More deaths near Gaza food distribution centre: Hamas
The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on Monday towards "several suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them", around a kilometre away from the aid distribution site at a time when it was closed. The army denied it was preventing people from reaching the site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
11 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Amid Gaza war, Israel defence exports jump 13% in 2024 to record $15bn
JERUSALEM: Israel's defence exports rose 13% in 2024 to a record of nearly $15 billion, led by missiles, rockets and air-defence systems with over half the deliveries going to European militaries, the government said on Wednesday. Military exports, the Defence Ministry said in a statement, have more than doubled over the past five years, reaching nearly $15 billion in value in 2024. The ministry said that since the outbreak of the Gaza war on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel's defence industries have operated in emergency mode with round-the-clock arms production while also maintaining manufacturing for foreign clients. 'The new record in Israeli defence exports, achieved during a year of war, reflects more than anything else the growing global appreciation for Israeli technology's proven capabilities,' said Defence Ministry Director-General Amir Baram. Israel in talks with US to reduce Trump tariffs 'Israeli systems have resonated throughout the Middle East this past year. More nations want to protect their citizens using Israeli defence equipment.' The ministry said there was significant growth in contracts from Europe last year, where exports accounted for 54% of the total, up from 36% in 2023. Asia-Pacific was next at 23% with the United States at 9%. Missile, rocket and air defence systems comprised 48% of defence exports, followed by vehicles and armoured personnel carriers at 9%, and satellites and space systems, radar and electronic warfare, manned aircraft and avionics at 8% each. Some 57% of contracts amounted to more than $100 million.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - We're in an era of ideological violence, and it's only getting worse
A CEO gunned down on an early morning Manhattan street. A young couple shot dead outside an event in the nation's capital. Separated by a few hundred miles and a few months, these two events perfectly encapsulate the era of ideological violence we are living in. A crazed man attacking Jews with a makeshift flamethrower while yelling 'Free Palestine' in Colorado is just the latest example in a trend that feels ominously like it is picking up pace. For years, we have managed threats to executives, celebrities and high-net-worth individuals. The threats against these groups have increased exponentially. It mirrors the zeitgeist in the country, which feels like it is on a razor's edge. Threats and who could become a target are evolving quickly beyond people with high profiles. Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was murdered in December, had a security detail and knew that he worked in a sector of the economy that many feel is deeply unjust. But he surely had no sense that he would become the personification of those grievances, and that his killer would become a folk hero to those who harbor similar grievances. Last month, when Israeli embassy employees Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky were leaving an event focused on humanitarian approaches to foreign policy, they were also surely aware of the vitriol directed at Israel for the war in Gaza and at Jews in general as a result. But this young couple was to face a similar fate as Thompson — becoming the personification of a grievance by a deluded individual, catalyzed towards violence by a society that no longer provides guardrails to curtail it. Social media has brought some good things into our lives. It allows us to keep in touch with old friends, share details of our lives broadly with our networks and get beyond traditional gatekeepers of media to broaden perspectives and quickly find out what's going on in the world. But in many ways, it is a scourge of our time. Algorithms consumed with driving engagement have become outrage machines and lesser minds fall prey to their catastrophic cacophony. Monitoring threats on social media and in other dark corners of the web has become a big part of the corporate security business. We use the same AI that powers the algorithms used by social media companies to drive us mad with anger to gauge who is potentially serious about committing violence by evaluating negative sentiment. We combine analytically driven approaches to language and frequency of posting with tools like background investigations into someone who might pose a threat to our protectee or company. It works, and we frequently take actions that mitigate threats, but it is a game of whack-a-mole. While these types of threats and the realization of the violence that they can bring are chilling and grab the headlines, disgruntled former employees and marginalized individuals with mental illness who have fixated on a celebrity or executive are the more traditional threats that remain the focus of our work. But something is at work in America that is deeply disturbing and changing the threat landscape. Professional athletes have always been under an intense spotlight and have faced the wrath of disappointed fans. But Red Sox pitcher Liam Hendricks described a new reality last month as the latest player to come forward about the many death threats that he has received. Many of these threats have arisen out of the miasma of legalized gambling, with a fan enraged when a pitcher like Hendricks gives up a lead and the gambler's bet is blown. With money on the line and the easy anonymity of social media available, it isn't hard for these gamblers to make vicious threats. And with a wealth of personal identifiable information about any of our lives out there (one threat against Hendricks alluded to the sliding door in his home) it is frightening how real these dangers can be. Hendricks is a cancer survivor and some of these individuals have messaged him that they wish he succumbed to the disease. He is not an outlier — Jarren Duran, an outfielder also with the Boston Red Sox, has bravely discussed suicidal ideations and recently had a fan in Cleveland scream at him that he wished he killed himself. While the trend of ideological violence has complex roots, it is further empowered and manifested by President Trump, who seems to revel in malice and cruelty, especially against anyone he feels may be against him. The examples are manifold, but the gleeful and dishonest purging of many innocent immigrants who have done nothing wrong and have, in many cases, fled violence in their home countries is but one example. The current administration is also awash in conspiracy theorists who have amplified the darkest and most vile rumors online. In many ways, the president of the United States sets the tone for the country. Previous presidents have tried to calm anger and violence in the country — this administration fuels it. Other presidents have tried to unite the country — this one seeks to further divide it. The fault of this crisis of ideological violence doesn't reside with the president, but he is making it worse. Indeed, Trump nearly lost his life to the trend during two assassination attempts last year. We are in the business of forecasting threats and protecting our clients. Doing the work we do, monitoring social media and the dark web for percolating threats and evaluating the fault lines of foreign affairs for other drivers of risk, we are predicting a continued rise in ideological violence. Unfortunately, it is the average American citizen who is likely to bear the continued burden of the violence of this unfortunate era. Don Aviv CPP, PSP, PCI, is CEO of Interfor International. Jeremy Hurewitz is Head of Interfor Academy and the author of 'Sell Like a Spy.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-What might happen in Israel's parliamentary dissolution vote?
(Reuters) -Opposition party Yesh Atid has submitted a vote to dissolve the Israeli parliament, known as the Knesset, for June 11, amid rising tensions in the ruling right-wing coalition. Here are some key facts about the Knesset, the procedure for a dissolution vote, which would lead to an election, and possible scenarios. KNESSET COMPOSITION Total seats: 120 Simple majority needed to pass the vote: 61 Current government majority: 8 seats LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE The Yesh Atid motion faces four votes with an absolute majority of the Knesset required in the final stretch to become law, thereby bringing a premature end to the legislature and triggering an election, which must be held within five months of the motion passing. In practice, if the initial vote passes, the subsequent stages could occur all the same day or take months. OPPOSITION STRATEGY A bill to dissolve parliament will only be brought to a vote if Yesh Atid is confident of securing a majority. If not, it can withdraw the motion anytime before June 11, preventing a vote. ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS Ultra-Orthodox coalition parties could decide to leave the government to protest at its failure to put forward a law granting exemption from military service to ultra-Orthodox men. At the same time, they might refuse to vote for dissolution of parliament, allowing a minority government to continue. COALITION NUMBERS The coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a majority of around 68 seats in parliament, though its size has fluctuated due to internal political shifts. The two coalition ultra-Orthodox parties, United Torah Judaism and Shas, hold 18 seats collectively. If they united with the opposition, they would have enough votes to dissolve parliament and trigger early elections a year ahead of schedule.
