logo
End support to terrorist groups, US secretary of state Marco Rubio tells Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif

End support to terrorist groups, US secretary of state Marco Rubio tells Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif

Time of India09-05-2025

NEW DELHI: Amid the threat of an all-out war between India and Pakistan,
US secretary of state
Marco Rubio
dialled his counterpart
S Jaishankar
and Pakistan PM
Shehbaz Sharif
, seeking immediate de-escalation and expressing support for direct dialogue between the two countries.
While the US readouts of the two conversations said Rubio encouraged continued efforts to improve communications,
Jaishankar
later on X said he told Rubio that India will firmly counter any escalation by Pakistan.
In the case of Shehbaz, while he expressed sorrow for the reported loss of "civilian lives in the current conflict", Rubio reiterated his calls for Pakistan to take concrete steps to end any support for
terrorist groups
. Pakistan has accused India of killing civilians but India has maintained that its May 7 strikes were targeted only at terrorists and their infrastructure, not civilians.
Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor: Several airports in India closed - check full list
Did Pak shoot down Indian jets? What MEA said
India foils Pakistan's attack on Jammu airport: What we know so far
In the case of India, he reiterated his condolences for the terrorist attack in Pahalgam and reaffirmed the US's commitment to work with India in the fight against
terrorism
. Appreciating the US support on terrorism, Jaishankar told Rubio that India will firmly counter any attempts at escalation by Pakistan, underlining India's measured response to cross-border terrorism. The conversation took place in the middle of fresh clashes between India and Pakistan late on Thursday that sparked fears of a major escalation.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Google Brain Co-Founder Andrew Ng, Recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Jaishankar also spoke to his EU and Italy counterparts late evening, as tensions soared.
Jaishankar also told his visiting Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araqchi, that it's not India's intention to escalate, but if there's any military attack on India, it will be met with a "very, very firm response". Jaishankar also met Saudi Arabia junior foreign minister Adel Aljubeir and, as he said in a post on X, shared India's perspective on firmly countering terrorism.
While the Iranian minister was in India on a pre-arranged visit for the regular India-Iran joint commission meeting, Aljubeir arrived here for an unannounced visit. Both countries have been in touch with top Indian and Pakistani leadership, looking to defuse tensions.
Araqchi and Aljubeir both urged restraint and de-escalation. "We hope that India and Pakistan will prevent the escalation of tension in the region.
Our region needs peace, especially to expand economic cooperation between regional countries, and we hope this will happen," said Araqchi.
The EU also strongly urged de-escalation, while condemning terrorism. Every state has the duty and the right lawfully to protect its citizens from acts of terror, said the EU in a statement. "The EU calls on both parties to exercise restraint, to de-escalate tensions and desist from further attacks to safeguard civilian lives on both sides.
The EU urges both sides to engage in dialogue. It is vital that India and Pakistan also live up to their obligations under international law and take all measures possible to protect civilian lives," said the statement.
Amid global calls for restraint, foreign secretary Vikram Misri said there has been a recognition among the international community of the fact that the
Pahalgam attack
was of barbaric nature, and of India's right to respond to it. "There is also a recognition of the fact that in responding, we have been nothing but responsible and have done so in a restrained, measured, and non-escalatory manner. I think that counts for something," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jaishankar warns West on selective outrage, pushes strategic ties in Brussels visit
Jaishankar warns West on selective outrage, pushes strategic ties in Brussels visit

Business Standard

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Jaishankar warns West on selective outrage, pushes strategic ties in Brussels visit

During his visit to Brussels, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar warned the West against selective outrage over terrorism, following the Kashmir attack that claimed 26 lives. Criticizing the global response, he argued that terrorism is a global threat, not just an India-Pakistan issue, and will eventually impact those ignoring it now. Jaishankar met EU leaders to push for stronger India-EU ties, pitched India as a trustworthy alternative to China, and opposed the EUs Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), calling it unfair. On Russia-Ukraine, he maintained Indias neutral stance, stressing non-prescriptive diplomacy. He also highlighted historical grievances with Western nations over Kashmir, emphasized Indias support for a multipolar world, and encouraged European companies to shift away from Chinese supply chains for security reasons.

Decode politics: In poll-bound Bihar, calls for domicile reservation grow. Why they are difficult to ignore
Decode politics: In poll-bound Bihar, calls for domicile reservation grow. Why they are difficult to ignore

Indian Express

time16 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Decode politics: In poll-bound Bihar, calls for domicile reservation grow. Why they are difficult to ignore

Ahead of the Bihar polls, an old issue has come to haunt the Nitish Kumar-led NDA government. On June 5, the Bihar Student Union, an umbrella body of several student organisations, led a protest in Patna demanding domicile reservation in government jobs. Bihar has an unemployment rate of 3.9% as per the latest NITI Aayog estimates, higher than the national average of 3.2%. Many young people in the state rely on government jobs, which have been marred with irregularities in the recent past. Hence, jobs are a politically sensitive issue, with resonance ahead of the polls. Those demanding domicile reservation argue that candidates from outside the state are taking away jobs that belong to youths of Bihar. Their slogan 'Vote de Bihari, naukari le bahri (Biharis vote, outsiders take jobs)' is fast gaining momentum as the elections draw closer. Under domicile reservation, the government of a particular state reserves a portion of government jobs or educational seats for its residents, the idea being to prioritise local candidates or protect local interests in competitive job markets. While Bihar does not have a general domicile-based reservation policy for government jobs, the NDA government claims that most of the recruits in recent government exams have been Bihar residents. Additionally, around a fortnight back, the Bihar government announced reservation of 4% of all government jobs for persons with disabilities from the state. In December 2020, following a series of protests, the state government had briefly introduced a domicile rule for school teacher recruitment. But it was withdrawn in June 2023 by the short-lived Mahagathbandhan alliance that subsequently came to power, allowing candidates from any Indian state to apply for the teaching positions. Then Bihar education minister Chandrashekar Yadav had cited 'vacant seats for quality mathematics and science teachers' as the reason, while bureaucrats had mentioned 'constitutional provisions and Supreme Court rulings' for the decision. The demand for domicile reservation flows from Bihar's economic and social challenges. As per a NITI Aayog report titled 'Macro and Fiscal Landscape of the State of Bihar', published in March 2025, Bihar's economy is predominantly agrarian, with 49.6% its workforce engaged in agriculture between 2022-23. Only 5.7% of the state has manufacturing jobs — one of the lowest shares in India. Service and construction jobs make up the rest of the jobs pie and constitute 26% and 18.4% of the workforce respectively. The lack of private-sector jobs makes government positions highly coveted, as they offer stability and benefits. Though the government has tried to expand hiring in recent years, demand far outstrips supply. They are demanding an official domicile quota with 100% reservation for Bihar natives in primary teacher recruitment and at least 90% reservation in other state jobs for candidates with valid long-term Bihar domicile certificates. The protesters argue that neighbouring states already protect the opportunities of their locals and that the youth of Bihar is competing unfairly with outsiders for limited opportunities. This, they argue, results in a vicious cycle of unemployment and migration from Bihar. State policies on domicile reservation vary. Uttarakhand reserves all Class III and IV jobs for candidates who have lived in the state for at least 15 years. Maharashtra also requires a similar 15-year domicile and fluency in Marathi for many government posts, effectively prioritising locals. Nagaland, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh have special constitutional provisions that reserve large fractions of local government jobs for indigenous tribes. Jammu and Kashmir had similar reservations before the abrogation of its special status in 2019. On June 2, the Central government notified 85% reservation for the residents of Ladakh. In 2023, the Jharkhand Assembly passed a Bill to reserve all government jobs in the Class III and IV category for domiciles based on the 1932 land record. But the governor returned it, citing constitutional issues, and it has not yet been implemented. Article 16(2) of the Constitution guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment and prohibits discrimination based on place of birth or residence. Article 16(3) allows only Parliament, not state governments, to prescribe residency requirements for specific posts. Besides, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled against state-level domicile reservations, emphasising national unity. In the Pradeep Jain vs Union of India case (1984), the Court held that 'sons-of-the-soil' policies are unconstitutional as they undermine equal opportunity. Exceptions exist under Article 371 for states like Nagaland to protect interests of the tribal population of the state. The Nitish Kumar-led NDA government has not yet given a direct public statement on the domicile protests. However, it has spoken out against this earlier. Last month, JD(U) leader Manish Kumar Verma said a domicile reservation policy would 'go against the Constitution', and could prompt retaliatory measures from other states and affect the millions of Bihari migrants working elsewhere. Instead, Verma said, the government was focusing on large-scale recruitment drives to address unemployment. Both RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav and Jan Suraaj head Prashant Kishor have, however, backed the demand. Yadav has even promised 100% reservation across all jobs if the RJD comes to power in the coming polls.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store