logo
Israeli strike on Iran ‘would be inappropriate' during nuclear talks

Israeli strike on Iran ‘would be inappropriate' during nuclear talks

Donald Trump said he has told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on striking Iran to give the US administration more time to push for a new nuclear deal with Tehran.
'I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House.
'Now, that could change at any moment. It could change with a phone call. But right now, I think they want to make a deal. And, if we can make a deal, (it would) save a lot of lives.'
The US president added that an agreement could come together 'over the next couple of weeks, if it happens'.
His comments came as the head of the United Nations' atomic watchdog said 'the jury is still out' on negotiations between Iran and the US over Tehran's nuclear programme – but described the continuing negotiations as a good sign.
Rafael Mariano Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), described himself as being in near-daily conversation with Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, as well as talking to Steve Witkoff, the US Middle East envoy.
Mr Grossi acknowledged one of his deputies was in Tehran on Wednesday. Iranian officials identified the official as Massimo Aparo, the head of the IAEA's safeguards arm.
That is the division that sends inspectors into Iran to monitor its programme, which now enriches uranium up to 60% purity – a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
'For the moment, the jury is still out. We don't know whether there's going to be an agreement or not,' Mr Grossi told journalists attending a week-long seminar at the agency in Vienna.
However, he described the ongoing meetings as a good sign.
'I think that is an indication of a willingness to come to an agreement. And I think that, in and by itself, is something possible.'
Iran and the US so far have held five rounds of talks in both Muscat, Oman, and Rome, mediated by Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi. A sixth round has yet to be set.
The talks seek to limit Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions the US has imposed on the Islamic Republic, closing in on a half-century of enmity.
Mr Trump has repeatedly threatened to unleash air strikes targeting Iran's programme, if a deal is not reached. Iranian officials increasingly warn they could pursue a nuclear weapon with their stockpile of uranium.
Mr Trump has described Iran as having an American proposal to reach a deal. However, Iran has repeatedly denied receiving such a proposal, with a fresh denial on Wednesday by Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran.
However, if a deal is reached, Iran might allow the IAEA to have American inspectors on their teams during inspections, Mr Eslami said. Americans represent the largest single nationality of IAEA employees, a 2023 agency report showed.
Before Mr Grossi's comments to journalists in Vienna, the head of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard issued a new warning to the US as the negotiations go on.
'Our fingers on the trigger, we are in ambush and we are waiting,' General Hossein Salami warned. 'If they make a mistake, they will immediately receive responses that will make them completely forget their past.'
Despite the tensions, Mr Grossi said that he believed 'there's always a way' to reach a deal between the Americans and the Iranians – even with the disagreement over enrichment. He added the IAEA had been making some 'suggestions' to both the Iranians and the Americans, without elaborating.
However, he added that any possible deal likely would require a 'solid, very robust' IAEA investigation of Iran's programme to understand where it stood after years of Tehran restricting inspectors' ability to assess it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song
Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song

It was billed by the president as a press conference.. But that was accurate only to the extent that there were a few select reporters asking questions in the Oval Office. They were part of the 'pool', a chosen group of journalists on a rota to cover the president's movements each day. The rota used to be drawn up by the White House Correspondents Association on a rotating basis. The Trump administration has changed that. They now compile the pool. And today, as it happens, the media seemed particularly compliant. The questions were soft. Painfully so. There was one on whether the president had any marital advice for his French counterpart - who appeared to be shoved by his wife the other day. Another was about whether Mr Musk thought it was harder to colonise to Mars or reform government. There were one or two about the pressing issues of the day, like Gaza, but nothing that could be described as probing or doing what we are supposed to be there to do - hold power to account. And Musk, under Trump, has without question wielded immense power over the past few months; unprecedented for an unelected official. He upended the workings of federal government, slashing thousands of jobs. He forced the closure of whole departments like USAID, changing America's global footprint. He did it all with a sense of enjoyment. The literal chainsaw to bureaucracy was memorable. 0:53 There is little debate in America about the need to cut government bureaucracy or cut the debt. America, more than any country I have lived in, is a place full of bloat and waste. Yet it was Mr Musk's methods which caused so much unease among his many critics. They argued that where a scalpel was definitely needed, Musk instead deployed a sledgehammer. At times, his flamboyant style was a neat distraction from the substance of Trump's sweeping policy changes. But none of that was interrogated in this 'press conference'. Instead, the inane questions went on. Trump was asked if he would pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs should he be convicted - he didn't say 'no', but there was no follow up to examine why. He was asked if he wished he'd become a judge given that they are blocking so much of his legislation. He laughed. There was a moment when irony appeared to have died altogether. In the same breath as trumpeting his success in cutting government waste - when he has, in fact, achieved a fraction of the $2 trillion savings he promised - Musk congratulated Trump for deploying so much gold around the Oval Office. The presidential office has had an extensive, gaudy gold makeover costing undisclosed sums. One reporter did ask about Musk's alleged drug use. But by attributing the story to the New York Times - who have made the allegations - Musk had an easy out. "Why believe that fake news," he essentially said. Surely the obvious question was "Mr Musk, when was the last time you took ketamine or ecstasy?" It never came. We did get the answer to one burning question, trivial though it was, given what's going on in the world. But it took 41 minutes for any of the reporters to ask it: Why was Elon Musk sporting a shiner on his right eye? 0:42 His 4-year-old son, X, whacked him, he said. Maybe young X has some sympathy for the thousands of federal workers - ordinary Americans - who Musk fired at his president's pleasure.

Savannah Chrisley addresses wild claim she 'slept with someone' to get parents Todd and Julie out of jail
Savannah Chrisley addresses wild claim she 'slept with someone' to get parents Todd and Julie out of jail

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Savannah Chrisley addresses wild claim she 'slept with someone' to get parents Todd and Julie out of jail

Savannah Chrisley has responded to claims that she 'slept' with someone with power to get het parents Todd and Julie pardoned by President Donald Trump this week. During a press conference in Nashville, Tennessee on Friday, the reality television personality, 27, slammed critics and defended her persistent efforts to free her mom and dad. 'Obviously the biggest misconception right now is that I either paid for a pardon or slept for a pardon,' she said to a hoard of media outlets. 'That's the biggest misconception right now, and if people knew the countless hours and the money and the time that I spent going to D.C., literally with not a meeting scheduled, and I just got on a plane and went and said, "I'm going to be in the right room at the right time and meet the right people..."' she added. Chrisley emphasized, 'I fought hard, and I was exhausted, and I begged for meetings. I was never too good to ask.' The Unlocked with Savannah podcaster stressed, 'That's the thing, is people think, "Oh, you're a celebrity, you're white, you have money," that we got an upper hand, and we didn't.' She reiterated, 'I had to fight, and I was relentless, and that's how it happened.' Todd, 56, who had been serving time for bank fraud and tax evasion before his release, also spoke out during the conference. He admitted to being unsure if fame played a part in his and his wife's pardon. 'That's not something that you can look at and say, "Well, that had nothing to do with it,"' he said candidly. During the meeting with media he also praised Savannah's tireless campaign to free her parents. 'Watching it all unfold, and listening to what she said, what was coming up next, and and just being consumed with pride while at the same time knowing that this is a long shot — because so many people are told no — and being in that, being in the prison system, anyone that says that it's a fair shake, it's not,' the former Chrisley Knows Best star explained. Reflecting on his time behind bars, he added, 'I dealt with young African-American males in the prison that I was in that were not treated the same. They were not. 'They were denied programming. They were denied access to certain things I was not denied.' During his appearance, Todd was asked by journalists whether he feels any remorse over his conviction, to which he firmly hit back. 'I would have remorse if it was something that I did,' he said. 'The corruption that went on in our case is going to continue to unfold.' Former USA Network stars Todd and Julie were both convicted in 2022 for orchestrating a $30 million bank fraud and tax evasion scheme and had been serving multi-year prison terms. Julie was sentenced to serve in Kentucky until 2028 and Todd in Florida until 2032. But on Tuesday, President Trump personally called their daughter to inform her of his bombshell decision to grant the couple clemency. Also during the high-profile press conference, the Chrisleys revealed that they already have a new reality television series in the works. Todd said he and his wife 'started filming literally the night that we got home' for a forthcoming Lifetime program. Savannah added: 'I think with this new series, you will see the first time he and mom see each other [after their respective prison releases].' Before her parents were pardoned, Savannah and her siblings had been filming a series detailing how they were coping while their parents were detained. She said: 'We obviously... we had been filming, and we had just wrapped filming for all intents and purposes and then we get the call that they had been pardoned, so we picked right back up. 'And we're excited because I think this new show is going to give... first off, it's gonna give people a look into the trial and things that we went through and we're gonna set the record straight, put some documents out there.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store