heavily skewed. For reference, the third line Edmonton rolled out in Game 5 against Dallas was Vasily Podkolzin, Mattias Janmark, and Viktor Arvidsson. Combined, they have 15 points - fewer than the individual totals of the top four scorers in the playoffs. When you run the most unbalanced forward unit in the league, what else is there for you to do but drastically improve your defense? Everyone on Edmonton's defensive corps has taken a step forward this year and two key additions helped boost their unit overall. All of the Oilers' defenders are on the good side of the plus-minus battle - including Jake Walman (+12), acquired from San Jose mid-season, and John Klingberg (+6), who has been surprisingly consistent. Finally, we look to the net. Stuart Skinner's early-playoff struggles led to him sharing time with Calvin Pickard. Skinner has been off and on all postseason. For the longest time, either he'd keep a shutout or let in at least four. The ship has been righted for the time being (he finished the conference final series with a .924 save percentage), but Edmonton will need Skinner to be consistent in the biggest games. Despite McDavid's playoff run, it could be Leon Draisaitl that takes the Art-Ross Trophy So who's gonna win it all? Here's what's at stake: Florida is looking to be the first team to win back-to-back Stanley Cups since the Pittsburgh Penguins in 2017. Edmonton hasn't won since 1988, while a Canadian team hasn't won the cup since 1994. Much like last year, this will be an incredibly hard series to predict. Once again, the Oilers top line is the most powerful in the league and they truly look like a cohesive unit. But Florida's balance throughout their lines is the envy of the NHL. As funny as it sounds, when it comes to two teams that match up so incredibly well, the only two places you have left to go are familiarity and history. Last year, Florida had home ice and won Game 7 by a single goal. This year, it's Edmonton that has that advantage. On top of that, the Oilers have lost just one game at home these playoffs - and even then, it required Vegas forward Reilly Smith scoring with 0.4 seconds left to beat them. Then there's the history. As mentioned at the start, the same pair of teams have only met in back-to-back finals twice since 1980. In 1983, the New York Islanders swept the upstart Oilers to win their fourth-straight Stanley Cup. The following year, the Oilers - led by Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Grant Fuhr and Wayne Gretzky - beat the Isles in five. The phenomenon wouldn't happen again until 2008 and 2009. First, the Detroit Red Wings knocked out a young Penguins team in six games before Sidney Crosby and Pittsburgh returned the favor the following year. It's both of the home ice and the history that lead to our choice. The prediction is: Edmonton in 7 games.