logo
Women can be drafted into the Danish military as Russian aggression and military investment grows

Women can be drafted into the Danish military as Russian aggression and military investment grows

Yahooa day ago

HOVELTE, Denmark (AP) — Peering across a dense stretch of woodland outside of Denmark's capital with camouflage paint smeared across her face, 20-year-old Katrine scans the horizon for approaching threats.
After nearly four months of military training, the young soldier and the rest of her unit spent early June completing their final exercises near the Danish army's barracks in Hovelte, 25 kilometers (15 miles) north of Copenhagen.
Katrine and other female soldiers, all of whom spoke to The Associated Press on June 11 on the condition that only their first names be used because of operational security, volunteered for military service earlier this year. Until now, that was the only way for women to be part of the armed forces.
The Scandinavian country is seeking to increase the number of young people in the military by extending compulsory enlistment to women for the first time. Men and women can both still volunteer, and the remaining places will be filled by a gender-neutral draft lottery.
'In the situation the world is in now, it's needed,' Katrine said. 'I think it's only fair and right that women participate equally with men.'
Under new rules passed by Denmark's parliament earlier in June, Danish women who turn 18 after Tuesday will be entered into the lottery system, on equal footing with their male compatriots. The change comes against a backdrop of Russian aggression and growing military investment across NATO countries.
Russia's looming threat
Even from the relative safety of Denmark, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine casts its shadow. Lessons from the Ukrainian battlefields have even filtered down into their training.
'That makes it very real,' Katrine said.
Denmark's gender-parity reforms were originally outlined in 2024 as part of a major defense agreement. The program was originally expected to be implemented by early 2027, but has been brought forward to summer 2025.
Col. Kenneth Strøm, head of the conscription program, told AP the move is based on 'the current security situation.'
'They could take part in NATO collective deterrence,' Strøm added. 'Raising the number of conscripts, that would simply lead to more combat power.'
Denmark, a nation of 6 million people, has about 9,000 professional troops. The new arrangement is expected to bring up to 6,500 annual conscripts by 2033, up from 4,700 last year.
Under Danish law, all physically fit men over age 18 are called up for military service. But because there are usually enough volunteers, there's a lottery system so not all young men serve. Women, by contrast, could only volunteer previously, making up roughly a quarter of 2024's cohort.
'Some will probably be very disappointed being chosen to go into the military,' Anne Sofie, part of Katrine's cohort of volunteers, said of the new female conscripts. 'Some will probably be surprised and like it a lot more than they think they would.'
The duration of service is also being extended from four to 11 months. Conscripts will first spend five months in basic training, followed by six months of operational service, plus additional lessons.
Military buildup
The move is part of a broader military buildup by the Nordic nation.
In February, Denmark's government announced plans to bolster its military by setting up a $7 billion fund that it said would raise the country's defense spending to more than 3% of gross domestic product this year. Parts of the conscript program are being financed by the so-called Acceleration Fund.
'We see a sharpened security situation in Europe. We have the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. We have focus on the Baltic countries, where Denmark is contributing a lot of soldiers. So, I think it's a general effort to strengthen the Danish defense,' said researcher Rikke Haugegaard from the Royal Danish Defense College.
But Haugegaard notes there are many challenges, from ill-fitting equipment and a lack of additional barracks, to potential cases of sexual harassment.
'For the next year or two, we will be building a lot of new buildings to accommodate all these people. So, it will be a gradual process,' she added.
In 2017, neighboring Sweden instituted a military draft for both men and women after its government spoke of a deteriorating security environment in Europe. Norway introduced its own law applying military conscription to both sexes in 2013.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: Forget ‘America First.' Trump ‘has no coherent foreign policy'
Letters to the Editor: Forget ‘America First.' Trump ‘has no coherent foreign policy'

Los Angeles Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Forget ‘America First.' Trump ‘has no coherent foreign policy'

To the editor: What contributing writer Josh Hammer experienced in Israel under Iran's retaliatory response to Israel's unprovoked attack hardly compares with what the Gazans have been subjected to over the last two years ('Trump's strike against Iran was 'America First' in action,' June 27). The damage to Israeli infrastructure was manageable compared with what the Gazans have suffered, and a frightened Hammer found a way out. The Palestinians, suffering an arguably genocidal assault, have no such options. Astonishingly, Hammer celebrates President Trump's order to strike a sovereign state as an 'America First' action. He cites Michael Anton's article, laughably titled 'The Trump Doctrine.' In fact, Trump has no coherent foreign policy that can be reasonably described as a doctrine. Under 'America First,' all we have is a series of capricious tariff directives, the brutal and unlawful detention and deportation of migrants both documented and undocumented, a condemnatory view of our NATO responsibilities and a manufacturing base in decline. Trump lacks the intellectual capacity to construct a coherent political doctrine. If it serves his interests, he has no problem entangling the U.S. in another foreign conflict. Consistent with the dubious Israeli narrative deployed to justify these unilateral attacks, Hammer characterizes Iran as the No. 1 state sponsor of terrorism, while Israel launches military strikes with near impunity throughout the region under the guise of preemptive action. Hammer absurdly describes Operation Midnight Hammer as a great act of presidential statesmanship. I ask you, how much lower can the bar be set? Andrew Spathis, Los Angeles .. To the editor: In trying to defend Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, Hammer cites the only fact he can find to support his argument: '94% of self-identified MAGA Republicans support Operation Midnight Hammer.' He cited no national poll. Apparently, all that's needed for an action to be seen as successful is to have the MAGA base show support. Despite Trump frequently signing his name on social media as 'Donald J. Trump, president of the United States,' clearly, Trump is not the president of all Americans, but just those that voted for him. He should sign his posts, 'Donald J. Trump, president of MAGA.' Mark Chipman, San Diego

Ukraine Sees Mixed Results at the 2025 NATO Summit
Ukraine Sees Mixed Results at the 2025 NATO Summit

Newsweek

time43 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Ukraine Sees Mixed Results at the 2025 NATO Summit

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Foreign officials and senior delegates met at The Hague for the 2025 NATO summit last month. During the two-day event, they emphasized the importance of collective security, explored ways to enhance the defense industrial base, and addressed Alliance defense spending. Aside from these topics, NATO members also discussed the organization's relationship with Ukraine, as well as Russia's ongoing war. In previous years, NATO-Ukraine relations were a key focus of the summit. In 2022, NATO members stated that they would directly contribute to Ukraine's defense. They also openly condemned Russia's "war of aggression against Ukraine," and members agreed to send weapons and technology to Ukraine. Then, in 2023, Alliance members established the NATO-Ukraine Council, a body that "advance[s] political dialogue, engagement, cooperation, and Ukraine's aspirations for membership in NATO." The NATO-Ukraine Council also "provides for joint consultations, decision-making, and activities." Outside of the establishment of this group, NATO members removed a membership action plan requirement for Ukraine. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks after the signing of an agreement for establishing a special tribunal to try top officials responsible for Russia's invasion of Ukraine at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France, on... Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks after the signing of an agreement for establishing a special tribunal to try top officials responsible for Russia's invasion of Ukraine at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France, on June 25, 2025. More FREDERICK FLORIN/AFP via Getty Images During the 2024 summit, NATO members stated that they would "station a senior civilian officer in Kyiv" so that Ukrainian officials could work more closely with NATO representatives. They also established the Ukraine Compact program that would "provide Ukraine with weapons, ammunition, and training necessary to repel Russian forces." The discussions held at the 2022, 2023, and 2024 summits, along with the actions taken during and after the meetings, signaled that the Alliance was ready, willing, and able to assist Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression. Events at the 2025 NATO summit, however, presented a different tone. The NATO-Ukraine Council was initially supposed to be a prominent part of the summit. In addition, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was to play a key role alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and other officials. But the agenda significantly changed. This was reportedly because the United States did "not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security," and the U.S. wanted Ukraine to have less involvement at the 2025 summit. As a result, President Zelensky was only invited to the NATO-Ukraine Council working dinner event. This marked a significant shift from previous NATO summits, during which President Zelensky held several high-level meetings with officials from NATO member states. Additionally, not everyone attended the NATO-Ukraine Council dinner. This further suggested that NATO members had relegated the importance of NATO-Ukraine relations. Furthermore, some officials publicly denounced Ukraine's future with the Alliance. During the 2025 NATO summit, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said that "NATO has no business in Ukraine." Similarly, members of the Trump-Vance administration stated that Ukraine should not join NATO. The declaration issued at the end of the 2025 NATO summit saw a change in tone regarding Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Unlike the NATO summits from 2022 to 2024, which mentioned Russia's war and NATO's relationship with Ukraine dozens of times, the 2025 joint statement only listed Ukraine twice. The declaration also did not condemn Russia's war. This was a significant departure from previous summits. Many supporters of Ukraine were left disappointed. They were puzzled by NATO's new approach, and some even argued that this was a victory for Russia. Critics will be right to question why NATO took a lesser approach in condemning Russia's war in the NATO declaration this year. But actions speak louder than words. During the summit, Alliance members committed to future assistance to Ukraine by linking aid to the new 5 percent annual gross domestic product (GDP) threshold for defense spending. This is particularly significant, as the decision is a victory for both NATO and Ukraine. Including defense aid to Ukraine in the calculation of the 5 percent GDP threshold will help NATO members meet this commitment. It also allows Ukraine to continue defending itself against Russia. Intertwining aid to Ukraine with NATO's defense framework suggests that Ukraine will continue to be part of the Alliance's strategic planning. This is much more important to Ukraine than words issued in the summit's final declaration. In addition, NATO members pledged to provide €40 billion in defense aid to Ukraine in 2025. According to reports, €35 billion in security assistance has already been supplied to Ukraine this year. This suggests that, despite some political tensions within the Alliance toward Ukraine and Russian aggression, NATO members remain committed to supporting Ukraine. Finally, while Zelensky was not as involved as he had been in the 2025 NATO summit as in previous years, he did still meet with Secretary-General Rutte. In addition, NATO Deputy Secretary General Radmila Shekerinska reaffirmed that NATO is committed to "sustain[ing] and strengthen[ing] support to Ukraine." Overall, the 2025 NATO summit presented mixed messages to Ukraine. On the one hand, NATO has articulated that it will continue to provide unwavering support for Ukraine. It will send tens of billions of euros in defense assistance to Ukraine. Additionally, NATO members will assist Ukraine in strengthening its defense industrial base. Finally, aid to Ukraine will be intertwined with defense spending commitments made by NATO members. But on the other hand, Ukraine's role at the 2025 NATO summit was relegated. Several officials from member states questioned or criticized Ukraine's future with the Alliance. Finally, supporters of Ukraine were hoping for firmer commitments from NATO during the summit, but this never came. Ukraine received mixed results during the 2025 NATO summit. Given this ambiguity, time will tell how the NATO-Ukraine relationship will unfold. Mark Temnycky is a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Center and a freelance journalist covering Eurasian affairs. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

The high costs of Trump's ‘peace through strength'
The high costs of Trump's ‘peace through strength'

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

The high costs of Trump's ‘peace through strength'

It requires a lot of resources to do what the United States did to Iran last month. The U.S. developed and built the bunker busters, as well as the stealth bombers capable of flying them halfway around the world. It developed the intelligence to figure out where to hit, and was able to coordinate the airstrikes with a barrage of precision missiles launched from nuclear submarines lurking in the Arabian Sea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store