Nova Scotia landowners can say no to uranium exploration on their properties: deputy
Nova Scotia's deputy minister of natural resources says private landowners whose property has been identified for potential uranium exploration can say no.
Karen Gatien told reporters Tuesday that letters are being sent to property owners in three selected areas, and the government hopes there will at least be conversations about possible exploration.
However, she says property owners retain surface rights to the land and don't have to agree to allow activity on their property.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The provincial government added uranium to its list of priority critical minerals earlier this month and issued a request for exploration proposals at three sites it says have known deposits of the heavy metal.
Each of the three sites is on private land, and Natural Resources Minister Tory Rushton has said the government would begin talks with the landowners about possible exploration.
Story continues below advertisement
The locations are: an 80-hectare site in Louisville in Pictou County; a 64-hectare site in East Dalhousie in Annapolis County; and a 2,300-hectare site in Millet Brook in Hants County.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 28, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
14 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Manitoba premier promotes more interprovincial trade, possible energy corridor
WINNIPEG - Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has announced another interprovincial trade deal, and has promoted plans for a northern energy corridor that could include a pipeline. Kinew told the Manitoba Chambers of Commerce that his government is finalizing a memorandum with British Columbia to cut trade barriers between the two provinces. Similar to a recent deal with Ontario, it's aimed at allowing more goods and services to flow freely, and Kinew says it will give Manitobans access to another big market. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Kinew also told the business crowd he plans to have Manitoba show itself as the path to getting natural resources to tidewater. He says among the possibilities are a new port on Hudson Bay and a pipeline to carry anything from oil to potash slurry. Kinew says something needs to get built in Western Canada, and it's up to the private sector to build a business case for the best plan. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025
Global News
17 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump wants Supreme Court to allow for gutting of education department
Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to 'second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions,' referring to the federal government's executive branch. 'The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach,' the filing said. Story continues below advertisement The department, created by a U.S. law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85% of public school funding comes from state and local governments. It provides federal grants for needy schools and programs, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programs and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the $1.6 trillion in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many U.S. conservatives. 1:50 Trump to sign executive order in attempt to close down U.S. Education Department Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorized by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Story continues below advertisement Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Trump called the order a first step 'to eliminate' the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its 'final mission.' Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself,' the judge wrote. Story continues below advertisement White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling 'misguided.' The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Joun. —Reporting by John Kruzel
Winnipeg Free Press
18 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
AFN to hold emergency meeting with chiefs on major projects bill
OTTAWA – The Assembly of First Nations will hold an emergency meeting to discuss the implications of proposed federal legislation that would speed up approvals for major projects. National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak says she met yesterday with Prime Minister Mark Carney about the bill his government plans to table today, adding that she remains 'deeply concerned' about the potential impact on consultations with First Nations. The meeting with Carney followed a series of comments by federal ministers about the legislation and Ottawa's duty to consult with Indigenous Peoples that Woodhouse Nepinak called 'disheartening.' Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Rebecca Alty told The Canadian Press that filling the First Nations infrastructure gap would not qualify as 'nation-building' under the legislation, while Justice Minister Sean Fraser said First Nations don't get a 'veto' over infrastructure projects. Former national chief Phil Fontaine called for the emergency meeting on Monday, saying Canada's governments are trampling on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Assembly of First Nations will also hold a meeting with its executive committee to discuss strategy and the potential legal implications of the legislation ahead of its annual general assembly in July. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025.
