
EXCLUSIVE Ava White's schoolboy killer unmasked: Murderer's identity is revealed on his 18th birthday after he stabbed 12-year-old to death outside Primark in petty row over Snapchat video
The teenage boy who murdered 12-year-old Ava White can today be named and pictured for the first time after he turned 18.
Harry Gilbertson was just 14 when he stabbed the schoolgirl in the neck following a petty row over a Snapchat video, in November 2021.
Following the attack, the teenager ran away, leaving Ava - who had been in Liverpool city centre with friends to watch the Christmas lights switch-on - bleeding to death on the pavement.
Gilbertson was convicted of Ava's murder after a two-week trial and locked up for a minimum of 13 years.
But the judge refused calls from Ava's family and the Press for him to be named, saying the risk to his family, in particular his younger siblings, was too great.
Today, however, the Mail can identify and picture Gilbertson for the first time on his 18th birthday after he officially became an adult.
Ava's mother, Leeann White, 42, said: 'It is important the public know who he is.
'The public know everything about Ava – her name was splashed everywhere when she died.
'Why shouldn't everyone know what he did? Why should he be protected?
'He was the one in the wrong, he was the one who went out that night with a knife.
'He's never shown any remorse.
'I know he was only a child himself when it happened but children know right from wrong and my child knew not to pick up a knife and stab someone.
'His name needs to be out there to act as a deterrent to others who might be thinking about carrying knives.'
Ms White said that she now believed that 'with hindsight' Mrs Justice Yip, who presided over Gilbertson's trial at Liverpool Crown Court, had been right to prevent him from being named initially.
'If the judge had named him then he would probably be getting a new identity on his 18th birthday so, in a way, I am glad she didn't,' Ms White added.
'I definitely don't want that.
'I've waited all this time for his name to be out there, if he was given a new identity and I didn't know who he was I don't think I would be able to go on living.'
Ava had been drinking vodka with her friends on November 25, 2021 when they encountered Gilbertson.
She became angry when he filmed her rolling around and laughing on the floor and posted it online.
Ava - who attended Notre Dame Catholic College in Everton - demanded Gilbertson delete the video from Snapchat.
But an argument developed and he stabbed her in the neck with a three-inch flick knife.
Gilbertson told jurors he carried the knife to make himself 'feel big'.
He claimed he stabbed her in self-defence.
But the court heard he 'grinned' as Ava lay dying, before running off to discard his coat and the weapon.
Jurors rejected his version of events and convicted him of Ava's murder.
Mrs Justice Yip was told that Gilbertson was de-sensitised to violence after witnessing his father attack his mother at home.
He had also been made the subject of a community resolution notice four months before Ava's murder for hitting a police community support officer on the head.
At the time of Ava's death he was awaiting trial for assaulting two women and was known to local police who were concerned he was being groomed into a criminal gang.
Sentencing Gilbertson, who has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and attended a special school, Mrs Justice Yip highlighted the role that social media played in the case, saying it was tragic that 'something so small' as a Snapchat video had left a young girl dead.
She told him: 'There is only one reason why Ava is dead and that is because you chose to carry a knife and you chose to get it out and use it.'
Ms White told the Mail that she agreed with Esther Ghey, 38, whose 16-year-old daughter Brianna was also stabbed to death by teenage killers, that the Government needed to do more to protect children from dangers associated with social media sites, such as Snapchat.
She said that despite Gilbertson being locked up in a young offenders' prison he had managed to post a picture of himself on the social media site – on what would have been Ava's 15th birthday in January last year.
'I know he got read the riot act for that,' Ms White added.
'They told me he used a tablet that was supposed to be for educational purposes to post it and that there was a glitch in the prison systems that allowed him to get onto the Internet, but I just don't buy that.
'They said it was just a coincidence that it was posted on Ava's birthday.
'It's disgusting, he didn't even get any extra time added onto his sentence.'
Ms White added: 'I've met Esther and agree with her campaigns.
'All social media does is cause harm and distress. Everything children are exposed to on there is frightening.'
Although almost four years have passed since Ava's death, Ms White said she finds it really hard to cope with the loss of her youngest child.
The mother-of-two tearfully added: 'I'm really up and down.
'Some days I'm okay, other days are really bad and I can't stop crying.
'It doesn't get any easier, it seems to get harder as time goes on.
'It really was so senseless what happened to Ava.
'I don't agree with violence at all, but I'm always thinking "Why couldn't he have just pushed or shoved her?"
'She was only 12, he was 14. She was a girl and he was a boy.
'Why didn't he just push her, he didn't have to stab her in the neck.'
She said the Ava White Foundation, which she set up in the wake of her daughter's murder, 'keeps me going.'
The not-for-profit organisation campaigns against knife crime and aims to fund and deliver specialist bleed packs to schools, youth clubs, pubs and train and bus stations across north west England.
They also visits schools to educate schoolchildren on the dangers of carrying knives and to teach them practical life-saving skills.
'To be honest I don't know where I would be without it,' Ms White, a former shop assistant, of Liverpool, added.
'It gives me a reason to get up in the morning.
'I know I have to do this for Ava and it keeps me going each day until I get home.'
The Ministry of Justice was approached for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Chris Brown due to enter plea over ‘bottle attack' charge
R&B singer Chris Brown is due to appear in court to enter a plea after he was charged over an alleged bottle attack at a London nightclub two years ago. The American musician, 36, was able to continue with his scheduled international tour after he was freed on conditional bail last month. Brown, accused of causing grievous bodily harm to Abraham Diaw in February 2023, is set to appear at Southwark Crown Court on Friday morning alongside his co-defendant, US national Omololu Akinlolu, 38, for a plea and trial preparation hearing. The Go Crazy singer had to pay a £5 million security fee to the court as part of the bail agreement, which is a financial guarantee to ensure a defendant returns to court and may be forfeited if they breach bail conditions. Brown and Akinlolu have both been charged relating to the alleged assault at the Tape venue in Hanover Square in Mayfair on February 19 2023. Manchester Magistrates' Court heard last month that Mr Diaw was standing at the bar of the Tape nightclub when he was struck several times with a bottle, and was then pursued to a separate area of the nightclub where he was punched and kicked repeatedly. Brown was arrested at Manchester's Lowry Hotel at 2am on May 15 by detectives from the Metropolitan Police. He is said to have flown into Manchester Airport on a private jet in preparation for the UK tour dates. Brown was released from HMP Forest Bank in Salford, Greater Manchester, on May 21. Shortly after being released from prison, Brown posted an Instagram story referencing his upcoming tour. It said: 'FROM THE CAGE TO THE STAGE!!! BREEZYBOWL.'


Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Post Office Capture scandal: Sir Alan Bates calls for those responsible for wrongful convictions to be 'brought to account'
Why you can trust Sky News Sir Alan Bates has called for those responsible for the wrongful convictions of sub postmasters in the Capture IT scandal to be "brought to account". It comes after Sky News unearthed a report showing Post Office lawyers knew of faults in the software nearly three decades ago. The documents, found in a garage by a retired computer expert, describe the Capture system as "an accident waiting to happen". 11:28 Sir Alan said the Sky News investigation showed "yet another failure of government oversight; another failure of the Post Office board to ensure [the] Post Office recruited senior people competent of bringing in IT systems" and management that was "out of touch with what was going on within its organisation". The unearthed Capture report was commissioned by the defence team for sub postmistress Patricia Owen and served on the Post Office in 1998 at her trial. It described the software as "quite capable of producing absurd gibberish" and concluded "reasonable doubt" existed as to "whether any criminal offence" had taken place. Ms Owen was found guilty of stealing from her branch and given a suspended prison sentence. She died in 2003 and her family had always believed the computer expert, who was due to give evidence on the report, "never turned up". Adrian Montagu reached out after seeing a Sky News report earlier this year and said he was actually stood down by the defending barrister with "no reason given". The barrister said he had no recollection of the case. Victims and their lawyers hope the newly found "damning" expert report, which may never have been seen by a jury, could help overturn Capture convictions. 1:49 'These people have to be brought to account' Sir Alan, the leading campaigner for victims of the Horizon Post Office scandal, said while "no programme is bug free, why [was the] Post Office allowed to transfer the financial risk from these bugs on to a third party ie the sub postmaster, and why did its lawyers continue with prosecutions seemingly knowing of these system bugs?" He continued: "Whether it was incompetence or corporate malice, these people have to be brought to account for their actions, be it for Capture or Horizon." More than 100 victims have come forward More than 100 victims, including those who were not convicted but who were affected by the faulty software, have so far come forward. Capture was used in 2,500 branches between 1992 and 1999, just before Horizon was introduced - which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body responsible for investigating potential miscarriages of justice, is currently looking at a number of Capture convictions. A CCRC spokesperson told Sky News: "We have received applications regarding 29 convictions which pre-date Horizon. 25 of these applications are being actively investigated by case review managers, and two more recent applications are in the preparatory stage and will be assigned to case review managers before the end of June. "We have issued notices under s.17 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 to Post Office Ltd requiring them to produce all material relating to the applications received. "To date, POL have provided some material in relation to 17 of the cases and confirmed that they hold no material in relation to another 5. The CCRC is awaiting a response from POL in relation to 6 cases." A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: "Postmasters negatively affected by Capture endured immeasurable suffering. We continue to listen to those who have been sharing their stories on the Capture system, and have taken their thoughts on board when designing the Capture Redress Scheme."


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boarding school gave me PTSD but I locked it away until my daughter started to board. Then it triggered a breakdown that saw me sectioned: DR CATHY WIELD
Lying in the darkness, the loneliness and panic hit. It was terror, mostly, of the dormitory bullies who could strike without warning or reason. Also the cruelty of the matrons, picking up on some minor infringement. And that all-consuming feeling of abandonment. The nightmare of boarding school was beginning, all over again. This may sound familiar to many of the alumni of this very British institution, particularly those who boarded in the 1970s like I did. But the dread and horror I was experiencing was not due to revisiting my own school.