Afraid of Sara Duterte? Chiz Escudero says that's a 'bait' question
Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero on Tuesday brushed off allegations that his supposed fear of Vice President Sara Duterte has resulted in delays in the start of her impeachment trial.
"Pain naman ang tanong na 'yun. Ginagawa namin kung ano ang trabaho namin. 'Yung mga ganyang uri ng komentaryo at pain, uulitin ko—du'n sa mga ayaw kay VP Sara at pabor sa impeachment, do'n sa mga gusto kay VP Sara at tutol sa impeachment—walang bale sa akin 'yun," Escudero said in an ambush interview.
(That's a bait question. We just do our jobs. That kind of comment and bait, I'll repeat—for those who don't like VP Sara and are in favor of impeachment, and for those who like VP Sara and are against impeachment—it doesn't matter to me.)
He was reacting to the statement of Akbayan party-list Representative Perci Cendaña, who earlier asked if the Senate President is afraid of Duterte.
Cendaña, who endorsed the first impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte in the House of Representatives, had stressed that convening the Senate as an impeachment court is "a solemn constitutional duty, not a seasonal accessory you put on or discard depending on the political weather, or one's personal agenda."
Escudero, in response, said he would just follow what he thinks is right and what is stated under the law, regardless of who will be affected.
"'Yung mga ganyang uri ng komentaryo, klarong nanggagaling sa kampo na tutol kay VP Sara at pabor sa impeachment. Hayaan natin dalhin nila 'yung kanilang opinyon at pananaw na 'yun," he added.
(Those kinds of comments clearly come from the camp that is against VP Sara and in favor of impeachment. Let's let them have their own opinions and perspectives.)
Escudero, however, once again lashed out at House members who want to expedite the impeachment proceedings, emphasizing that it took the lower chamber four months before sending the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate.
"Kung sila mismo 'yung hindi nagmadali, inupuan, at pa-banjing banjing sa mahabang panahon, sino naman sila para madaliin kami ngayon? Hindi porket gusto nila, eh ganu'n na. At nung ayaw naman nila, e karapatan din nilang magpa-banjing banjing at i-delay 'yun," he said.
(If they themselves didn't hurry; and instead sat on the complaints and waited for a long time, who are they to rush us now? It's not because they want to, we would just let them. And if they don't want to, they would just wait around and delay it.)
Public interest
Opposition lawmakers and impeachment complainants from the Makabayan coalition earlier questioned if senators are protecting Duterte instead of the public interest.
This was in response to Escudero's statement that the convening of the Senate impeachment court for the trial of the impeached Vice President depends on the plenary vote of the senators, even though the Constitution states that a Senate impeachment trial "shall forthwith proceed" once a verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the members of the House.
Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint against her. She was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Villanueva concerned P200 wage hike bill might get vetoed
Senator Joel Villanueva has expressed concern regarding the House of Representatives' approval of the bill granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers, as it might get vetoed by President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. if adopted by the Senate. The House version of the legislated wage hike offers a higher increase than the P100 approved by the Senate. For Villanueva, chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor, Employment and Human Resources Development, the Senate's proposal is more convenient and practical. 'Parang ang tingin natin 'pag nangyari 'yan, diretsong veto. 'Yan ang kailangan din natin pagtuunan ng pansin kung ia-adopt natin 'yan kasi baka 'yan din 'yung dahilan ng iba na nandun sa Kamara para masiguro na ma-veto 'yan,' he told reporters. (I think that it may be directly vetoed by the President. That's what we also need to look at, if we are going to adopt that because some House members may just use that to ensure that the bill will get vetoed.) 'That's another way of looking at it. For us, we still believe [that the] P100 is the most convenient and practical. But 'yung [but for] P200, medyo, as much as we wanted to, we don't know,' he added. The House of Representatives on Wednesday's plenary session approved the bill granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers in the private sector on its third and final reading. Villanueva said he wants to see the House's basis for the proposed P200 wage increase. 'Of course, that would be interesting… Kung sabihin ng Malacañang na it's okay for us to, na napag-aralan rin nila, mas malaki 'yung resources nila to study all these measures, so why not. But, at the same time I'm also thinking, baka way din 'yan para immediately shutdown 'yung P100 dahil ibe-veto rin 'yung P200,' he said. (If the Malacañang says it's okay for us to adopt that because it's already been studied, why not. But, at the same time I'm also thinking that it may be a way to immediately shutdown the P100 because the P200 will be vetoed.) The House and the Senate will have to reconcile the differences in a bicameral conference committee before transmitting the enrolled bill to Malacañang for Marco' signature to become a law. The House and the Senate have until June 13 or the last session day of the 19th Congress to reconcile their differing versions of the wage hike measure and ratify the reconciled version for the bill to be ready for the President's signature. Otherwise, the bill has to be refiled next Congress. Malacañang said that Marcos will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage hike. ''Nais ng Pangulo na maibigay kung ano ang makakabuti sa manggagawang Pilipino,'' Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said during a briefing Thursday. (The President wants to give the best for the Filipino workers.) — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate dismissal of Sara impeachment without trial unconstitutional — Monsod
The Senate cannot legally dismiss the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte without a trial, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution said Thursday. Interviewed on Dobol B TV, constitutionalist Atty. Christian Monson said dismissing the Duterte impeachment would violate the Charter. "Hindi (No). That's because under the Constitution, it is the duty of the Senate to hear the case. So that's not hearing the case when you entertain a motion to dismiss," Monsoda said. Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa on Wednesday said he and other senators are working on their drafts of a Senate resolution seeking to dismiss the impeachment case against Duterte. Asked if senators can make a vote on such a resolution, Monsod said, "In other words, the majority of the Senate can stop the impeachment proceedings—Hindi puwede 'yun (This is not allowed) because they have a duty to conduct the hearing under the Constitution. They are violating the Constitution." 20th Congress Last Monday, Senator Francis Tolentino said the impeachment case against Duterte would be considered "functionally dismissed" if the Senate impeachment court is unable to finish the trial before June 30, which is the end of the 19th Congress. Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero on Wednesday said the senators will vote if Duterte's impeachment trial is already considered dead by that time or will be carried over to the 20th Congress. However, Monsod said Duterte's impeachment case can continue in the 20th Congress because the Senate is a continuing body. "Wala namang issue 'yun, continuing body naman 'yung Senate (That is not an issue. The Senate is a continuing body). What technicality are they talking about?" Monsod said. "If they want technicality, you know, on the noon of June 30 when the outgoing senators leave, at that exact moment, the incoming 12 assume office. So actually if you look at technicalities, there is no time at which there are no 24 senators," he added. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint against her. On the same day, the impeachment complaint, which constitutes the Articles of Impeachment, was transmitted to the Senate. The upper chamber, however, adjourned without addressing the case. On February 25, Escudero said the processes related to Duterte's impeachment trial would start on June 2. Last week, however, Escudero said the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment before the Senate was moved to June 11 to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the end of 19th Congress. Redress with Supreme Court Monsod warned that concerned parties would seek redress with the Supreme Court should senators commit abuse of discretion. "If there is really, on the part of the senators, abuse of discretion, then we'll go to the Supreme Court," Monsod said. "Kapag hininto nila o dinismiss nila 'yun, may abuse of discretion 'yun. Abangan natin kung anong gagawin nila kasi si Senate President Escudero, he's a smooth talker. Nagshi-shift siya ng position. Let's see what happens," he added. (When they stopped or dismissed it, it was an abuse of discretion. Let's see what they will do because Senate President Escudero, he's a smooth talker. He has been shifting his position. Let's see what happens.) Conflict of interest? Meanwhile, Monsod said Escudero and Tolentino should consider recusing themselves from Duterte's impeachment case due to probable bias and conflict of interest. "Senator Bato and Tolentino, they should think about recusing themselves. What is recusing? We're not participating on the ground of probable bias or conflict of interest," Monsod said. "When they act as a judge, the source of legitimacy is independence. If they're incapable of independent thinking, I think they should withdraw and say we're not participating," he added. Duterte is accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Vice President has denied the allegations. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos to look into economic implications of wage hike — Palace
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage hike for workers, Malacañang said Thursday. According to Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro, Marcos wants to provide what's best for the Filipino workers. ''Nais ng Pangulo na maibigay kung ano ang makakabuti sa manggagawang Pilipino,'' Castro said during a briefing. (The President wants to give the best for the Filipino workers.) With 171 yes votes, zero no votes, and one abstention, the House of Representatives approved on third and final reading the proposed measure granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers in the private sector. The House version of the legislated wage hike offers a higher increase than the P100 approved by the Senate. The House and the Senate will have to reconcile the differences at the bicameral conference committee before transmitting the enrolled bill to Malacañang for President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s signature to become a law. Congress has until June 13 or the last session day to reconcile their differing versions of the wage hike measure and ratify the reconciled version for the bill to be ready for the President's signature. Otherwise, the measure has to be refiled in the next Congress. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
