logo
Area districts advance cyber programs, call for even playing field

Area districts advance cyber programs, call for even playing field

Yahoo28-04-2025

The vibe inside the Conneaut Cyber Academy cyber lounge on Friday was low key, but that was part of the appeal.
A couple of easy chairs in one corner were empty, and the coffee maker in another was silent. Seated at tables in the middle of the room, juniors Amanda Shearer, Daylee Watson and Mitchell Lasko checked their computers before heading from Linesville to Meadville for the second half of their school day in various Crawford Tech programs. In another corner of the room, Jason Wertelet, one of the district's two full-time cyber teachers, was seated in front of two widescreen monitors, ready to answer questions on topics ranging from pre-algebra for seventh graders to AP calculus.
The flexibility offered by taking some classes online through the Conneaut Cyber Academy, now in its 15th year, has been a game-changer for the 55 full-time students in the program this year as well as the 80 students, like Shearer, Watson and Lasko, whose schedules are a blend of in-person and cyber classes.
'It's really nice,' Shearer said of the cyber option. 'We can't take all of our classes like other students can because we only have half a day here.'
Last year, for instance, Shearer couldn't fit an agriculture class into her half-day schedule at Conneaut Area Senior High (CASH). Taking the class online through Conneaut Cyber Academy allowed her to remain in the school's FFA club, where enrollment in an ag class is a requirement. This year, she is taking physical education and health online while taking agriculture in person.
For Watson, cyber versions of her Spanish and health classes enable her to balance classes at CASH, the sports medicine program at Crawford Tech, and the demands of a wrestling schedule that saw her earn a silver medal at the PIAA championships in Hershey last month.
'I'm able to do some work at home and not overwhelm myself at school with so many classes,' Watson said. 'With the cyber classes, we can get it done any time we have an opening.'
Lasko, who spends half his school day working at Griffin Motors Co. through Crawford Tech's cooperative education program, wouldn't be able to take all of his required classes this semester if not for the cyber option.
'I like it because I've got a pretty busy schedule these days as a co-op student, and I don't have time to get all my school work done in school,' Lasko said. 'So it's nice to have all week to get the assignments done on your own time.'
The program is not for everyone, according to Wertelet, who was been part of Conneaut's cyber offerings since they were launched.
'There has to be a self-motivation for the students,' he said. That attitude is sometimes lacking, he added, in students who come to Conneaut's cyber school from other cyber programs expecting an easy ride.
'I can tell when some students come from other cyber programs and they just will open up an assignment and submit an assignment because they've had teachers that have never even looked at anything before,' he said. 'I'm like, I'm sorry — I actually grade.'
Calls for changes
Like the students in the cyber classes, area school districts are hoping that in-house options can reshape the current cyber school landscape. In addition to building their own programs, the districts continue to mobilize in favor of major changes to how the state funds cyber charter schools, their primary competition in the world of online education.
It's a war that has featured numerous skirmishes over the past decade, many of them coming in the form of springtime griping from district officials concerned about the impact of cyber charter tuition costs on annual budgets.
More recently, however, local districts have grown increasingly vocal in their calls for reform following the February release of an audit of cyber charter school performance from 2020 to 2023 by the Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General.
Among several key findings, the report described how the fund balances of cyber charter schools ballooned from $254 million to $619 million in the three-year period of the audit, an increase of 144 percent. The report also noted that while students who transfer to cyber charter schools from different districts receive similar educations, the tuition charges to their home districts can vary widely — from $6,975 to $25,150 per student for regular education and from $18,329 to $60,166 per student for special education. Because each of Pennsylvania's 500 school districts is required to calculate its own rate for regular and special education cyber charter tuition, there are 1,000 distinct tuition rates paid across the state to each cyber charter school, according to the auditor general's report.
Board members in Crawford Central School District last month unanimously endorsed a letter to Sen. Michele Brooks and Rep. Brad Roae, the legislators who represent Crawford Central residents, calling for changes. In addition to endorsing 'a comprehensive reassessment of the cyber charter school funding model,' the letter asked Brooks and Roae to consider requiring students to use a district's own cyber platform rather than private cyber charter schools.
Last year, Conneaut board members endorsed a similar letter to legislators that called for cyber charter tuition costs for regular education to be capped at $10,000 per student with an added provision that would have required all school districts to pay the statewide tuition rate or their calculated charter school tuition rate, whichever was lower.
Earlier this month, PENNCREST School District officials encouraged district residents to send similar letters to Roae and Brooks calling for cyber charter reform.
PENNCREST board member Tim Brown said he was disappointed to find both Brooks and Roae 'standoffish' when he raised the subject of cyber charter reform at a recent Republican Party event.
'As many letters as we can get out, we should,' Brown said.
'That's the key,' board President Bob Johnston agreed. 'They've heard from us board members, and I think they're just getting tired of hearing from us.'
Response from legislators
It's not as though years of school district concerns regarding cyber charter funding have been ignored. In fact, the latest calls for change come after major changes in 2024, according to Brooks.
'Last year we enacted significant reforms that included a reduction in cyber charter school special education costs by approximately $190 million annually beginning January 1st of this year,' Brooks said in a statement to The Meadville Tribune. 'In addition, school districts received $100 million in cyber charter reimbursements. Ethics and transparency measures were also passed at that time. I have to believe we'll see additional movement and reforms on this topic during this year's budget.'
Roae, on the other hand, appeared less sympathetic to the idea of increasing limitations on cyber charter school funding. In an emailed statement, he highlighted Conneaut's spending, saying the district spends about $25,000 per student, well above the national average.
'When a student leaves for a cyber charter school, Conneaut pays $14,875 tuition,' Roae said. 'Conneaut gets to keep the other $10,129 even though they no longer have to educate that student.'
Capping cyber charter tuition costs at $8,000 per student, Roae said, would mean 'Conneaut would keep $17,004 for a student that they no longer have, but the school educating that child would only get $8,000.'
'All local districts have similar numbers,' he added.
Fair competition
It's an argument Roae has made before and that school district officials have responded to before. One point of contention is that school districts spend thousands per student on costs associated with brick-and-mortar buildings, transportation and other requirements that cyber charter schools don't incur. While individual students may depart for cyber charter schools, these costs remain — but at least part of the tax revenue that should pay form them follows the student to the cyber charter school that doesn't have to transport students or maintain the same infrastructure-intensive system of buildings.
In responding to arguments like Roae's, Jarrin Sperry, Conneaut's outgoing superintendent, has pointed out the district's roughly $2 million in annual transportation costs and argued that the comparison Roae draws is no comparison at all.
'To simply take a district's budget and divide it by the number of students is misguided at best and dishonest at worst,' Sperry wrote in one response. 'If Conneaut's budget numbers were reduced to the same level as a cyber charter, the numbers would become more honest.'
Looking at just the expenses for teachers, administrators and business offices, Sperry argued, Conneaut's annual per-pupil costs are less than $12,000 — significantly less than the amount it pays per pupil for cyber charter tuition.
In making a similar point this month, PENNCREST Superintendent Shawn Ford said he was in favor of competition between public schools and cyber charter schools.
'I think it makes you better,' Ford told board members. 'I'm not even saying that we shouldn't help fund those schools, OK? But what I am saying — let's make it reasonable.'
At $8,000 per student for regular education, PENNCREST would save nearly $1 million next year, according to district estimates, about 1.7 percent of its projected $58 million budget.
'We'll compete with anyone,' Ford said, 'but put us on the fair grounds to compete.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Summer trip? You could learn the language by the time school's out with Babbel.
Summer trip? You could learn the language by the time school's out with Babbel.

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Summer trip? You could learn the language by the time school's out with Babbel.

Discover startups, services, products and more from our partner StackCommerce. New York Post edits this content, and may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you buy through our links. TL;DR: Learn a new language in three weeks with this lifetime subscription to Babbel Language Learning, now $129.99 (MSRP $599) with code LEARN40 until June 30. Got a family trip planned? If you're traveling anywhere that English isn't the first language, why not pick up that language with help from Babbel? By the time the kids are out of school, you could be ready to chat like a local! And for a limited time, you can get a lifetime subscription that includes all 14 languages for just $129.99 with code LEARN40 during this special promotion through our shop. If you want to become fluent in French or finally feel confident speaking Spanish, Babbel could help you reach your goal in just three weeks. But no stress—with lifetime access, you can take your time and fit in the 10–15 minute bite-sized lessons whenever it works for your schedule. Your progress will sync across your devices, so you can work from your laptop, desktop, or smartphone and not miss a beat. Heading offline? You can download lessons and keep learning off the grid, too. That means you can get in some last-minute practice on the flight, even if it's not a plane with Wi-Fi. This Babbel subscription includes over 10,000 hours of online instruction. Choose from three levels of learning: beginner, intermediate, or advanced. Lessons focus on practical topics you'll actually put to use, like dining, shopping, making friends, and getting around. Babbel's advanced speech recognition technology helps you work on your pronunciation as you go, so you'll end up sounding like a local. An AI conversation partner is available to work with in real time, so you can practice having conversations. Get a lifetime subscription to Babbel Language Learning, now for just $129.99 (MSRP $599) during this StackSocial special promotion with code LEARN40 through June 30. StackSocial prices subject to change.

This ‘dual-use' electric tractor can sow fields and run guns
This ‘dual-use' electric tractor can sow fields and run guns

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

This ‘dual-use' electric tractor can sow fields and run guns

A Spanish startup called Voltrac says it is building a new breed of smart tractor—one that could sow fields by day and run weapons to soldiers by night. And while the Hot Wheels-looking, fully electric tractor is currently remote-controlled, Voltrac is working to make its next version fully autonomous. This 'dual-use' tractor, first spotted by The Next Web, reportedly weighs 3.5 tons—roughly the size of a young African elephant—and has a carrying capacity of nearly 8,900 pounds. It can reach a top speed of around 24 miles per hour and operate for anywhere between 8 to 20 hours, thanks to two large 200kW batteries. The Voltrac comes equipped with a suite of sensors and onboard cameras that can be used to monitor a crop field—or a mine-filled battlefield. Currently, the Voltrac is remotely controlled by a human operator who steers the machine through a first-person point of view. The company told TNW it's currently awaiting EU regulatory approval to allow the machine to operate fully autonomously. In theory, they say, one remote operator, be it a farmer or a military commander, could oversee multiple shiny steel tractors working simultaneously. Voltrac says its low-profile tractor uses distributed electric propulsion via per-wheel motors, which it claims helps eliminate around 70 percent of traditional tractor components. That increased efficiency, they say, should reduce annual maintenance and operating costs for the owner by roughly 30 percent. Voltrac did not immediately respond to Popular Science's request for comment. As a farming tool, the Voltrac features a hitch that can be used to attach common tools of the trade like plows, mowers, or cutters. It also supports a large, attachable flatbed add-on for transporting containers full of tools and gear. The machine's cameras can be used to conduct what the company calls 'live experiments' on crops. The tractor could, for example, treat different parts of a field in slightly different ways to observe how plants respond to various treatments. For military applications, the tractor could be used to remotely inspect areas for signs of mines, improvised explosive devices, or other unexploded ordnance. Its hefty carrying capacity means it could also be deployed to troops in difficult or dangerous-to-reach areas. Voltrac told TNW it is in early talks with several NATO departments regarding the tractor's potential use in military scenarios. 'It's built for tough terrain, and it doesn't risk human life. It can do the same job whether it's hauling crops or carrying ammo,' Voltrac's co-founder and CTO Francisco Infante Aguirre said in a recent interview with TNW. Using farming equipment for war might sound odd, but it's not a totally novel idea. In Ukraine, farmers are already using basic tractors retrofitted with abandoned Russian tank parts to scour crop fields for unexploded mines. Others have reportedly built DIY radio-controlled tractors to clear mines and debris from contested farmland. Major militaries around the world—such as those of the US and France,—have already demonstrated the use of remote-controlled robots, similar in shape and size to the Voltrac, to aid in resupply efforts. Voltrac likely still has hurdles to clear before reaching that stage. The company is still raising money and says it plans to start shipping its first tractors in early 2026.

X Tests New Process To Reduce Political Division
X Tests New Process To Reduce Political Division

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

X Tests New Process To Reduce Political Division

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. You have to give credit where credit's due: While I don't believe that X's Community Notes approach is an effective way to combat the spread of misinformation in the app (at least as a sole measure, outside of internally-staffed moderation), I do respect that the Community Notes development team is continually working to implement new updates to address key concerns with the Notes system. Today, X's Community Notes team has announced a new experiment that will highlight content which sees agreement from users of differing political perspectives, in the hopes of reducing division and angst in the app. As you can see in this example, X will soon begin showing some users (Community Notes contributors to start with) prompts in the lower segment of some X posts that have been liked by people from opposing sides of the political spectrum. And if you tap through on the 'What do you think?' text, you'll be able to give the X team more insight as to what you like, or don't, about that specific post, which could help X address common elements of division on content. As explained by X: 'A subset of Community Notes contributors - representing a wide range of viewpoints - will occasionally see a new callout in the product. The callout shows based on early and limited Like signals on the post. Contributors will then be able to rate and provide more feedback about the post, helping to develop an open source algorithm that could effectively identify posts liked by people from different perspectives.' X says that these ratings won't affect a post's reach or visibility, but that: 'Depending on insights and feedback from the pilot test, it is possible that in the future, ratings could help spotlight posts that are liked by people who normally disagree.' Why is that important? Because political disagreement is a key flaw within the Community Notes system, with Community Notes only being displayed in the app when Notes assessors of differing political perspectives agree that a note is warranted. It's this proviso that's led to many, many Community Notes never being shown, to anybody, despite these posts often including blatant misinformation. Indeed, according to analysis conducted by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) last year, 73% of submitted Community Notes relating to political topics are never displayed on X, despite them often providing valuable context, while another study conducted earlier this year by Spanish fact-checking site Maldita found that 85% of all Community Notes are never displayed to X users for the same reason. On some issues, users are never going to agree, and those often relate to divisive misinformation about hot-button political issues. That's worsened in the current landscape, where even the U.S. President is prone to amplifying questionable claims. As such, Community Notes often fails to keep people informed of relevant context, because people don't agree on the need for such on certain points. But maybe, if X is able to showcase more cases of agreement, that will ease disputes, and get people to view things in a more objective way. I mean, it seems unlikely that Republican and Democrat aligned voters are ever going to agree that the 2020 U.S. Election was manipulated or not, no matter evidence is produced, but maybe, if X can build more community alignment into the system, by showcasing such to respective users, that could at least open more conversation around more topics, as opposed to siloing people into their own echo chambers. It's worth a shot, and it's a fairly simple measure, at this stage, to better demonstrate relative agreement. And if X can somehow dilute this aspect, and ensure more relevant, valuable Community Notes are displayed in the app, that could be a big step forward in ensuring greater protection for X users.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store