logo
U.S. Supreme Court orders review over religious challenge to New York abortion law

U.S. Supreme Court orders review over religious challenge to New York abortion law

Yahoo4 hours ago

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered a lower court in New York to reevaluate whether some religious organizations should be excluded from a state mandate that requires employers to provide employee health care plans that include abortion coverage.
The ruling from the high court said the case, Diocese of Albany v. Harris, should be sent back to New York courts to be reviewed again in light of an earlier unanimous Wisconsin case related to the Catholic Church groups being denied state tax exemptions.
The justices pointed to the Wisconsin case because the New York case poses similar issues about states exempting religious employers and faith-based groups, The Associated Press reported.
The New York case stems from a 2017 state mandate that requires health insurance plans provided by employers to include abortion coverage for situations that include rape and incest. The state mandate includes a religious exemption for institutions, but not for religious-affiliated groups.
It was challenged by Catholic and Anglican nuns, Catholic dioceses, Christian churches and other faith organizations. They argued the religious exemption is so narrow that it violates the freedom of religion protected under the First Amendment.
The most recent order from the Supreme Court is the second time the case has reached the justices after being litigated for years.
After the state adopted the mandate in 2017, religious groups challenged it in state court. The appeals court upheld the regulation and the state refused to exempt religious organizations.
In 2021, the religious groups appealed the state's ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices asked New York to reconsider based on its ruling in another case involving religion, Fulton v. Philadelphia. State courts found the Fulton decision was inapplicable to the situation, prompting the groups to bring it to the Supreme Court again.
The religious liberty law firm Becket noted in a release that New York's exemption doesn't currently apply to some organizations, including the Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm and the Teresian Nursing Home because they 'serve the elderly and dying regardless of religious affiliation.'
'New York wants to browbeat nuns into paying for abortions for the great crime of serving all those in need,' Becket Vice President and senior counsel Eric Baxter said in a statement.'
Following the Supreme Court's Monday order, the case is headed back to the New York Court of Appeals.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Under-the-Radar Healthcare Stock Could Be a Solid Income Play
This Under-the-Radar Healthcare Stock Could Be a Solid Income Play

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Under-the-Radar Healthcare Stock Could Be a Solid Income Play

CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) is one of the best dividend stocks for a bear market. Even during economic downturns, people continue to rely on medications, essential consumer products, and affordable local healthcare. CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) serves as a convenient healthcare and retail destination within communities. A row of shelves in a retail pharmacy, demonstrating the variety of drugs and over-the-counter products. The company's overall business remains solid, thanks to its diversified operations and multiple sources of revenue. In recent years, it has expanded its presence in primary care and launched a subsidiary called Cordavis to focus on developing and marketing biosimilar drugs. Its broad reach across communities and wide range of services are key advantages. Lately, higher Medicare usage and increased post-pandemic healthcare costs have impacted the company's revenue and earnings growth. However, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) remains profitable and maintains a solid cash position. In the most recent quarter, it reported $4.6 billion in operating cash flow. Looking ahead to 2025, the company has raised its full-year operating cash flow forecast from around $6.5 billion to approximately $7.0 billion. In addition, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) appears to have significant room to grow its dividend. With a cash payout ratio of just 30%, even doubling that figure would still leave it within a sustainable range. Due to this strong cash generation, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) has maintained its payouts since 1997. Currently, it offers a quarterly dividend of $0.665 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.96%, as of June 17. While we acknowledge the potential of CVS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None.

Fast Five Quiz: How Much Do You Know About Bell Palsy?
Fast Five Quiz: How Much Do You Know About Bell Palsy?

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

Fast Five Quiz: How Much Do You Know About Bell Palsy?

Bell palsy, or idiopathic facial paralysis, is the most common peripheral paralysis of the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII). Many cases of facial nerve paralysis have identifiable etiologies, such as stroke, Lyme disease, or Ramsay Hunt syndrome, but Bell palsy is, by definition, idiopathic in nature. How much do you know about Bell palsy and its management? Check your knowledge with this quick quiz. Type 2 diabetes is associated with several types of peripheral neuropathy, including Bell palsy. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy among patients with type 2 diabetes has been calculated to be as high as 53.6%. In one retrospective cohort study, 33% of participants with Bell palsy had coexisting type 2 diabetes. Additionally, obesity might increase the risk for Bell palsy. Some studies have concluded that there is a slight female preponderance among patients with Bell palsy, whereas others have found no sex predilection. Even if female sex is not a risk factor, evidence suggests that Bell palsy is associated with pregnancy. The median age of onset is 40 years, and patient age < 15 years is not a risk factor. However, Bell palsy has been identified in children and even infants. Facial nerve trauma can certainly cause symptoms resembling Bell palsy, but Bell palsy is idiopathic and does not have a traumatic etiology. If these symptoms resulted from trauma, the diagnosis would be traumatic facial nerve palsy rather than Bell palsy. Learn more about Bell palsy epidemiology. Lagophthalmos, but not true eyelid ptosis, is a characteristic feature of Bell palsy. Symptoms of Bell palsy typically have a rapid onset, manifesting from 24 to 72 hours and often resolving or partially resolving within a few weeks to 3 months. In Bell palsy, facial paralysis is usually unilateral, and bilateral facial paralysis should lead to consideration and evaluation for other etiologies. Hearing loss is not a typical symptom of Bell palsy. The presence of hearing loss indicates an association with an upper motor neuron lesion or a lesion involving more than the facial nerve. Learn more about Bell palsy presentation. A rapid evidence review on Bell palsy points out that, as the condition is idiopathic, laboratory diagnostics are not required for a diagnosis. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery concur that diagnostic testing is not needed to identify Bell palsy. The guidelines recommend that clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory testing in patients with new-onset Bell palsy, pointing out that this approach is not cost-effective. However, both the rapid evidence review and guidelines state that laboratory testing can help identify systemic causes of facial palsy symptoms, such as Lyme disease or diabetes, when reasonable clinical suspicion exists. Learn more about workup for Bell palsy. Oral corticosteroids are recommended in a rapid evidence review as the first-line treatment for Bell palsy. Guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery also recommend this approach in patients age = 16 years with Bell palsy. Antiviral monotherapy has not been demonstrated to influence recovery and should be avoided. However, combination therapy with oral corticosteroids and antivirals should be considered, as this approach consistently results in lower rates of synkinesis and might reduce rates of incomplete recovery. Local injectable anesthetic would not be an appropriate therapy because it would not address the underlying cause, lower motor neuron palsy. There is no evidence-based role for local anesthetic in the treatment of Bell palsy. Electroconvulsive therapy is mostly used in the treatment of severe mood disorders. The mechanism of action would not be expected to be useful in the treatment of facial nerve palsy. Learn more about management of Bell palsy. Along with the Sunnybrook facial grading system, the House-Brackmann scale is widely used to qualify symptom severity of Bell palsy. A patient with obvious facial weakness, inability to move the forehead, incomplete closure of the eyelids, and mouth asymmetry with maximal effort would be grade IV, moderately severe symptoms. Grade I is classified as a normal presentation with full facial function in all areas. Grade II is characterized by slight facial weakness on close inspection, slight synkinesis, and no lagophthalmos. Grade III would exhibit moderate symptoms with noticeable, but not severe, synkinesis; obvious facial asymmetry but not disfiguring; complete eyelid closure with effort; and slightly weak mouth even with maximal effort. Learn more about Bell palsy prognosis.

Feds demand Oregon Health Plan data in crackdown against immigrant coverage
Feds demand Oregon Health Plan data in crackdown against immigrant coverage

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Feds demand Oregon Health Plan data in crackdown against immigrant coverage

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Federal officials are seeking the personal data of the Medicaid-funded Oregon Health Plan as part of a crackdown on coverage for undocumented immigrants. The request, as first reported by , comes after the Department of Homeland Security provided immigration officials with similar data from California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C. 'Just wrong': Oregon advocates say SCOTUS decision targets transgender youth Oregon, like these states, has expanded medical coverage to undocumented residents through state-funded programs. On Monday, Gov. Tina Kotek said her office is reviewing the order. 'I think it's very important, to a degree that we can, that we do not share personal information,' Kotek said. 'Always comfortable with aggregated information, but when we start sharing personal medical information that could be misused, that's a challenge for me.' The state of Oregon has until the end of July 2025 to comply. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store